Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > The White House
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The White House A forum to discuss politics regarding the President, Vice President, the Cabinet and the executive branch of government in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,900

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViPER View Post
Why do you make this ridiculous claim?


Also - the majority of the donating military support Paul.
Read your signature.

Less than 1% of all military personnel support Ron Paul using your OWN stats in your OWN link...yet your link says he is "number 1 among the military."

Your math sucks, dude.

But you already know that, because I have created a thread and proven your claim is false on its base, and complete nonsense.

I don't know why you bother acting as though you are surprised by your own false statement.

You are correct in that the majority of the MONEY that went to the cadidates, a TOTAL, ALL TOGETHER, of 16,440 dollars among 2.2 MILLION soldies went to Ron Paul.

Change your false signature to say "Number one in the dollar amount donated to candidates" and it will no longer be a blatant lie.

Saying that $16,440 = the majority among the military.....or number one among the military is a blatant lie.

It's pretty sad when you need false statements to back your candidate, and you are dishonoring the military by falsely stating that he is "number one" among them.

What you've stated is completely false and totally misleading, and I will continue to point it out, right up until you end up on the ignore list.
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,900

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

But, anyway...there have been over 900 arrests for terrorism since 2004, and there have been over 400 convictions thus far as of Jan 2007, including airline bomber and US citizen planning to bomb the US, Jose Padilla.

So to say that not a single American has been convicted of terrorism...is a lie at worst, and idiotic at best....or maybe just plain old ignorance.

And it is sad that any of them wanted to do anything to harm their country.
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2007
ViPER's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
ExRepublican - NeoModerate - anti-Neocon

 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,782

United_States     Texas

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

As I said, Site specific cases to support your claim. Padilla was detained on a flight from Paris - how would giving up our rights have helped with Padilla?
__________________
The bush administration and bank lobbyists proudly killing our economic system - 2003.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2007
MattInFla's Avatar
Administrator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 31,336

United_States     Florida

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Yes, he was detained on a US air carrier on a flight from Paris.

He was convicted in a US court.

The US court was, of course, in the US.

Therefore, you claim that there have been no terror convictions in the US in wrong.

Just accept it and move on.

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,900

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViPER View Post
As I said, Site specific cases to support your claim.

As I said, you first....

I gave you everything you need...but it rocks your fantasy world where everything you believe is correct....therefore you just ignore it and continue the drivel. Must be scary for you that all your false statements shown to be what they are....false, and complete nonsense.
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 11-17-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,900

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
Yes, he was detained on a US air carrier on a flight from Paris.

He was convicted in a US court.

The US court was, of course, in the US.

Therefore, you claim that there have been no terror convictions in the US in wrong.

Just accept it and move on.

Matt

He's wrong on just about everything that comes from his cakehole, but he won't let a little thing like proof of it slow him down...
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
ViPER's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
ExRepublican - NeoModerate - anti-Neocon

 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,782

United_States     Texas

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
Yes, he was detained on a US air carrier on a flight from Paris.

He was convicted in a US court.

The US court was, of course, in the US.

Therefore, you claim that there have been no terror convictions in the US in wrong.

Just accept it and move on.

Matt
Semantics

Never the less his terror conviction is not based on crimes committed on US soil and does not reflect any mythical notions of sleeper cells within our borders.

Simply provide one source of a conviction as a result of terrorist crimes committed on US soil since 911. Even better that such a conviction showed ties to AQ. There are none.
__________________
The bush administration and bank lobbyists proudly killing our economic system - 2003.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 23,692

United_States    
Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViPER View Post
Semantics

Never the less his terror conviction is not based on crimes committed on US soil and does not reflect any mythical notions of sleeper cells within our borders.

Simply provide one source of a conviction as a result of terrorist crimes committed on US soil since 911. Even better that such a conviction showed ties to AQ. There are none.
semantics??...uh huh....look who’s talking.....so catching someone in the planning stage of an act and proving, by conviction of such is now disregarded as a condition regards terrorism...and Mossaui who was convicted of planning and being part of 911? He was not part of AQ huh? Oh that doesn’t count..yea semantics.... head meet wall....
__________________

"The captain has turned off the `No Dubbing' sign. You are free to speak any language you choose."
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,900

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

This is just typical of someone who will lie and ignore proof to protect himself from admitting when he's wrong.

He's the type who could convince himself so well that he'd be able to pass a lie-detector.

Completely unhinged and totally obsessed...with himself.
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 15,343

United_States    
Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViPER View Post
Semantics

Never the less his terror conviction is not based on crimes committed on US soil and does not reflect any mythical notions of sleeper cells within our borders.

Simply provide one source of a conviction as a result of terrorist crimes committed on US soil since 911. Even better that such a conviction showed ties to AQ. There are none.
Yes, semantics...the actual meaning, you know. Beyond hope. *shaking her head in disbelief*

It looks like the only "myths" that you post are yours and yours alone - in your head.
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
Steve's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 23,280

   
Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by ViPER View Post
Never the less his terror conviction is not based on crimes committed on US soil and does not reflect any mythical notions of sleeper cells within our borders.
Are you suggesting that there are no such cells in the United States?
__________________



For those who have fought to defend it, freedom has a taste the protected will never know...



If it wasn't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all...
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
ViPER's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
ExRepublican - NeoModerate - anti-Neocon

 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,782

United_States     Texas

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
semantics??...uh huh....look who’s talking.....so catching someone in the planning stage of an act and proving, by conviction of such is now disregarded as a condition regards terrorism...and Mossaui who was convicted of planning and being part of 911? He was not part of AQ huh? Oh that doesn’t count..yea semantics.... head meet wall....
If he got on the plane in the US - would even one case warrant all the lawless actions of government to diminish our rights in the US? No, I don't think so - even the fact of zero cases does not warrant lawlessness by government as well.
__________________
The bush administration and bank lobbyists proudly killing our economic system - 2003.
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
ViPER's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
ExRepublican - NeoModerate - anti-Neocon

 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: United States
Posts: 2,782

United_States     Texas

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Are you suggesting that there are no such cells in the United States?
Sleeper Cells is a Neocon myth. Growing hatred for the US is the result of reckless neocon policy changing American Values to shit, and the ongoing relationship of two right-wing extreme entities - The neocons and AQ.
__________________
The bush administration and bank lobbyists proudly killing our economic system - 2003.
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2007
Meridious's Avatar
Ron Paul is a Nutwackaroo

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: USA - Beacon of Freedom and Democracy
Posts: 2,900

Alaska     Scotland

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Like I said, obsessed and unhinged.

Totally dicsonnected from reality, and living in a fantasy-land of upside-down mathematics and wacko K0nspiracies.
__________________

"War is nothing but a continuation of politics with the admixture of other means"
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2007
Secretary of Defense
Incrementally from Smiley to Big Bad Bill to NOT SO Sweet William :)

 
Member Since: Sep 2007
Location: south west usa
Posts: 2,166
Blog Entries: 82

United_States     Texas

Re: Government seeks to redefine privacy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus1124 View Post
Please point to the "right to privacy" in the Constitution?
Article Four: Would seem enough to indicate just how serious the framers were about privacy. Read it !!

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall be issue, BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE, Supported by oath or affermation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online