Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Suggestions/Comments/Questions/Ideas for New Forums A forum to post your comments and suggestions, or your ideas for a new forum. If you have a forum related question you can also post that here. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
How about a rule against campaigning
Could we have a forum rule established to prevent campaigning for specific candidates? Ron Pauls supporters are the biggest offenders here. Im only concered with posts that go something like:
"Ron Paul Rocks! Check out this link to all the cool stuff he says <link>. Vote Ron Paul in 08!" I dont think his campaign understands the damage this type of harrasment is doing to him.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax. |
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Quote:
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" |
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Campaigning for votes is equivalent to spam to me.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax. |
|
|||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Yeah, it's like campaigning for .... a national sales tax.
__________________
Curly The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. - Hermann Goering |
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Ding!
Of course, if you don't like the threads, you could not read them. Besides, I suspect there is no measurable effect to a candidate's campaign from what's posted on this website.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon Staun ma groon al nae be afraid Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears |
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Then take that up with Marc although the way he has let people have much more freedom of expression on here in the past makes me think he isn't likely to agree. It is his decision ultimately.
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" |
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
I'm also not sure how we would enforce such a rule.
Obviously, people here are going to back a single candidate in the upcoming elections. How do we tell the difference between someone explaining why they are backing a particular candidate and someone actually campaigning for them? The amount of links used? Can someone endorse a candidate in their posts, but it's off limits to try and convince others to endorse this candidate, too? Seems like it would be a nightmare.
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need I want nothing to do with And to do what I want And to do what I please Is first on my to-do list" -Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics |
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
I think Curly nails the issue quite succinctly.
![]() I truly suspect jviehe considers anything anyone posts that he disagrees with is spam. Can you say intolerant or xenophobic? Btw, jviehe, I haven't caught up with all your insults yet. I figure a couple hassle-posts per day for the next year or two might allow me to catch-up!
|
|
|||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
I think it's a pretty stupid idea.
As has already been said, everyone here is, in essence, campaigning for something. And, as has also already been mentioned, this is especially funny coming from someone who has a link to a website for a "fair, or "flat" tax (which I support, by the way)...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin": ![]() ![]() Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING" |
|
|||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Also there are laws that stop non citizens from contributing money and so on to political campaigns (presumably to stop obnoxious blowhard Canadians and so on from trying to influence an election of some importance and value) so the countless number of Candians who see it as their God given right to promote him (Paul) might well remember they have no right of any sort to influence our elections under U.S. Federal law and any monatary influence is a felony.
|
|
||||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Well, if someone would be posting "Vote for Ron Paul" threads all over the place or just copy and past material, that would be spam. But as we got quite a lot of threads for or against certain candidates, banning campaigning would be pretty much impractical. Especially as it would also have to include negative campaigning. And what would this forum be without the "Bush sucks" or "Clinton sucks" threads.
|
|
|||
|
Re: How about a rule against campaigning
Well Bush nor (Bill) Clinton are campaigning for office but what i mean is instinctively telling people to "Vote "x" candidate" is something different.
Also it may not just be a copy and paste job, they may add in their own comments like "Vote Paul, he rocks" or "Americans should finally wake up and elect...", you know the usual sort of one line comments to avoid it being a cut and paste job. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|