Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Reply
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
MattLarson's Avatar
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 30,167

United_States     Florida

It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

... and Obama still hasn't made a decision. 76 days since request for more troops, Obama accused of stalling - Times Online

Seriously, WTF?

Hiding from this won't make it go away. Obama needs to step up and make a decision, one way or the other.

Time to do your job, Mr. President. Good men and women are dying while you dither.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Fidei Defensor's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
AMDG

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: in partibus infidelium
Posts: 3,199

United_States     Vatican

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

U.S. decision can't wait for Afghan legitimacy: Gates | Reuters
__________________
http://www.ecatholicchurches.com/eccuniversal/eccbanners/st_peters_square_1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,277

United_States    
Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

yea now we need to know if ali babba no.1 or 2 will be in office before we commit......hes floundering Matt. This is the VERY first, direct, real decision he and his 2 henchmen cum advertising agents have to make that they cannot in any way shape of form slough off on Bush.
And because he botched the Health Care bill he needs the anti war lefty’s to pipe down , they won’t, if he commits 40K, plus the depth of this alone is probably making his head explode, this isn’t some soup kitchen on the south side of Chicago, there isn't anyone to bedazzle in this gig, its gut check time.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."

Last edited by Imperator; 4 Weeks Ago at 01:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

he's been BUSY dammit ! Its not like he's just screwing around !

__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Mushroom's Avatar
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Jan 2009
Location: Al-Audib, Qatar
Posts: 427
Blog Entries: 1

United_States     Qatar

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

15 July 2008:

"Our troops and our NATO allies are performing heroically in Afghanistan, but I have argued for years that we lack the resources to finish the job because of our commitment to Iraq. That's what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said earlier this month. And that's why, as President, I will make the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win."

New York Times, 11 October 2009:

President Obama's national security team is moving to reframe its war strategy by emphasizing the campaign against Al Qaeda in Pakistan while arguing that the Taliban in Afghanistan do not pose a direct threat to the United States, officials said Wednesday.

And should anybody be surprised? I have spent the last 6 months sitting in a country he does not support, operating a weapons system he says does not work, protecting them against a country he says is not a threat.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
Vice President
Be Prepared to Make an Argument

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 6,403

United_States     Illinois

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

It seems to me that an important decision such as this merits taking some amount of time.

After all, we've been in Afghanistan for about 8 years now. This decision to make a troop increase has been pending for what? 2 months?

Also, the elections legitimately weigh in to this decision. The outcome is not yet known and the strategy...even McChristol's strategy could need adjustment. We are sticking it out in large force in Iraq mainly to ensure that things are stable after the 2010 elections there....The Afghan election outcome is just as crucial.

The governing body and the extent to which it's seen as the native people's own (and not just an extension of our power) is important. We need to get there both in Iraq and Afghanistan....and if it's just not going to happen, it may be wiser to leave.

In the end, the premium is on the correct decision, not the faster one.
__________________

The world could use more Stan Ovshinsky's
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
AkDiesel's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: USA-Alaska
Posts: 2,870

United_States     Alaska

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

But what if the so called correct decision comes to late?

Would it still be the Correct Decision?
__________________
Government Should Fear the People That Voted Them In!!

New Government=one that the President likes a GOP idea but then the Staff puts that Idea in a very DEEP HOLE.

Read HR143 get enlightment.

The Revolution Will not be Televised

off.gif
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
It seems to me that an important decision such as this merits taking some amount of time.

After all, we've been in Afghanistan for about 8 years now. This decision to make a troop increase has been pending for what? 2 months?

Also, the elections legitimately weigh in to this decision. The outcome is not yet known and the strategy...even McChristol's strategy could need adjustment. We are sticking it out in large force in Iraq mainly to ensure that things are stable after the 2010 elections there....The Afghan election outcome is just as crucial.

The governing body and the extent to which it's seen as the native people's own (and not just an extension of our power) is important. We need to get there both in Iraq and Afghanistan....and if it's just not going to happen, it may be wiser to leave.

In the end, the premium is on the correct decision, not the faster one.


its not like this is some ten year plan that cannot be adjusted. factors change all the time and all mentioned were in the mix already.

this is noting more than him being unable to get a clear direction of where the political winds here are blowing relative to his wanning political capital.

and thats the wrong reason to not act.
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
Vice President
Be Prepared to Make an Argument

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 6,403

United_States     Illinois

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by AkDiesel View Post
But what if the so called correct decision comes to late?

Would it still be the Correct Decision?
What impending timeline are we dealing with?

Is a Fall of Saigon scenario upon us?


IMO..no. We've held the fort for 8 years and though McChristol is anxious to do a full-fledged clear, hold, build, we are not under threat of being overrun.
__________________

The world could use more Stan Ovshinsky's
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
What impending timeline are we dealing with?

Is a Fall of Saigon scenario upon us?


IMO..no. We've held the fort for 8 years and though McChristol is anxious to do a full-fledged clear, hold, build, we are not under threat of being overrun.


Scout.... we WERE overrun the other day. One outpost yes, but do you not believe others are at risk ?
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 21,277

United_States    
Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
It seems to me that an important decision such as this merits taking some amount of time.

After all, we've been in Afghanistan for about 8 years now. This decision to make a troop increase has been pending for what? 2 months?

Also, the elections legitimately weigh in to this decision. The outcome is not yet known and the strategy...even McChristol's strategy could need adjustment. We are sticking it out in large force in Iraq mainly to ensure that things are stable after the 2010 elections there....The Afghan election outcome is just as crucial.

The governing body and the extent to which it's seen as the native people's own (and not just an extension of our power) is important. We need to get there both in Iraq and Afghanistan....and if it's just not going to happen, it may be wiser to leave.

In the end, the premium is on the correct decision, not the faster one.

uhm no, its been pondered for 8 months since McKiernan was sacked.
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Vice President
Speak like a clown, get Japanese latern cat

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,416

California     United_States

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
What impending timeline are we dealing with?

Is a Fall of Saigon scenario upon us?


IMO..no. We've held the fort for 8 years and though McChristol is anxious to do a full-fledged clear, hold, build, we are not under threat of being overrun.
No, but as clearly has been shown here, the hand-wringers and Obama-haters need something to whine and complain about.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
Vice President
Be Prepared to Make an Argument

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 6,403

United_States     Illinois

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
Scout.... we WERE overrun the other day. One outpost yes, but do you not believe others are at risk ?
I've heard of attacks...but I was unaware we were overrun. Care to point it out or expound?


Well, the way we have been taking casualties in short scuffles is because we are dispersed into small outposts. The Taliban try to overwhelm the small outposts with numbers and sometimes they are successful. But even when they are, it does not represent an existential tactical threat.

You do realize why McChristol wants additional forces, don't you? He wants to cover more area. Which doesn't address the problem of having small vulnerable outposts....there would just be more of them.
__________________

The world could use more Stan Ovshinsky's
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
chassisman's Avatar
Secretary of State
Right Wing Extremist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 10,384

United_States     Texas

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
... and Obama still hasn't made a decision. 76 days since request for more troops, Obama accused of stalling - Times Online

Seriously, WTF?

Hiding from this won't make it go away. Obama needs to step up and make a decision, one way or the other.

Time to do your job, Mr. President. Good men and women are dying while you dither.
A lot of people don't do anything when they don't know what to do. This is Obama's first lose-lose situation and he's frozen stiff.
__________________
Want government run healthcare? Join the military.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,837

United_States     Virginia

Re: It's been 76 days since the request for more troops in Afghanistan....

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
I've heard of attacks...but I was unaware we were overrun. Care to point it out or expound?


Well, the way we have been taking casualties in short scuffles is because we are dispersed into small outposts. The Taliban try to overwhelm the small outposts with numbers and sometimes they are successful. But even when they are, it does not represent an existential tactical threat.

You do realize why McChristol wants additional forces, don't you? He wants to cover more area. Which doesn't address the problem of having small vulnerable outposts....there would just be more of them.

the recent one

one before that

another one in 08 (NATO)
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online