Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Election - Page 4 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

Tanngrisnir3 · #46 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Drake

Well, first you have to send all the white people off to internment camps. Remember? Mudwhistle was the the first to warn us about them too.

To be fair, was it Mud or was it that short-lived Nazi sympathizer loonjob who claimed to have been shot by (wait for it......) A BLACK MAN in VA?

jet57 · #47 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlesDavenport

Remedial stuff. Judging by your sig, it would be a waste of time to Google it for you anyway.

All the easier for you then eh? But, you can't back up what you say, so --

You, mudwhitsle and Steve.

Got it.

CowboyTed · #48 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by mudwhistle

Very wrong.

That is not a democracy. That is an example of authoritarism.

Because my opinion doesn't count, thus my vote doesn't count, this country is being railroaded into being a country where some votes will count more then others.

This is supposed to be a Republic where I have a representative voice in Washington. But Obama is assuring that my voice will be silenced.

Notice in Obama's speeches that he rarely speaks of freedom. He mostly speaks of change. What he doesn't mention is the change he brings will be bad for most of us in favor of his special interest groups. His policies are designed to force us to change our habits due to economic hardship making everything in our lives more expensive thus curbing our consumption. This is the type of change he failed to illuminate and continues to hide.

I said 'that you opinion shoulds not be taken on board. ' not that I doesn't count. So please quote me probably. Your vote should not be taken because the country voted to marginalize your view.

He doesn't talk about Freedom all the time because it was a running joke by the time Bush had finished... Obama 'force' no one to do anything yet... Obama had to change after Bush, he said it in the election and the voters agreed.

John Drake · #49 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3

To be fair, was it Mud or was it that short-lived Nazi sympathizer loonjob who claimed to have been shot by (wait for it......) A BLACK MAN in VA?

I'm sorry if it wasn't Mud, but I think it was him AND Meritocrat, tho I can't be sure as I can't figure how to search for it.

And it really wouldn't work for gerrymandering a state either, but what, could gerrymandering a state for a Presidential election just be.... impossible?

mudwhistle · #50 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by CowboyTed

I said 'that you opinion shoulds not be taken on board. ' not that I doesn't count. So please quote me probably. Your vote should not be taken because the country voted to marginalize your view.

He doesn't talk about Freedom all the time because it was a running joke by the time Bush had finished... Obama 'force' no one to do anything yet... Obama had to change after Bush, he said it in the election and the voters agreed.

He rarely speaks about freedom because he doesn't believe in it.

That stupid election was not the end of the debate. I would be willing to bet that Obama wouldn't win today if he ran against any decent GOPer. And if Obama hadn't hidden his agenda I doubt seriously that he would have won in the first place.

mudwhistle · #51 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by goober

How do you gerrymander a state for the presidential election?

Same why Tom Delay did it in Texas. Isn't that what the Dems accused him of?

CowboyTed · #52 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by mudwhistle

He rarely speaks about freedom because he doesn't believe in it.

The stupid election was not the end of the debate. I would be willing to bet that Obama wouldn't win today if he ran against any decent GOPer.

He doesn't rabbit on about Freedom cause he has a vocabulary...

If!! There is a lot of ifs in this world... Well it won't happen so tough..

His approval ratings are still high..

mudwhistle · #53 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by redrover

I would like to think that Obama will be President for all Americans unlike Bush who didn't even pretend to represent people who didn't agree with him. When he came to our town to speak, the audiance was cherry picked. Why would Obama have to steal the election. Who do the Republicans have waiting in the wings? S. Pallin? Give me a break!

That's total horse-shit of course. Now how do you suppose Bush did that?

Bush never cherry picked a crowd.

Seems you have this impression that Bush's press fits his image.

They aren't even close.

Bush was loved by military. I was at one of his speeches and everyone loved him, even though the press claimed he was the cause of so many of their deaths.

Now how do you suppose he managed that?

And why is it Obama goes to a military post and 80% of the attendees are usually black?

Why is it 70% of us are worried about Obama's policies but 52% of us think he's a great guy? Maybe it's because the prick always gets all of the good press.

CowboyTed · #54 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by mudwhistle

That's total horse-shit of course. Now how do you suppose Bush did that?

Bush never cherry picked a crowd.

Seems you have this impression that Bush's press fits his image.

They aren't even close.

Bush was loved by military. I was at one of his speeches and everyone loved him, even though the press claimed he was the cause of so many of their deaths.

Now how do you suppose he managed that?

And why is it Obama goes to a military post and 80% of the attendees are usually black?

Why is it 70% of us are worried about Obama's policies but 52% of us think he's a great guy?

Could we have a few few links proving some of the stuff your spouting now..
Otherwise it would be termed as you put it 'total horse-shit'

John Drake · #55 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by mudwhistle

Bush never cherry picked a crowd.

Seems you have this impression that Bush's press fits his image.

They aren't even close.

Bush was loved by military. I was at one of his speeches and everyone loved him, even though the press claimed he was the cause of so many of their deaths.

Now how do you suppose he managed that?

And why is it Obama goes to a military post and 80% of the attendees are usually black?

Maybe, I don't know, he cherry picked them???

How can you tell anything about the rest of the crowd, what with all those tears in your eyes?

John Drake · #56 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by mudwhistle

That's total horse-shit of course. Now how do you suppose Bush did that?

Bush never cherry picked a crowd.

Seems you have this impression that Bush's press fits his image.

They aren't even close.

Bush was loved by military. I was at one of his speeches and everyone loved him, even though the press claimed he was the cause of so many of their deaths.

Now how do you suppose he managed that?

And why is it Obama goes to a military post and 80% of the attendees are usually black?

Why is it 70% of us are worried about Obama's policies but 52% of us think he's a great guy? Maybe it's because the prick always gets all of the good press.

Obviously, it's yet more evidence of the Great Black Conspriracy To Take Over America. They're all there to get the Secret Orders and be told when to go round up all the whites.

But, of course, that remark you made wasn't racist, I'm just being PC.

Rakkasan · #57 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Drake

Obviously, it's yet more evidence of the Great Black Conspriracy To Take Over America. They're all there to get the Secret Orders and be told when to go round up all the whites.

But, of course, that remark you made wasn't racist, I'm just being PC.

wow , you do talk in talking points when ever someone questions obama call them a racist

it isnt about black or white

its about blue or red

and by taking extra control over the census they dems will be able to redistrict and ensure more victories in the future,

it is what the ultra libs on here have been calling for since day one

hell goober has been jerking off to this concept since i came to the board

wooyarn · #58 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

All politicians cherry pick who they give speaches to from time to time. Both parties have gerrymandered at one time or another. But what I find really funny is watching all the forum "FRINGES" playing in the school yard. I think I even read things like "you poo-poo head" and "my daddies bigger then you're daddy" in the past, but I guess children have to play

Captain Trips · #59 (**permalink**) 06-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by wooyarn

All politicians cherry pick who they give speaches to from time to time. Both parties have gerrymandered at one time or another.

So, you don't beleive that Americas political "system" has become a corrupt mockery of itself ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by wooyarn

But what I find really funny is watching all the forum "FRINGES" playing in the school yard. I think I even read things like "you poo-poo head" and "my daddies bigger then you're daddy" in the past, but I guess children have to play

This is the internet

A place where bored teenagers, incompetents, malcontents and weirdos of every stripe come and "play." What were you expecting ?

Knute · #60 (**permalink**) 06-29-2009

Now don't tell me this isn't relevant to stealing elections :

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode