Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,727

United_States     Russian

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Would you like to read the contract?
http://usmilitary.about.com/library/pdf/enlistment.pdf

From section C:



I think that should cover it....
Well, Steve is the one who said it is not covered.
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,320

   
Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Well, Steve is the one who said it is not covered.
When did I say that?

When did I say anything about pay and allowances?

Do you understand what "pay" and "allowances" and "other benefits" are with respect to the military?

If you'd be so kind to explain them, as you understand them, that will help to move this discussion along.

I suspect you'll not respond favorably to that, either, instead opting to dodge and try to nit-pick at something you know absolutely nothing about...
__________________
Science flies you to the moon.

Religion flies you into buildings.

  #78 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,727

United_States     Russian

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
When did I say that?

When did I say anything about pay and allowances?

Do you understand what "pay" and "allowances" and "other benefits" are with respect to the military?

If you'd be so kind to explain them, as you understand them, that will help to move this discussion along.

I suspect you'll not respond favorably to that, either, instead opting to dodge and try to nit-pick at something you know absolutely nothing about...
Well, here is how the conversation went. Italicized parts are added by me to explain how the words relate to the general discussion.

Slon: "As for reimbursements (that is, reimbursements for the expenses incurred while traveling according to US military orders), it would depend on the details of the contract the troops signed with them military."

Steve to Slon: "The troops don't sign a contract with the military regarding monetary reimbursements... (read: the expenses I am discussing)"

Slon to Steve: "And it's (the aforementioned expenses I'm discussing) not part of any contract that the soldiers sign when they sign up for military service?"

Steve to Slon: Nope... (that's where you said it)

Slon to Steve: "Soldier expenses when not within the military infrastructure are not mentioned, at least according to you."

Mrs. M to Slon: "I think that should cover it.... (the aforementioned expenses)"

Slon to Mrs. M: "Well, Steve is the one who said it (the aforementioned expenses) is not covered."

Steve to Slon: "When did I say that?"
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Bayou Bengal Fan
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 26,832

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Well, here is how the conversation went. Italicized parts are added by me to explain how the words relate to the general discussion.

Slon: "As for reimbursements (that is, reimbursements for the expenses incurred while traveling according to US military orders), it would depend on the details of the contract the troops signed with them military."

Steve to Slon: "The troops don't sign a contract with the military regarding monetary reimbursements... (read: the expenses I am discussing)"

Slon to Steve: "And it's (the aforementioned expenses I'm discussing) not part of any contract that the soldiers sign when they sign up for military service?"

Steve to Slon: Nope... (that's where you said it)

Slon to Steve: "Soldier expenses when not within the military infrastructure are not mentioned, at least according to you."

Mrs. M to Slon: "I think that should cover it.... (the aforementioned expenses)"

Slon to Mrs. M: "Well, Steve is the one who said it (the aforementioned expenses) is not covered."

Steve to Slon: "When did I say that?"
Slon, travel pay isn't specified in the contract but it is understood and I think that is what Steve was trying to get you to understand.
__________________





"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,066

   
Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
I think you need to stop cheerleading. Your 0-content posts are highly annoying and add nothing to the debate.


And like I said, if they are to be required by law to accomplish those tasks simply because they signed the contract, those requirements should be placed in the contract.
look man, here it is, laid out for you.

You join the military. They need you somewhere. They cut some orders telling you to go there.

The government makes your travel arrangemnets and pays for them. You get a ticket to fly/drive/train/ship.

You sit your ass in the seat.

You arrive where you need to be.

Now, as far as excess baggage is concerned: The airlines have a set amount most individuals can bring on the plane. Some companies/government entities have contracts allowing more, because sometimes you have to travel with a LOT of shit.

For anything over the limit, the government pays for, and the airplane allows it on.
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,066

   
Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
So...nothing from any of you to say regarding the content of my argument? Figures.
That's because your arguement is retarded and petulant.
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,066

   
Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Your "actual arguments" are stupid because they have no basis in reality.

Why?

Because you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

You're afraid to tell us what your knowledge level or experience is, because those are comepletely non-existent.

You can prove me wrong, or you can continue to look foolish. That choice is yours, and I don't really care either way...
how old is Slon, and what does he do for a living, anyone know?
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,066

   
Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Depends on what you want the result to be. If you want the government to cover travel expenses, the wording would say that the government will pay for transfer of the soldier, if deemed reasonably important for the transportation of the soldier to wherever he must report according to official orders, using approved methods of transportation (in this case, AA), up to a certain amount. Once the amount is exceeded (perhaps due to extra luggage), the soldier must pay for it personally and, if the soldier wants a refund, must send the receipt or proof of purchase of service to the issuer of the contract. If it is determined to be valid and not unreasonably excessive, it would then be reimbursed. Something like that.

I haven't admitted anything, and it's rather clear that you don't know my age (or even that I am underage) based on your contradictory assumptions regarding my age (5, 18, 21).

I am speaking intelligently, Steve. It's you that is having trouble comprehending what I am saying and instead relying on ad-hominem.

How so?
You are not speaking intelligently. What you are doing is displaying your lack of reading comprehension.

Many here have told you the reality, you are not comprehending. Instead, you are glancing at the facts, and twisting them to fit into your little fantasy.

Read and comprehend, if you can not comprehend, ask a specific question for a specific clarifying answer.
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,066

   
Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

CYD, here's that link, sorry about that.

Travel | American Airlines gets bad rap on military-fee rumor | Seattle Times Newspaper
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,727

United_States     Russian

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Slon, travel pay isn't specified in the contract but it is understood and I think that is what Steve was trying to get you to understand.
I was not referring to travel pay alone, but rather to the clause generalizing about expense reimbursements.
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,727

United_States     Russian

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeMarine View Post
You are not speaking intelligently. What you are doing is displaying your lack of reading comprehension.

Many here have told you the reality, you are not comprehending.
Why do you assume that?
Quote:
Instead, you are glancing at the facts, and twisting them to fit into your little fantasy.
Glancing over what facts? Twisting what?
Quote:
Read and comprehend, if you can not comprehend, ask a specific question for a specific clarifying answer.
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Bayou Bengal Fan
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 26,832

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
I was not referring to travel pay alone, but rather to the clause generalizing about expense reimbursements.
Quote:
It says for EXCESS baggage. I don't see why they should get a free pass from the airlines to carry as much shit as they want onto the plane when everyone else is presumably getting charged for it. It would depend on the contract AA has with the military. As for reimbursements, it would depend on the details of the contract the troops signed with them military.
Quote:
And it's not part of any contract that the soldiers sign when they sign up for military service?
Quote:
Then why are they getting reimbursements? The government shouldn't be handing out free money to people with no contract
Quote:
Then all the contract says is that the soldier must arrive somewhere by some date. The means would be left up to the person who would pay for them by default, the traveler.
Quote:
They may do it, but legally speaking (as far as the contract is concerned), they don't have to pay for your travels.
Quote:
And my point is that if it is not in the contract, then it would be (or should be) harder to prosecute, since no agreement was made on paper. It ought to be contracted or not done.
Quote:
And like I said, if they are to be required by law to accomplish those tasks simply because they signed the contract, those requirements should be placed in the contract.
Quote:
Sure it is. My argument is about what the general design of the contract should be, which is obviously relevant to the requirements, expectations and obligations, such as paying or not paying for extra baggage.
Quote:
Depends on what you want the result to be. If you want the government to cover travel expenses, the wording would say that the government will pay for transfer of the soldier, if deemed reasonably important for the transportation of the soldier to wherever he must report according to official orders, using approved methods of transportation (in this case, AA), up to a certain amount. Once the amount is exceeded (perhaps due to extra luggage), the soldier must pay for it personally and, if the soldier wants a refund, must send the receipt or proof of purchase of service to the issuer of the contract. If it is determined to be valid and not unreasonably excessive, it would then be reimbursed. Something like that.
Seems to me you spent a whole lot of time talking about travel reimbursement! Either way though, the contract says nothing about any reimbursements but it's generally understood by the educated enlistees that the government is responsible for getting soldiers from point A to point B, just as it's understood that when the soldier signs the dotted line, he becomes the property of the United States Government.
__________________





"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,727

United_States     Russian

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Seems to me you spent a whole lot of time talking about travel reimbursement!
Because that is what the article addresses. However, if you read my posts, you would know that I am for expenses in general, whether they be specifically listed in the contract or referred to in general.
Quote:
Either way though, the contract says nothing about any reimbursements but it's generally understood by the educated enlistees that the government is responsible for getting soldiers from point A to point B, just as it's understood that when the soldier signs the dotted line, he becomes the property of the United States Government.
It might be understood, but mutual understanding (or lack thereof) is not the reason I have given for my support of the contract text I suggested.
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Bayou Bengal Fan
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 26,832

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Because that is what the article addresses. However, if you read my posts, you would know that I am for expenses in general, whether they be specifically listed in the contract or referred to in general.
It might be understood, but mutual understanding (or lack thereof) is not the reason I have given for my support of the contract text I suggested.
Whatever, Slon...you seem to want to "fix" that which is not broken.
__________________





"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 08-14-2008
Stapo's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,866

Germany     European_Union

Re: Troops Pay 4 Xtra Baggage

Sorry Slon, but I honestly have to ask, whether you have any mental health problems and if anyone has diagnosed you with some sort of autismn, ADHS or stuff like this before?

I mean you seem to get yourself totaly obsessed about discussing what there should be in a enlistment contract, instead of seeing the greater "pic.

Just like everything else in life, the military is based on rather well known principles/laws/customs (well known as provided/proven by the "expierences" of e.g. Steve).

So why do you continue to shit about it for so many endless thread pages?

What's so damn difficult to understand about it, hell we aren't talking about rocket science?

Anyway honestly as an ex draftie I can't remember, if I ever signed something like a "contract" at all. Hell I was medically tested and asked if I "wanted" to serve, answered "Yes," a few weeks later had my train ticket and had to show up at an unknown military base at a given time.

It was as simple as that and as millions of citizens before me, I accepted the process and went through it. Why (according to you) should there be a need to sign a million of papers, when it worked fine for so many drafties before me, for so long?
__________________
"Homo Homini Lupus"
Thomas Hobbes
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online