Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #166 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2008
moon's Avatar
President
caçador dos roedores

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 15,549

Portugal     Brazil

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Pakistan has summoned the US ambassador to Islamabad in protest over a "shameful" alleged attack by US troops in South Waziristan in which women and children are reported to have been killed.

Al Jazeera English - CENTRAL/S. ASIA - Pakistan condemns US over raid



Terrorists.
Reply With Quote
  #167 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2008
MattLarson's Avatar
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 30,167

United_States     Florida

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post


Terrorists.
Yup, most likely some terrorists there among the folks burning the flag.

Good eye.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #168 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
moon's Avatar
President
caçador dos roedores

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 15,549

Portugal     Brazil

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Pakistan has reportedly blocked a major fuel supply route for Western forces in Afghanistan in response to a raid by US forces in northwest Pakistan earlier this week, the defence minister said.

Al Jazeera English - CENTRAL/S. ASIA - Pakistan blocks fuel to US forces
It's hard to believe that Pakistan is at last showing some nads, but there you are. Even the Pakistanis can only take having their population chopped up by American-led terrorists for just so long.

Quote:
Pakistan's envoy to the US said on Friday the raid had failed to capture anyone important and helped fighters by enraging the Pakistani public.
Just about everybody, outside of America's arms-dealing club, is entitled to be enraged.




Quote:
In April, Russia agreed to allow Nato to transport non-lethal supplies through its territory and into northern Afghanistan.
A halt to that little perk must be on the cards too.
Reply With Quote
  #169 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
It's hard to believe that Pakistan is at last showing some nads, but there you are. Even the Pakistanis can only take having their population chopped up by American-led terrorists for just so long.


Just about everybody, outside of America's arms-dealing club, is entitled to be enraged.






A halt to that little perk must be on the cards too.
Pakistans defence minister says something quite different.
Reply With Quote
  #170 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
moon's Avatar
President
caçador dos roedores

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 15,549

Portugal     Brazil

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Really.

Quote:
Chaudhry Ahmed Mukhtar, Pakistan's defence minister, said on Saturday: "We have told them that we will take action and we have already taken action today.

"We have stopped the supply of oil and this will tell how serious we are," he told Pakistan's Dawn Television.
Reply With Quote
  #171 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Really.
Actually I think it was the Prime Minister, my mistake.

Id like to ask you why you think that Northern tribesmen should have the protection of the border when they retreat from Afghanistan?
Reply With Quote
  #172 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
moon's Avatar
President
caçador dos roedores

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 15,549

Portugal     Brazil

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Because disrespect for any State's borders equates to international criminality. America is currently leading the world in international criminality. Many people have been deceived into believing that the criminals are the policemen. Many more know better.
Reply With Quote
  #173 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
Because disrespect for any State's borders equates to international criminality. America is currently leading the world in international criminality. Many people have been deceived into believing that the criminals are the policemen. Many more know better.
Hmm. yet Pakistan allows it citizens to cross into afghanistan and cause trouble there. Thus there is balance.
Reply With Quote
  #174 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,272

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
I simply accused you of being underhand and detailed why I think thats so, you then denied that accusation of underhandedness, without detail. Matt and others then spoke of WS views on the murder of the student - a view from a post on another thread. Then the discussion they sought to have on this thread decended into baiting re Allah.

Thankfully we've moved on from then.
see post #120.....
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #175 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
moon's Avatar
President
caçador dos roedores

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 15,549

Portugal     Brazil

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Hmm. yet Pakistan allows it citizens to cross into afghanistan and cause trouble there. Thus there is balance.
If you have evidence of Pakistani State-sponsored raiding into Afghanistan then lets see it. I'm not speculating about deadly American-led raids into Pakistan. The reports are all over the Internet.
Reply With Quote
  #176 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,272

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

yes I agree with that, I don’t believe the paki gov. is sponsoring or actively aiding them, but they are turning a blind eye to it, Musharraf ceded Waziristan to extremist elements, and to be fair to expect him or the new gov. whoever the heck they are, to basically undertake a war to destroy them etc. is not really our biz, aside from what we now suffer from regards those elements is wholly of our own making by going into Afghanistan pushing the balloon and forcing them into paki. In much greater numbers and it provides a sanctuary.

Of course it would great if paki. Secured their border etc. but its aint gonna happen.

The only option left is the Cambodian option and we aint there yet.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #177 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
Wisdom_Seeker's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: my house
Posts: 1,577

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Hmm. yet Pakistan allows it citizens to cross into afghanistan and cause trouble there. Thus there is balance.
The problem is more complicated. I personally believe that the region across the border of Pakistan with Afghanistan has been pushed to be the way it is now.

Elements from Afghanistan crossed into that region after the war started and passed on the influence. Then you have to consider the similarities in culture, tradition, ethnicity and religion. That part of pakistan has been quickly falling in the hands of what is known now as Taliban Pakistan.

This is new... it came about as a byproduct of the US led invasion and their behaviour in that region. Also, they share similar interests and objectives. Known of them wants invaders around there.

Now everyone around there can cross between Afghanistan and Pakistan however and whenever they wish. The Pakistani Gov cant do much about it. It is trying by sending their troops up there but they are unwanted, they have been resisted and to expect them to control the borders is ridiculous.

How can they control the borders when its 100s of kms of mountains and difficult terrain, donkeys are the only means of transport there.

Then the point Moon brought up is valid. America attacks anyone who looks like Taliban across the border (in pakistan) regardless of International Law. I dont think the Pakistani Gov has a clear independent say in this. After all they have to look as if they are within the group (war on terror etc).

Musharraf is out... lets see what the new president is like. Musharraf was considered very proAmerican.... and a military dictator not liked by his people. Its very likely that the new government will not bend over to American demands as Musharraf's gov did. We'll have to wait and see.

WS.
__________________
"You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom"- Malcom X
Reply With Quote
  #178 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
yes I agree with that, I don’t believe the paki gov. is sponsoring or actively aiding them, but they are turning a blind eye to it, Musharraf ceded Waziristan to extremist elements, and to be fair to expect him or the new gov. whoever the heck they are, to basically undertake a war to destroy them etc. is not really our biz, aside from what we now suffer from regards those elements is wholly of our own making by going into Afghanistan pushing the balloon and forcing them into paki. In much greater numbers and it provides a sanctuary.

Of course it would great if paki. Secured their border etc. but its aint gonna happen.

The only option left is the Cambodian option and we aint there yet.
Let's hope the new Pakistani government does recognize that there is the Cambodian option, though, so that this does not escalate to that level.
Reply With Quote
  #179 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
MattLarson's Avatar
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 30,167

United_States     Florida

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by moon View Post
If you have evidence of Pakistani State-sponsored raiding into Afghanistan then lets see it. I'm not speculating about deadly American-led raids into Pakistan. The reports are all over the Internet.
No, just the circumstances surrounding them.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #180 (permalink)  
Old 09-06-2008
moon's Avatar
President
caçador dos roedores

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Cyberia
Posts: 15,549

Portugal     Brazil

Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

American-led raids into Pakistan

American-led raids into Pakistan - Google Search

Thirty-eight thousand nine hundred references.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online