Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
Sponsored by:
 |
|
|||||||
| Suggestions/Comments/Questions/Ideas for New Forums A forum to post your comments and suggestions, or your ideas for a new forum. If you have a forum related question you can also post that here. |
| View Poll Results: Would you support this idea | |||
| I would support it |
   
|
19 | 54.29% |
| I'm nuetural or apathetic to it |
  
|
6 | 17.14% |
| I would oppose it |
  
|
10 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Potential Rule Change
Hi all,
I want to emphasize from the beginning that this is *NOT* a change to the rules, nor is it one that is inevitably going to be enacted. In another thread, it was suggested to give the moderating staff the power to vote to determine, subjectively, whether or not a user is SPAMing the forum, even if he or she is technically adhering to the rules of the site (a bit of commentary with an article, for instance). That is, if it is determined that a poster is basically advertising for a candidate or cause, doing nothing to further (and possibly stifling) discussion, such a poster might be given a "general SPAMing" warning, and a continuation of the behavior would result in points. The decision would be made by a near-unanimous or unanimous decision of the mod staff (exact details would be hashed out) to avoid any impression of favoritism or squelching an unpopular or partisan point of view. That is, a substantial cross-section of the moderator staff with its diverse political opinions would basically all have to agree that a poster was a SPAMer. This is the general idea, and certainly if it were sufficiently well received, there would be discussion among the moderators and the board members at large as to what the particulars were, etc. The purpose of this poll is to get a general consensus as to whether or not the board membership would find such a policy favorable and/or trust the mod staff to implement it. So, the question is, would you be amenable to such a policy?
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." -Thomas Jefferson 
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
At first it seemed like a good idea because I've noticed some members who are nothing more than shills for particular people/causes. But I decided to vote against it simply for the fact that I've noticed some mods aren't exactly impartial either, and could very well be just as liable for pushing agendas or belittling a certain person/idea.
|
|
05-13-2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
__________________
Something wicked this way comes.
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
I haven't noticed any spammers like that recently, although while I am posting regularly I am not here for most of the time so I must miss the night time antics.
I'm confused about the vote part. When did the hoi polloi start having a say in the rules? That is a sincere question. Forums are definitely not democracies and couldn't be: benevolent (hopefully) dictatorship is the model. I'm just wondering why we are asked for our opinion on this rule? 
__________________
My good blade carves the casques of men, My tough lance thrusteth sure, My strength is as the strength of ten, Because my heart is pure. "Sir Galahad," by Alfred, Lord Tennyson (1834)
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
|
|
05-13-2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
Which I seriously doubt. This is more about personal issues and pissing matches than it is about "spamming." That's what it looks like to me.
__________________
Something wicked this way comes.
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
It doesn't matter what the topic is. It was really disruptive and lowered the tone of everything. I don't see anything comparable now.
__________________
My good blade carves the casques of men, My tough lance thrusteth sure, My strength is as the strength of ten, Because my heart is pure. "Sir Galahad," by Alfred, Lord Tennyson (1834)
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush "I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006 "[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
|
|
05-13-2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
What I AM seeing are more personal, childish "pissing matches," baiting and insulting bullshit taking place rather than discussing topics. I guess people are bored. We have three candidates running for president that are different only in age, race and gender. They're all openly corrupt liars. What else can we do but attack each other I guess ?
__________________
Something wicked this way comes.
|
|
05-13-2008
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Quote:
Yes, it is working fine.
__________________
Something wicked this way comes.
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Discuss Spam and not other members and admins.
__________________
The essence of tyranny is the denial of complexity; where everything is made simple, and in that simplification the truth is lost. Last edited by iamwhatiseem; 05-13-2008 at 03:33 PM.
|
|
05-13-2008
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Potential Rule Change
Due to a few members only this thread is, at least - temporarily closed
__________________
The essence of tyranny is the denial of complexity; where everything is made simple, and in that simplification the truth is lost.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
