Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Britain tells EU to sod off

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Britain tells EU to sod off

    When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
    Britain votes to leave EU in historic divorce: BBC

    Britain has voted to leave the European Union, the BBC said based on voter tallies from Thursday's referendum, an outcome that would set the country on an uncertain path and deal the largest setback to European efforts to forge greater unity since World War Two.

    World financial markets dived as counting from 304 of 382 areas showed a 51.5/48.5 split for leaving. Sterling suffered its biggest one-day fall of 9.4 percent against the dollar on market fears the decision will hit investment in the world's 5th largest economy, raise questions over London's role as a global financial capital, and usher in months of political limbo.

    The euro slumped nearly four percent against the dollar on concerns a Brexit vote would do wider economic and political damage to what would become a 27-member union. Investors poured into safe haven assets including gold, and the yen surged.

    In an early mark of international concern, Japan's top currency diplomat Masatsugu Asakawa said he would consult with Finance Minister Taro Aso on how to respond to the market moves, describing the foreign exchange moves as very rough.

    Yet there was euphoria among Britain's eurosceptic forces, claiming a victory they styled as a protest against British political leaders, big business and foreign leaders including Barack Obama who had urged Britain to stay in the bloc.

    "Dare to dream that the dawn is breaking on an independent United Kingdom," said Nigel Farage, leader of the eurosceptic UK Independence Party.

    "If the predictions are right, this will be a victory for real people, a victory for ordinary people, a victory for decent people...Let June 23 go down in our history as our independence day."

    He called the EU a "doomed project".
    Brussels just learns a painful but powerful lesson, as taught by Henry David Thoreau, "That government is best which governs least".

    I suspect other EU states will threaten similar moves, which will force serious, meaningful reforms on the EU. The question is, will Europe act quickly enough to avert the divisions that forces to the east seek to drive, in order to divide... and conquer.

    Last edited by Commodore; 06-23-2016, 09:47 PM.

  • #2
    "Brussels" is not a governement, dear. It is a vehicle for intergovernemental cooperation. And obviously membership is voluntarily ( as this referendum has demonstrated), yet Britain will still have to sort out its relations with the bloc, its access to european markets ( considered vital even by most Brexiters), its cooperation on security, police, justice,, and many other fields ( including millions of british citizens living in the EU for whom life looks set to become complicated and that were denied a vote if they had been abroad for fifteen years or more). The Brexiters will figure that there is a hangover after the party and that stirring up emotion is far easier than getting the promised better terms without any of the cost out of their favourite bogeyman, "Brussels".
    It is furthermore not "Britain" that has told the EU to sod off, it is England. Scots have demonstrated a clear majority pro-EU and so have the Northern Irish. Scotland has already indicated prior to the vote that it would rather preserve its EU membership ( if necessary as an independent state) than its membership of the UK. And irish leaders are on the record for predicting a new push for the islands reunification should a new border divide it ( The northern irish peace process was made possible not least by both parties membership of the EU).
    That means the most likely first casualty of the referendum is not "Brussels", but the UK itself that for the first time in centuries has a very real chance to fall part.
    As far as other alleged breakaway states are concerned : Dont bet on it. The british (english) vote was as much a domestic anti-establishment vote and "Brussels" was partially wrongly conflated with that. And british "euroscepticism" is of a very british kind. In the EEC, that later became the EU, Britain had joined a project ( for largely economic motives) that it never fully embraced ( as far as integration was/is concerned), and that was dominated by very "continental", often franco-german, ideas. For the latter, the project was/is born out of the ashes of WW II and cooperation and integration, also between former arch-enemies the way forward for the peoples of Europe, that are both related as well as diverse.
    It is not as if Britain couldnt have built alliances for many of its positions in the EU, but that would have required more engagement than the british electorate was willing to support ( or was considered to). That is why Britain, rightly or wrongly is not the point, chose to sit on the fence on most major european integration steps, such as Schengen ( the zone of borderless travel), or the Euro. Making a habit out of sitting on the fence is a letigimate choice, it also comes at a price however : That the others may make decisions without you in the room, even if they affect you. One such example is Britains cherished finance industry : That the city of London is going to loose its trade in Euros is now pretty much inevitable ( Dublin, Luxembourg and Frankfurt are already standing in line). And if the issue of Common Market access is not very speedily resolved the effect is even likely to be more devastating, also for other industries ( cars f.e.). Another one is refugees : France has made clear that stopping and detaining refugees / illegals claiming Britain as their destination rests on Britain beeing an EU member. Which would be a rather interesting outcome of a campaign based to a considerable extent on rejection of immigration.
    Brits (at least far too many Brits) have on the other hand never really grasped why the EU for Continental Europeans is about far more than just about the economy, and the quality of british media coverage on european issues has often been poor. That is also why british commentators have misjudged the Euro-crisis from the beginning. How many times was the single currency claimed to be breaking up ? This time really ?
    A choice either way had to be made at some point. It is regrettable though that it had to be in the form of this campaign, full of hate rethoric, oversimplifications and untruths. It is now up to the likes of Londons ex-Mayor Johnson ( who has likened the EU to the Nazis) to repair ties with the continent that Britain needs, since David Cameron has (rightly) announced his resignation. Good luck with that.
    Prediction : The core EU will stick together and the Eurozone as well, since in spite of evident problems the desire to make it work is greater than to retreat in cuddly national homes. Germany will, in the absence of Britain, inevitably emerge as the dominating power at least for the time beeing, a position that Germany never wanted ( and they know well why they prefer to act multilaterally, which will create problems of its own. Nations that could at some point eye "renegotiation" of certain terms might be Denmark and Sweden, yet slamming the door is rather unthinkable.
    I would be far more worried about the UK itself, we will muddle through ( I will be in Luxembourg today, where many meetings will take place).

    P: S : There is also another prediction : That after the party and the hangover, when the hooray and flag waving has died down, both sides will sooner or later come up with a new trade deal that the Brexiters will try to sell as a magnificient success, even though it leaves pretty much everything in place. probably glossed over by some face-saving rethorical cosmetics (like freedom of movement for people and payments in the EU budget). That Britain will have lost representation in EU institutions and therefore gained nothing might be further on the backpages.

    The pound is in freefall, stockmarkets around the world have crashed, german carmakers BMW ( Mini, Rolls Royce) and Volkswagen ( Bentley) have confirmed to have plans to move out of the UK in case of a Brexit vote, Toyota, Honda and Nissan have indicated to overthink investions as well, Spain has said that now it wants control over Gibraltar, the irish question is back and Scots openly eye breaking away from the UK ( the polls this time leave little room for doubt). Germany has announced a governement emergency summit with France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and Italy in Berlin tomorrow ( the founding nations of the EU), and the European parliament looks set to pass a vote on stripping Britains EU commissioner ( Lord Hill/finance) off his Office. Immediately. Just to mention a few points. Good Job, Brexiters...
    Last edited by Voland; 06-24-2016, 04:02 AM.

    ?


    • #3
      It is a good job the people of a nation have a right to retain their nation as they see it.

      ?


      • #4
        Yes, they do, and noone in the EU has questioned that. Wether it is also a good service for Britains place in Europe and the world, for british jobs and Business ( the economic plan of the Brexiters is so far their secret), for Britains young Generation ( it appears that 75 % or more under 25 voted to stay in the EU while those over 65 voted majority against) , and also overall stability in Europe ( markets appear to go crazy, and old issues like Gibraltar, Scotland and Northern Ireland appear back on the agenda), not to mention that this partially nasty campaign has broken a lot of goodwill in other european capitals ( particularly statements like Boris Johnsons "EU/Nazi" slur) stands on a different sheet of paper.
        Last edited by Voland; 06-24-2016, 04:43 AM.

        ?


        • #5
          The heads of the European Council, the European Parliament, and the European Commission, Donald Tusk ( Poland), Martin Schulz ( Germany), and Jean-Claude Juncker ( Luxembourg) along with dutch PM Mark Rutte ( who holds the rotating EU presidency), have all called on the UK to exit as quickly as possible, to not unnecessarily extend the period of uncertainty. The leaders of the Brexit campaign however have claimed not to be in a hurry to "brexit". Which leads to suspicions in Europe that in fact they are after another deal with Europe.......

          ?


          • #6
            There have to be a lot of deals with Europe as they are untangling from current trade agreements at many levels. This is going to take several months if not a couple years.

            ?


            • #7


              So, is there any relation to what is going on here in America, with this election cycle, and what the Brits voted to do? Does the exit have something to do with immigration, loss of sovereignty?

              What is the driving force behind the vote going this way? I will say this though, and that is, it looks like the Brits the people, still have a greater voice in what happens in the UK. I am not so sure about the US voters having that power.

              ?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                So, is there any relation to what is going on here in America, with this election cycle, and what the Brits voted to do? Does the exit have something to do with immigration, loss of sovereignty?
                Yes and no. Sovereignty is a big part of it, but the economic philosophy behind it is very different than the knee jerk reaction we see from the "leaders" of both parties in the US, Watch the Brexit movie I linked above. It's long, but it is worth it to understand the long term consequences of the kind of meddling that so many are clamoring for.

                ?


                • #9
                  'Explosive shock' as Britain votes to leave EU, Cameron quits

                  Britain has voted to leave the European Union, forcing the resignation of Prime Minister David Cameron and dealing the biggest blow to the European project of greater unity since World War Two.

                  Global financial markets plunged on Friday as results from a referendum showed a 52-48 percent victory for the campaign to leave a bloc Britain joined more than 40 years ago.

                  The pound fell as much as 10 percent against the dollar to touch levels last seen in 1985, on fears the decision could hit investment in the world's fifth-largest economy, threaten London's role as a global financial capital and usher in months of political uncertainty. The euro slid 3 percent.

                  World stocks saw more than $2 trillion wiped off their value, with indices across Europe heading for their sharpest one-day drops ever. Britain's big banks took a $100 billion battering, with Lloyds, Barclays and RBS plunging as much as 30 percent at one point.

                  The United Kingdom itself could now break apart, with the leader of Scotland - where nearly two-thirds of voters wanted to stay in the EU - saying a new referendum on independence from the rest of Britain was "highly likely".

                  An emotional Cameron, who led the "Remain" campaign to defeat, losing the gamble he took when he called the referendum three years ago, said he would leave office by October.

                  "The British people have made the very clear decision to take a different path and as such I think the country requires fresh leadership to take it in this direction," he said in a televised address outside his residence.

                  "I do not think it would be right for me to be the captain that steers our country to its next destination," he added, choking back tears before walking back through 10 Downing Street's black door with his arm around his wife Samantha.
                  This worship of the currency markets is bizarre. It's as if people really thing that by simply checking a box on a piece of paper, and sticking that paper in a box, 10% of the country just spontaneously exploded or something. It's that very attitude of centralized control that got us here to begin with.

                  ?


                  • #10
                    The current reaction from markets is idiotic as it is simply the vote that has happened, everything is still legally the same today as it was yesterday. Getting out now is just greedy short term minded fools making investors with patience and fortitude wealthier.

                    ?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JDJarvis View Post
                      The current reaction from markets is idiotic as it is simply the vote that has happened, everything is still legally the same today as it was yesterday. Getting out now is just greedy short term minded fools making investors with patience and fortitude wealthier.
                      I don't know about wealthier, but it will certainly have an impact on the spreadsheet they are charging you to watch on your behalf.
                      Last edited by Commodore; 06-24-2016, 09:33 AM.

                      ?


                      • #12
                        I think it's really a sad day for Europe. Don't want them to leave. With Scotland threatening to leave the UK however, this could be a boomerang.

                        ?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Shanon View Post
                          I think it's really a sad day for Europe. Don't want them to leave. With Scotland threatening to leave the UK however, this could be a boomerang.
                          What's sad about it? That everyone isn't one big happy bureaucracy anymore?

                          In case anyone was still wondering why Britain did it, the EU was kind enough to provide a reminder today...

                          EU to launch kettle and toaster crackdown after Brexit vote

                          The EU is poised to ban high-powered appliances such as kettles, toasters, hair-dryers within months of Britains referendum vote, despite senior officials admitting the plan has brought them ridicule.

                          The European Commission plans to unveil long-delayed ecodesign restrictions on small household appliances in the autumn. They are expected to ban the most energy-inefficient devices from sale in order to cut carbon emissions.

                          The plans have been ready for many months, but were shelved for fear of undermining the referendum campaign if they were perceived as an assault on the British staples of tea and toast.

                          A sales ban on high-powered vacuum cleaners and inefficient electric ovens in 2014 sparked a public outcry in Britain.

                          EU officials have been instructed to immediately warn their senior managers of any issues in their portfolios that relate to the UK and could boost the Leave campaign were they to become public.

                          The decision to push ahead with the plans soon after the British vote was revealed by Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, at the weekly College of Commissioners meeting on April 20.

                          Internet routers, hand-dryers, mobile phones and patio jet-washers are also being examined by commission experts as candidates for new ecodesign rules.

                          However, several products may be granted a stay of execution, as officials admitted the plans are a lightning rod for public anger at perceived meddling by Brussels.
                          This particular regulation reminds me of the low flow toilet regulation from a while back here in the US. Designed to save water, it actually required several flushes to remove particularly robust deposits, completely eliminating any water savings. Toasting your toast several times will waste power.

                          Here's a crazy idea, people will buy what works for them, and it's none of Brussels business what that might be.

                          Or, as Monty Python put it...

                          Last edited by Commodore; 06-24-2016, 12:17 PM.

                          ?


                          • #14
                            The fact that markets all over the world are plummeting, despite the fact that not one single bit of real wealth has been destroyed shows just how far society has deviated from reality. Spreadsheets are not wealth. Speculation does not create or destroy it. Resources and the knowledge to use them are wealth.

                            ?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Commodore View Post

                              Yes and no. Sovereignty is a big part of it, but the economic philosophy behind it is very different than the knee jerk reaction we see from the "leaders" of both parties in the US, Watch the Brexit movie I linked above. It's long, but it is worth it to understand the long term consequences of the kind of meddling that so many are clamoring for.
                              The argument from both the labor and conservative voters, is that the flow of cheap labor immigrants into the UK has depressed wages, as the flow into the US has done the same thing. The people being hurt by this flow, and not talking about muslims here, are the people NOT at the top. So, the new Polish plumber who will fix plumbing at half the rates of an English plumber of course will push down wages for plumbers. And it can literally take away the ability for plumbers to prosper by their work. Of course others will say if plumbers do not prosper, make a living wage, then so what? Of course, it is the non plumbers who ask this, not the plumbers. Now include every other job that will be affected by immigrants.

                              The UK is now running trade deficits that they ran right as the empire was collapsing. Trade deficits might be profitable for a certain corporation but it is at the cost to others. Our trade deficits happen because MNCs are exporting from china or mexico, into our markets, and china or mexico is not buying products made here, which we cannot export to mexico or china. So, we run billions in trade deficits, because particular MNCs from America, are making that stuff with cheap labor outside the US. Trade deficits used to be unacceptable, that is, until our MNCs were causing it. LOL. Fact is, trade deficits are still bad for America, and any nation that runs them in such great numbers as we do. But we now allow it to happen, even if it is bad, for corporations who offshore benefit, at the cost to America. So, America is no longer important, corporate profits trumps America. The same can be said for the UK. But the people rebelled. As they are currently rebelling against open borders free trade globalization in America, and across Europe. WHY? Because it is nothing more than the newest scheme from the bankers and those that own big banking and MNCs, to remove the income and wealth from the middle, and take it for themselves. Advancing technology just made it easier, as it served as the RUSE to promote it. But it is nothing more than the age old game that elites always play. If you turn them loose so they can do it, and Reagan began turning them loose along with Thatcher. And for working people in the west it has literally taken away the ability to propser by the work needed for a modern society to operate. And of course it creates new poverty. And inevitably the worse thing any nation can have, social disorder. So you can never turn an economy, or any system that affects the income of the working and middle class to the greed driven self interests of the rich. And we never seem to learn that lesson, once and for all. This is where ideological beliefs based upon a disconnect from reality comes in. A system based upon a failed ideological belief never seems to die out, we never seem to be able to put it in the trash bin of history, because people will still cling to a failed ideological belief. Human nature can be so inducing of ignor-ance.



                              ?

                              Working...
                              X