Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #106 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 23,528

United_States    
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisdom_Seeker View Post
When it comes to Israel's behaviour? I think this recent news says it all really:

Al Jazeera English - Middle East - Israel evicts Palestinian families

Israel is not interested in a two state solution, it wants Palestinians to dissapear

WS.
we have a thread on this.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #107 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: A federation starship in the Altair system
Posts: 98

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by joyb View Post
it says what it says, writing a revision about the events that took place doesn't change it's simplified language, which is interpreted by most in the international community to mandate israeli withdrawal to the 1967 borders; but even if this resolution is open to interpretation; that doesn't change the fact that Israel is an aphartied state and it needs to deliver human rights in a 2 state solution, the 67 area being only 22% of that country but less when the occupied golan heits is considered, the population living in the territories is more than 22 or 18% of the total and then there are refugees , so independent of any un resolutions israel continues to have serious legitimacy issues as a racist aphartied state, if there is not adequate withdrawal then there is an aphartied scheme and not 2 states.
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but the moment you use the description "racist apartheid state" with respect to israel, the conversation with you ends, because it is proof you understand nothing of the situation, prefer to bait and slur rather than use facts and intelligent reasoning, and are not interested in a genuine dialogue.

I'd imagine the equivalent off switch for arab muslims would be to call all of them terrorists because of Bin Laden, it simply is a sign that the person prefers to screech nonsense, and not discuss.

Once I saw you use that phrase, there was no need to read anything else you wrote, or will write, in the future.
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: A federation starship in the Altair system
Posts: 98

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisdom_Seeker View Post
When it comes to Israel's behaviour? I think this recent news says it all really:

Al Jazeera English - Middle East - Israel evicts Palestinian families

Israel is not interested in a two state solution, it wants Palestinians to dissapear

WS.
Just as all of the jews HAD to leave gaza, they will all HAVE to leave the WB? You consider israel a racist state, because they do not allow arab muslims into jewish areas, but then they themselves are not allowed to live in muslim ones?

When the 2 states are established, will jews be allowed to live in the arab nation, or will they all have to be cleared out - yet israel will have to continue to accept a large portion of arab muslim citizens?
Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old 08-04-2009
Wisdom_Seeker's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: my house
Posts: 1,587

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodescholar View Post
Just as all of the jews HAD to leave gaza, they will all HAVE to leave the WB? You consider israel a racist state, because they do not allow arab muslims into jewish areas, but then they themselves are not allowed to live in muslim ones?

When the 2 states are established, will jews be allowed to live in the arab nation, or will they all have to be cleared out - yet israel will have to continue to accept a large portion of arab muslim citizens?
What are you talking about? This is not nuclear science. There is clear injustice taking place and you have to acknowledge that. If you dont acknowledge that Israel is oppressing Palestinians and grabbin their land and property to bring jews to replace them..... il do what you did with Joyb above... il ignore your ignorant ass in this forum for the rest of your life.

You dont understand what a two state solution is do ya?? I am not the one who labelled Israel as a racist state,... it labelled itself through its behaviour. If you want to be an Israel apologist who thinks it is 21st century cool to support israel. . . well il repeat, il ignore your ignorant ass for ever.... for everrrrrrr i tells ya.

WS.
__________________
"You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom"- Malcom X
Reply With Quote
  #110 (permalink)  
Old 09-07-2009
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: A federation starship in the Altair system
Posts: 98

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wisdom_Seeker View Post
You dont understand what a two state solution is do ya?? I am not the one who labelled Israel as a racist state,... it labelled itself through its behaviour. If you want to be an Israel apologist who thinks it is 21st century cool to support israel. . . well il repeat, il ignore your ignorant ass for ever.... for everrrrrrr i tells ya. WS.

I am quaking that you might ignore my posts.

As for a 2-state solution, fine let israel leave the WB - but the terrorism and animalism from the arab muslim side would just continue, and it will not provide a peaceful solution, just as it did not for Gaza or in the North.

So long as arab muslims do not tolerate the sovereignty of minorities in the middle east, this war will continue.

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LAND, NOTHING.
Reply With Quote
  #111 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-2009
Secretary of Defense
Incrementally from Smiley to Big Bad Bill to NOT SO Sweet William :)

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: south west usa
Posts: 2,123
Blog Entries: 81

United_States     Texas

Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodescholar View Post
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but the moment you use the description "racist apartheid state" with respect to israel, the conversation with you ends, because it is proof you understand nothing of the situation, prefer to bait and slur rather than use facts and intelligent reasoning, and are not interested in a genuine dialogue.

I'd imagine the equivalent off switch for arab muslims would be to call all of them terrorists because of Bin Laden, it simply is a sign that the person prefers to screech nonsense, and not discuss.

Once I saw you use that phrase, there was no need to read anything else you wrote, or will write, in the future.
How would you describe Israel ? It is referred to as a Jewish State by its own inhabitants. It would seem Arabs do not have the same rights as Jews.

I think after 60+ years most Americans are very much aware of the situation

Now comes a real war monger to criticize our president.

Netanyahu: Schism With U.S. Grows Under Obama

What a large pair indeed !
Reply With Quote
  #112 (permalink)  
Old 09-14-2009
htperr6565's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 3,461

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodescholar View Post
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you this, but the moment you use the description "racist apartheid state" with respect to israel, the conversation with you ends, because it is proof you understand nothing of the situation, prefer to bait and slur rather than use facts and intelligent reasoning, and are not interested in a genuine dialogue.

I'd imagine the equivalent off switch for arab muslims would be to call all of them terrorists because of Bin Laden, it simply is a sign that the person prefers to screech nonsense, and not discuss.

Once I saw you use that phrase, there was no need to read anything else you wrote, or will write, in the future.
so would the conversation with many historical scholars end abruptly as well?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)  
Old 09-15-2009
Concerned Citizen

 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Thailand
Posts: 52

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

EVERY South African politician, activist, former apartheid government official, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, people on both sides of the previous system, labor unions, have described israel as a racist aphartied state..and most of them have remarked that the zionist system is worse than apharied era..
rhodescholars comment about arab animilism is proof that israel's supporters are fundamentally racists, anyone that believes a society should have different 'classes' of people, that a country with a mixed population can characterize itself as a state of "jewish people" (who are mostly immigrants from western countries and Russia) and confine the indigenous population to ghettos, constantly harassing them and practicing ethnic cleansing while stealing lands, and this is 'democratic' would have to be a racist, militancy against the most racist and repressive regime in the modern era is not animalism, it's resistance..

notice how he talks about zionist organizations trying to get his appearances at US universities canceled and calling him an "anti-semite" .. this is standard practice of zionists - calling anyone who criticizes zionism an antisemite.

Tutu to Haaretz: Arabs paying the price of the Holocaust - Haaretz - Israel News

never get security through fences, walls and guns," Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu of South Africa told Haaretz Thursday.

Commenting on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement in Germany Thursday that the lesson of the Holocaust is that Israel should always defend itself, Tutu noted that "in South Africa, they tried to get security from the barrel of a gun. They never got it. They got security when the human rights of all were recognized and respected."

The Nobel Prize laureate spoke to Haaretz in Jerusalem as the organization The Elders concluded its tour of Israel and the West Bank. He said the West was consumed with guilt and regret toward Israel because of the Holocaust, "as it should be."
Advertisement
"But who pays the penance? The penance is being paid by the Arabs, by the Palestinians. I once met a German ambassador who said Germany is guilty of two wrongs. One was what they did to the Jews. And now the suffering of the Palestinians."

He also slammed Jewish organizations in the United States, saying they intimidate anyone who criticizes the occupation and rush to accuse these critics of anti-Semitism. Tutu recalled how such organizations pressured U.S. universities to cancel his appearances on their campuses.

"That is unfortunate, because my own positions are actually derived from the Torah. You know God created you in God's image. And we have a God who is always biased in favor of the oppressed."

Tutu also commented on the call by Ben-Gurion University professor Neve Gordon to apply selective sanctions on Israel.

"I always say to people that sanctions were important in the South African case for several reasons. We had a sports boycott, and since we are a sports-mad country, it hit ordinary people. It was one of the most psychologically powerful instruments.

"Secondly, it actually did hit the pocket of the South African government. I mean, when we had the arms embargo and the economic boycott."

He said that when F.W. de Klerk became president he telephoned congratulations. "The very first thing he said to me was 'well now will you call off sanctions?' Although they kept saying, oh well, these things don't affect us at all. That was not true.

"And another important reason was that it gave hope to our people that the world cared. You know. That this was a form of identification."

Earlier in the day, Tutu and the rest of the delegation visited the village of Bil'in, where protests against the separation fence, built in part on the village's land, take place every week.

"We used to take our children in Swaziland and had to go through border checkpoints in South Africa and face almost the same conduct, where you're at the mercy of a police officer. They can decide when they're going to process you and they can turn you back for something inconsequential. But on the other hand, we didn't have collective punishment. We didn't have the demolition of homes because of the suspicion that one of the members of the household might or might not be a terrorist."

He said the activists in Bil'in reminded him of Ghandi, who managed to overthrow British rule in India by nonviolent means, and Martin Luther King, Jr., who took up the struggle of a black woman who was too tired to go to the back of a segregated bus.

He stressed his belief that no situation was hopeless, praising the success of the Northern Irish peace process. The process was mediated by Senator George Mitchell, who now serves as the special U.S. envoy to the Middle East.

Asked about the controversy in Petah Tikva, where several elementary schools have refused to receive Ethiopian school children, Tutu said that "I hope that your society will evolve."
Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2009
Secretary of Defense
Incrementally from Smiley to Big Bad Bill to NOT SO Sweet William :)

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: south west usa
Posts: 2,123
Blog Entries: 81

United_States     Texas

Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhodescholar View Post
I am quaking that you might ignore my posts.

As for a 2-state solution, fine let israel leave the WB - but the terrorism and animalism from the arab muslim side would just continue, and it will not provide a peaceful solution, just as it did not for Gaza or in the North.

So long as arab muslims do not tolerate the sovereignty of minorities in the middle east, this war will continue.

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LAND, NOTHING.
In respect to Winston's remarks

"Never in the field of human conflict has so much been "owed" by so many to so few".


The Arab states could use them today as a slogan with a different connotation !
Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: A federation starship in the Altair system
Posts: 98

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by joyb View Post
EVERY South African politician, activist, former apartheid government official, Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela, people on both sides of the previous system, labor unions, have described israel as a racist aphartied state..and most of them have remarked that the zionist system is worse than apharied era..
They have tried to ingratiate themselves with the far greater amounts of muslims, after being part of a country that was ostracised for decades.

Tutu's credibility is long gone, and I notice that you avoided my point in the post above, such as the lack of respect for minorities and the heinous treatment of them in arab muslim countries.

The arab muslim will not tolerate the sovereignty of other people, and this fact is so powerful that you cannot even address.

Quote:
rhodescholars comment about arab animilism is proof that israel's supporters are fundamentally racists, anyone that believes a society should have different 'classes' of people, that a country with a mixed population can characterize itself as a state of "jewish people" (who are mostly immigrants from western countries and Russia) and confine the indigenous population to ghettos, constantly harassing them and practicing ethnic cleansing while stealing lands, and this is 'democratic' would have to be a racist, militancy against the most racist and repressive regime in the modern era is not animalism, it's resistance..
Freaking hilarious, you treat someone like garbage for 1,000 years, then wonder why he wants a safe place far from you. Shocking.

And your lies about how israel is made up of people from outside the middle east is also hilarious, most israelis by a wide margin come from arab muslim countries, unlike the fakestinians - like arafat - who came from egypt, jordan or syria.

Interesting how you did not include quotes like those from Martin Luther King about how anti-zionism is actually anti-semitism - hatred of jews.
Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: A federation starship in the Altair system
Posts: 98

   
Re: West Bank vs. Gaza - Palestinians have a clear choice

Quote:
Originally Posted by skeptic1 View Post
How would you describe Israel ? It is referred to as a Jewish State by its own inhabitants. It would seem Arabs do not have the same rights as Jews.
So how come they don't leave if they have it so bad? 20% of israel is arab muslim, who enjoy FAR more rights than they would have in ANY arab muslim country. Why let facts get in the way of your arguments?

Quote:
I think after 60+ years most Americans are very much aware of the situation
Correct, which is why we support Israel so strongly.

Quote:
Now comes a real war monger to criticize our president.
Obama, the one-term president, i.e, the second coming of jimmy carter?

Last edited by Imperator; 11-15-2009 at 08:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online