Slur-mongering

[Rakkasan]

Originally Posted by Mark_Twain

Did Steve steal your password & start posting as Rakk?

No , just sick of the whining by people who insult, bait and act a fool , yet always seem to be running around playing victims

the board moderation is fine

they should go to another board , you wont find many that are well maintained like this, and are not over moderated which usually is the case, if this one doesnt seem to be giving them the attention they need , then it is their option to move it along

if not , then stay , and quit bitching all the time, its fucking pathetic and embarrassing

[moon]

Geez. I'll get back to the thread when it's been cleaned .

Or at the next slur-monger strike, whichever is the sooner.

[Rakkasan]

Originally Posted by moon

Geez. I'll get back to the thread when it's been cleaned .

Or at the next slur-monger strike, whichever is the sooner.

here is the victim example there Mark.............

[Mark_Twain]

No one's been truly vicitimized until they've been donkey-punched.

[Donkey_Left]

Originally Posted by Mark_Twain

No one's been truly vicitimized until they've been donkey-punched.

Booyah!

[Rakkasan]

Originally Posted by Mark_Twain

No one's been truly vicitimized until they've been donkey-punched.

that or rabbit kicked either way.............

[Mark_Twain]

Originally Posted by Donkey_Left

Booyah!

An unintentional double-entendre! You're welcome.

[pramjockey]

Moon, perhaps your complaint would be taken more seriously if you actually provided some examples.

[drgoodtrips]

Originally Posted by Mark_Twain

Uh-oh, I hear the mods coming! Looks like Moon might have criticized mod actions (or, in this case, inaction). A definite no-no.

Yeah... he's totally banned now.

[drgoodtrips]

Originally Posted by moon

Why are moderators so slow to act in instances of public libel ? Surely, these are against forum rules, just as 'insults', to state but one, but even multiple complaints can, sometimes, result in no action.

The moderation is fair, if members pursue their complaints beyond what would be reasonably expected, but leaving libel in posts, even after complaints have been lodged, reflects badly on its commitment, not to mention its impartiality.


Everybody accepts a little 'disguised' roughing-up. Heckling is an accepted part of public speaking, or should be, but blatant libel stinks. Libel 'lowers the quality of debate for everyone'.

Where's the action ?

So, do you mind if we cut to the "meat" of the issue, moon? You want to start three to five threads per day ('SPAM', if you will) about how much Israel and 'zionists' suck, and then have the moderation staff step in to hold your hand when anyone suggests that you don't like Jews?

Is that about the gist of it?

[drgoodtrips]

Originally Posted by moon

Rakkasan;


That sure smells like ad hominem to me. How do you get away with it, Rakkasan ? And what qualifies you to answer on behalf of anybody else ?

I dig how you italicize your latin. Very sophisticated

[drgoodtrips]

Originally Posted by Mark_Twain

An unintentional double-entendre! You're welcome.

One of my favorite forms of humor (much better than the way-too-often employed pun)

[Mark_Twain]

Originally Posted by drgoodtrips

One of my favorite forms of humor (much better than the way-too-often employed pun)

Well, I'm nothing if not your huckleberry.

[Donkey_Left]

Originally Posted by drgoodtrips

One of my favorite forms of humor (much better than the way-too-often employed pun)

Yeah, but what kind of humour do eskimos like?

Double-on-tundras, of course.

[drgoodtrips]

Originally Posted by Mark_Twain

Well, I'm nothing if not your huckleberry.

Why, Johnny Ringo... you look as if someone just walked over your grave