Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > The White House
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The White House A forum to discuss politics regarding the President, Vice President, the Cabinet and the executive branch of government in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,623

United_States     Ohio

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

I'll be honest here. Every time I see legislation like this, it actually makes me lose respect for the groups that want to be favored in it. It creates hate, it doesn't minimize it.

edit: If it's what I'm thinking it is. If it's just a general "hate" bill, then I don't see the point but am not upset about it.
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,857

Georgia_state    
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

IMO, Federal hate crimes violate the very amendment the Left uses to justify their passage, ie, "equal protection under the law" in the 14th. OTOH, the 14th, also imo, doesn't nationalize every conceivable crime some would wish to protect against, as it could easily be used by an illogical and subjective Court to nationalize all crimes.
__________________
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. ---P. J. O'Rourke
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,623

United_States     Ohio

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleTed View Post
IMO, Federal hate crimes violate the very amendment the Left uses to justify their passage, ie, "equal protection under the law" in the 14th. OTOH, the 14th, also imo, doesn't nationalize every conceivable crime some would wish to protect against, as it could easily be used by a illogical and subjective Court to nationalize all crimes.


I agree, I'm all for equal treatment, tired of this special treatment crap. My guess is Jesse Jackson won't be speaking out against this.

Special treatment is only bad when it favors white males.
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
drgoodtrips's Avatar
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,913

   
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiggidy View Post
Makes me wonder why they would have to add specifics about ethnicity and religion. It's as if they are saying it's ok to hate some groups but not the ones specified in the bill.
I'm not positive, but I don't believe the bill says anything specific about any group. I think it just classifies a "hate crime" as one that is committed exclusively based on the race, religion (or now sexual orientation) of the victim.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,623

United_States     Ohio

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I'm not positive, but I don't believe the bill says anything specific about any group. I think it just classifies a "hate crime" as one that is committed exclusively based on the race, religion (or now sexual orientation) of the victim.

If that's all it is, I still don't agree with it, but am not going to lose any sleep over it.
Reply With Quote
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
timj219's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 5,523

United_States     New_York

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wiggidy View Post
They have more protection from the law. That's a benefit.

However, I'm still wondering about the specifics. If a white male is attacked because he is a white male, does he receive the same treatment?


edit: If two guys are getting in a fight outside of a bar, and another guy calls the other one a "faggot" before they fight but he doesn't know he's gay, does he get in more trouble for the assault?
How do they get "more protection"? The victim is already a victim before the perp is charged. That's not 'more protection".

As for your questions. Yes if a white male is attacked because he is a white male then the perp can be subject to hate crime prosecution. So a fanatical member of farakhans gorup who picks out a random victim because he wants to "get whitey" could be prosectured for a hate crime.
No the use of offensive language is not in itself basis for a hate crime prosecution. If the "faggot" yeller did not start the fight in order to get a faggot then it's just a bar fight.
__________________
The most important political office is that of the private citizen.
Justice Louis D Brandeis
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,623

United_States     Ohio

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219 View Post
How do they get "more protection"? The victim is already a victim before the perp is charged. That's not 'more protection".

As for your questions. Yes if a white male is attacked because he is a white male then the perp can be subject to hate crime prosecution. So a fanatical member of farakhans gorup who picks out a random victim because he wants to "get whitey" could be prosectured for a hate crime.
No the use of offensive language is not in itself basis for a hate crime prosecution. If the "faggot" yeller did not start the fight in order to get a faggot then it's just a bar fight.


Fair enough, these were the answers I was looking for. As I said in my last post, I don't agree with it, but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
timj219's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 5,523

United_States     New_York

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
I don't agree with hate crime legislation, so I can't speak for advocates of such policy, but I believe I understand the actual principle of the matter. This is my understanding of their argument

A "hate crime" is a crime that is committed with the intention of not only victimizing a particular person, but also intimidating a particular group. If a bunch of white guys in an area beat up a black guy simply because he's black, there is the crime of simple assault. However, there is also the underlying 'crime' in the message that they're sending to other black people who were not the actual victim - "you better not come around here or you're going to get your ass kicked." That is, the "hate crime" is a crime against a person and a de facto threat to all other people who share a particular characteristic with that person.

I don't support this sort of distinction as some kind of special crime. It is already a crime to assault/rape/murder, and it is also a crime to threaten/terrorize. So, in the scenario I mentioned earlier, I think it should be up to the DA to make the case that the perpetrators committed a de facto crime of threatening or terrorizing others in addition to their original victim. I see no reason to create new, "special", crimes when existing ones already cover behavior. This just strikes me as political grandstanding.
I don't know what it takes to prove threatening or terrorizing a group but I suspect it's a pretty high bar. Higher than can be met by the beating or killing of an individual absent any specific widely circulated public statement of intent. What the legislation does is lower the burden of proof in the cases of certain well recognized and longstanding institutionalized prejudices. I'm not sure if I'm sold on the idea either but ou can make the argumetn that longstanding prejudices which frequently lead to violence are harmful to the society as a whole and that discouraging them is a legititmate law enforcement aim and a legitimate reason for new definitions of law.
__________________
The most important political office is that of the private citizen.
Justice Louis D Brandeis
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
CSA's Avatar
CSA CSA is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
I am a fiscal conservative, but fairly moderate socialy

 
Member Since: Feb 2009
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 1,203

United_States     Arizona

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

If I beat a man to death for raping my 5 year old daughter, it's becaue I hate that son of a bitch, should child rapists be part of hate crime law?
__________________
http://www.BHOCOUNTDOWN.com



"A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers." -Ronald Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
John Drake's Avatar
Secretary of State
The Last Eisenhower Republican

 
Member Since: May 2008
Location: America
Posts: 4,230

   
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EagleTed View Post
IMO, Federal hate crimes violate the very amendment the Left uses to justify their passage, ie, "equal protection under the law" in the 14th. OTOH, the 14th, also imo, doesn't nationalize every conceivable crime some would wish to protect against, as it could easily be used by an illogical and subjective Court to nationalize all crimes.
The courts don't determine Federal Crimes, do they? Bank Robbery was federalised by Congress at the urging of Elliott Ness, who argued they were a favorite tactic of revolutionaries, kidnapping was nationalised by the Lindbergh Act, again, partially because of it's revolutionary cachet.

Hate crimes strike at the very basis of American freedom, which is tolerance of diversity.
__________________
Alizee Jacotay, the reason god invented hips
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,857

Georgia_state    
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
The courts don't determine Federal Crimes, do they? Bank Robbery was federalised by Congress at the urging of Elliott Ness, who argued they were a favorite tactic of revolutionaries, kidnapping was nationalised by the Lindbergh Act, again, partially because of it's revolutionary cachet.

Hate crimes strike at the very basis of American freedom, which is tolerance of diversity.
Kidnapping and transporting the victim across state lines is a Federal crime, which kind of makes sense. The Federal Reserve's and FDIC role in banking makes sense that robbing a FDIC insured bank is a Federal crime, while robbing a local loan shark (involved in the same business) is not.

Your last statement is nice sentiment, but doesn't have a legal basis under the constitution.
__________________
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. ---P. J. O'Rourke
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
drgoodtrips's Avatar
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21,913

   
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timj219 View Post
I don't know what it takes to prove threatening or terrorizing a group but I suspect it's a pretty high bar. Higher than can be met by the beating or killing of an individual absent any specific widely circulated public statement of intent. What the legislation does is lower the burden of proof in the cases of certain well recognized and longstanding institutionalized prejudices. I'm not sure if I'm sold on the idea either but ou can make the argumetn that longstanding prejudices which frequently lead to violence are harmful to the society as a whole and that discouraging them is a legititmate law enforcement aim and a legitimate reason for new definitions of law.
I could see this angle more if it were between letting someone walk and giving them a prison sentence, but my understanding of these crimes is that it's going to be the difference between 25-life and 30-life or life. I don't think that maxing out the sentences is worth creating special legislation.

(Admittedly, I don't know the exact terms of how it extends prison sentences)
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Cari's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: I'm on a boat
Posts: 2,082

   
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Sexual orientation does not imply which way you orient yourself. If a straight person gets beat up outside a gay bar because the gay people hate him, they can be subject to the same penalties if it were the other way around. There are no groups singled out in this bill, it applies to anyone who is targeted simply because of their race, ethinicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation, what ever that may be.
__________________
Democrats are sexy. Who ever heard of a nice piece of elephant?

Whenever someone says "I'm not book smart, but I'm street smart", all I hear is "I'm not real smart, but I'm imaginary smart".
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
timj219's Avatar
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 5,523

United_States     New_York

Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSA View Post
If I beat a man to death for raping my 5 year old daughter, it's becaue I hate that son of a bitch, should child rapists be part of hate crime law?
Be careful. I don't people who post ridiculous non sequiturs that show their complete ignorance of the subject are covered by the new law.
__________________
The most important political office is that of the private citizen.
Justice Louis D Brandeis
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,857

Georgia_state    
Re: Can someone explain "Hate Crimes" to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cari View Post
Sexual orientation does not imply which way you orient yourself. If a straight person gets beat up outside a gay bar because the gay people hate him, they can be subject to the same penalties if it were the other way around. There are no groups singled out in this bill, it applies to anyone who is targeted simply because of their race, ethinicity, gender, religion, or sexual orientation, what ever that may be.
It's pretty clear to many of us that most crimes, including what you may consider a hate crime, are matters for states and localities to deal with, not the Federal government. Besides the practical aspects, such as local police having knowledge of local known criminals, I'm still waiting for someone who thinks Federal Hate Crime legislation is needed to point out what authorizes the Federal government to enforce the same.
__________________
Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. ---P. J. O'Rourke
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online