Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
SomeMarine;
Quote:
You didn't make any mention of the rape, torture, backshooting and premeditated murders. Reputation too sullied to bother ? Imperator; Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Yes, since it was for actual combat. The plain bronze star can be awarded for as little as administartive support, the V is what establishes it as regards to actions performed against the enemy.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
You are most welcomed. Forest replies as you shout.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
En uneksi. I do not dream. |
|
||||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
I understand the difference, so that is why I asked.
__________________
I am a liberal, a classical liberal. Classical liberalism is liberalism, but the current collectivists have captured that designation in the United States. In Europe they are glad enough to call themselves socialists. But no one in America wants to be called socialist and admit what they are. Courage, Truth, Honor, Fidelity, Discipline, Hospitality, Industriousness, Self-Reliance, Perseverance |
|
|||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Quote:
What torture? Remember, your beliefs don't mirror mine. Water-boarding? Hell, I water boarded myself last time I went to the beach. Abu-Ghraib? Those dumbass soldiers have been prosecuted and jailed also. But, it also my opinion that wasn't torture. Dumbass BS? Yes. Torture? No. |
|
|||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Quote:
As most other countries, or when another country or the UN begs us to pull their asses out of another sling. Yes, America has not always been altruistic in our actions, but for the most part we try to be. Yes. And you shouldn't see it the same way I do. You should feel YOUR country is the best on the planet. |
|
||||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Quote:
wow sounds like something that could have been written by an Israeli newspaper person after a rocket goes off regards terrorist responsibilities, why they are justified etc....good job moon, I'll keep this handy.. rest- And as far a haditha…just one little tidbit for you…are you aware that the defense team could not go to haditha? They could not for themselves look at the forensic evidence, or the actual place the attack ocurred etc…That sound fair to you?….and your “media reports”… this is the very same media that has lost interest in the iraq because there aren’t enough bodies blowing up? As usual, you hang your hat on thin air…Do I have to go into the whole witness thing too?? I hope not…..
__________________
"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose." |
|
||||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Oh, that is a verbal expression we use. It has little to do with actual shouting.
Quote:
Succesful UN actions are not taken into account often, failed ones are. Quote:
I despise my nations military leaders and their incompitant actions, I don't trust our Goverment, I have serious doubts about our President and I see that Parliament is a failure once more. -And I'd defend my nation against any foe. It's OK to be critical, but must also be able to carry responsibility.
__________________
En uneksi. I do not dream. |
|
|||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Quote:
2. No offense taken, hell, we have our own little kiddie song about Yanks. Agreed on the UN. They do a swell job of feeding people and raising awareness about certain subjects, not so great at most other things. ( in my opinion ) 3. Agreed, it is every humans duty to disagree with injustices, percieved or actual. |
|
||||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Some Marine;
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Quote:
Do I condone it? No, I don't. Disgusted by it? Once again, no. |
|
|||
|
Re: Slaughter of Afghan civilians; Marine tribunal opens
Quote:
When counseling people seeking advice on their path in life I find it intellectually dishonest to consider recommending a vocation where they put their life at risk when commanded to do so with no input or decision as to the logic and reasoning behind such commands. You chose such a vocation and yet refuse any criticism of the orders you follow, preferring to defer criticism with statements of 'people should do what I do to understand what I do' with seemingly no understanding that a majority of any population prefers to avoid what you do. As your vocation requires you unquestionably following someone else's orders without your input or opinion, why do you feel it necessary to emotionally defend those orders when someone disagrees with the intent and results of following those orders? You're not personally responsible for anything but following and executing someone else's orders, a job you chose. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|