Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Some good events
1) Pope John Paul II resisting communism and helped end communism in Poland. CBC News Indepth: POPE JOHN PAUL II 2) Dietrich Bonhoeffer's (Lutheran Pastor) fight against Hitler Dietrich Bonhoeffer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 3) The Jubilee movement to forgive third world debt comes from the Biblical idea of debt cancellations every 50th year.
__________________
"A dog barks when his master is attacked. I would be a coward if I saw that God's truth is attacked and yet would remain silent." -John Calvin |
|
|||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Re: Religious Politics
I think it is due to a poverty of State-ism in those regions. In my opinion, any region experiencing excessive anarchy should be able to petition the UN for a republican form of government.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Quote:
lpfan |
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Quote:
ya know? LPfan |
|
|||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Religious faith has always been a highly significant and powerful factor in human life throughout history; the prevalence of atheism and materialism in the west is recent development and an anomaly.
Anythng that is a powerful motivating issue has been used as a cause for war. Power, money. honor, ambition, family quarrels and prestige are other powerful factors and they usually can't be separated. Those who wage war will use anything that is important to people. There is nothing surprising about that. |
|
|||
|
Re: Religious Politics
What is the opinion of religion and politics in the US, from the viewpoint of having "under God" in the pledge, but no legislated anti-hypocrisy laws or religious moral tests for Constitutional offices?
How can any political leader in the US be taken seriously, from a moral standpoint, if they have to resort to a form of affirmative action concerning morals? From a public policy perspective, is it more moral to allow for official poverty while wasting taxpayer monies on public policy schemes that do not provide for the general welfare of the republic? By no latitude of construction can the wars on drugs and terror be considered providing for the common Defense or general Welfare of the United States. Why is it that those projects can be funded, at exorbitant cost to the taxpayer, if they are not specifically enumerated in our Constitution? Eliminating official poverty could be said, with some latitude of construction, to provide for both the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; by denying and disparaging (according to Aristotle) the parent of revolution and crime: poverty, as officially recognized with the full faith and credit of public acts of the United States. |
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Quote:
__________________
... .................. We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
|
|||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Quote:
We have a supreme code law of the land. It is called the US Constitution. |
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
Could you give a few specific examples of these "religious" laws and explain why you call them "religious" laws?
__________________
... .................. We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
|
|||
|
Re: Religious Politics
A simple example would be the Ten Commandments. Almost everyone is familiar with them. Those "laws" are purely religious in nature. Being religious however, does not mean that they cannot serve secular and practical purposes; such as ensuring the domestic tranquility.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
How did you come to that conclusion?
__________________
... .................. We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
|
||||
|
Re: Religious Politics
How did you come to that conclusion that they are "purely religious in nature"?
__________________
... .................. We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|