Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net

















heres the definition of religion:
–noun
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects: the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices: a world council of religions.
4. the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.: to enter religion.
5. the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6. something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience: to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7. religions, Archaic . religious rites.
8. Archaic . strict faithfulness; devotion: a religion to one's vow.
None of those rule out beliefs with apostasy laws. You don't get to make up definitions dude. We have a common language, one who's terms you do not get to dictate. :rolleyes:





Of course you do, never said you didn't. And that Candidate would be elected PRESIDENT, not SUPREME DICTATOR FOR LIFE. The President and Congress can no more legally do what you suggest than your suggested dictator could. Those policies are strictly against the Constitution and the founding principles of our nation. To put them into motion would be to void the social contract that is the Constitution. You do that and the government is nothing but armed thugs, devoid of all right authority and I will shoot them along with a significant portion of the population.









Just about any evangelical denomination falls into the same general category, even though most aren't quite as extreme. You'd have to go outside the U.S. to find Christian groups as extremely rigid as the Wahhabi.
Exactly the same problem as I have with a Wahhabi Muslim or a member of the Taliban. The common thread here is a belief that one has a monopoly on Truth, that God is on one's side and that all unbelievers are either agents or dupes of Satan. From this comes all the religious wars and persecutions, regardless of what religion it's done in the name of.And what problem do you have with a "typical evangelical Christan"?
If Adam Smith were alive today, he'd be a socialist.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Mohandas K. Gandhi
Robin, a science-fiction dystopic version of the Robin Hood myth: http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/44436




People who say Islam is a threat, are threats.
Anyone who says this, is a potential bin Ladin. Your attitude is EXACTLY the same as his, merely reversing the religions involved. He calls for violence against Christians and Jews. You call for violence against Muslims. He is a religious bigot. So are you. Peas in a pod. Except he has more money.1.5 billion Muslims are potential bin Ladens
If Adam Smith were alive today, he'd be a socialist.
"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." Mohandas K. Gandhi
Robin, a science-fiction dystopic version of the Robin Hood myth: http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/44436
Naw, you're full of it DT. None are anything like Wahhabists. Can you give even a single example?
Again, full of it. Evangelical Christians don't believe all unbelievers are agents or dupes of Satan. You're just plain making shit up. Again, how about a single credible, verifiable example.Exactly the same problem as I have with a Wahhabi Muslim or a member of the Taliban. The common thread here is a belief that one has a monopoly on Truth, that God is on one's side and that all unbelievers are either agents or dupes of Satan. From this comes all the religious wars and persecutions, regardless of what religion it's done in the name of.
I'll wait.........
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.







So you admit that Christianity does preach violence and death against witches?
Unless it's a witch, I suppose.
So what? They can easily get around that by not considering the killing of a witch to be murder. A time to kill and all...The 10 Commandments say Thou Shall Not Murder.




Actually you're not aware of any such thing. Casualty figures for 911 were just under 3000 - and that includes people in the pentagon and those on the planes. Of these approx 372 were foreign nationals ( the single biggest group were from my own country: The UK ) I'd happily grant that 3,000 odd people died and the majority were American, but your statement is factually incorrect.
England has no eternal friends and no eternal enemies, only eternal interests - Palmerston
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)
The only fundamental fallacy being promoted here is by you. If people go directly against the teachings and doctrines of Christianity that is a corruption of Christianity. Christianity does not teach violence and you've, yet, been able to show evidence to prove otherwise. What you have done is blow a smoke screen about what you want Christianity to mean. I've already proven you wrong once, on this point.
With your convoluted logic I could say something like....
The USA promotes to murder of innocent people because Charles Manson killed people and he is a US citizen.
"The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." - John Maynard Keynes (admits his philosophy is not viable)
Bookmarks