Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Ainoow Ainoow is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Europe; Belgium; Flanders; Ghent
Posts: 663

European_Union     Belgium

Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Sanity seems to prevail at the moment with regard to Iran. Condi-Gates seem to have managed to shut down the Cheney & co hawks and look eager to implement Obama's foreign policy even before he's elected president. No complaints here, but let's see how this works out.

Condi's coup: how the neo-cons lost the argument over Iran - Americas, World - The Independent

Quote:
Condoleezza Rice was George Bush's handmaiden for the war in Iraq but she is now emerging as the best hope for avoiding a military conflict between the United States and Iran.

The Secretary of State, who is one of the few people with the President's ear, has shown the door to Vice-President Dick Cheney's cabal of war-hungry advisers. Ms Rice was able to declare yesterday that the administration's decision to break with past policy proves that there is international unity in opposing Iran's nuclear programme. "The point that we're making is the United States is firmly behind this diplomacy, firmly behind and unified with our allies and hopefully the Iranians will take that message," Ms Rice said.

Mr Bush's decision to send the number three in the State Department, William Burns, to attend talks with Iran in Geneva at the weekend caused howls of outrage that were heard all the way from the State Department's sanctuary of Foggy Bottom to the White House on Pennsylvania Avenue. A parallel initiative to reopen the interest's section of the American embassy in Tehran, which would be the first return of a diplomatic presence on Iranian territory since 1979, has also received a cool response from neo-conservatives.
__________________
Exposing the dark side.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
MattLarson's Avatar
MattLarson MattLarson is online now
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 25,913

United_States     Florida

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

It looks like this will be the first administration in three decades to come close to normalizing diplomatic relations with Iran.

Matt
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Jason Marcel Jason Marcel is offline
Secretary of State
MovieJay

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,805
Blog Entries: 5

Canada     United_States

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
It looks like this will be the first administration in three decades to come close to normalizing diplomatic relations with Iran.

Matt
It drives me mad that it took this long.

The OP said that Condi-Gates adopted "Obama's" plan, but having diplomatic relations with every country should be the norm. Should be common sense. I don't see it as a left/right issue.

I'm glad that the White House is doing it, but like other moves they've had to make, it's like they need to be pinned into a corner and even then they don't come around until things are nearly falling apart.

Maybe Bush learned the word "legacy" in his remedial english class recently?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Ainoow Ainoow is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Europe; Belgium; Flanders; Ghent
Posts: 663

European_Union     Belgium

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Marcel View Post
It drives me mad that it took this long.

The OP said that Condi-Gates adopted "Obama's" plan, but having diplomatic relations with every country should be the norm. Should be common sense. I don't see it as a left/right issue.

I'm glad that the White House is doing it, but like other moves they've had to make, it's like they need to be pinned into a corner and even then they don't come around until things are nearly falling apart.

Maybe Bush learned the word "legacy" in his remedial english class recently?
I was about to say that . He finally found himself one!
__________________
Exposing the dark side.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Jason Marcel Jason Marcel is offline
Secretary of State
MovieJay

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,805
Blog Entries: 5

Canada     United_States

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ainoow View Post
I was about to say that . He finally found himself one!
On this issue, I don't really want to bash Bush, because this is kind of historic, even though Iran sort of forced us to the table instead of the other way around. But America can make this thing work.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Ainoow Ainoow is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Europe; Belgium; Flanders; Ghent
Posts: 663

European_Union     Belgium

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Marcel View Post
On this issue, I don't really want to bash Bush, because this is kind of historic, even though Iran sort of forced us to the table instead of the other way around. But America can make this thing work.
If it's for real indeed it's historic. Does this get much airplay in the US? But then again, I want to see first how this plays out. I'd hate to see this turn into some sort of PR stunt.
__________________
Exposing the dark side.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
John Drake John Drake is offline
U.S. Senator

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 791

   
Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

We'll see what happens, we'll see. This could just as easily be a setup to give an invasion crediblity. After a manufactured "incident" Bush could say "...see, we tried, but they wanted war.."
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Ainoow Ainoow is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: Europe; Belgium; Flanders; Ghent
Posts: 663

European_Union     Belgium

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
We'll see what happens, we'll see. This could just as easily be a setup to give an invasion crediblity. After a manufactured "incident" Bush could say "...see, we tried, but they wanted war.."
Again, I so hope I'm wrong about this, but it looks too good to be true. Although Condi's struggle against the Cheney hawks with regard to Iran is well documented.
__________________
Exposing the dark side.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Rakkasan's Avatar
Rakkasan Rakkasan is offline
President

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Woodlawn, TN
Posts: 11,065

United_States     Tennessee

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

well if he doesnt he gets bashed

if he does he gets bashed

catch 22
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
daddio daddio is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 847

United_States     Virginia

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ainoow View Post
Sanity seems to prevail at the moment with regard to Iran. Condi-Gates seem to have managed to shut down the Cheney & co hawks and look eager to implement Obama's foreign policy even before he's elected president. No complaints here, but let's see how this works out.


the messiah's plan is direct talks pres to pres without pre-conditions.

this is sitting in on multiparty talks with a diplomat. which I believe we've done in the past til it proved fruitless and we left it for some euros.
__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Luap's Avatar
Luap Luap is offline
Secretary of Defense
NBA Champs 2008

 
Member Since: May 2006
Location: The world
Posts: 2,114

Earth    
Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

It's a step, but:

Quote:
Burns will not negotiate with Jalili but officials said he will listen to his presentation of Iran's final answer to the package. Burns will also restate a U.S. offer for formal negotiations with Iran if it suspends uranium enrichment and reprocessing. He will warn that if the deal is not accepted, the Iranian government can expect more sanctions to be imposed on its banking and financial sectors. And, he will remind Iran that Bush has not taken the military option off the table.
ABC News: U.S. Set for Rare Iran Diplomatic Meeting

Doesn't sound like a "U-turn" IMO.
__________________
No man is an island...
Each man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in Mankind.
And therefore, never send to know
For whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.

—John Donne
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 13,143

United_States     Texas

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Its not even a step, its just an easy way to spy on them.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
daddio daddio is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 847

United_States     Virginia

Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luap View Post
It's a step, but:



ABC News: U.S. Set for Rare Iran Diplomatic Meeting

Doesn't sound like a "U-turn" IMO.

excellent way to pull it into focus, thanks !
__________________
Hope is the opposite of audacity. It's passive, an excuse for inaction.

Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

“What's the difference between Sarah Palin and Barack Obama?”

“One is a well turned-out, good-looking, and let's be honest, pretty sexy piece of eye-candy.

“The other kills her own food.”
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008
Andrewl's Avatar
Andrewl Andrewl is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,540

   
Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

I likewise don't see a u-turn. The US is still not willing to negotiate until Iran gives up its only card - enrichment. These mixed messages are not helping at all. One minute you read they are negotiating, the next minute you read that Condi is repeating the same old pre-conditions for real negotiations.

I was hopeful for about 12 hours.

The Bush admin seems as confused and bumbling as ever.

Andrew
__________________
Ethanol is a fabulous solution to our energy dilemma because it will provide more fuel for us to drive around and look for food.

-- Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2008
Wisdom_Seeker's Avatar
Wisdom_Seeker Wisdom_Seeker is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: my house
Posts: 877

   
Re: Whitehouse U-turn on Iran?

I dont see how this is a Condi Vs Hawks move..... Condi does not have power,...if she came up with this move, it is not her independent decision, but any move has to be agreed by whose in control. She is just a messenger.

Secondly, they are beginning to think that another war will not benefit them.......not financially, not any other way they looked at it. They have an objective reg Iraq and M/E and they have to play the Iran ball intelligently. If they want to maintain any sort of control over Iraq's oil, security of their troops in the region, security if Israel, influence and control over M/E politics etc.... then they cant mess things up with Iran. Iran is a big player in the region so the US must rethink its relationship with Iran. They will loose everythin if they dont do that. Its not in their interest.

Hmmm did they realise they cant do much about Iran's nuclear programme? The thing is, if they could use War, they would have, I have no doubt about that. But these recent developments show that they are moving away from the option of war. They dont have a choice.

WS.
__________________
"You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom"- Malcom X
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online