Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Political Arenas > The White House
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

The White House A forum to discuss politics regarding the President, Vice President, the Cabinet and the executive branch of government in general

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 9,789

United_States     Virginia

Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

according to the dubious NYT

I would think that prezbo might consider whacking the trillion in new spending he made first


Quote:
While President Obama’s decision about sending more troops to Afghanistan is primarily a military one, it also has substantial budget implications that are adding pressure to limit the commitment, senior administration officials say.
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2009
Ernie S.'s Avatar
Speaker of the House
Right Wing Biker

 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 834

United_States     United_States

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

No problem spending a couple trillion on socialism but another fifty billion to support our military is expensive? Asshole!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-14-2009
CYDdharta's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 5,490

   
Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

They're just being silly, now. Winning the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban and al Qaeda is Obama's highest proirity; he wouldn't let a little thing like expense stand in the way of fighting this war we must win.
__________________
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.” - Lord Palmerston
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
chassisman's Avatar
Secretary of State
Right Wing Extremist

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 10,760

United_States     Texas

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post
according to the dubious NYT

I would think that prezbo might consider whacking the trillion in new spending he made first
Sometimes there isn't enough money to go around .......... like when the head of a family decides they need expensive "toys" rather than purchase health care insurance.
__________________
Chassisman be lovin him some fishin'
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
countryboy's Avatar
U.S. Senator

 
Member Since: Jun 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 799

United_States     Ohio

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

I thought OBL was somewhere along the Afghani/Pakistan border.
I thought B.O.'s top priority was to "get Bin Laden". What happened to that?

Just another load of BS.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Ernie S.'s Avatar
Speaker of the House
Right Wing Biker

 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 834

United_States     United_States

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
I thought OBL was somewhere along the Afghani/Pakistan border.
I thought B.O.'s top priority was to "get Bin Laden". What happened to that?

Just another load of BS.
The election is over. Did you really expect bho would actually do anything he promised that did not placate the ultra-left?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 9,789

United_States     Virginia

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CYDdharta View Post
They're just being silly, now. Winning the war in Afghanistan against the Taliban and al Qaeda is Obama's highest proirity; he wouldn't let a little thing like expense stand in the way of fighting this war we must win.


did you mean to put a smiley on this ?

he HAS come to realize reckless spending is an issue. of course he pretends not to know how it came to be so.

last in,first out prezbo.
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
CYDdharta's Avatar
Administrator

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 5,490

   
Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Folks, let's stick to the topic.
__________________
“Nations have no permanent friends or allies, they only have permanent interests.” - Lord Palmerston
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 17,204

United_States     Colombia

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

No money for healthcare, unlimited money for war. That's what I'm hearing.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Ernie S.'s Avatar
Speaker of the House
Right Wing Biker

 
Member Since: Sep 2009
Location: South Florida
Posts: 834

United_States     United_States

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Healthcare costs 1.3 trillion, 40,000 more troops = 54 billion. about 4%
__________________
I'm sick and tired of my brothers and sisters dying to preserve Americans' right to drive like assholes.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 9,789

United_States     Virginia

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
No money for healthcare, unlimited money for war. That's what I'm hearing.

thats what the Constitution allows.
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 3,083

New_York     Earth

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
No money for healthcare, unlimited money for war. That's what I'm hearing.
That moneys not for health care. Its for control.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Andrewl's Avatar
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,475

   
Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
No money for healthcare, unlimited money for war. That's what I'm hearing.
And with the added bonus that with health care you actually get somethibg in return....

Andrew
__________________
“...corporations and those who run them cannot stop exploiting resources and amassing wealth until they have... .I cannot finish this sentence, because the truth is that can never stop; like cancer, they can only continue to expand until they kill the host.”

-- Derrick Jensen
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 17,204

United_States     Colombia

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrewl View Post
And with the added bonus that with health care you actually get somethibg in return....

Andrew
That would be more compelling if I wouldn't rather the government literally burn money than spend it on war.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 11-15-2009
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 18,539

United_States     Russian

Re: Afghanistan decision thorny due to cost ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernie S. View Post
Healthcare costs 1.3 trillion, 40,000 more troops = 54 billion. about 4%
Both amounts can be put to infinitely better use.

Are people still shitting themselves over Osama bin Laden?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online