Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Officer killed by illegal invader

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Officer killed by illegal invader


    Yesterday we had an illegal invader murder a police officer in California, a state that WILLINGLY gives sanctuary to illegal invaders.

    These kinds of things are happening more, they're ON "the news," & democrats somehow think we don't need to put a barrier up ?

    They somehow think that seeing these events in the news is going to make more Americans feel good about the idea of having a completely open border with Mexico/Latin America ??

    The man this invader killed, came to America lawfully - the way it should be done.

    He came here and did something positive, became a valuable citizen. A police officer.

    He has a 5 month old son who ...... will know about this. I wonder what he will think ?

    and

    The media keeps telling us about "Trumps wall" blah blah blah.

    In fact, the barrier we need at our border isn't Trumps at all.

    It's the property of the American people.


    The people want it, they want the invasion stopped !

    We're tired of hearing about "caravans" ie - massive columns of invaders, we're tired of seeing stories like this, were tired of being told how bad we are, to want to keep ourselves free and safe from being invaded by dirt-bags from around the world who have nothing to contribute but crime or drugs.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Suspect in fatal California cop shooting is in US illegally, authorities say

    The suspect sought in connection with the murder of a California cop earlier this week is in the U.S. illegally, authorities revealed on Thursday.

    The unidentified man alleged to be behind the slaying of Newman police Cpl. Ronil Singh, 33, is considered armed and dangerous, Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson said during a news conference on Thursday afternoon, vowing that the manhunt would relentlessly continue.

    This suspect is in our country illegally. He doesnt belong here. He is a criminal. We will find him, we will arrest him, we will bring him to justice, Christianson said.

    Singh was shot and killed during a traffic stop just before 1 a.m. Wednesday in Newman, about 100 miles southeast of San Francisco, according to police.

    The suspect was stopped by Singh for a DUI investigation before engaging in a gunfight with the officer, during which Singh tried to defend himself, Christianson said.


    CALIFORNIA POLICE FIND TRUCK IN HUNT FOR ALLEGED COP-KILLER AS HIS IDENTITY REMAINS ELUSIVE

    Singh had called in the traffic stop and reported "shots fired" over his radio a few minutes later, sheriff's officials previously said. The suspect fled when backup officers arrived to assist Singh, who was then rushed to a hospital. He later died from his gunshot wounds, the department said.

    Surveillance photos released of the suspect showed him inside the Newman Food Store shortly before the fatal attack. Police also located the truck the suspect is believed to have driven.

    There is right now a full scale manhunt going on in California for an illegal immigrant accused of shooting and killing a police officer during a traffic stop, Trump tweeted. Time to get tough on Border Security. Build the Wall!



    https://www.foxnews.com/us/suspect-i...cSWRDXcWpApTno



    Stanislaus County detectives were searching a farmhouse about 12 miles south of Merced on Thursday afternoon in connection with the shooting death of a Newman Police Department corporal.

    While Christianson said investigators have identified the suspect, they will not release his name. He said the suspect is in the country illegally.

    He doesnt belong here; he is a criminal, the sheriff said.

    Less than two hours after after the press conference, President Donald Trump tweeted about the suspects illegal immigration status.


    Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
    There is right now a full scale manhunt going on in California for an illegal immigrant accused of shooting and killing a police officer during a traffic stop. Time to get tough on Border Security. Build the Wall!

    ...

    https://www.sacbee.com/news/state/ca...223621665.html


    Singh was a native of Fiji and immigrated to America. He lived in Modesto with his family.

    Singh is survived by his wife, Anamika, and a 5-month-old son.

    In a statement, family said Singh loved being around family and his job:

    "Ronil Singh was a family guy. He loved to travel, be around his family, and he really loved his job. He talked very highly about his work and how much he enjoyed being a police officer. He left behind a wife, a 5-month-old baby boy, his mom and dad and younger brother. We would like to remember him as a hero, his smile, and him serving and protecting this city. We love you Ronil, thank you for your service."



    https://www.kcra.com/article/remembe...dream/25684834



    Cpl. Ronil Singh spent time with his wife and 5-month-old son on Christmas Day before heading out to work an overnight shift.

    In the predawn hours of the next morning, the 33-year-old radioed that he was pulling over a vehicle in Newman, where he had worked for the Police Department for seven years. A few minutes later, he called over the radio: Shots fired!

    Officers who responded found Singh had been shot. He was taken to a hospital, where he died.

    The motorist, who had been stopped as part of a DUI investigation, was gone.

    The Stanislaus County Sheriffs Department has identified a suspect in the case, but he is not in custody. His name has not been released, and authorities would say only that the man is in the country illegally.

    Singh, who was Indo-Fijian, came to the U.S. from Fiji about 20 years ago, his family said. He volunteered with the Modesto Police Department and was a Turlock Police Department cadet. He spent part of his career with the Merced County Sheriffs Office as a reserve deputy sheriff.

    When Randy Richardson took over as chief of the Newman Police Department, one of his first hires was Singh, in July 2011.

    He told me he came to America to become a police officer. Thats all he wanted to do, Richardson said, growing teary-eyed during a news conference. He truly loved what he did.


    https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...227-story.html

  • #2
    There's MORE breaking news on this subject.

    Now we have....

    Another mass of invaders coming our way.

    These aren't "caravans" and the people aren't "migrants."

    These are masses of invaders that we have our government to thank for allowing America to have a wide open border.

    Maybe they'll stay in Mexico ? We can hope.

    Let Mexico have them !

    -----------------------------------------------------------------

    Second Migrant Caravan to Leave From Honduras in January

    A caravan of migrants, estimated at up to 15,000 people, is set to depart from Honduras in mid-January a few months after the previous caravan, according to the San Diego Union Tribune.

    They say they are even bigger and stronger than the last caravan, said Irma Garrido of Reactiva Tijuana Foundation, which advocates for migrants.

    The previous caravan left Honduras in October, and is currently stuck at the U.S. border with Mexico, with many migrants taking refuge in crowded shelters while applying for asylum in America. This new caravan likely will stay in the south of Mexico in Chiapas and Oaxaca, according to Garrido. Their aim is to request work there.

    Mexican President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador vowed that Central American migrants will find work and receive visas in Mexico, having pledged to complete multiple public works projects like a 1,500-kilometer railroad and the planting of two million trees, in an $8 billion project that likely will create hundreds of thousands of jobs in the southern Mexican states.


    https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/mi.../28/id/896159/


    Another migrant caravan this one estimated at 15,000 people is preparing to leave Honduras on Jan. 15, according to migrant rights advocates and Spanish-language media.

    They say they are even bigger and stronger than the last caravan, said Irma Garrido, a member of the migrant advocacy group Reactiva Tijuana Foundation.

    Coordinators who helped direct the migrants on the 2,000-mile trek with bullhorns, arranging for buses and giving advice along the way, have mostly vanished. Many of the migrants say they feel abandoned and unsure where to turn next. Some are ready to return home.

    Garrido said this new, larger caravan will probably be joined by more people in El Salvador and in Guatemala, but she said they dont plan on coming straight to the Tijuana-San Diego border, where resources are already stretched nearly to a breaking point.

    They will stay in the south of Mexico in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Their aim is to request work there, she said.

    Mexican President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador has pledged visas and work in Mexico for Central American migrants. In his inauguration speech, he pledged public works projects such as planting 2 million trees and construction of his Maya Train, which will link cities in the three Yucatan peninsula states as well as Tabasco and Chiapas.

    The $8-billion project is expected to create hundreds of thousands of jobs in the southern states of Mexico.


    Last week, Mexico and the United States agreed to develop a plan to curb Central American migration. The plan includes a $25-billion investment from Mexico into its southern states over the next five years. The United States will contribute $4.8 billion to Mexico and $5.8 billion to the Northern Triangle of Central America, which is made up of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. Most of the U.S. funding will be allocated from existing aid programs.


    ...


    https://www.latimes.com/world/la-me-...227-story.html

    ............

    The best example of ...NeverTrump derangement is the opposition to the wall.

    In 2006, Congress passed the Secure Fence Act, which was to provide for over 700 miles of double-link fencing. It passed the House 283 to 138 and the Senate 80 to 19.

    But now the Dems who supported the Fence Act oppose a wall. The difference between a fence and a wall is a distinction without a difference.

    So why the opposition ... ?

    ..

    In Canto III, Dante describes a room reserved for the Opportunists, who in life stood neither for good nor for evil, but for themselves. They did not take a position in life and are unworthy of either Hell or Heaven.

    These worthless, spineless NeverTrumps refuse to take a stand on voting to fund the wall and instead hide behind a rule that requires 60 votes, which means that at least ten Democrats would have to support a vote on the wall. The Dems will not support funding the wall.

    Dante describes such people as follows:

    These are the nearly soulless
    Whose lives concluded neither blame nor praise.
    They are mixed here with that despicable corps
    Of angels who were neither for God nor Satan,
    But only for themselves. The High Creator
    Scourged them from Heaven for its perfect beauty,
    And Hell will not receive them since the wicked
    Might feel some glory over them.


    This band of so-called Republicans will not allow a vote on funding the wall, which means they will not fight to protect the safety of Americans by stopping drug-smuggling and illegal aliens.

    In Book 8 of the Iliad, King Agamemnon tries to rally his Greek army that is running away in a battle against the Trojans by shaming them:

    "Shame on you, Argives disgraces, pretty boys, frauds! What happened to our boasts about being the bravest of men? (See, Homer,The Iliad, translated by Stephen Mitchell, Weidefeld & Nicolson, London, 2011.)

    In 2006, they boasted about securing the border. Now they oppose it because they hate President Trump.

    They're disgraces, frauds, pretty-boys, who do not support the president and leader of their party in the most important issue and battle: building the wall.

    We expect such disgrace and fraud from the Schumer-Pelosi Democrats whose sole interest is opposing President Trump, regardless of the cost to the safety of Americans. But Republican senators should support our president. They do not, and they have no shame.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...es_frauds.html


    ?


    • #3
      Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
      There's MORE breaking news on this subject.

      Now we have....

      Another mass of invaders coming our way.

      These aren't "caravans" and the people aren't "migrants."

      These are masses of invaders that we have our government to thank for allowing America to have a wide open border.

      Maybe they'll stay in Mexico ? We can hope.

      Let Mexico have them !

      -----------------------------------------------------------------

      Second Migrant Caravan to Leave From Honduras in January

      A caravan of migrants, estimated at up to 15,000 people, is set to depart from Honduras in mid-January a few months after the previous caravan, according to the San Diego Union Tribune.

      They say they are even bigger and stronger than the last caravan, said Irma Garrido of Reactiva Tijuana Foundation, which advocates for migrants.

      The previous caravan left Honduras in October, and is currently stuck at the U.S. border with Mexico, with many migrants taking refuge in crowded shelters while applying for asylum in America. This new caravan likely will stay in the south of Mexico in Chiapas and Oaxaca, according to Garrido. Their aim is to request work there.

      Mexican President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador vowed that Central American migrants will find work and receive visas in Mexico, having pledged to complete multiple public works projects like a 1,500-kilometer railroad and the planting of two million trees, in an $8 billion project that likely will create hundreds of thousands of jobs in the southern Mexican states.


      https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/mi.../28/id/896159/


      Another migrant caravan this one estimated at 15,000 people is preparing to leave Honduras on Jan. 15, according to migrant rights advocates and Spanish-language media.

      They say they are even bigger and stronger than the last caravan, said Irma Garrido, a member of the migrant advocacy group Reactiva Tijuana Foundation.

      Coordinators who helped direct the migrants on the 2,000-mile trek with bullhorns, arranging for buses and giving advice along the way, have mostly vanished. Many of the migrants say they feel abandoned and unsure where to turn next. Some are ready to return home.

      Garrido said this new, larger caravan will probably be joined by more people in El Salvador and in Guatemala, but she said they dont plan on coming straight to the Tijuana-San Diego border, where resources are already stretched nearly to a breaking point.

      They will stay in the south of Mexico in Chiapas and Oaxaca. Their aim is to request work there, she said.

      Mexican President Andrs Manuel Lpez Obrador has pledged visas and work in Mexico for Central American migrants. In his inauguration speech, he pledged public works projects such as planting 2 million trees and construction of his Maya Train, which will link cities in the three Yucatan peninsula states as well as Tabasco and Chiapas.

      The $8-billion project is expected to create hundreds of thousands of jobs in the southern states of Mexico.


      Last week, Mexico and the United States agreed to develop a plan to curb Central American migration. The plan includes a $25-billion investment from Mexico into its southern states over the next five years. The United States will contribute $4.8 billion to Mexico and $5.8 billion to the Northern Triangle of Central America, which is made up of Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. Most of the U.S. funding will be allocated from existing aid programs.


      ...


      https://www.latimes.com/world/la-me-...227-story.html

      ............

      The best example of ...NeverTrump derangement is the opposition to the wall.

      In 2006, Congress passed the Secure Fence Act, which was to provide for over 700 miles of double-link fencing. It passed the House 283 to 138 and the Senate 80 to 19.

      But now the Dems who supported the Fence Act oppose a wall. The difference between a fence and a wall is a distinction without a difference.

      So why the opposition ... ?

      ..

      In Canto III, Dante describes a room reserved for the Opportunists, who in life stood neither for good nor for evil, but for themselves. They did not take a position in life and are unworthy of either Hell or Heaven.

      These worthless, spineless NeverTrumps refuse to take a stand on voting to fund the wall and instead hide behind a rule that requires 60 votes, which means that at least ten Democrats would have to support a vote on the wall. The Dems will not support funding the wall.

      Dante describes such people as follows:

      These are the nearly soulless
      Whose lives concluded neither blame nor praise.
      They are mixed here with that despicable corps
      Of angels who were neither for God nor Satan,
      But only for themselves. The High Creator
      Scourged them from Heaven for its perfect beauty,
      And Hell will not receive them since the wicked
      Might feel some glory over them.


      This band of so-called Republicans will not allow a vote on funding the wall, which means they will not fight to protect the safety of Americans by stopping drug-smuggling and illegal aliens.

      In Book 8 of the Iliad, King Agamemnon tries to rally his Greek army that is running away in a battle against the Trojans by shaming them:

      "Shame on you, Argives disgraces, pretty boys, frauds! What happened to our boasts about being the bravest of men? (See, Homer,The Iliad, translated by Stephen Mitchell, Weidefeld & Nicolson, London, 2011.)

      In 2006, they boasted about securing the border. Now they oppose it because they hate President Trump.

      They're disgraces, frauds, pretty-boys, who do not support the president and leader of their party in the most important issue and battle: building the wall.

      We expect such disgrace and fraud from the Schumer-Pelosi Democrats whose sole interest is opposing President Trump, regardless of the cost to the safety of Americans. But Republican senators should support our president. They do not, and they have no shame.


      https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...es_frauds.html

      Yes indeed those damn pretty boys.

      ?


      • #4
        They caught the cop killer !

        These are the kinds of scum we have coming here every day with our wide open border.

        This is why we need a wall, this is why we'll HAVE one.

        The American people are seeing these things happening, they want it to stop.

        We have enough of our OWN killers to deal with, WE CAN'T AFFORD TO IMPORT MORE !

        "The sheriff leading the investigation into the shooting death of a California police officer took aim at so-called sanctuary laws that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities." - see below story

        See video at link below- worth watching

        ----------------------------------------------------------------------


        Sheriff blames sanctuary laws in officer's death
        The Associated Press Dec 28th 2018 4:25PM


        The sheriff leading the investigation into the shooting death of a California police officer took aim at so-called sanctuary laws that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities.

        Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson told reporters Friday that the suspect was in the country illegally and that if he had been deported for previous DUI arrests, Cpl. Ronil Singh would still be alive.

        Christianson blamed California's sanctuary law for preventing local authorities from reporting Gustavo Perez Arriaga to federal immigration officials.

        He spoke at the news conference about making laws stricter as the Singh's brother wept beside him.

        Authorities say the man accused of killing a California police officer during a traffic stop has been captured.

        Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson told reporters Friday that Gustavo Perez Arriaga was arrested in Bakersfield in the death of Cpl. Ronil Singh.

        The sheriff says Perez Arriaga was in the country illegally after crossing the border in Arizona. He didn't say when that happened but that he has been in the U.S. for several years.

        Christianson says Perez Arriaga is from Mexico and was trying to cross back over the border before his arrest.

        The sheriff says Perez Arriaga had two prior drunken driving arrests and known gang affiliations.


        ...

        https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...eath/23628821/

        ?


        • #5
          Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
          They caught the cop killer !

          These are the kinds of scum we have coming here every day with our wide open border.

          This is why we need a wall, this is why we'll HAVE one.

          The American people are seeing these things happening, they want it to stop.

          We have enough of our OWN killers to deal with, WE CAN'T AFFORD TO IMPORT MORE !

          "The sheriff leading the investigation into the shooting death of a California police officer took aim at so-called sanctuary laws that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities." - see below story

          See video at link below- worth watching

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------


          Sheriff blames sanctuary laws in officer's death
          The Associated Press Dec 28th 2018 4:25PM


          The sheriff leading the investigation into the shooting death of a California police officer took aim at so-called sanctuary laws that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities.

          Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson told reporters Friday that the suspect was in the country illegally and that if he had been deported for previous DUI arrests, Cpl. Ronil Singh would still be alive.

          Christianson blamed California's sanctuary law for preventing local authorities from reporting Gustavo Perez Arriaga to federal immigration officials.

          He spoke at the news conference about making laws stricter as the Singh's brother wept beside him.

          Authorities say the man accused of killing a California police officer during a traffic stop has been captured.

          Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson told reporters Friday that Gustavo Perez Arriaga was arrested in Bakersfield in the death of Cpl. Ronil Singh.

          The sheriff says Perez Arriaga was in the country illegally after crossing the border in Arizona. He didn't say when that happened but that he has been in the U.S. for several years.

          Christianson says Perez Arriaga is from Mexico and was trying to cross back over the border before his arrest.

          The sheriff says Perez Arriaga had two prior drunken driving arrests and known gang affiliations.


          ...

          https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...eath/23628821/
          I have an idea let's demand thet Mexico build a fifty foot high concrete wall across the border or we'll nuke Mexico City. None of this cheap steel slat nonsense. Some people are saying Trump doesn't care about the wall. All he want's is the fight over the wall that provides a blessed distraction away from his legal troubles.

          ?


          • #6
            Originally posted by redrover View Post

            I have an idea let's demand thet Mexico build a fifty foot high concrete wall across the border or we'll nuke Mexico City. None of this cheap steel slat nonsense. Some people are saying Trump doesn't care about the wall. All he want's is the fight over the wall that provides a blessed distraction away from his legal troubles.
            The president has no "legal troubles."

            He has people who hate him trying to cause him trouble.

            Since you like to stray way off the rails, and the topic...

            Here we have a guy just like you, going apeshirt bananas about a guy in the store he works in.

            The store fired the idiot. This nice liberal guy who had nothing but hate and venom for a guy wearing a Trump shirt ...

            ... just like you, and half the lying thieves in D.C.... who want America to continue being invaded.

            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            A clerk at Xhale City vape shop in Tucker, Atlanta went absolutely ballistic after a customer wearing a Trump t-shirt walked into the establishment.

            The pro-Trump customer was denied service and asked to leave the store while the vape shop employee accused him of being a racist motherf*cker.

            The customer refused to be bullied and told the clerk to call the police this is when things took a wild turn.

            F*ck off dude! F*ck off! Get the f*ck out of here! the employee screamed as he assaulted the customer.

            The employee is heard talking on the phone presumably to his boss where he calls President Trump a treasonous asshole.

            At this point the lunatic employee walks back over to the Trump-supporting customer, assaults him then calls him the N word.
            Leave the store! Leave the store! Leave the store! F*ck off! Get the f*ck off n*****! the employee screamed.

            The employee continued to melt down and refused to serve a paying customer the best part about the video is that the pro-Trump customer REFUSED to back down to the liberal lunatic.

            The Yelp page for Xhale City vape shop in Tucker, GA was quickly filled with one-star reviews calling for the unhinged employee to be fired.


            https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ught-on-video/

            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            It's about power & it's about hate. That's all.

            Democrats, and too many republicans, are a powermad bunch and they must be defeated !

            ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            While all of them are on record supporting a border wall in the past, now that Donald Trump is president, they all oppose it with every fiber of their being. They know that it will work, and they cannot abide Trump having a win. These people Schumer, Pelosi, Gutirrez, etc. are truly venal.

            Governor Brown has effectively destroyed California, now benighted by rampant homelessness and the crime that accompanies a population of illiterate, drug-addicted, gang-affiliated, criminally inclined persons adrift on our streets. And now another young officer has been killed by an illegal alien thanks to the left's obsession with protecting the throngs of migrants crossing the border into the U.S.

            The Democrats in office today, and those about to take the majority in the House, are anti-Americans. Of that you can be sure.

            They care about keeping our borders open to all comers more than they care about keeping Americans safe.

            They all supported a border wall when Clinton and Obama were in office. Now they hate the president more than they love the country. Of this there can be no doubt.

            The young policeman who died in California Christmas night will and should be a wake-up call for the Democrats. They are 100% responsible for the presence of such criminals, protected by ridiculous sanctuary policies in our cities. The media and the Democrats are in an uproar over the two migrant children who died at the hands of irresponsible parents who used them as a ticket to ride, yet they have nothing to say about the murder of the young policeman in Newman, Calif. He is, to them, a casualty of politics, of their grand design to obliterate conservatives from the public realm forever. They do not care about him, his widow, or his infant son. They were happy to contribute to the odious Christine Blasey Ford's GoFundMe page, but not one of them will contribute to a GoFundMe page for Ronil Singh's family. He is law enforcement, so they feel nothing.

            The Democratic Party of today is an abomination. The assault on our constitutional republic began with Woodrow Wilson, and their long-range plan to overhaul what the Founders built is still operational. The left has nothing but contempt for ordinary Americans, especially those who voted for Trump.

            Leftists are dangerous when challenged, like a pack of jackals dismembering its prey. They need to be defeated, indicted, arrested, tried, convicted, and imprisoned. They are a scourge on the nation as founded. They do not love this country; they seek to destroy all that was and is good within it.



            https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...he_nation.html

            ?


            • #7
              Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

              The president has no "legal troubles."

              He has people who hate him trying to cause him trouble.

              Since you like to stray way off the rails, and the topic...

              Here we have a guy just like you, going apeshirt bananas about a guy in the store he works in.

              The store fired the idiot. This nice liberal guy who had nothing but hate and venom for a guy wearing a Trump shirt ...

              ... just like you, and half the lying thieves in D.C.... who want America to continue being invaded.

              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              A clerk at Xhale City vape shop in Tucker, Atlanta went absolutely ballistic after a customer wearing a Trump t-shirt walked into the establishment.

              The pro-Trump customer was denied service and asked to leave the store while the vape shop employee accused him of being a racist motherf*cker.

              The customer refused to be bullied and told the clerk to call the police this is when things took a wild turn.

              F*ck off dude! F*ck off! Get the f*ck out of here! the employee screamed as he assaulted the customer.

              The employee is heard talking on the phone presumably to his boss where he calls President Trump a treasonous asshole.

              At this point the lunatic employee walks back over to the Trump-supporting customer, assaults him then calls him the N word.
              Leave the store! Leave the store! Leave the store! F*ck off! Get the f*ck off n*****! the employee screamed.

              The employee continued to melt down and refused to serve a paying customer the best part about the video is that the pro-Trump customer REFUSED to back down to the liberal lunatic.

              The Yelp page for Xhale City vape shop in Tucker, GA was quickly filled with one-star reviews calling for the unhinged employee to be fired.


              https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...ught-on-video/

              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              It's about power & it's about hate. That's all.

              Democrats, and too many republicans, are a powermad bunch and they must be defeated !

              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              While all of them are on record supporting a border wall in the past, now that Donald Trump is president, they all oppose it with every fiber of their being. They know that it will work, and they cannot abide Trump having a win. These people Schumer, Pelosi, Gutirrez, etc. are truly venal.

              Governor Brown has effectively destroyed California, now benighted by rampant homelessness and the crime that accompanies a population of illiterate, drug-addicted, gang-affiliated, criminally inclined persons adrift on our streets. And now another young officer has been killed by an illegal alien thanks to the left's obsession with protecting the throngs of migrants crossing the border into the U.S.

              The Democrats in office today, and those about to take the majority in the House, are anti-Americans. Of that you can be sure.

              They care about keeping our borders open to all comers more than they care about keeping Americans safe.

              They all supported a border wall when Clinton and Obama were in office. Now they hate the president more than they love the country. Of this there can be no doubt.

              The young policeman who died in California Christmas night will and should be a wake-up call for the Democrats. They are 100% responsible for the presence of such criminals, protected by ridiculous sanctuary policies in our cities. The media and the Democrats are in an uproar over the two migrant children who died at the hands of irresponsible parents who used them as a ticket to ride, yet they have nothing to say about the murder of the young policeman in Newman, Calif. He is, to them, a casualty of politics, of their grand design to obliterate conservatives from the public realm forever. They do not care about him, his widow, or his infant son. They were happy to contribute to the odious Christine Blasey Ford's GoFundMe page, but not one of them will contribute to a GoFundMe page for Ronil Singh's family. He is law enforcement, so they feel nothing.

              The Democratic Party of today is an abomination. The assault on our constitutional republic began with Woodrow Wilson, and their long-range plan to overhaul what the Founders built is still operational. The left has nothing but contempt for ordinary Americans, especially those who voted for Trump.

              Leftists are dangerous when challenged, like a pack of jackals dismembering its prey. They need to be defeated, indicted, arrested, tried, convicted, and imprisoned. They are a scourge on the nation as founded. They do not love this country; they seek to destroy all that was and is good within it.



              https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...he_nation.html
              I think a meaningless wall stuck out in the desert somewhere is a fitting monument to the worst president in American history. While we are waiting for the Mexicans to come up the money I think all the Trump supporters should chip in $10 each to repaid when Mexico comes through. All the talking heads on fake news claim the wall is never going to happen. They are not factoring in the undying devotion of Trump lovers who will think nothing of chipping in $100 or more for Trump's monument.

              ?


              • #8
                Originally posted by redrover View Post

                I think a meaningless wall stuck out in the desert somewhere is a fitting monument to the worst president in American history. While we are waiting for the Mexicans to come up the money I think all the Trump supporters should chip in $10 each to repaid when Mexico comes through. All the talking heads on fake news claim the wall is never going to happen. They are not factoring in the undying devotion of Trump lovers who will think nothing of chipping in $100 or more for Trump's monument.
                That you hate the man doesn't show us whether or not he will go down in history as "the worst president in American history."

                It just shows us your own irrational issue.

                The brain dead creatures on "the news" say all kinds of things, few take any of it seriously.

                There will be no "monument" and there is yet no wall, it's a work in progress.

                But it is going to happen, because walls work ! Our houses even have them ! The creeps in DC ALL live behind walls, most even have EXTRA walls around the gated communities they live in... as they tell us lies about how walls don't work - which proves two things; 1. They're liars and 2. They think the people of America are stupid.... nothing new there.

                Hate the president all you wish, I suspect when he's no longer the president, you'll have a newfound love of walls. Just like the people in DC who found a hatred for walls to accompany their hatred for the president. Foolish people fooling themselves with their own silliness.

                ?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  I think a meaningless wall stuck out in the desert somewhere is a fitting monument to the worst president in American history. While we are waiting for the Mexicans to come up the money I think all the Trump supporters should chip in $10 each to repaid when Mexico comes through. All the talking heads on fake news claim the wall is never going to happen. They are not factoring in the undying devotion of Trump lovers who will think nothing of chipping in $100 or more for Trump's monument.
                  From your friend chuckie shoomer in 2009;

                  -"Americans don't like illegal immigration
                  -"illegal immigration is wrong"
                  -People illegally in the US are "illegal aliens," not "undocumented"
                  -Border fence made the southern border far more secure... created a significant barrier to illegal immigration" - Chuck Schumer, 2009


                  Now, because of his hate for the current president, he's done an about face.

                  The man is full of hate, is a liar & an opportunist.

                  He's sickening.

                  If it were president hilary wanting a wall on the border to protect Americans from the garbage coming in, ...

                  ...contraband, human etc, ...

                  ...chuckie would be singing a different tune ! Only fools won't see this.

                  The man is a mindless moron fueled only by hate and partisanship.

                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  Schumer speaks with forked tongue on illegal immigration

                  As the government shutdown goes on over the Senate's failure to fund a border wall (and a new caravan is forming to enter illegally because of it), the man most responsible for the political gridlock, New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer, has dug in his heels and insisted there will never be a border wall. On principle, and as a "moral issue," and all that. Away he piously intones.

                  There's just one problem.

                  He doesn't believe any of it.

                  Journalist Ryan Saavedra has found him saying the exact opposite in a windy speech less than a decade ago, showing how phony his current argument is. Get a load of him then:

                  -"Americans don't like illegal immigration
                  -"illegal immigration is wrong"
                  -People illegally in the US are "illegal aliens," not "undocumented"
                  -Border fence made the southern border far more secure... created a significant barrier to illegal immigration"


                  This would be the same Chuckie Schumer who was caught exploiting the interns for free labor, not long after he piously intoned about the "moral issue" of the $12 or $15 hourly minimum wage.

                  Hypocrisy, it seems, is a way of life for the creepy Senate minority leader.

                  Here's what he said in 2009, via Daily Wire:

                  "The first of these seven principles is that illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple," Schumer said. "When we use phrases like 'undocumented workers,' we convey a message to the American people that their government is not serious about combating illegal immigration, which the American people overwhelmingly oppose."

                  "People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens, and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered the United States legally," Schumer continued. "Any immigration solution must recognize that we must do as much as we can to gain operational control of our borders as soon as possible."


                  Here's what he's saying now about the wall and shutdown, from a recent CNN report:

                  The bottom line is simple. The President made clear that he wants a shutdown. His position, if he sticks to his position for a $5 billion wall, he will get no wall and he will get a shutdown. The bottom line is very, very simple. That is, we want border security. We offered him border security. But Americans know that the wall, not paid for by Mexico anymore, is not the way to border security.

                  Really? A wall is "not the way to border security," yet before, he plainly said walls work? He's got quite a pattern on the hypocrisy front, and he ought to be asked about it, if not from the incurious press, then by another pol, with the cameras around.


                  https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...migration.html

                  ?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                    From your friend chuckie shoomer in 2009;

                    -"Americans don't like illegal immigration
                    -"illegal immigration is wrong"
                    -People illegally in the US are "illegal aliens," not "undocumented"
                    -Border fence made the southern border far more secure... created a significant barrier to illegal immigration" - Chuck Schumer, 2009


                    Now, because of his hate for the current president, he's done an about face.

                    The man is full of hate, is a liar & an opportunist.

                    He's sickening.

                    If it were president hilary wanting a wall on the border to protect Americans from the garbage coming in, ...

                    ...contraband, human etc, ...

                    ...chuckie would be singing a different tune ! Only fools won't see this.

                    The man is a mindless moron fueled only by hate and partisanship.

                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Schumer speaks with forked tongue on illegal immigration

                    As the government shutdown goes on over the Senate's failure to fund a border wall (and a new caravan is forming to enter illegally because of it), the man most responsible for the political gridlock, New York Democrat Sen. Chuck Schumer, has dug in his heels and insisted there will never be a border wall. On principle, and as a "moral issue," and all that. Away he piously intones.

                    There's just one problem.

                    He doesn't believe any of it.

                    Journalist Ryan Saavedra has found him saying the exact opposite in a windy speech less than a decade ago, showing how phony his current argument is. Get a load of him then:

                    -"Americans don't like illegal immigration
                    -"illegal immigration is wrong"
                    -People illegally in the US are "illegal aliens," not "undocumented"
                    -Border fence made the southern border far more secure... created a significant barrier to illegal immigration"


                    This would be the same Chuckie Schumer who was caught exploiting the interns for free labor, not long after he piously intoned about the "moral issue" of the $12 or $15 hourly minimum wage.

                    Hypocrisy, it seems, is a way of life for the creepy Senate minority leader.

                    Here's what he said in 2009, via Daily Wire:

                    "The first of these seven principles is that illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple," Schumer said. "When we use phrases like 'undocumented workers,' we convey a message to the American people that their government is not serious about combating illegal immigration, which the American people overwhelmingly oppose."

                    "People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens, and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered the United States legally," Schumer continued. "Any immigration solution must recognize that we must do as much as we can to gain operational control of our borders as soon as possible."


                    Here's what he's saying now about the wall and shutdown, from a recent CNN report:

                    The bottom line is simple. The President made clear that he wants a shutdown. His position, if he sticks to his position for a $5 billion wall, he will get no wall and he will get a shutdown. The bottom line is very, very simple. That is, we want border security. We offered him border security. But Americans know that the wall, not paid for by Mexico anymore, is not the way to border security.

                    Really? A wall is "not the way to border security," yet before, he plainly said walls work? He's got quite a pattern on the hypocrisy front, and he ought to be asked about it, if not from the incurious press, then by another pol, with the cameras around.


                    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...migration.html
                    ren't you the guy who is always complaining about spending other people's money. Why don't you and your ilk chip in and give lord Donald the money for his wall? Donnie tried to make the midterms about the wall how did that work out for him? Now he's got no nonsense Nancy to deal with. Instead of putty spine Paul Ryan.

                    ?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by redrover View Post

                      ren't you the guy who is always complaining about spending other people's money. Why don't you and your ilk chip in and give lord Donald the money for his wall?
                      No one wants to give money to the president for a wall for HIM.

                      They want to, and have collected a lot of money from Americans for a wall to keep trash out of America. They want a wall for America, NOT for Donald.

                      https://www.gofundme.com/TheTrumpWall

                      Originally posted by redrover View Post
                      Donnie tried to make the midterms about the wall how did that work out for him?
                      Seems to be going well so far. There was no "blue wave"

                      Originally posted by redrover View Post
                      Now he's got no nonsense Nancy to deal with. Instead of putty spine Paul Ryan.
                      Nancy is off in Hawaii I hear.

                      She's off vacationing, enjoying the hell out of herself. She's having a great time, I think she's quite pleased with all of this.

                      Earlier Friday, The Washington Free-Beacon first reported that Pelosi was spotted at the Fairmont Orchid resort. According to that resorts website, guests are treated to luxury resort amenities featuring our Spa Without Walls, a 10,000 sq.ft. oceanfront swimming pool and 24-hour fitness center.

                      https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nan...uring-shutdown

                      She' better have a good time, it's not too far away for her last days in an elder-care facility being spoon fed her oatmeal and yogurt every morning.

                      ?


                      • #12
                        As has been pointed out, this resistance to fully securing our border with Mexico, has to do with one thing only.

                        Hate for the current president.

                        Hate is irrational and foolish, those who engage in it make fools of themselves.

                        They were for it before they were against it ?

                        No.

                        They were for it until a man named Donald Trump got elected president.

                        Stupidity of the highest order. Hypocrisy no one can miss.

                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                        Top Democrats Fighting Trump on Border Security Who Sang a Different Tune in the Past

                        ..its coming to light that some Democratic leaders past and present havent always opposed securing our borders.

                        Several top Democrats such as Schumer, former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton have called for tougher border security and even called illegal immigration wrong, plain and simple:


                        Obama claimed immigrants who come into the U.S. illegally are disrespecting the rule of law and are showing disregard for those who are following the law.

                        We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, and lawfully to become immigrants in this country, he said.

                        Schumer calling illegal immigration wrong, plain and simple made its rounds online in recent weeks.

                        He suggests in the video that the term undocumented workers conveys a message to the American people that their government is not serious about combating illegal immigration, which he then admitted that Americans overwhelmingly oppose illegal immigration.

                        I think it is illegal and wrong. And we have to change it, he said. People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens, and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered the U.S. legally.

                        In another resurfaced video of Schumer, he admitted there are millions of immigrants crossing the border illegally who are taking jobs away from American workers.

                        Schumer made it clear in the old footage he was committed to ending the waves of illegal immigration.

                        He added that immigrants who cross the border illegally are criminal and should be prosecuted and deported.

                        One of the most effective things we do on the border is turn people back, Schumer said in old footage from 2013 about securing the border. They get up to the border and we find them and say, go home!'

                        ....past footage of Bill and Hillary Clinton, in which the former first lady is heard saying the border should be secured by technology, personnel, physical barriers if necessary.

                        The former president then talked about how the administration is moving aggressively to secure the border by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before.

                        We are also a nation of laws, the former president said, adding that its wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years.



                        https://ijr.com/top-democrats-trump-...K1E4QPjUPo4xJA







                        ?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                          As has been pointed out, this resistance to fully securing our border with Mexico, has to do with one thing only.

                          Hate for the current president.

                          Hate is irrational and foolish, those who engage in it make fools of themselves.

                          They were for it before they were against it ?

                          No.

                          They were for it until a man named Donald Trump got elected president.

                          Stupidity of the highest order. Hypocrisy no one can miss.

                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          Top Democrats Fighting Trump on Border Security Who Sang a Different Tune in the Past

                          ..its coming to light that some Democratic leaders past and present havent always opposed securing our borders.

                          Several top Democrats such as Schumer, former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton have called for tougher border security and even called illegal immigration wrong, plain and simple:


                          Obama claimed immigrants who come into the U.S. illegally are disrespecting the rule of law and are showing disregard for those who are following the law.

                          We simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently, diligently, and lawfully to become immigrants in this country, he said.

                          Schumer calling illegal immigration wrong, plain and simple made its rounds online in recent weeks.

                          He suggests in the video that the term undocumented workers conveys a message to the American people that their government is not serious about combating illegal immigration, which he then admitted that Americans overwhelmingly oppose illegal immigration.

                          I think it is illegal and wrong. And we have to change it, he said. People who enter the United States without our permission are illegal aliens, and illegal aliens should not be treated the same as people who entered the U.S. legally.

                          In another resurfaced video of Schumer, he admitted there are millions of immigrants crossing the border illegally who are taking jobs away from American workers.

                          Schumer made it clear in the old footage he was committed to ending the waves of illegal immigration.

                          He added that immigrants who cross the border illegally are criminal and should be prosecuted and deported.

                          One of the most effective things we do on the border is turn people back, Schumer said in old footage from 2013 about securing the border. They get up to the border and we find them and say, go home!'

                          ....past footage of Bill and Hillary Clinton, in which the former first lady is heard saying the border should be secured by technology, personnel, physical barriers if necessary.

                          The former president then talked about how the administration is moving aggressively to secure the border by hiring a record number of new border guards, by deporting twice as many criminal aliens as ever before.

                          We are also a nation of laws, the former president said, adding that its wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years.



                          https://ijr.com/top-democrats-trump-...K1E4QPjUPo4xJA






                          The hate for Trump has a lot to do with his demands that American tax payers should pay for it despite the fact that only absolute morons think is necessary..

                          ?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by redrover View Post

                            The hate for Trump has a lot to do with his demands that American tax payers should pay for it despite the fact that only absolute morons think is necessary..
                            That is incorrect.

                            It's like saying; "..only absolute morons think it's necessary to lock the doors to their cars or homes."

                            Which is a ridiculously dumb, and incorrect statement.

                            It again needs to be pointed out that if walls were so pointless and wasteful, these people, Nancy, Chuckles and the rest of the rich rats in Washington would not themselves live in WALLED, GATED communities to protect themselves.

                            Walls are necessary and needed.

                            It again needs to be pointed out that if walls were so pointless and wasteful, we wouldn't need them for our homes.

                            Walls are necessary and needed.

                            We have doors with locks, we have walls and we have borders for a reason.

                            People in general know that there are others in the world that will be happy to enter your home, your car, your place of work, your COUNTRY to take advantage of, or hurt you.

                            This is the hard reality of the world we live in, denying or pretending it isn't so, only leads to trouble.

                            If it were hilary pressing to protect America with a wall on the border of Mexico, you the "media" and the rest of the liberal crowd would be happy to accommodate, even cheer on the building of that wall !

                            This resistance, this obstruction, is only about hatred for the current president. Which is juvenile and tiresome.

                            Shut up and build the wall already !!

                            We've had quite enough of these kinds of occurrences - https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...der#post559645

                            ?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                              No one wants to give money to the president for a wall for HIM.

                              They want to, and have collected a lot of money from Americans for a wall to keep trash out of America. They want a wall for America, NOT for Donald.

                              https://www.gofundme.com/TheTrumpWall



                              Seems to be going well so far. There was no "blue wave"



                              Nancy is off in Hawaii I hear.

                              She's off vacationing, enjoying the hell out of herself. She's having a great time, I think she's quite pleased with all of this.

                              Earlier Friday, The Washington Free-Beacon first reported that Pelosi was spotted at the Fairmont Orchid resort. According to that resorts website, guests are treated to luxury resort amenities featuring our Spa Without Walls, a 10,000 sq.ft. oceanfront swimming pool and 24-hour fitness center.

                              https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nan...uring-shutdown

                              She' better have a good time, it's not too far away for her last days in an elder-care facility being spoon fed her oatmeal and yogurt every morning.
                              I bet there was a time when you thought people who were fifty were ancient. When you get to my age 78 doesn't sound that old any more As a girl I dated in college used to say " It's all relative."

                              ?

                              Working...
                              X