Thread: The Post American World - Obama~

Originally Posted by Cari

So if you read that book it means you're anti-American? I'd like to remind you that this thread was not created to personally attack Sunshine.

It sure looked that way to me when I started reading it, everything BUT address the actual original post.

And I explained the first part of your post. If Reagan had been seen reading this book it would have been of no concern at all because he loved the Constitution. When you see this shred of human debris with that book in his hand it brings the memories rushing to the fore of all the horrible individuals this guy has surrounded himself with since the beginning and it should bring concern to every true American.

Wow all this fervor over a book? No wonder the government always has thier hands in our pocket, we are to easily distracted. I say forget the democrats and republicans they havent done anything for us lately but argue. Time for a real choice, real 3rd party The Quilist.

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

It sure looked that way to me when I started reading it, everything BUT address the actual original post.

And I explained the first part of your post. If Reagan had been seen reading this book it would have been of no concern at all because he loved the Constitution. When you see this shred of human debris with that book in his hand it brings the memories rushing to the fore of all the horrible individuals this guy has surrounded himself with since the beginning and it should bring concern to every true American.

That statement alone exposes the man behind the curtain that you wish no one would pay attention to.

The WOD is pointing and laughing at you.

Originally Posted by John Drake

No, sorry to be unclear,

OH...it was clear!

the topic is- should people be concerned Obama is reading the book in question. Constrain yourself to that point please, not why the poster created the post/topic etc. or move on.

Here's something for the lad to read when he's finished with his current tutorial

Originally Posted by chassisman

Wise up, the worlds powerful are laying the groundwork. I'm sure you've heard the term international law and should be aware of the desires of some to expand what international law should cover.

Damn long project as they've been doing it for 60+ years... Quite impressive to orchestrate anything over that time period and still not get anywhere.

Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger

Damn long project as they've been doing it for 60+ years... Quite impressive to orchestrate anything over that time period and still not get anywhere.

"Not get anywhere!!" You don't see the liberal move away from our Constitution in favor of international law? That's why this book in the hands of the "most liberal" is concerning.

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

"Not get anywhere!!" You don't see the liberal move away from our Constitution in favor of international law? That's why this book in the hands of the "most liberal" is concerning.

Oh. Have you read the book in question?

Originally Posted by Michael_Q

"Not get anywhere!!" You don't see the liberal move away from our Constitution in favor of international law? That's why this book in the hands of the "most liberal" is concerning.

So let me see if I am getting this right.

Its not really the book that is the problem, it is who is reading the book that is the problem? Reagan reads it, fine. Obama reads it, AHH!!!!!!!


Okie dokie then.

Originally Posted by Miranda

So let me see if I am getting this right.

Its not really the book that is the problem, it is who is reading the book that is the problem? Reagan reads it, fine. Obama reads it, AHH!!!!!!!


Okie dokie then.

It's like trying to talk to kids.

Freedom's just a monkey without a tard harness.

Originally Posted by Miranda

So let me see if I am getting this right.

Its not really the book that is the problem, it is who is reading the book that is the problem? Reagan reads it, fine. Obama reads it, AHH!!!!!!!
Okie dokie then.

Hey! You're good!

Originally Posted by Miranda

So let me see if I am getting this right.

Its not really the book that is the problem, it is who is reading the book that is the problem? Reagan reads it, fine. Obama reads it, AHH!!!!!!!


Okie dokie then.

There are those who maintain that 'all behavior has meaning.' They have maintained it SO loudly for SO long that pretty much every American has bought into that little bit of psychobabble. No president I can remember in my lifetime, and that's a long time, has been as distrusted as this one. The people with whom he surrounds himself, the fact that he is a muslim, his stated past hatred of the white race, all those things add up to a lot of things to overcome as a president. He, like anyone else, can read what he damn pleases. He could step off Air Force 1 reading Hustler if he so chose. But how prudent would that be? He is at least prudent enough not to do THAT.

The Obamas KNOW they aren't trusted. The fact that they distanced themselves from the socialist books on the shelves there in the White House pretty fast is evidence of that.

While we have a lot of educated people in America, we have a lot more who are not educated, but who form a large contingent of our voting public. They will form opinions based upon behaviors such as having socialist books on the shelf, or carrying a book whose title at least 'suggests' the downfall of America.

While Obama has every right to do exactly as he is doing in this picture - carrying a book whose title suggests the downfall of America is not prudent. And lack of prudence in and of itself is enough to make sane people doubt him as a leader.

He should have stuffed that book between the seats.

I personally have a copy of the Quran, the Upinashads, the Talmud, The Satanic Verses, the Kama Sutra and other notable titles on my bookshelves. They are no one's business unless I am a public figure and I am flaunting them. Then they are everyone's business.