Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net


Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: First Post -- White House/Capital Hill

  1. #1
    grayfox is offline Citizen
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    South Dakota (temp)
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0

    First Post -- White House/Capital Hill

    Everyone has their opinion, so here's my take on these two topics.

    From the time of Jimmy Carter who deregulated oil/gas and said unfortunately gas prices would rise, and rise they began -- within (6) six months!, to our unethical/immoral elected person (action should have been taken sooner), to our current person in the office of president -- has anyone noticed the trend in the economy and lack of military personnel to defend our borders?

    According to the last numbers I looked at, we are at our lowest point in military manning. The National Guard was designed for homeland defense, call-up to active duty and die in some other country for reasons of "national interest". Yes, I understand we have those interests, but why must we run to everyone else's defense or aid, and turn a blind eye to what's occuring in our own backyards? We are stretched so thin right now, borrowing against what we just borrowed, and very likely will, or have lost, our "status". Where is the check and balance to the office of president?

    We have elected officials to represent us in Washington, yet their track records indicate they are more interested in themselves than their constituents! Where is the check and balance for Congress?

    The government was designed to be for, of and by the People -- that means each and every US citizen. With the narcistic attitude prevalent in society today, we'll be lucky to be able to turn these trends around.

    Sorry, got on a roll.....

  2. #2
    tsquare's Avatar
    tsquare is offline Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    St Louis
    Posts
    12,449
    Blog Entries
    6
    Rep Power
    2766

    Re: First Post -- White House/Capital Hill

    You got a point somewhere in all that?

    If you are calling for a massive cut in defense spending Obama is going to give it to you... right at the time China is expanding theirs. That ours is at the lowest point (in terms of % of GDP) that it's been in a generation is a whole other thing.

    If you have other issues with federal spending, please do some research... we spend more on healthcare than anything else... and we could cut defense to zero and still be running 500 billion dollar deficits.

    Oh, and welcome...

  3. #3
    jviehe is offline Citizen
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    0
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: First Post -- White House/Capital Hill

    Quote Originally Posted by grayfox View Post
    Everyone has their opinion, so here's my take on these two topics.

    From the time of Jimmy Carter who deregulated oil/gas and said unfortunately gas prices would rise, and rise they began -- within (6) six months!, to our unethical/immoral elected person (action should have been taken sooner), to our current person in the office of president -- has anyone noticed the trend in the economy and lack of military personnel to defend our borders?

    According to the last numbers I looked at, we are at our lowest point in military manning. The National Guard was designed for homeland defense, call-up to active duty and die in some other country for reasons of "national interest". Yes, I understand we have those interests, but why must we run to everyone else's defense or aid, and turn a blind eye to what's occuring in our own backyards? We are stretched so thin right now, borrowing against what we just borrowed, and very likely will, or have lost, our "status". Where is the check and balance to the office of president?

    We have elected officials to represent us in Washington, yet their track records indicate they are more interested in themselves than their constituents! Where is the check and balance for Congress?

    The government was designed to be for, of and by the People -- that means each and every US citizen. With the narcistic attitude prevalent in society today, we'll be lucky to be able to turn these trends around.

    Sorry, got on a roll.....
    The check and balance is obviously the voters. Govt cant do much without the appearance of legitimacy. And people continuing to vote for the same people year after year and otherwise let them do whatever they want gives it to them.

Similar Threads

  1. White House back to Snubbing FNC
    By jviehe in forum Culture & Media Issues
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-29-2011, 05:39 AM
  2. the GOP conquers the white house in 2008! what then, aye?
    By MeadHallPirate in forum The White House
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-16-2011, 01:52 PM
  3. We need this man in the White House
    By John Drake in forum Just for Fun!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-13-2010, 04:08 PM
  4. White House making their own News....
    By iamwhatiseem in forum The White House
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-16-2010, 11:49 AM
  5. White House Correspondents Dinner
    By jviehe in forum The White House
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-09-2010, 06:08 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •