Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by usmc7011 View Post
its all the difference in the world
That's an emotional response with a complete lack of justification. Aren't they generating a majority of the US bad press? Maybe mixing them in with the army would resolve that issue.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
usmc7011's Avatar
usmc7011 usmc7011 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
god

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 1,589

United_States     United_States

Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
That's an emotional response with a complete lack of justification.
Not true, the justification in in the military history.
Quote:
Aren't they generating a majority of the US bad press?
Not true try again.
Quote:
Maybe mixing them in with the army would resolve that issue.
There is not a issue to be resolved so your suggestion is pointless
__________________
"Chaplain Charlie will tell you about how the free world will conquer Communism with the aid of God and a few marines! God has a hard-on for marines because we kill everything we see! He plays His games, we play ours! To show our appreciation for so much power, we keep heaven packed with fresh souls! God was here before the Marine Corps! So you can give your heart to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the Corps! Do you ladies understand?"
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,339

United_States    
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by usmc7011 View Post
its all the difference in the world
amen.
__________________
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)




Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 874

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Isn't this an instance of an occupying military killing civilians with the same disregard Blackwater mercenaries employed in Iraq?

"Afghanistan's Independent Human Rights Commission cited witness reports saying the marines had fired indiscriminately at pedestrians and vehicles in six different locations along a 10 mile (16 km) stretch of road."

I can almost accept one mistake, but a ten mile stretch of road with multiple incidents? US forces are known to immediately summon air support when under fire, making this appear more like indiscriminate killing.

Out of curiosity, why do these incidents invariably involve US troops when other NATO combat troops are present and engaged in the same activities in the same area?
First of all, Haditha was a set up. Read here:
http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKi...1%5D.BATES.pdf

and here:

American Thinker Blog: Was Haditha a deliberate propaganda ploy by al Qaeda?

and here:



Second, Blackwater fell into the same type trap. The insurgents set up an ambush in a crowded area, looking for media sympathy. The Blackwater vehicles were full of bullet holes from the insurgents.

Third, I have operated extensivly in Nangarhar Province. The scenario the Marines state is very likely. It is SOP for the insurgents to commit this type of act. They set up the primary ambush, with secondary ambushes along likely ingress/egress routes. Their favorite spots are in villages.

We ran into a similar situation outside Jalalabad City in 2005. My Battalion was pulling out of the Kunar valley after a massive operation, and heading back to Jalalabad airfield for after action debriefings. One company was left behind for rear guard while the rest of the Battalion exfiled. Once we were all back at the FOB, the rear guard broke position, and headed back to the FOB.

Lots of action ensued, the militants who refused to fight the whole battalion jumped on the one company, and got their asses handed to them. The Company Commander was awarded the Bronze Star for his actions and leadership.

Once out of the Kunar valley and those fights, they loaded up on trucks, and headed home. They ran into a couple of small actions along the way to the finaly. As they were nearing Jalalbad on the far side of the river, the insurgents kicked off another LARGE ambush using RPGs, RPK,s and AKs in a small village that lined both sides of the road. The insurgents were firing from inside houses that they had the families held hostage in, intentionally drawing our fire into them. Luckily, no civilians were hurt, but many insurgents who were outside the buildings were cut down.

So, for all you nay-sayers who think you know what you are talking about, I would ask you to throw on a pair of boots and a vest, go over there, and see what the real story is. At the very least, ask someone who was involved. But please, for the love of God, quit making assumptions and talking out of your asses about our guys using excessive force, or force when it isn't necessary, just because you don't like Bush. It really raises the blood pressure, know what I'm saying?
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 874

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Out of curiosity, why do these incidents invariably involve US troops when other NATO combat troops are present and engaged in the same activities in the same area?
The sad thruth is, they don't leave their FOBs for the most part, or are stationed where nothing is going on.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 874

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Maybe mixing them in with the army would resolve that issue.
The Army is a low rent organization that can't find its ass with two hands, a flashlight, and a map now a days. The Afghanis thought they were the biggest joke around, and the Iraqi's think they are weak and lazy.

I do know some awesome Army units, don't get me wrong, but as a whole, the army sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 874

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Isn't this an instance of an occupying military killing civilians with the same disregard Blackwater mercenaries employed in Iraq?

"Afghanistan's Independent Human Rights Commission cited witness reports saying the marines had fired indiscriminately at pedestrians and vehicles in six different locations along a 10 mile (16 km) stretch of road."

I can almost accept one mistake, but a ten mile stretch of road with multiple incidents? US forces are known to immediately summon air support when under fire, making this appear more like indiscriminate killing.

Out of curiosity, why do these incidents invariably involve US troops when other NATO combat troops are present and engaged in the same activities in the same area?
First of all, Haditha was a set up. Read here:
http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKi...1%5D.BATES.pdf

and here:

American Thinker Blog: Was Haditha a deliberate propaganda ploy by al Qaeda?

and here:



Second, Blackwater fell into the same type trap. The insurgents set up an ambush in a crowded area, looking for media sympathy. The Blackwater vehicles were full of bullet holes from the insurgents.

Third, I have operated extensivly in Nangarhar Province. The scenario the Marines state is very likely. It is SOP for the insurgents to commit this type of act. They set up the primary ambush, with secondary ambushes along likely ingress/egress routes. Their favorite spots are in villages.

We ran into a similar situation outside Jalalabad City in 2005. My Battalion was pulling out of the Kunar valley after a massive operation, and heading back to Jalalabad airfield for after action debriefings. One company was left behind for rear guard while the rest of the Battalion exfiled. Once we were all back at the FOB, the rear guard broke position, and headed back to the FOB.

Lots of action ensued, the militants who refused to fight the whole battalion jumped on the one company, and got their asses handed to them. The Company Commander was awarded the Bronze Star for his actions and leadership.

Once out of the Kunar valley and those fights, they loaded up on trucks, and headed home. They ran into a couple of small actions along the way to the finaly. As they were nearing Jalalbad on the far side of the river, the insurgents kicked off another LARGE ambush using RPGs, RPK,s and AKs in a small village that lined both sides of the road. The insurgents were firing from inside houses that they had the families held hostage in, intentionally drawing our fire into them. Luckily, no civilians were hurt, but many insurgents who were outside the buildings were cut down.

So, for all you nay-sayers who think you know what you are talking about, I would ask you to throw on a pair of boots and a vest, go over there, and see what the real story is. At the very least, ask someone who was involved. But please, for the love of God, quit making assumptions and talking out of your asses about our guys using excessive force, or force when it isn't necessary, just because you don't like Bush. It really raises the blood pressure, know what I'm saying?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
usmc7011's Avatar
usmc7011 usmc7011 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
god

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: florida
Posts: 1,589

United_States     United_States

Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeMarine View Post
First of all, Haditha was a set up. Read here:
http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKi...1%5D.BATES.pdf

and here:

American Thinker Blog: Was Haditha a deliberate propaganda ploy by al Qaeda?

and here:



Second, Blackwater fell into the same type trap. The insurgents set up an ambush in a crowded area, looking for media sympathy. The Blackwater vehicles were full of bullet holes from the insurgents.

Third, I have operated extensivly in Nangarhar Province. The scenario the Marines state is very likely. It is SOP for the insurgents to commit this type of act. They set up the primary ambush, with secondary ambushes along likely ingress/egress routes. Their favorite spots are in villages.

We ran into a similar situation outside Jalalabad City in 2005. My Battalion was pulling out of the Kunar valley after a massive operation, and heading back to Jalalabad airfield for after action debriefings. One company was left behind for rear guard while the rest of the Battalion exfiled. Once we were all back at the FOB, the rear guard broke position, and headed back to the FOB.

Lots of action ensued, the militants who refused to fight the whole battalion jumped on the one company, and got their asses handed to them. The Company Commander was awarded the Bronze Star for his actions and leadership.

Once out of the Kunar valley and those fights, they loaded up on trucks, and headed home. They ran into a couple of small actions along the way to the finaly. As they were nearing Jalalbad on the far side of the river, the insurgents kicked off another LARGE ambush using RPGs, RPK,s and AKs in a small village that lined both sides of the road. The insurgents were firing from inside houses that they had the families held hostage in, intentionally drawing our fire into them. Luckily, no civilians were hurt, but many insurgents who were outside the buildings were cut down.

So, for all you nay-sayers who think you know what you are talking about, I would ask you to throw on a pair of boots and a vest, go over there, and see what the real story is. At the very least, ask someone who was involved. But please, for the love of God, quit making assumptions and talking out of your asses about our guys using excessive force, or force when it isn't necessary, just because you don't like Bush. It really raises the blood pressure, know what I'm saying?
Semper Fidelis Devil Dog!!!!
__________________
"Chaplain Charlie will tell you about how the free world will conquer Communism with the aid of God and a few marines! God has a hard-on for marines because we kill everything we see! He plays His games, we play ours! To show our appreciation for so much power, we keep heaven packed with fresh souls! God was here before the Marine Corps! So you can give your heart to Jesus, but your ass belongs to the Corps! Do you ladies understand?"
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeMarine View Post
First of all, Haditha was a set up. Read here:
http://warchronicle.com/TheyAreNotKi...1%5D.BATES.pdf

and here:

American Thinker Blog: Was Haditha a deliberate propaganda ploy by al Qaeda?

and here:



Second, Blackwater fell into the same type trap. The insurgents set up an ambush in a crowded area, looking for media sympathy. The Blackwater vehicles were full of bullet holes from the insurgents.

Third, I have operated extensivly in Nangarhar Province. The scenario the Marines state is very likely. It is SOP for the insurgents to commit this type of act. They set up the primary ambush, with secondary ambushes along likely ingress/egress routes. Their favorite spots are in villages.

We ran into a similar situation outside Jalalabad City in 2005. My Battalion was pulling out of the Kunar valley after a massive operation, and heading back to Jalalabad airfield for after action debriefings. One company was left behind for rear guard while the rest of the Battalion exfiled. Once we were all back at the FOB, the rear guard broke position, and headed back to the FOB.

Lots of action ensued, the militants who refused to fight the whole battalion jumped on the one company, and got their asses handed to them. The Company Commander was awarded the Bronze Star for his actions and leadership.

Once out of the Kunar valley and those fights, they loaded up on trucks, and headed home. They ran into a couple of small actions along the way to the finaly. As they were nearing Jalalbad on the far side of the river, the insurgents kicked off another LARGE ambush using RPGs, RPK,s and AKs in a small village that lined both sides of the road. The insurgents were firing from inside houses that they had the families held hostage in, intentionally drawing our fire into them. Luckily, no civilians were hurt, but many insurgents who were outside the buildings were cut down.

So, for all you nay-sayers who think you know what you are talking about, I would ask you to throw on a pair of boots and a vest, go over there, and see what the real story is. At the very least, ask someone who was involved. But please, for the love of God, quit making assumptions and talking out of your asses about our guys using excessive force, or force when it isn't necessary, just because you don't like Bush. It really raises the blood pressure, know what I'm saying?
Why would anyone with a working brain cell want to throw on a pair of boots and go there? Fighting a lost war while killing civilians is bad enough without being there.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by usmc7011 View Post
Semper Fidelis Devil Dog!!!!
No red, white and blue pom poms to go with the slogans?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,339

United_States    
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

re: your last 2 posts- your derision isn't very attractive americano....
__________________
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)




Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,246

United_States     Texas

Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Why would anyone with a working brain cell want to throw on a pair of boots and go there? Fighting a lost war while killing civilians is bad enough without being there.
I didn't know they had wars where civilians didn't die...........you know of any? I'm sure that those who join up have their reasons. I certainly wouldn't dismiss them as brainless.
__________________
In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot. ~Mark Twain, Notebook, 1935
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 874

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Why would anyone with a working brain cell want to throw on a pair of boots and go there? Fighting a lost war while killing civilians is bad enough without being there.
Yep, that's what I thought. Keyboard activist and nothing more. More concerned about saving your own skin than getting the real truth.

Throw out some more rhetoric about baby killing though, it covers your cowardice nicely.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 874

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
Why would anyone with a working brain cell want to throw on a pair of boots and go there? Fighting a lost war while killing civilians is bad enough without being there.
Can't refute the facts, so you just throw out the incompetence and indiscriminate killing cards?
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
re: your last 2 posts- your derision isn't very attractive americano....
One becomes weary of uniformed grown men acting like chest beating braggart children. I do realize their bravado/team/camaraderie remarks are primary psychological factors that provide them with the motivation to do their job and understand their training empathizes it to instill the attitude necessary to keep them functioning in their chosen circumstances, but it reminds me of a bowling team trying to roll strikes on a football field. Over and over again while wondering why the crowd has disappeared. I'm of the opinion that those who chose/choose the military are unaware that many civilians would prefer that they go about their lives without bothering others with their rationalizations, slogans and look at me, I'm a ______ . Perhaps other vocations could begin touting their professions and military buffs would realize how boring listening to someone else talk about what they did/do actually is. Maybe we could start with engineers, morticians or even stamp collectors.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:10 AM.