Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > The White House
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The White House A forum to discuss politics regarding the President, Vice President, the Cabinet and the executive branch of government in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 831

   
Re: Obama , War, and the liberal left

Quote:
Time will tell what the better plan was, drawing terrorist insurgents into Iraq where they could be eliminated in a somewhat simple fashion, or having a brand new Vietnam where the tunnels and VC networks are now Paki mountain villages and Afghan caves. America will tire of the Afghan war as it will be long and probably somewhat futile.
The solution is actually a lot simpler than all that, but there is a lack of will to do what is really necessary to deal with terrorist cretins; it is actually much easier politically to get millions killed and drag it all out for decades rather than just do the most direct and effective tactics, which is to use their own methods against them.

None of these groups are 'independents', just loose cannons running around. They are all government sponsored and sheltered , usually by more than one government. Once you start extracting a price from these governments, in blood and treasure, these groups disappear, virtually overnight. Their former sponsors will hunt them down.
__________________
"The real question of life after death isn't whether or not it exists, but even if it does, what problems this really solves." - Ludwig Wittgenstein

"A day without sunshine is, you know, night."- Shannon
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,686

United_States     Russian

Re: Obama , War, and the liberal left

Quote:
Originally Posted by picaro View Post
The solution is actually a lot simpler than all that, but there is a lack of will to do what is really necessary to deal with terrorist cretins; it is actually much easier politically to get millions killed and drag it all out for decades rather than just do the most direct and effective tactics, which is to use their own methods against them.

None of these groups are 'independents', just loose cannons running around. They are all government sponsored and sheltered , usually by more than one government. Once you start extracting a price from these governments, in blood and treasure, these groups disappear, virtually overnight. Their former sponsors will hunt them down.
What evidence do you have that all of them are funded and controlled by national governments?
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,612

   
Re: Obama , War, and the liberal left

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
As Obama requests billions more to fight a war in Afghanistan, where are all the war is evil for lunch bunch? What happened to Cindy Sheehan? Is she ( and all the other pre Obama war protesters) OK with GI's dying as long as it's in Afghanistan and not Iraq? Where is all the tallying on how much is being spent per day, month, year, etc? I find it simply amazing that the left has obviously just chugged down a huge steaming cup of STFUAboutWar
Time will tell what the better plan was, drawing terrorist insurgents into Iraq where they could be eliminated in a somewhat simple fashion, or having a brand new Vietnam where the tunnels and VC networks are now Paki mountain villages and Afghan caves. America will tire of the Afghan war as it will be long and probably somewhat futile.
Yes. Ive noticed that as well. It will pick up again rather quickly when the coming slaughters and casualties start to mount up. Tis the fightin' season over there now and Obama has chosen to escalate.

I for one think Obama is an idiot for thinking he can accomplish anything lasting or positive in the "Afpak" theatre. But this strategy should not come as a surprise, it is what he campaigned on and that is also partly why there is so much silence. He has not betrayed his base, he has done what he said he was going to do.

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009
RingoStarr's Avatar
Citizen

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Here, There, and Everywhere
Posts: 20

United_States    
Re: Obama , War, and the liberal left

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
So all the al-q and other insurgents that showed up in Iraq were not the enemies of America. Go figger..............
Not until after the war started. Don't you remember the reason being WMD? Or was it Saddam, or...wait....
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2009
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: Obama , War, and the liberal left

Quote:
Originally Posted by picaro View Post
The solution is actually a lot simpler than all that, but there is a lack of will to do what is really necessary to deal with terrorist cretins; it is actually much easier politically to get millions killed and drag it all out for decades rather than just do the most direct and effective tactics, which is to use their own methods against them.

None of these groups are 'independents', just loose cannons running around. They are all government sponsored and sheltered , usually by more than one government. Once you start extracting a price from these governments, in blood and treasure, these groups disappear, virtually overnight. Their former sponsors will hunt them down.
Hmm, fight terror with terror!

Who would you like to terrorise and how?

Might I suggest mass murder of entire villages, suicide bombers and such?

Would you like to be such a suicide bomber? Im sure youd be good at it.
__________________
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if Labor had not first existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

Guess who?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online