Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net


Page 1 of 43 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 639

Thread: Wikileaks...

  1. #1
    Steve Guest

    Wikileaks...

    It's probably time to send a squad after the fuck-sticks at Wikileaks. If what they're doing even remotely threatens operations, they need to be dealt with as foreign combatants are most often dealt with...

  2. #2
    O'Sullivan Bere's Avatar
    O'Sullivan Bere is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    11,781
    Rep Power
    1046

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    It's probably time to send a squad after the fuck-sticks at Wikileaks. If what they're doing even remotely threatens operations, they need to be dealt with as foreign combatants are most often dealt with...
    Indeed, Rasmussen put it well as quoted in your linked article:

    . . . NATO chief Anders Fogh Rasmussen said any release would create "a very unfortunate situation."

    "I can't comment on the details of the exact impact on security, but in general I can tell you that such leaks ... may have a very negative security impact for people involved," he told reporters Friday in Berlin following a meeting with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. . . .
    This isn't appropriate material for the usual Internet wave of voyeuristic indulgences, much of which is legally and/or ethically questionable anyway. It's dangerous and deadly business to do that and it's not material to which they are entitled to possess, never mind distribute and publicise globally. We're not talking about legitimate whistleblowing on illegal conduct, but dumping massive classified documents regarding a UN authorised and international forces war against a global threat, namely AQ and its Taliban ally. Enacting and/or enforcing criminal laws prohibiting and sanctioning such conduct ought to be in order.

  3. #3
    tsquare's Avatar
    tsquare is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    12,405
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    2293

  4. #4
    goober's Avatar
    goober is offline President
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    massachusetts
    Posts
    20,575
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Of course it begs the question, how does a website get a hold of 390,000 pages of classified documents?

  5. #5
    hairballxavier is offline President
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    The Crossroads ...
    Posts
    14,244
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
    I ask for not the first time... why are these guys (guy?) still alive?
    I think they should capture them alive and get medieval on their asses with a pair of pliers and a blowtorch until they turn in the mole who gave them access to the classified documents. Then shoot them.

  6. #6
    Wallaroo's Avatar
    Wallaroo is offline Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,366
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by O'Sullivan Bere View Post
    Indeed, Rasmussen put it well as quoted in your linked article:
    Rasmussen is the former danish PM - a stupid fucking cunt and nazi-asshole that has NEVER admitted to have made ANY mistakes in his entire political career. In his last years as PM he were almost never present at home, but used most of his time to travel around and kissing asses to become General secretary of NATO (not exactly what he was paid to do as a PM). All this while completely denying to everybody that he was a canditate for the job.

    But enough about that cocksucker - he is propably right in this particular case.
    Never trust a man who doesn't swear!

  7. #7
    Steve Guest

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by goober View Post
    Of course it begs the question, how does a website get a hold of 390,000 pages of classified documents?
    It does.

    But that, of course, doesn't negate the fact that the fuckers involved in this should be aerated...

  8. #8
    Rakkasan's Avatar
    Rakkasan is offline President
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Woodlawn, TN
    Posts
    13,194
    Rep Power
    1062

    Re: Wikileaks...

    this calls for a cyber attack

  9. #9
    Farouk is offline Citizen
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    20
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    It's probably time to send a squad after the fuck-sticks at Wikileaks. If what they're doing even remotely threatens operations, they need to be dealt with as foreign combatants are most often dealt with...

    Do you listen to yourself? You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech. I'll fucking say it again:

    You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech.

    That's quite astounding to me. And sad.

  10. #10
    Ernie S.'s Avatar
    Ernie S. is offline Secretary of Defense
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,588
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by Farouk View Post
    Do you listen to yourself? You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech. I'll fucking say it again:

    You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech.

    That's quite astounding to me. And sad.
    Freedom of speech doesn't extend to treason, and treason is a capitol offense.
    I'm sick and tired of my brothers and sisters dying to preserve America's right to drive like assholes.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  11. #11
    Steve Guest

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by Farouk View Post
    Do you listen to yourself? You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech. I'll fucking say it again:

    You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech.

    That's quite astounding to me. And sad.
    I don't believe Wikileaks is an American organization. As such, I don't give a fuck about their "rights" if their "rights" threaten our operations or our people...

  12. #12
    Lutherf's Avatar
    Lutherf is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    9,795
    Rep Power
    1013

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Unfortunately it looks like this is going to be the new norm. Lots of military personnel have been unhappy with their responsibilities through the years and many choose to see only their version of what's happening. These people often choose to take action against the military for perceived "atrocities". It isn't a new thing but before, where an enemy agent had to seek out these malcontents and compromise them (not always too difficult a task) they now need look no farther than the internet.

    I'd be willing to bet that the turds that leaked this stuff feel mighty proud of themselves and if someone dies because of their actions....well, it's a pity but, of course, it's all for the greater good.

  13. #13
    Disillusioned_1's Avatar
    Disillusioned_1 is offline Vice President
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    9,135
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Since wikileaks is an international group, it wouldn't necessarily be treason. Enemy combatant possibly, but not treason unless its americans or other coalition citizens.

  14. #14
    Wallaroo's Avatar
    Wallaroo is offline Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    1,366
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Wikileaks...

    International law must be too lax if wikileaks does not belong to a certain country, and this is possible to publish without consequences. Blame the politicians, as usual.
    Never trust a man who doesn't swear!

  15. #15
    tsquare's Avatar
    tsquare is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    12,405
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    2293

    Re: Wikileaks...

    Quote Originally Posted by Farouk View Post
    Do you listen to yourself? You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech. I'll fucking say it again:

    You are are calling for the death of people who use their right to freedom of speech.

    That's quite astounding to me. And sad.
    There are limits to free speech. Prime among them is the endangerment of others. This is sometimes know by 'you can't yell FIRE! in a crowded theater'

    That you don't know this is quite astounding to me. And sad.

Similar Threads

  1. The Effect of WikiLeaks
    By Hoplite in forum Humanities Issues
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 10-18-2011, 11:26 AM
  2. Tunisia/Wikileaks
    By Andrewl in forum Breaking News
    Replies: 89
    Last Post: 01-25-2011, 07:38 PM
  3. Is Wikileaks culpable?
    By CharlesDavenport in forum War & Peace
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 01-03-2011, 04:10 AM
  4. Is Wikileaks culpable?
    By CharlesDavenport in forum Breaking News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-20-2010, 09:34 PM
  5. A question about Wikileaks
    By Agentorange in forum The White House
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-12-2010, 03:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •