Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > War & Peace
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

War & Peace A forum to discuss the current conflict with Iraq, North Korea, and the war on terrorism, as well as military/defense policy in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-20-2009
jviehe's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 16,803

United_States    
Brown Vows to Continue War Effort in Afghanistan

Im not a British expert, but it seems like they have more decisive leaders than we do in the US. I wish our Commander was as willing to committ. Of course I wish the Brits woulds send in an additional 50k troops, not 500.

Quote:
LONDON — As President Obama moves closer to a decision on the United States military’s request for more troops in Afghanistan, the British government has made an unflinching commitment to continue its role as the second largest troop provider in the 43-nation coalition fighting the war.

In the face of opinion polls suggesting that British public opinion has moved sharply against the war in the face of rising British casualties, Prime Minister Gordon Brown and David Miliband, the foreign secretary, used major speeches in the past two days to reaffirm Britain’s determination to fight on in Afghanistan alongside the United States.

They also renewed a commitment made last month to increase, by an initial increment of at least 500 soldiers, Britain’s current Afghan deployment of 9,000 troops. That compares with the 68,000 already committed by the United States, and 27,000 from other coalition countries. Mr. Obama has spent several weeks reviewing a request by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the American and NATO commander in Afghanistan, for a further increase of as many as 40,000 troops.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/wo...18britain.html

I cant imaging this coming out of Obamas mouth

Quote:
Vigilance in the defense of national security will never be sacrificed to expediency. Necessary resolution will never succumb to appeasement. The greater international good will never be subordinated to the mood of the passing moment
__________________
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2009
Secretary of Defense
Incrementally from Smiley to Big Bad Bill to NOT SO Sweet William :)

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: south west usa
Posts: 2,170
Blog Entries: 82

United_States     Texas

Re: Brown Vows to Continue War Effort in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Im not a British expert, but it seems like they have more decisive leaders than we do in the US. I wish our Commander was as willing to committ. Of course I wish the Brits woulds send in an additional 50k troops, not 500.



http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/18/wo...18britain.html

I cant imaging this coming out of Obamas mouth
It is time to call off the dogs of war and regroup !

The Brits are sending only 500 ,men because they are not "total ass holes".

Bush's war has come to its predictable end for the West.

Time to wake up and smell the Roses on a massive scale !
__________________
Laws are purchased-Justice is prayed for.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2009
jviehe's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 16,803

United_States    
Re: Brown Vows to Continue War Effort in Afghanistan

The predictable end of being lost by a democrat?
__________________
"To take from one, because it is thought his own industry and that of his father has acquired too much, in order to spare to others who (or whose fathers) have not exercised equal industry and skill, is to violate arbitrarily the first principle of association, "to guarantee to everyone a free exercise of his industry and the fruits acquired by it."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online