Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Is president Trump fanning the flames of racial terroism?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is president Trump fanning the flames of racial terroism?

    Here is an interesting article by former FI man Frank Figliuzzi. . https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/o...terrorism.html

  • #2
    Dems and msm have worked so hard to convince americans that trump is a strong racist even when he has not pushed for any action that is driven by racism.

    If trump critiques any person or group that share skin color msm says it is racism which proves trump is a racist. And this can work at least on the idiots and we have lots of no common sense idiots.

    You and your banana republic dems want to convince others of a lie you guys concocted for politically dirty reasons

    So the lie is that trump is more racist than George Wallace and loves the kkk and neonazis so much that he speaks in codes that these racist groups undersunderstand along with the dog whistles.

    So he is working for two radical groups of hateful racists that are such a minoriminority as to number only in the thousands!

    So when one lays out what the Dems and msm wants others to believe it quickly becomes an absurdity .so much so it stinks of hateful dirty lies. The forte of characterless dems and all of msm.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
      Dems and msm have worked so hard to convince americans that trump is a strong racist even when he has not pushed for any action that is driven by racism.

      If trump critiques any person or group that share skin color msm says it is racism which proves trump is a racist. And this can work at least on the idiots and we have lots of no common sense idiots.

      You and your banana republic dems want to convince others of a lie you guys concocted for politically dirty reasons

      So the lie is that trump is more racist than George Wallace and loves the kkk and neonazis so much that he speaks in codes that these racist groups undersunderstand along with the dog whistles.

      So he is working for two radical groups of hateful racists that are such a minoriminority as to number only in the thousands!

      So when one lays out what the Dems and msm wants others to believe it quickly becomes an absurdity .so much so it stinks of hateful dirty lies. The forte of characterless dems and all of msm.
      I have heard it said that Trump has been known to date black women. By that standard Mississippi plantation owners weren't racists because there was a lot of 'dating" going on between slave owners and slaves. We know you hate the MSM. Are you still getting all your news from WikiLeaks? Now there's a reliable news source for you, especially if you are a big supporter of Russia. like Moscow Mitch.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        Originally posted by redrover View Post

        I have heard it said that Trump has been known to date black women. By that standard Mississippi plantation owners weren't racists because there was a lot of 'dating" going on between slave owners and slaves. We know you hate the MSM. Are you still getting all your news from WikiLeaks? Now there's a reliable news source for you, especially if you are a big supporter of Russia. like Moscow Mitch.
        If one wanted an accurate information source given the undisputed accuracy of Wikileaks the smart folks would read this source.

        I follow greenwald's reporting given he is a real journalist and leans left but isnt a lefty nut or msm propagandist.

        The real news of 2016 was not the dem created conspiracy but of what assange revealed about your party. They would make your typical politician from mexico look like saints.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5

          Words below from the racist at rovers link.

          It's not surprising that our elected hater Ilhan Omar agrees with the man

          It's all about hate with these people, AND IT IS THEY WHO WANT TO FOMENT RACIAL DIVISIONS.

          Which they accomplish by their words spoken and written - like that garbage cited by rover above, and that I've shown here for what it is.

          Hateful, false, racist swill.

          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Now, instinct and experience tell me we're headed for trouble in the form of white hate violence stoked by a racially divisive president. I hope I'm wrong.

          ...Mr. Trump's rants emboldened white hate groups and reinforced racist blogs, news sites and social media platforms. In response to his tweets, one of the four lawmakers,

          Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, said: "This is the agenda of white nationalists, whether it is happening in chat rooms or it's happening on national TV. And now it’s reached the White House garden." She's right.


          ...I am not accusing President Trump of inciting violence in Gilroy or anywhere else. But he empowers hateful and potentially violent individuals with his divisive rhetoric and his unwillingness to unequivocally denounce white supremacy.

          If a president paints people of color as the enemy, encourages them to be sent back to where they came from and implies that no humans want to live in certain American cities, he gives license to those who feel compelled to eradicate what Mr. Trump calls an infestation.

          It doesn't really matter whether Mr. Trump is truly a racist or merely playing one on television to appeal to his base. Either way, his path can lead to bloodshed. When that happens, we will hear White House officials and the Republican leadership claim their hands are clean because malicious people can’t be stopped from acting out.



          https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/o...terrorism.html

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
            Words below from the racist at rovers link.

            It's not surprising that our elected hater Ilhan Omar agrees with the man

            It's all about hate with these people, AND IT IS THEY WHO WANT TO FOMENT RACIAL DIVISIONS.

            Which they accomplish by their words spoken and written - like that garbage cited by rover above, and that I've shown here for what it is.

            Hateful, false, racist swill.

            -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Now, instinct and experience tell me we're headed for trouble in the form of white hate violence stoked by a racially divisive president. I hope I'm wrong.

            ...Mr. Trump's rants emboldened white hate groups and reinforced racist blogs, news sites and social media platforms. In response to his tweets, one of the four lawmakers,

            Representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, said: "This is the agenda of white nationalists, whether it is happening in chat rooms or it's happening on national TV. And now it’s reached the White House garden." She's right.


            ...I am not accusing President Trump of inciting violence in Gilroy or anywhere else. But he empowers hateful and potentially violent individuals with his divisive rhetoric and his unwillingness to unequivocally denounce white supremacy.

            If a president paints people of color as the enemy, encourages them to be sent back to where they came from and implies that no humans want to live in certain American cities, he gives license to those who feel compelled to eradicate what Mr. Trump calls an infestation.

            It doesn't really matter whether Mr. Trump is truly a racist or merely playing one on television to appeal to his base. Either way, his path can lead to bloodshed. When that happens, we will hear White House officials and the Republican leadership claim their hands are clean because malicious people can’t be stopped from acting out.



            https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/31/o...terrorism.html
            Anytime the feckless dems resort to the worn out over used racist card this covers their refusal to represent working middle class americans of all races. Since Clinton that party represents pprimarily .the upper middle class the professional class . No place for pro worker fdr democrats who believe in. border cccontrol and pputting our own workers first .which the dems call nazi nnationalism instead of protecting aAAmericans from toxic capitalism as globalist practice

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
              Anytime the feckless dems resort to the worn out over used racist card this covers their refusal to represent working middle class americans of all races. Since Clinton that party represents pprimarily .the upper middle class the professional class . No place for pro worker fdr democrats who believe in. border cccontrol and pputting our own workers first .which the dems call nazi nnationalism instead of protecting aAAmericans from toxic capitalism as globalist practice
              Yeah, every thing pro American is "white nationalism" or "Neo Nazi" blah blah blah

              It's all such B.S. and all so very tiresome

              Demorats have over-played this garbage and will fail big time for it.

              ALL people are sick of being told that it is wrong or "hateful" to want to work and get ahead, make better lives for themselves

              And they're sick as hell of being told that they're "racists" for not wanting people that don't belong in America to come here and suck up our resources !

              People that don't belong here, don't belong here and SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COME HERE !

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                Yeah, every thing pro American is "white nationalism" or "Neo Nazi" blah blah blah

                It's all such B.S. and all so very tiresome

                Demorats have over-played this garbage and will fail big time for it.

                ALL people are sick of being told that it is wrong or "hateful" to want to work and get ahead, make better lives for themselves

                And they're sick as hell of being told that they're "racists" for not wanting people that don't belong in America to come here and suck up our resources !

                People that don't belong here, don't belong here and SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COME HERE !
                The article I posted doesn't say that every white person is a Nazi. The thread asks the question. Is president Trump fanning the flames of white terrorism? I have seen the author of article many times on MSNBC as an expert on national security issues. While we give a lot Muslim terrorism we don't seem to be willing to address domestic terror or election security. It would be nice if once in awhile we could stay on topic. The thread is about Trump and what he is doing. If you don't agree with the premise that he is fanning the flames that's fine, but let's not make it about Democrats playing the race card There are a number of national security types are concerned https://www.lawfareblog.com/trump-na...ed-scorecard-0

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  The article I posted doesn't say that every white person is a Nazi. The thread asks the question. Is president Trump fanning the flames of white terrorism?
                  Yes, I see that.

                  That there is no such thing as "white terrorism," anymore than there is "brown terrorism" is my main point.

                  And this president does not wish for, or condone anybody going off nuts and killing other people at random as we've been seeing lately.

                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  I have seen the author of article many times on MSNBC as an expert on national security issues. While we give a lot Muslim terrorism we don't seem to be willing to address domestic terror or election security. It would be nice if once in awhile we could stay on topic.
                  Forgive my chuckle at this, but yes staying on topic is good I don't disagree : )

                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  The thread is about Trump and what he is doing. If you don't agree with the premise that he is fanning the flames that's fine, but let's not make it about Democrats playing the race card There are a number of national security types are concerned https://www.lawfareblog.com/trump-na...ed-scorecard-0
                  This president could be the most mealy mouthed sissy America ever experienced and liberals and the "media" would STILL be out blaming him for every problem under the sun - just as they did with George Bush - damn him for beating Gore in the Florida recount .....

                  ....and DAMN THIS orange Trump Monkey for beating Hilary !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                  You see, it's cheap & easy to forever find ways to blame a "president" for our own troubles and failures.

                  But cheap & easy just means cheap & easy and beyond that nothing ....

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                    Yeah, every thing pro American is "white nationalism" or "Neo Nazi" blah blah blah

                    It's all such B.S. and all so very tiresome

                    Demorats have over-played this garbage and will fail big time for it.

                    ALL people are sick of being told that it is wrong or "hateful" to want to work and get ahead, make better lives for themselves

                    And they're sick as hell of being told that they're "racists" for not wanting people that don't belong in America to come here and suck up our resources !

                    People that don't belong here, don't belong here and SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COME HERE !
                    Immigration can indeed be good for america but only if it does not create more expensive problems socially economically and fiscally

                    We can use immigimmigration to make us stronger and more intelligent as a people using intelligence driven goals or we can do what the dems gave us in the late 60s political driven as well as ideological driven by a shady post modern marxist iinfluence. Then toss in anti middle class gglobalist agenda utilizing illegal immigration so business can max out profits by keeping wages lower. A war waged on our working middle class by using illegal aaliens as well as hb1 workers that displaces stem Americans in favor of indian modern indentured servants

                    No doubt bringing in educated immigrants due to a lack of American stem. wworkers. is good but this has been abused by congress and employers big time.

                    Immigration has been used to create division and ill health by not being pragmatic selective employing intelligence and positive goals. All it takes to forsake intelligence driven immigration is for dishonorable and dishonest partisans to scream racism in their stupidity

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                      Immigration can indeed be good for america but only if it does not create more expensive problems socially economically and fiscally
                      That's right.

                      This topic about;

                      "Is president Trump fanning the flames of racial terrorism?"

                      ...
                      is really, at it's root about the presidents goal of FINALLY dealing with our open border with our southern neighbors.

                      Which the incompetent fools in Washingtoon D.C. have done nothing about for more than 50 years !!

                      This isn't about racism or terrorism at all.

                      But that's what liars like Piglosi and Shoemer want to make it about.

                      To distract us and make us forget the real issue. Get us thinking this president is a racist and evil etc.


                      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                      We can use immigimmigration to make us stronger and more intelligent as a people using intelligence driven goals or we can do what the dems gave us in the late 60s political driven as well as ideological driven by a shady post modern marxist iinfluence. Then toss in anti middle class gglobalist agenda utilizing illegal immigration so business can max out profits by keeping wages lower. A war waged on our working middle class by using illegal aaliens as well as hb1 workers that displaces stem Americans in favor of indian modern indentured servants
                      So if they can keep us distracted and keep the border open - keep us thinking about how Trump is a racist and evil and this and that .... these greedy pigs can keep the dependents, cheap labor

                      ...oh yes, and voters too !!

                      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                      No doubt bringing in educated immigrants due to a lack of American stem. wworkers. is good but this has been abused by congress and employers big time.

                      Immigration has been used to create division and ill health by not being pragmatic selective employing intelligence and positive goals. All it takes to forsake intelligence driven immigration is for dishonorable and dishonest partisans to scream racism in their stupidity
                      That is where we are & that is what we're seeing.

                      The issue isn't the issue, they turn it around and make it about something else - in THIS case about the president and him supposedly "fanning the flames" of racism blah blah blah...

                      .. and terrorism.. have to throw that in to make it even better !!

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by redrover View Post

                        The article I posted doesn't say that every white person is a Nazi. The thread asks the question. Is president Trump fanning the flames of white terrorism? I have seen the author of article many times on MSNBC as an expert on national security issues. While we give a lot Muslim terrorism we don't seem to be willing to address domestic terror or election security. It would be nice if once in awhile we could stay on topic. The thread is about Trump and what he is doing. If you don't agree with the premise that he is fanning the flames that's fine, but let's not make it about Democrats playing the race card There are a number of national security types are concerned https://www.lawfareblog.com/trump-na...ed-scorecard-0
                        Only some ideological trump hating partisan would invent that premise which cannot be supported by actual fact. Instead it relies on a reality filter being in place and is driven by nothing but scumbag dirty politics thbecsu being iirresponsibly used by your crowd.

                        Your ssources are all affected and infected and are not credible given their hatred and bias and just like msm jjournalists cannot employ standards that relegates them to simple propagandists with an obvious political agenda that lacking integrity ensures they must be damned liars and con men.

                        Each time such claims ate made against trump it cannot be supported by actions but must depend and rely upon a biased partisan iinterpreting something trump said that can be spun deceitfully which is then used as hard evidence in the attack . The self evident scheme must be ignored by minds as yours or you could not continue on with the ppolitical bs.

                        So only a mentally ill or cchallenged person could use the words of trump as their cause for violence or racism and only a hateful politically driven partisan creates these delusions about a racist trump.

                        Trump has not committed any racist driven policy whose only motivation was due to racism. And when your tribe iincluding msm can try to use an adherence to the rule of law as proof trump only does that because he is racist reasonable people see nefarious irresponsible liars in operation known as democrats who assange revealed to be anti democratic and will usurp democratic institutions in order to win. You ally yourself with these 3rd world thinking scum whereas my mmoral values prohibited me.

                        ​​​​​​​Yet your party still had one honest person with moral values and integrity thanks to the anomaly named tulsi. That means you can't vote for her of course but i can and will. Corporate dems dont value iintegrity and honesty so they will never support her either.

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                          That's right.

                          This topic about;

                          "Is president Trump fanning the flames of racial terrorism?"

                          ...
                          is really, at it's root about the presidents goal of FINALLY dealing with our open border with our southern neighbors.

                          Which the incompetent fools in Washingtoon D.C. have done nothing about for more than 50 years !!

                          This isn't about racism or terrorism at all.

                          But that's what liars like Piglosi and Shoemer want to make it about.

                          To distract us and make us forget the real issue. Get us thinking this president is a racist and evil etc.




                          So if they can keep us distracted and keep the border open - keep us thinking about how Trump is a racist and evil and this and that .... these greedy pigs can keep the dependents, cheap labor

                          ...oh yes, and voters too !!



                          That is where we are & that is what we're seeing.

                          The issue isn't the issue, they turn it around and make it about something else - in THIS case about the president and him supposedly "fanning the flames" of racism blah blah blah...

                          .. and terrorism.. have to throw that in to make it even better !!
                          Fanning the flames of racism is a harmful lie and creation of the losers better known as dems. I just dont see ccredibility in their assumptions but then again they declared as fact for years that trump and putin conspired getting worked up into a frenzy as they had no evidence to base it on. Their hoax of racism id no different and non dems see what the dems are. Untrustworthy and perpetually wrong inferring a high degree of stupidity or basic ppathological lying.


                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                            That's right.

                            This topic about;

                            "Is president Trump fanning the flames of racial terrorism?"

                            ...
                            is really, at it's root about the presidents goal of FINALLY dealing with our open border with our southern neighbors.

                            Which the incompetent fools in Washingtoon D.C. have done nothing about for more than 50 years !!

                            This isn't about racism or terrorism at all.

                            But that's what liars like Piglosi and Shoemer want to make it about.

                            To distract us and make us forget the real issue. Get us thinking this president is a racist and evil etc.




                            So if they can keep us distracted and keep the border open - keep us thinking about how Trump is a racist and evil and this and that .... these greedy pigs can keep the dependents, cheap labor

                            ...oh yes, and voters too !!



                            That is where we are & that is what we're seeing.

                            The issue isn't the issue, they turn it around and make it about something else - in THIS case about the president and him supposedly "fanning the flames" of racism blah blah blah...

                            .. and terrorism.. have to throw that in to make it even better !!
                            In 2016 Trump's appeal to poor urban populations was, 'What have you got to lose? Since then he has done nothing to help these communities. They are not his people so as president he has no obligation to serve them. He is all about his base. That is why his favorability polls are so sub par. He is happy to shore up his base by preaching racist hate. Despite what you might think Elijah Cummings is a Phi Beta Kapa and one of the most respected men in congress. Unlike most members of the Washington elite he goes home to his Baltimore home every night.

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by redrover View Post

                              In 2016 Trump's appeal to poor urban populations was, 'What have you got to lose? Since then he has done nothing to help these communities.
                              Bullshit.

                              Historical lowest unemployment and raising wages.
                              Trump signs criminal justice overhaul | TheHill
                              https://thehill.com/homenews/.../422517-trump-signs-criminal-justice-reform-bill
                              Dec 21, 2018 - President Trump on Friday signed into law a bipartisan criminal justice reform bill after it overwhelmingly passed both chambers earlier this ...

                              All that's 'nothing' by your measure? :LOL: What a load of crap. How about discussing how Obama and the constant braying of 'racist' from the left has raised racial tensions? Any honesty at all?

                              They are not his people so as president he has no obligation to serve them. He is all about his base. That is why his favorability polls are so sub par. He is happy to shore up his base by preaching racist hate.
                              More bullshit.

                              Despite what you might think Elijah Cummings is a Phi Beta Kapa and one of the most respected men in congress. Unlike most members of the Washington elite he goes home to his Baltimore home every night.
                              Cumming had already called his own district drug infested. An accurate assessment.

                              https://twitter.com/i/status/1156685887268380676

                              Why is it only 'racist' depending on which politician or form which party they call from? Seems rather obviously hypocritical.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?

                              Working...
                              X