Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > The White House
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The White House A forum to discuss politics regarding the President, Vice President, the Cabinet and the executive branch of government in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,061
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger View Post
And some people who didn't vote for him don't feel he's the anti-christ.

Why is that?

Look, mate, we can play these games all day. Do you have real evidence that he's planning on rigging the next election or is this another one of your baseless attack threads.
Already posted.

He's personally taken over the Commerce Dept which controls the national census, placed the controls in the West Wing, and he's funding ACORN in the stimulus bill.

Once the census is done they'll redistrict key districts to favor their candidates. ACORN will flood the polls with millions of new registrations.

Obama is going around the Constitution by appointing a zar for just about every issue he dreams up. They're paid by our taxes but they answer to no one but Obama.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,061
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
At least have the courtesy to try and pesuade us to take our heads out the sand. So far there are no warning signs, Obama does belieive in freedom, you are the one without common sense and you are a practiced deceiver.
Pot, meet kettle.

Maybe someday you'll come up with something other then insults to prove your point.

It's always............"No, you suck". "This is soooooooo stupid".

You're gonna have to do better then that.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
Vice President
Speak like a clown, get Japanese latern cat

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,416

California     United_States

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
Already posted.

He's personally taken over the Commerce Dept which controls the national census, placed the controls in the West Wing, and he's funding ACORN in the stimulus bill.

Once the census is done they'll redistrict key districts to favor their candidates. ACORN will flood the polls with millions of new registrations.

Obama is going around the Constitution by appointing a zar for just about every issue he dreams up. They're paid by our taxes but they answer to no one but Obama.
That post is the honesty equivalent of 'hiking in Appalachia'.

Oh, just for fun: what's a 'zar'.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2009
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,061
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyTed View Post
In all fairness it is really only Mudwhitsle who is at it... I agree with you, Obama is playing this one right.. If he says anything about Iran the hardliners will use it as an excuse to crack down on the population more. Thus killing the revolution.

Iran has tried to open dialog in the past and the Bush admin shut it down. At the end of the day this revolution in Iran is only for the second job not the top job. The supreme leader is the only guy to talk too. Generally best to ignore the president especially if hostile.
The problem being that the Iranian people feel that their government is illegit so talking to them is establishing a false legitimacy and thus making us a party to their illegitimacy. So the Iranian people will hate us for it.

Bad call, if you as my opinion. What the people think should be more important but Obama really doesn't give a shit what the pee-ons think anyway.

And let us not forget that this same Iranian government has been responsible for the deaths of thousands of our kids in uniform over the years. But you folks don't give a flying-fuck about them now. Bush is out of office. Caring about dead soldiers is a thing of the past to you'all.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
WharfedaleTiger's Avatar
Moderator
Social Democrat

 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire/England
Posts: 2,353
Blog Entries: 1

England     European_Union

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
Already posted.

He's personally taken over the Commerce Dept which controls the national census, placed the controls in the West Wing, and he's funding ACORN in the stimulus bill.

Once the census is done they'll redistrict key districts to favor their candidates. ACORN will flood the polls with millions of new registrations.

Obama is going around the Constitution by appointing a zar for just about every issue he dreams up. They're paid by our taxes but they answer to no one but Obama.
Well, one would assume that as the sole executive he would have control over the commerce department as well and in a economic crisis having leverage and controls over such a key department would make sense. As a question, was Abe Lincoln tyring to rig the election when he enlisted the help of Weed? Was he trying to give the civil war to the south when he took control of the telegraph post in Washnington and gave McCellen direct orders? after all, he was a boarderline southerner and with your gneral reasoning that seems to be enough to damn someone.

Okay, I'm going to ask again now. Evidence. Real hard facts, not assertions now 'he will do this' but evidence that he is doing this. You seem to criticise him for doing things every president does; he appoints tsars (I prsume) to be in charge of things! Wow! because no president does that.

All officals in the US executive are answerable to Obama and Congress, all positions he appoints (as is his perogative) are answerable to Congress. He hasn't done anything unusal.
__________________
I am a Socalist. It's a simple term, but dreadfully misunderstood by most people. Plain words those four, and yet they seem to offend so many. What do they say to you? Humanity, kindness, co-operation and a fundimental belief in the dignity of humanity lie behind them. They are more than just words. So whenever you hear them just think, and look back on our history with pride. I am an Socalist; a tradition from Tolpuddle to Bevan.
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
Chocobot's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,049

   
Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
Pot, meet kettle.

Maybe someday you'll come up with something other then insults to prove your point.

It's always............"No, you suck". "This is soooooooo stupid".

You're gonna have to do better then that.
Interesting...

I really would go further to engage with you yet since you are continually unwilling to back up anything you say further than a few sentences I have to ask, is there any point?

Further I dont think my position re your efforts is such a tangent when its apparant that most of the participants on this thread and this board agree with me when I look around.

However, that said if you promise to stick around and argue at least one of your outlandish claims to a further extent than 'its my opinion' I will give you a go rather than simply calling you out as a deceiver. fair enough?

ok, you tell us that;
Quote:
The problem being that the Iranian people feel that their government is illegit so talking to them is establishing a false legitimacy and thus making us a party to their illegitimacy. So the Iranian people will hate us for it.
So please back this up that all the Iranian people feel their government is illegit.

then also please follow Wharfdale tigers request;
Quote:
Okay, I'm going to ask again now. Evidence. Real hard facts, not assertions now 'he will do this' but evidence that he is doing this. You seem to criticise him for doing things every president does; he appoints tsars (I prsume) to be in charge of things! Wow! because no president does that.
__________________
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if Labor had not first existed. Labor is superior to capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.

Guess who?
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
jet57's Avatar
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 904

United_States     Scotland

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Interesting...

I really would go further to engage with you yet since you are continually unwilling to back up anything you say further than a few sentences I have to ask, is there any point?

Further I dont think my position re your efforts is such a tangent when its apparant that most of the participants on this thread and this board agree with me when I look around.

However, that said if you promise to stick around and argue at least one of your outlandish claims to a further extent than 'its my opinion' I will give you a go rather than simply calling you out as a deceiver. fair enough?

ok, you tell us that;


So please back this up that all the Iranian people feel their government is illegit.

then also please follow Wharfdale tigers request;

You will find that none of the righwing extremists can or will back up anything they say with anythig tangible. They are simply extremely uniformed people who are capitalizing on the campaign of harrasment leveled on the president by the right. The extremists use venues like this forum - because they can. They get to see their nonsense in print and they feel heard.

I find it to be a shame because these folks can't at all engage in meaningful debate - they don't posess the capacity, and it really defeats the fun of this type of medium. These pople are impervius to any factual evidence and they just reply with more hysteria because that's all they are prepared to do.

Sometimes pot shots come in, that are really very funny: I'm guilty of it. But these people won't change. Any smart rightwingers know that our opposition arguments are correct, but they're certianly not going to come around here. Although I will say, that there are some from the right in this forum that are very very good at crytical thinking and analysis and put up excellent arguments that make it a workout, and that's the way it's supposed to be.

I think that perhaps the best thing to do with the mudwhistle type is to just completely ignore them - maybe that will work to show them the true value of ther opinions, and maybe they'll just go away after a time.
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 2,098
Blog Entries: 8

   
Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
The problem being that the Iranian people feel that their government is illegit so talking to them is establishing a false legitimacy and thus making us a party to their illegitimacy. So the Iranian people will hate us for it.

Bad call, if you as my opinion. What the people think should be more important but Obama really doesn't give a shit what the pee-ons think anyway.

And let us not forget that this same Iranian government has been responsible for the deaths of thousands of our kids in uniform over the years. But you folks don't give a flying-fuck about them now. Bush is out of office. Caring about dead soldiers is a thing of the past to you'all.
Proof!! Where is Iran responsible for killing thousands of Americans...
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
Evil_inKarlate's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
True Non-conformist

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,945

United_States    
Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Jumping back to the OP... Needs a little work to be a viable conspiracy theory, but then maybe the actual conspiracy isn't fully in place yet. It loses some steam based on the 'Bush will incite/allow/plan a terrorist attack' stupidity that preceded it, but seems quite plausible (at least in intent, not sure about execution, given the scale involved) for those of us who bother to remember The Big O is a product of the Chicago Political Machine.
__________________
Today's forecast: Government corruption.
Tomorrow's forecast: 100% chance of more 'politics as usual'

Maybe it's finally time to vote Libertarian
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
jet57's Avatar
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 904

United_States     Scotland

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evil_inKarlate View Post
Jumping back to the OP... Needs a little work to be a viable conspiracy theory, but then maybe the actual conspiracy isn't fully in place yet. It loses some steam based on the 'Bush will incite/allow/plan a terrorist attack' stupidity that preceded it, but seems quite plausible (at least in intent, not sure about execution, given the scale involved) for those of us who bother to remember The Big O is a product of the Chicago Political Machine.
I can't believe that your even hinting at taking that nonsense seriously. The president may be from the area of Chicago, but what has he done - or said for tha matter, that leads you conclude that he's connectd in any way to any political machine?
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,061
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyTed View Post
Proof!! Where is Iran responsible for killing thousands of Americans...
By training Somalis to kill Rangers in Mogadishu in 93'......


By training insurgents to kill our troops on the ground in Iraq....


And by providing the IEDs that work against armor......


Yes, they're responsible for the death of thousands.

Wake up.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,061
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger View Post
Well, one would assume that as the sole executive he would have control over the commerce department as well and in a economic crisis having leverage and controls over such a key department would make sense. As a question, was Abe Lincoln tyring to rig the election when he enlisted the help of Weed? Was he trying to give the civil war to the south when he took control of the telegraph post in Washnington and gave McCellen direct orders? after all, he was a boarderline southerner and with your gneral reasoning that seems to be enough to damn someone.

Okay, I'm going to ask again now. Evidence. Real hard facts, not assertions now 'he will do this' but evidence that he is doing this. You seem to criticise him for doing things every president does; he appoints tsars (I prsume) to be in charge of things! Wow! because no president does that.

All officals in the US executive are answerable to Obama and Congress, all positions he appoints (as is his perogative) are answerable to Congress. He hasn't done anything unusal.

By placing the Commerce Dept. in the West Wing he took Congress out of the loop. Congress is supposed to have oversight over every Dept. but now we have zars for every issue Obama can dream of and they don't answer to Congress. The only reason he can get away with this is because nobody will stop him. Congress is Democrat controlled and they aren't about to say anything.

The situation has changed in Washington. The Constitution is being ignored. Right now Obama can have the 22nd Amendment revolked if he wants to. He has the votes now. He has to do it before Nov. of next year. A bill is already in the works.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
mudwhistle's Avatar
Vice President
Strict Constitutionalist and Radical Right-wing Extremist

 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,061
Blog Entries: 41

United_States     Montana

Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocobot View Post
Interesting...

I really would go further to engage with you yet since you are continually unwilling to back up anything you say further than a few sentences I have to ask, is there any point?

Further I dont think my position re your efforts is such a tangent when its apparant that most of the participants on this thread and this board agree with me when I look around.

However, that said if you promise to stick around and argue at least one of your outlandish claims to a further extent than 'its my opinion' I will give you a go rather than simply calling you out as a deceiver. fair enough?

ok, you tell us that;


So please back this up that all the Iranian people feel their government is illegit.

then also please follow Wharfdale tigers request;
A majority of the Iranian people believe the election was a sham not all.

You ask a question that has a false premise.

When someone says The Iranian People it assumes that this is the popular majority. Never would one assume that every single friggen Iranian believes the same thing.

You want me to go to the trouble of proving my point then try to refrain from playing games.
__________________
It's hard to stay mad at someone who makes you laugh - Jay Leno
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
John Drake's Avatar
Secretary of State
The Last Eisenhower Republican

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 4,225

   
Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Quote:
Originally Posted by jet57 View Post
I can't believe that your even hinting at taking that nonsense seriously. The president may be from the area of Chicago, but what has he done - or said for tha matter, that leads you conclude that he's connectd in any way to any political machine?
Been a Democrat, and dared to run against a Republican, and even worse, he won.
__________________
Alizee Jacotay, the reason god invented hips
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 07-01-2009
CharlesDavenport's Avatar
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: us
Posts: 867

United_States    
Re: Obama Isn't Saying Much About Iran Elections Because He Plans On Stealing Electio

Is there a bloody forehead award at the year end USPOL awards? Should be.
__________________
"The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." - Margaret Thatcher
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online