Easy on the outrage….so he forgot a link ,,,,I have too so have others......I don't jump to assumptions or make accusations, that he or anyone is attempting to rob another’s words... shit happens…

And so what if its pro Israel…..it appears you are pro Palestinian and use sources that can be seen as such? …so?

__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

the pic won't display...damn....

__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Israel would have the right to shoot at the combatant; they have no right to do things like this...

From International Court of Justice Ad Hoc Judge Dr. John Dugard:

If reports from respected human rights organisations and even a ruling from the International Court of Justice is viewed as "pro-Palestinian" because they tell the truth I would have to question the motives of those whom view them as such...

ah, once again my laziness is showing. thank you.

Livni: Israel Won't Agree to a PA State With Gaza - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Arutz Sheva
********************************
source

note the published date of " Jan 25, 2008 ", that means a full month on kassams not registered. i would guess the total number since disengagement about 5000 or so. a significant number since israel rendered itself jew free in the gaza.
**************************

this is a good observation:

retort:

The 7,000 number is disputed by the United Nations and I am inclined to take their word before that of a pro-Israel source like "Jpost." Since disengagement 7,000 rockets have not been fired...

According to the UN a little over 2,600+ were fired between 2004 and late 2007. In addition to this attacks in the first two months of 2008 at best would bring the number to 2,800 depending on the source used.

Second, Israel has not relinquished control over Gaza; Gaza is not "Jew free."

III. THE OCCUPATION OF GAZA

11. The test for determining whether a territory is occupied under international law is effective control,8 and not the permanent physical presence of the occupying Power's military forces in the territory in question. Judged by this test it is clear that Israel remains the occupying Power as technological developments have made it possible for Israel to assert control over the people of Gaza without a permanent military presence.9 Israel's effective control is demonstrated by the following factors:

(a) Substantial control of Gaza's six land crossings: the Erez crossing is effectively closed to Palestinians wishing to cross to Israel or the West Bank. The Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza, which is regulated by the Agreement on Movement and Access entered into between Israel and the Palestinian Authority on 15 November 2005 (brokered by the United States, the European Union and the international community's envoy for the Israeli disengagement from Gaza), has been closed by Israel for lengthy periods since June 2006. The main crossing for goods at Karni is strictly controlled by Israel and since June 2006 this crossing too has been largely closed, with disastrous consequences for the Palestinian economy;

(b) Control through military incursions, rocket attacks and sonic booms: sections of Gaza have been declared "no-go" zones in which residents will be shot if they enter;

(c) Complete control of Gaza's airspace and territorial waters;

(d) Control of the Palestinian Population Registry: the definition of who is "Palestinian" and who is a resident of Gaza and the West Bank is controlled by the Israeli military. Even when the Rafah crossing is open, only holders of Palestinian identity cards can enter Gaza through the crossing; therefore control over the Palestinian Population Registry is also control over who may enter and leave Gaza. Since 2000, with few exceptions, Israel has not permitted additions to the Palestinian Population Registry.

The fact that Gaza remains occupied territory means that Israel's actions towards Gaza must be measured against the standards of international humanitarian law.

A/HRC/7/17 of 21 January 2008

There is nothing to retort; voluntary human shields who do not attack any target are protected persons under international law and they should be treated humanely. However, I have little evidence that the Palestinians routinely use human shields. I have plenty of evidence though that Israel uses indiscrimate bombing tactics under the guise that they were attacking sites shielded by civilians.

Seriously, when you want to state something that is so easily confirmed or refuted, try pating a bit of attnetion to detail. It only lends credibility, which would be helpful for you.

List of countries by population density - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Palestinian territories are 13th in population density, behind Monaco, The Vatican, Hong Kong, Singapore, etc.

The Palestinian territories would include the West Bank and East Jerusalem; Moon is referring to Gaza alone...

What is this, dummer week ? I said GAZA. It's not quite as crowded as yesterday though, if the Zionists have killed more kids and babies than have been born in the waterless and electricity-scarce hospitals.

Frank;
Right.

K. Now that I have read the entire thread, I am reminded of meth-heads who blow themselves up when trying to synthesize methylamphetamine. Amatuers playing with stuff they shouldn't be and paying a dear price for it.

It's silly to continue to argue that this is an Israeli airstrike when there is not enough evidence or even any evidence that it is the case.

But, it is amusing to continue to watch the nonsense used to "prove" that it is an Israeli airstrike.

When the investigation is completed, will we see any retractions? As Pram said, we will suffocate holding our breath.

The population density of the Gaza Strip is as follows:

Assuming the Wikipedia article is correct and I do not trust Wikipedia as a rule Gaza would be ranked 3rd in the world on the population density per square km scale...

That's close enough to make my point. Emptying the Zionist dungeons might move them up a place.


.....and that's without the 5-6 million in the refugee diaspora waiting to get back in.

Gaza is clearly one of the most densely populated places in the world; this is a fact regardless of whether they are ranked 1st or 3rd.

It's actually quite effective. Note, that many people bought it on page one without critical examination, and nobody (the user) seems to have taken it on faith here lately. Meanwhile, continually bumping the thread keeps the unsupported assertion at the top of the forum. As we've seen, many people will just believe it because it is the thread title. Brilliant from a propagandizing perspective.

Glad you took the time to read the thread though.

The latest Zionist missile strikes have been equally callous in their contempt for civilians. The m.o. is instantly recognisable.