I wonder why they don't call it the F-35 stealth defense fighter .

Meanwhile, as Congress gives the Zionists more billions for free, more than 40 million Americans live below the poverty line.




That's odd. The US and Israel started the Second Lebanese War in 2006.

I wonder why your source calls it an attack fighter, no one else does.

__________________
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.” - Lord Palmerston

They must be anticipating that the Zionists will attack somebody with it. Them and every scarecrow, mannequin , crash-test dummy or anybody else with a head.

Do you have a comment regarding a few extra billions for a proven ethnic-cleansing regime or would you rather gloss over that.

And what of these gifts of billions of dollars, certain to be used for further Middle East tyranny and bloodshed, when many Americans go hungry ?

The F-35 is a joint program between the U.S., U.K., Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway, Denmark, Israel and Singapore. So, there seems plenty of "blame" to go around.

Really. I suppose Congress voted extra billions to the Zionist regime on behalf of these other governments ?

The Israelis are paying for the fighters, yet you keep saying we are giving the fighters to them. Why is that, moon?

Hmm.... this argument of guilt by association is losing it's punch a little bit.

It's more compelling to blame America for Caterpillar for manufacturing a bulldozer with which the Zionists used to push down houses.

Applying the same concept to the F-35 (which has yet to kill any Palestinians) blames Canada and Norway by virtue of manufacturing the Aicraft that Zionists may potentially use, kind of makes the argument flat.

I suppose this is the result of a "you're either with us, or you're against us." mentality..... As Bush knows now, but likely would never admit, that's not a good policy when there are so few willing to be on your side.

__________________

The world could use more Stan Ovshinsky's

Maybe because the Zionists are supposed to 'pay' for military equipment by means of loans from the US which are not expected to be repaid. Sounds free to me.
What are the conditions attached to the extra billions from Congress ?

LBS;
Finding Congress 'guilty by association' simply because they voted extra billions for Zionism gets up your nose ?

This is good news.

Maybe those who insist on attacking Israel will think twice once they realize they can be blasted back to the fucking Stone Age.

Naaah, they probably won't. They're too fucking stupid...

Yeah. I have no issue with the Israelis having a few F-35s. (I try to keep moon's hissy fits low-key, though.)

By the same token, I try to soften the laughabilities of the Zionist War Supporters Club, none of whom have ever succeeded in justifying Zionist warmongering methodology.

"we don't justify , we bombify".... new hit single by the ghost bombers 5...

__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

I, for one, don't think that we should be encouraging, funding, or facilitating the current Israeli government's militarism.

__________________
Nothing to see here.

What about the other U.S. allies participating in the project?

Sweet we should give Israel a fleet of them for free.