Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Grand Central > Suggestions/Comments/Questions/Ideas for New Forums

Suggestions/Comments/Questions/Ideas for New Forums A forum to post your comments and suggestions, or your ideas for a new forum. If you have a forum related question you can also post that here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,580

United_States    
How about a rule against campaigning

Could we have a forum rule established to prevent campaigning for specific candidates? Ron Pauls supporters are the biggest offenders here. Im only concered with posts that go something like:

"Ron Paul Rocks! Check out this link to all the cool stuff he says <link>. Vote Ron Paul in 08!"

I dont think his campaign understands the damage this type of harrasment is doing to him.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit White Rabbit is offline
Secretary of Defense
Déjà vu

 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Go Ask Alice
Posts: 3,303

   
Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Perhaps it would be easier if we just a short list of the things that don't annoy jviehe?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Speaking Easily

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,625

United_States     Virginia

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Could we have a forum rule established to prevent campaigning for specific candidates? Ron Pauls supporters are the biggest offenders here. Im only concered with posts that go something like:

"Ron Paul Rocks! Check out this link to all the cool stuff he says <link>. Vote Ron Paul in 08!"

I dont think his campaign understands the damage this type of harrasment is doing to him.
As long as the post isn't spam, it's alright. If people truly believe that Ron Paul is the best candidate, they're free to try and explain why and provide links to his stances on the issue.

Besides, this entire forum is basically people 'campaigning' their views on the various issues, such as abortion, gay rights, gun rights, etc. To say it's not okay to support someone or something would go against the idea of what we're trying to promote here.
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
partofme's Avatar
partofme partofme is online now
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Murray Kentucky
Posts: 14,993

Earth     United_States

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Could we have a forum rule established to prevent campaigning for specific candidates? Ron Pauls supporters are the biggest offenders here. Im only concered with posts that go something like:

"Ron Paul Rocks! Check out this link to all the cool stuff he says <link>. Vote Ron Paul in 08!"

I dont think his campaign understands the damage this type of harrasment is doing to him.
I guess you missed the word politics in the name of the site.
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 11,580

United_States    
Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by partofme View Post
I guess you missed the word politics in the name of the site.
Campaigning for votes is equivalent to spam to me.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Curly Curly is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,827

United_States     Virginia

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Yeah, it's like campaigning for .... a national sales tax.
__________________
Curly

The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

- Hermann Goering
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
pramjockey's Avatar
pramjockey pramjockey is offline
OMG!
Scruffy-looking nerf herder

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Morrison, CO
Posts: 14,134

Scotland     Colorado

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curly View Post
Yeah, it's like campaigning for .... a national sales tax.
Ding!

Of course, if you don't like the threads, you could not read them.

Besides, I suspect there is no measurable effect to a candidate's campaign from what's posted on this website.
__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
partofme's Avatar
partofme partofme is online now
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Murray Kentucky
Posts: 14,993

Earth     United_States

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Campaigning for votes is equivalent to spam to me.
Then take that up with Marc although the way he has let people have much more freedom of expression on here in the past makes me think he isn't likely to agree. It is his decision ultimately.
__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Speaking Easily

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,625

United_States     Virginia

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

I'm also not sure how we would enforce such a rule.

Obviously, people here are going to back a single candidate in the upcoming elections. How do we tell the difference between someone explaining why they are backing a particular candidate and someone actually campaigning for them? The amount of links used?

Can someone endorse a candidate in their posts, but it's off limits to try and convince others to endorse this candidate, too?

Seems like it would be a nightmare.
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit White Rabbit is offline
Secretary of Defense
Déjà vu

 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Go Ask Alice
Posts: 3,303

   
Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Campaigning for votes is equivalent to spam to me.
I think Curly nails the issue quite succinctly.

I truly suspect jviehe considers anything anyone posts that he disagrees with is spam. Can you say intolerant or xenophobic?

Btw, jviehe, I haven't caught up with all your insults yet. I figure a couple hassle-posts per day for the next year or two might allow me to catch-up!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,280

United_States     Texas

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy
I'm also not sure how we would enforce such a rule.

Obviously, people here are going to back a single candidate in the upcoming elections. How do we tell the difference between someone explaining why they are backing a particular candidate and someone actually campaigning for them? The amount of links used?

Can someone endorse a candidate in their posts, but it's off limits to try and convince others to endorse this candidate, too?

Seems like it would be a nightmare.
If someone started a thread called "Vote Ron PAul 08", then surely that would be seen as petitionning on a candidate's behalf or something like that. It would be, quite literally, campaigning.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,720

   
Re: How about a rule against campaigning

I think it's a pretty stupid idea.

As has already been said, everyone here is, in essence, campaigning for something.

And, as has also already been mentioned, this is especially funny coming from someone who has a link to a website for a "fair, or "flat" tax (which I support, by the way)...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,280

United_States     Texas

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speakeasy View Post
As long as the post isn't spam, it's alright. If people truly believe that Ron Paul is the best candidate, they're free to try and explain why and provide links to his stances on the issue.
Also there are laws that stop non citizens from contributing money and so on to political campaigns (presumably to stop obnoxious blowhard Canadians and so on from trying to influence an election of some importance and value) so the countless number of Candians who see it as their God given right to promote him (Paul) might well remember they have no right of any sort to influence our elections under U.S. Federal law and any monatary influence is a felony.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Malvolio's Avatar
Malvolio Malvolio is offline
Moderator

 
Member Since: Apr 2003
Location: 51st parallel
Posts: 8,209

Germany    
Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Well, if someone would be posting "Vote for Ron Paul" threads all over the place or just copy and past material, that would be spam. But as we got quite a lot of threads for or against certain candidates, banning campaigning would be pretty much impractical. Especially as it would also have to include negative campaigning. And what would this forum be without the "Bush sucks" or "Clinton sucks" threads.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,280

United_States     Texas

Re: How about a rule against campaigning

Well Bush nor (Bill) Clinton are campaigning for office but what i mean is instinctively telling people to "Vote "x" candidate" is something different.

Also it may not just be a copy and paste job, they may add in their own comments like "Vote Paul, he rocks" or "Americans should finally wake up and elect...", you know the usual sort of one line comments to avoid it being a cut and paste job.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online