Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
You are entirely missing the point Si Modo. They are not just merely using their technology and smarts to protect their own lives, they are using it in a way that puts innocent life at great risk. That is what makes them cowards. They would rather kill sixty children than lose a few soldiers in a raid. If they can't take that risk to protect those children, they get no respect from me. It sickens me.

And whether or not they can do any different at this point is irrelevant, they are still cowards. That is the reality of modern warfare, avoidable or not.

Andrew
No, that's your reality, not mine.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 12,893

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
No, that's your reality, not mine.
Wow, that's clever.

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 08-29-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
Wow, that's clever.

Andrew
No, it's what it is. You believe something different than I and you have an issue with it? Perceived realities are based on firmly held beliefs. Now, one must ask who has a problem with keeping their emotions in check.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
CYDdharta's Avatar
Moderator

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 5,252

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
I never hide my emotions. I can still make posts that actually have a point though. Perhaps you should shelve your emotion until you can control it better.


Andrew




The irony of that post is breath-taking. “I never hide my emotions; you need to learn to control yours”. Thanx, it’s been quite a while since I got a good chuckle from a post like I did from this one.
__________________
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.” - Lord Palmerston
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Wisdom_Seeker's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: my house
Posts: 1,577

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

I dont see why we cant show any emotions regarding this issue. 90 innocent women and children are killed. WE DAM SHOULD SHOW EMOTIONS. Its about being human. Or do you only show emotions at dead Americans?

If you dont show emotions at dead children, then you are one heartless cold son of a gun.

There is no remorse or regret across the board at this incident. All I see is members avoiding to discuss this fact and getting involved in personal insults as a way of avoiding the point.

On the point of cowardice, thats well covered by Andrew and I dont need to cover it again. Too much failed aerial bombardment that results in the death of innocent lives,... very little ground work. That is not the work of a technologically advanced army. If technology is used for the death of innocent people, that does not show bravery or how advanced an army is. It shows the opposite.

WS.

WS.
__________________
"You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom"- Malcom X
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisdom_Seeker View Post
I dont see why we cant show any emotions regarding this issue. 90 innocent women and children are killed. WE DAM SHOULD SHOW EMOTIONS. Its about being human. Or do you only show emotions at dead Americans?

If you dont show emotions at dead children, then you are one heartless cold son of a gun.

There is no remorse or regret across the board at this incident. All I see is members avoiding to discuss this fact and getting involved in personal insults as a way of avoiding the point.

On the point of cowardice, thats well covered by Andrew and I dont need to cover it again. Too much failed aerial bombardment that results in the death of innocent lives,... very little ground work. That is not the work of a technologically advanced army. If technology is used for the death of innocent people, that does not show bravery or how advanced an army is. It shows the opposite.

WS.

WS.
Actually, while I dont agree with either Wisdom Seeker or perhaps Andrewl on the politics of Afghanistan its clear the issue of courage is won by the human with the lesser protection.

To think otherwise is to presume that the forces driving the tanks into Tianenmen square had just as much courage as the guy standing in front of that tank pleading for it to stop.

Those that dont recognise this must admit that they hold a bias towards their own forces that skews their vision or perhaps just that they need to think more on the issue. That said Id love to hear the counter argument to this.

Lastly, it IS a matter of either laziness or cowardlyness when a bomber decides not to fly lower in order to fuly ascertain the nature of the people in the target he wishes to bomb. However, it may be that the bomber was given a target by ground forces. Thus the fault is not with him but with those ground forces.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
City Council Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 139

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
Oh they are making a difference, mass slaughter of children always makes a difference. Apparently this is something for you to make light of?

Andrew

The reality is I wasn’t taking it lightly, I was calling you a coward. The truth is I don’t know if you are or not (I suspect you are, but I don’t know). What I do know is that you are making judgments on something that you are way way in over your head on. And you have a very warped sense of reality to the point where you seem to honestly think that a tribal culture somehow is the answer to our problems (and that is so far out to lunch that I can’t even describe it).

I haven’t talked to anyone who was there yet, but I know how these things work. I don’t know what happened here, but I’m willing to be a LOT of money that 90 civilians is a very exaggerated number. Ignoring for now that the number was arrived at using only surveys, the fact that counting casualties is extraordinarily difficult, and that 90 and especially 60 is a very round number, there are mountains of measures put in place to avoid that sort of thing happening, and I just cannot see how something like that could happen unless they were intentionally planted by insurgents in order to cause this sort of uproar, or something of the like.


Now moreover, I do get very upset when people like you try to pretend that somehow by virtue of sitting on your ass on a couch and reading a few books, that you have an increased capacity to care about these sorts of things. Worse things than this happen everyday, and if you aren’t dead serious crying your eyes out every minute of every day, than you are a hypocritical asshole who is using tragedy to his own political ends. And I certainly spit on that.


Anybody who thinks that a battle should be a fair fight is an idiot. Anyone who thinks that even an unfair fight doesn’t take plenty of courage, and that using an air strike when your getting shot at is cowardice gets his idea of bravery from action movies and video games, and anyone who wants to flaunt that sophomoric lunacy about just to try to make himself feel better about some political point he is trying to make is an asshole.
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Etbauer View Post
The reality is I wasn’t taking it lightly, I was calling you a coward. The truth is I don’t know if you are or not (I suspect you are, but I don’t know). What I do know is that you are making judgments on something that you are way way in over your head on. And you have a very warped sense of reality to the point where you seem to honestly think that a tribal culture somehow is the answer to our problems (and that is so far out to lunch that I can’t even describe it).
Andrewl has not made comment on the value of tribal culture.

Quote:
I haven’t talked to anyone who was there yet, but I know how these things work. I don’t know what happened here, but I’m willing to be a LOT of money that 90 civilians is a very exaggerated number. Ignoring for now that the number was arrived at using only surveys, the fact that counting casualties is extraordinarily difficult, and that 90 and especially 60 is a very round number, there are mountains of measures put in place to avoid that sort of thing happening, and I just cannot see how something like that could happen unless they were intentionally planted by insurgents in order to cause this sort of uproar, or something of the like
.

This is reasonable comment. Agreed. 90 is just a number. Its very likely alot less. However, if the 90 bodies have been counted out and shown Ill take it back.


Quote:
Now moreover, I do get very upset when people like you try to pretend that somehow by virtue of sitting on your ass on a couch and reading a few books, that you have an increased capacity to care about these sorts of things. Worse things than this happen everyday, and if you aren’t dead serious crying your eyes out every minute of every day, than you are a hypocritical asshole who is using tragedy to his own political ends. And I certainly spit on that.
Its not by that virtue that he criticises. Its by virtue of his humanity. Its not enough for a decent human being just to say 'oh well, dont really know whats happened....etc etc. Hey who won the Superbowl?'
Besides, worse things actually do not happen every day. When they do they are not within the political remit of this citizen. For example, Sunni female had bombed a Shia procession lately. This should be cried over and criticised, yes? Yet what access does a poster like Andrewl have to the Sunni's? Do they offer him a vote on their actions? No.


Quote:
Anybody who thinks that a battle should be a fair fight is an idiot. Anyone who thinks that even an unfair fight doesn’t take plenty of courage, and that using an air strike when your getting shot at is cowardice gets his idea of bravery from action movies and video games, and anyone who wants to flaunt that sophomoric lunacy about just to try to make himself feel better about some political point he is trying to make is an asshole.

Quote:
Anybody who thinks that a battle should be a fair fight is an idiot.
Agreed. war is a matter of effective power.

Quote:
Anyone who thinks that even an unfair fight doesn’t take plenty of courage, and that using an air strike when..........
Not agreed. While the pilot does have courage, this is only most evident when faced with a foe of equal strength. A few buildings with some miltants firing AKs does not qualify. Besides, few in the 80s had a problem criticising the Russians as cowards for their use of Hind gunships against the mudjahadeen. This logic is valid now as it was then.

Degrees of defence/ offence capability are crucial in deciding comparative courage and honour. Otherwise we cannot judge conduct in the field of human conflict.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Here is an interesting development:
Quote:
Pentagon Reports U.S. Airstrike Killed 5 Afghan Civilians, Not 90

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, August 29, 2008; A04



A U.S. military review of an airstrike last week in western Afghanistan maintains that only five civilians were killed, Pentagon officials said yesterday, a finding that starkly contradicts reports by the United Nations and Afghan officials that the civilian death toll from the bombing was at least 90....
Pentagon Reports U.S. Airstrike Killed 5 Afghan Civilians, Not 90

I wonder who has it right?
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,270

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisdom_Seeker View Post
I dont see why we cant show any emotions regarding this issue. 90 innocent women and children are killed. WE DAM SHOULD SHOW EMOTIONS. Its about being human. Or do you only show emotions at dead Americans?

If you dont show emotions at dead children, then you are one heartless cold son of a gun.


WS.
to bad you only practice that on your own limited level, though eh?

not all dead children are equal are they?
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
to bad you only practice that on your own limited level, though eh?

not all dead children are equal are they?
Interesting comment.

Care to explain?
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,270

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Interesting comment.

Care to explain?
no, its in past posts in other topics most especially displayed in the Israeli palast. context......lets say the old saying where in; ‘all pigs are not equal' is quite apt as to WS's approach to according or assigning sympathy to dead children, civilians etc.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
no, its in past posts in other topics most especially displayed in the Israeli palast. context......lets say the old saying where in; ‘all pigs are not equal' is quite apt as to WS's approach to according or assigning sympathy to dead children, civilians etc.
Thank you, I take its your opinion that WS puts dead Palestinian children above dead Isreali children, correct?

Or does he just think the difference in numbers is significant?

Anyway, WS, this is a rather underhand attack, but very cutting.

What say you?
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,400

United_States    
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Thank you, I take its your opinion that WS puts dead Palestinian children above dead Isreali children, correct?

Or does he just think the difference in numbers is significant?

Anyway, WS, this is a rather underhand attack, but very cutting.

What say you?
Use the search feature and find out what WS has to say about dead Israelis or Americans (children or otherwise) vs. dead Palestinians/Iraqis/Afghanis (children or otherwise).
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 08-30-2008
Wisdom_Seeker's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: my house
Posts: 1,577

   
Re: UN confirms 90 civilians killed in US airstrike

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
to bad you only practice that on your own limited level, though eh?

not all dead children are equal are they?
I dare you to prove evidence where I have differentiated between dead Israeli children with dead palestinian children.

I have clearly condemned attacks on Israeli civilians by Hamas or Hizbullah.

You failed to provide the same when on a daily basis palestinian children were being killed.

You have also failed to condemn this attack in Afghanistan. The same with Si Modo.... all you two did here was avoiding this point by diverting into other completely irrelevant conversations.... usually pointless attacks such as this one.

So I am waiting for your proof where I said its ok for Israeli children to die and not ok for palestinian children.

If you cant provide this, it will be nice of you to apologise, oh and to provide a condemnation of this US attack on afghani children.

WS.
__________________
"You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom"- Malcom X
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online