Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

The media is fanning the flames of racial terrorism

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The media is fanning the flames of racial terrorism

    Tonight on the CBS evening news, the focus is on "white terrorism" and "white nationalism"

    We had some of the race baiting ambulance chasing politicians like beto odork saying similar things

    Our media has proven over and over that it is they that are the racists

    White this white that... now it's white terrorism

    What effect do you think this is going to have ?

    White people are going to say to themselves; "Gosh, we really need to work on that !"

    Or are they going to be insulted that the "media" and "politicians" are trying to make events like this RACIAL ????

    Let's attack Caucasians !!

    These people are dangerous.

    With their words they are NOT helping these matters


    These are not racial issues

    They are mental health issues

  • #2
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    Tonight on the CBS evening news, the focus is on "white terrorism" and "white nationalism"

    We had some of the race baiting ambulance chasing politicians like beto odork saying similar things

    Our media has proven over and over that it is they that are the racists

    White this white that... now it's white terrorism

    What effect do you think this is going to have ?

    White people are going to say to themselves; "Gosh, we really need to work on that !"

    Or are they going to be insulted that the "media" and "politicians" are trying to make events like this RACIAL ????

    Let's attack Caucasians !!

    These people are dangerous.

    With their words they are NOT helping these matters


    These are not racial issues

    They are mental health issues
    It would seem obvious that the people pulling the triggers are the racists. How can you say this is a mental health issue unless you want to raise the president's mental health as the issue. I would agree that you would have to be crazy to take action on the basis of Trump's hate filled screeds nut there are people out there who feel he has given them the green light. There are many nutty people out there who are planning to vote for this monster again. The hoods are off now and Trump is the Grand Wizard. And as much as it horrifies me he may win again.

    ?


    • #3
      Originally posted by redrover View Post
      It would seem obvious that the people pulling the triggers are the racists.
      Only to someone who has allowed the bullshit spewed daily by the race-baiting hate filled "media" to become a part of their beliefs.

      As for the rest of us, this has diddly squat to do with "racism."

      If it did, these shooters would have been more selective of who they were shooting. As it is, they were shooting all people, kids, adults all "colors" all "sexes" all what-evers.

      This is a mental illness issue, it has not one iota to do with any racism. . . and there's nothing "white" about any of this.

      But that's what our media wants us to believe. Why is that do you think ?

      Originally posted by redrover View Post
      How can you say this is a mental health issue unless you want to raise the president's mental health as the issue.
      The presidents mental health is not at issue.

      Donald Trump has no mental health problems

      Your opinion on the matter of Donald Trumps mental health is meaningless.

      Originally posted by redrover View Post
      I would agree that you would have to be crazy to take action on the basis of Trump's hate filled screeds nut there are people out there who feel he has given them the green light.
      If Donald Trump wrote ANYTHING CLOSE to the kinds of hate filled screeds that you write here so regularly, he would have been physically removed from the Whitehouse by security and put under observation LOL

      Originally posted by redrover View Post
      There are many nutty people out there who are planning to vote for this monster again.
      Yes there are !

      And they're not nuts LOL

      But here's a show for you about our monster... I'll be your monster -

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6lDMLlX_R0


      Originally posted by redrover View Post
      The hoods are off now and Trump is the Grand Wizard. And as much as it horrifies me he may win again.
      He will

      Why ?

      Because the people you support are the real monsters, communist creeps all of them.

      ?


      • #4
        Words from our president on the matter

        Democrats are destroying themselves with their idiotic accusations and poorly chosen words

        They're race-baiting, TRYING to inflame racial tensions

        Why ?

        Because they hate

        -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Trump Condemns Hate, Dems Slams Trump, White Nationalism After Shootings

        Two mass shootings that killed 29 people in Texas and Ohio reverberated across the U.S. political arena on Sunday, with some Democratic presidential candidates accusing President Donald Trump of stoking racial divisions while he insisted "hate has no place in our country."

        Several 2020 candidates said Trump was indirectly to blame.

        "Donald Trump is responsible for this. He is responsible because he is stoking fears ad hatred and bigotry," U.S. Senator Cory Booker said on CNN's "State of the Union."

        Speaking to reporters on the airport tarmac in Morristown, New Jersey after spending the weekend at his golf resort nearby, Trump said: "Hate has no place in our country, and we're going to take care of it."

        In his first public comments since the shootings, he said he had spoken to the FBI, Attorney General William Barr and members of Congress about what can be done to prevent such violence. But he offered no specifics, except to say he would make a statement in Washington on Monday morning.

        The Republican president did not address accusations by critics about his anti-immigrant and racially charged rhetoric, though he earlier called the El Paso shooting a "hateful act" and "an act of cowardice."

        "This is also a mental illness problem, if you look at both of these cases. This is mental illness. These are really people that are very, very seriously mentally ill," Trump told reporters.

        White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney rebutted the Democrats' allegations and attributed the shootings to "sick" individuals.

        "There's no benefit here in trying to make this a political issue, this is a social issue and we need to address it as that," he said Sunday on ABC's "This Week."


        It was a personal issue for Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke, the former congressman who returned to El Paso after the attack in his hometown. Asked on CNN if he believed Trump was a white nationalist, he responded, "Yes, I do."

        "Let's be very clear about what is causing this and who the president is," O'Rourke said. "He is an open avowed racist and is encouraging more racism in this country."

        Bernie Sanders said he agreed that Trump was a white nationalist.

        "It gives me no pleasure to say this but I think all of the evidence out there suggests that we have a president who is a racist, who is a xenophobe who appeals, and is trying to appeal, to white nationalism," Sanders said on CNN.


        "Clearly Donald Trump does not want anybody shooting down innocent people," Sanders said, but his talk about invasions and calling Mexicans criminals risks leading unstable people to take up arms.

        "White nationalists think he's a white nationalist," added U.S. Representative Tim Ryan.

        A hallmark of Trump's presidency has been his determination to curb illegal immigration. Trump has drawn criticism for comments disparaging Mexican immigrants and referring to the flood of migrants trying to enter through the U.S. southern border as an "invasion."


        https://www.newsmax.com/us/trump-dem.../04/id/927244/

        ?


        • #5
          The hate of our media and loud mouthed, lying democrat politicians are making these matters worse

          It is democrats and
          the media that are fanning the flames of racial terrorism

          Race hustlers like Jay Inslee. Like all the rest of the hateful democrats

          Who talk of little else but hate !!! Hate for Caucasian people !

          The new trendy form of racism is racism against WHITE PEOPLE !!

          It's a real clever racket, hate white people, call them racists and destroy them with the "media."

          Call the president a "white nationalist" etc etc


          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


          Donald Trump is a nationalist who supports all things American, and has admitted as much.

          What he is not is a white nationalist -- a detail that, like a decimal point, seems minor on the surface yet really is the difference between a lightning bug and lightning.

          Yet Democrats and the hard left continue to play with lightning, incessantly labeling Trump a white nationalist despite knowing how such language could be misperceived by legitimate neo-Nazis and white supremacist groups in America, possibly emboldening them to act.


          Democrats and the mainstream media have wasted no time using the massacre to further inject the word white into Trump's pro-American nationalism.

          "The President of the United States is condoning white nationalism," South Bend Mayor and presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg said of the attack. "White nationalism is one of the evils that is motivating and inspiring at least some people to go kill Americans. The president has a responsibility to nip this in the bud."

          Interestingly, it's the Democrats that want to keep white nationalism alive in the White House, as Trump has nipped this in the bud, many times.

          In August of 2017, when violence started to escalate during a white supremacy rally in Charlottesville, Va., Trump tweeted, "We ALL must be united & condemn all that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in America. Lets come together as one!"

          Later, after a 32-year-old female was hit and killed by a white nationalists car that ran into counterprotesters, Trump made the following statement: "We condemn in the strongest most possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides. On many sides."

          Trump's short impromptu response -- made during televised remarks about a bill signing already underway -- suggested it takes two to tango, and failed to specifically condemn white nationalism, although Trump and White House officials insisted this was implied in Trumps original tweet. But this was not good enough for those Trump haters who so desperately wanted to see America's highest office stained by white supremacy.

          After claiming Trump was himself a white nationalist or at the very least a neo-Nazi apologist, Trump publicly condemned such hate groups and their sympathizers, stating, "Racism is evil and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups."

          A White House official even clarified Trump's initial remarks. "The President said very strongly in his statement yesterday that he condemns all forms of violence, bigotry, and hatred," the statement said. "Of course that includes white supremacists, KKK, Neo-Nazi, and all extremist groups. He called for national unity and bringing all Americans together."

          What Democrats should have done at this point was back President Trump, forever putting to rest the ridiculous notion that white supremacist hate groups have an ally in the White House.

          Instead they did the opposite. They rallied together with the mainstream media to create the narrative that Trump was indeed a vicious racist, that yes, the President of the United States was a white supremacist, and that he welcomed -- even encouraged -- such displays of hatred and intolerance.

          Of course Trump did not, and Democrats and the hard left knew it. Trump is an American nationalist, not a white nationalist, the former being patriotic and putting the interests of America and all its citizens first, the latter being a bigot who uses violence and fear to preach and establish white supremacy. Because Democrats have no solid platform of their own, they must use a scorched-earth approach, bending over backwards to frame everything Trump says and does as racist and thus evidence of him being a 'white nationalist.'

          "The first order of business to reduce white nationalism is to eliminate white nationalism in our White House," Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee said after the El Paso shooting. "The sentiments of fear and division, and outright racism, that this president has emboldened out to be sickening to anyone." Inslee went on to say that fear and division are "Donald Trump's stock-in-trade," and that Trump owed it to the country to heal its historic racial wounds.

          Heal, really?

          How can Trump or anyone else heal racial wounds when people like Inslee continue to rip these wounds wide open by constantly framing everything in terms of race, and by disingenuously referring to Americas president as a "white nationalist," whereby providing legitimate hate groups with the misconception that they have a partner in the White House?

          Wajahat Ali, a journalist for Al Jazeera America and former consultant for the U.S. State Department under Obama, recently mocked the Republican party and slammed Trump as a white nationalist, too:

          "I think the Republican Party is the most diverse party on Earth. When I look at the Republican Party I see every shade of white under the sun, I see white men, old white men, young white men, white men with facial hair, some white men with fades. I even see some white women. What I don't see are people of color. Why? Because Donald Trump is a racist. He's a racist president and he's promoting a white nationalist ideology."

          This isn't racist? Mocking the very color of someone's skin? Still, what on earth is this "white nationalist ideology" that Trump espouses, anyway? Trump criticizes the Squad for bad mouthing America, inviting them to go to struggling countries like Somalia - fix them up - and then come back and let us know how it's done. Yet somehow Trump is a bigot and white nationalist who told the congresswomen to go back where they came from, as if they weren't welcomed in the U.S. because they werent white enough. Not only was race not mentioned by anyone except Democrats, but the invitation to come back was conveniently dropped.

          Trump criticizes Elijah Cummings because Baltimore is overrun with rats and urban blight, bringing attention to an area of America neglected by Cummings and the Democrats for decades, and Trumps an intolerant bigot. Again, no mention of race anywhere, except from liberals themselves.

          Trump calls for a merit-based immigration policy, one that accepts people who have viable skills and the ability to assimilate to American culture and values, and the left insists he's a white nationalist, favoring white countries over nonwhite ones. Who bought up skin color? Not President Trump, but the race-obsessed left.

          Ironically, it's the Democrats who want white nationalism in the White House, not Trump and his conservative supporters. It's high time they take responsibility for their dangerous and irresponsible rhetoric, before they embolden more hate groups to act out.

          https://www.americanthinker.com/arti..._el_paso_.html


          ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


          Love him or hate him, he is right about this

          Our "media" needs to be more responsible AND HONEST !!!!


          -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Trump later Monday morning took aim at the media, blaming "fake news" for fueling "anger and rage" in the nation:

          "The Media has a big responsibility to life and safety in our Country. Fake News has contributed greatly to the anger and rage that has built up over many years. News coverage has got to start being fair, balanced and unbiased, or these terrible problems will only get worse!


          ...

          https://www.newsmax.com/politics/tru.../05/id/927282/

          ?


          • #6
            I keep hearing how white. racists are the greatest perps when it comes to murder and maiming. The left screams this at every opportunity and yet is it a fact ?

            One cannot trust stats from groups like the southern law center given they are loose in determining who is a real racist. I would think fbi stats might reveal the facts.

            It is hard to believe that white racists kill more than the drug gangs and other gangs seen in American cities. Of course msm covers white racist killing to the max while ignoring the murder of gangs in ghettos hiding that huge problem and concentration on white racist murders. Why the selectivity? Some motive drives it, some agenda. What are they trying to achieve?

            ?


            • #7
              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
              I keep hearing how white. racists are the greatest perps when it comes to murder and maiming. The left screams this at every opportunity and yet is it a fact ?
              It is nonsense

              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
              One cannot trust stats from groups like the southern law center given they are loose in determining who is a real racist. I would think fbi stats might reveal the facts.
              We wouldn't want to ruin the lefts game with facts would we ? We dare NOT !

              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
              It is hard to believe that white racists kill more than the drug gangs and other gangs seen in American cities.
              It's hard to believe because it's nonsense, so easy to see for the nonsense it is.

              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
              Of course msm covers white racist killing to the max while ignoring the murder of gangs in ghettos hiding that huge problem and concentration on white racist murders. Why the selectivity?
              Today, "white nationalism" and therefore white racism is the trendy new idea for the left to promote to the people of America. - while we also accuse the president of being a racist

              It tells us where their heads are : )

              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
              Some motive drives it, some agenda. What are they trying to achieve?
              Dividing us and putting us all at war with one another is their main goal. Promoting hatreds old, dredged up "racism" and hates etc. by any creative means possible... and they have plenty, get very creative with their big mouths and their cameras.

              We are being herded, but there's too much resistance. It's not going to work, people see through their lies and chicanery.

              and

              There's no longer just 3 TV stations and one local newspaper giving us "the news."

              Thank Heavens !

              ?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                It is nonsense



                We wouldn't want to ruin the lefts game with facts would we ? We dare NOT !



                It's hard to believe because it's nonsense, so easy to see for the nonsense it is.



                Today, "white nationalism" and therefore white racism is the trendy new idea for the left to promote to the people of America. - while we also accuse the president of being a racist

                It tells us where their heads are : )



                Dividing us and putting us all at war with one another is their main goal. Promoting hatreds old, dredged up "racism" and hates etc. by any creative means possible... and they have plenty, get very creative with their big mouths and their cameras.

                We are being herded, but there's too much resistance. It's not going to work, people see through their lies and chicanery.

                and

                There's no longer just 3 TV stations and one local newspaper giving us "the news."

                Thank Heavens !
                Yes I think that independent voters see through what dishonorable dems and msm have attempted to do which is to use propaganda steeped in lies in or to manufacture perception that then creates a false reality. The only people who will succumb to this destructive nefarious trickery are mostly dems and those with an iq of 80 or less.

                ?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                  Yes I think that independent voters see through what dishonorable dems and msm have attempted to do which is to use propaganda steeped in lies in or to manufacture perception that then creates a false reality. The only people who will succumb to this destructive nefarious trickery are mostly dems and those with an iq of 80 or less.
                  I don't think it's an outlandish prediction to guess that these wild-eyed nuts, known as liberals, will fail in some huge ways very soon.

                  They pushed and pushed, became so obviously hateful & dishonest.

                  And there's just not enough Americans with that iq of 80 or less

                  ?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                    I don't think it's an outlandish prediction to guess that these wild-eyed nuts, known as liberals, will fail in some huge ways very soon.

                    They pushed and pushed, became so obviously hateful & dishonest.

                    And there's just not enough Americans with that iq of 80 or less
                    You can't say that the Republican party is dishonest because they have decided to openly embrace their racism. They have stopped trying to hide it. It's all in the open now. No more need for dog whistles. Just lay it all out there The president is speaking today in El Paso and Dayton. Let's see if he gets all politically correct or if he speaks from his heart reminding us that Latinos and black people are vermin. I hear that he read his statement in Dayton from behind closed doors away from the adoring crowd thirsting for words of comfort from our beloved leader.

                    ?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by redrover View Post

                      You can't say that the Republican party is dishonest because they have decided to openly embrace their racism. They have stopped trying to hide it. It's all in the open now. No more need for dog whistles. Just lay it all out there The president is speaking today in El Paso and Dayton. Let's see if he gets all politically correct or if he speaks from his heart reminding us that Latinos and black people are vermin. I hear that he read his statement in Dayton from behind closed doors away from the adoring crowd thirsting for words of comfort from our beloved leader.
                      You make these claims while not being able to back them up with evidence that could be used in a court of law. Just like Kipling's monkeys when asked how they determine what the truth is on a subject you parrot them with, "we all say it is so, so it must be true! "

                      But unless one is a monkey or a dem this is just idiotic talk from idiots. And monkeys and idiots can't discern they are monkeys or idiots and only those with healthy minds can discern the self evident.

                      Repeating a lie over and over can cause low iq people and modern progs to believe in a lie and that is why you guys do it. But it also makes iindependents appalled by a party being so lacking in character and honesty that they wont support your scumbags going into the future.

                      So continue on with the monkey like ways and the good American will get fed up with it at some point and realize exactly what and who the run of the mill democrat is.

                      The down side is that the gop while being better humans have no intention of representing the working middle. class any more than the dp does. Only trump has sshown any interest and it has waned. When he leaves that representation has left the building

                      And dems will be elayed that the deplored will once again not have a party to stand up for them. Unless tulsi runs and wins in 2024. It is shameful that out of the entire dem party only one person will stand up for the common man while being the lone dem who values snd exhibits honesty and integrity which means that your crowd and the cororate dp will do anything to keep her out.
                      Last edited by Blue Doggy; 2 weeks ago.

                      ?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post

                        You make these claims while not being able to back them up with evidence that could be used in a court of law. Just like Kipling's monkeys when asked how they determine what the truth is on a subject you parrot them with, "we all say it is so, so it must be true! "

                        But unless one is a monkey or a dem this is just idiotic talk from idiots. And monkeys and idiots can't discern they are monkeys or idiots and only those with healthy minds can discern the self evident.

                        Repeating a lie over and over can cause low iq people and modern progs to believe in a lie and that is why you guys do it. But it also makes iindependents appalled by a party being so lacking in character and honesty that they wont support your scumbags going into the future.

                        So continue on with the monkey like ways and the good American will get fed up with it at some point and realize exactly what and who the run of the mill democrat is.

                        The down side is that the gop while being better humans have no intention of representing the working middle. class any more than the dp does. Only trump has sshown any interest and it has waned. When he leaves that representation has left the building

                        And dems will be elayed that the deplored will once again not have a party to stand up for them. Unless tulsi runs and wins in 2024. It is shameful that out of the entire dem party only one person will stand up for the common man while being the lone dem who values snd exhibits honesty and integrity which means that your crowd and the cororate dp will do anything to keep her out.
                        FBI Director Chris Wray has said that white supremacist violence poses a persuasive and consistent threat in the US. On the other hand Tucker Carlson says white supremacy is a hoax. IT sounds like Tucker is bucking for the job of FBI Director. based on his Fox creds which qualifies him for job in the Trump administration.https://video.search.yahoo.com/yhs/s...4d&action=view

                        ?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          You can't say that the Republican party is dishonest because they have decided to openly embrace their racism.
                          Examples please

                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          They have stopped trying to hide it. It's all in the open now.
                          Examples please


                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          No more need for dog whistles.
                          Dog whistles ? What about fuzzy toys for cats ? Dog whistles ????

                          What idiotic idea is THIS ?

                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          Just lay it all out there The president is speaking today in El Paso and Dayton. Let's see if he gets all politically correct or if he speaks from his heart reminding us that Latinos and black people are vermin.
                          The vermin are in Washington D.C. and they come in all kinds of different skin tones

                          Then there are rat infested cities like Baltimore, rats are called vermin too, it's not just politicians

                          Oddly enough, ... this might be scary, so put your nitroglycerin tab under your tongue, there are plenty of these "blacks" and "Latinos" - just people really - who are in favor of and support Donald J. Trump as our president.

                          I know, scary !!!

                          Don't follow Fred Sanford, hope you got that nitro tab in place - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stdi-1tIUhM

                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          I hear that he read his statement in Dayton from behind closed doors away from the adoring crowd thirsting for words of comfort from our beloved leader.
                          You've spent too much time in your homeland North Korea

                          Here, we just have a president, not a madcap dictator who we have to call our beloved leader and who likes to control every body and everything.

                          ?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                            Examples please



                            Examples please




                            Dog whistles ? What about fuzzy toys for cats ? Dog whistles ????

                            What idiotic idea is THIS ?



                            The vermin are in Washington D.C. and they come in all kinds of different skin tones

                            Then there are rat infested cities like Baltimore, rats are called vermin too, it's not just politicians

                            Oddly enough, ... this might be scary, so put your nitroglycerin tab under your tongue, there are plenty of these "blacks" and "Latinos" - just people really - who are in favor of and support Donald J. Trump as our president.

                            I know, scary !!!

                            Don't follow Fred Sanford, hope you got that nitro tab in place - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stdi-1tIUhM



                            You've spent too much time in your homeland North Korea

                            Here, we just have a president, not a madcap dictator who we have to call our beloved leader and who likes to control every body and everything.
                            Trump has posted thousands of ads on facebook touting the invasion narrative. Some very bad people are getting his message,https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...f-facebook-ads

                            ?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by redrover View Post
                              Trump has posted thousands of ads on facebook touting the invasion narrative.
                              False

                              There is no "invasion narrative"

                              There IS an invasion of people from southern countries, across our southern border

                              That this invasion is being promoted and supported by our own government, doesn't make it something else

                              It is an invasion and it isn't a narrative

                              Originally posted by redrover View Post
                              Some very bad people are getting his message,https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...f-facebook-ads
                              Some "very bad people" got Barack Obamas messages too

                              And Jimmy Carters

                              And George Bush'

                              And Bill Clintons

                              Maybe you want the government to round up and put all "bad people" into a re-education camp to reform them ?

                              Then no bad people could get any presidents message

                              This would be good yes ?

                              ?

                              Working...
                              X