Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Trump the weakest president ever?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trump the weakest president ever?

    After Putin bitch slapped him in front of the whole world all he can say is thank you. Can you imagine this clown being president in 1941. Thank you Mr. Tojo for helping us dispose of those obsolete battleships and reduce our navy payroll. Then he gets tough with Kim Jung un. You better just stop right now or I'm going to bite you so hard your mommy will never be able to stop your crying. I'm embarrassed for you Americans.

  • #2
    Originally posted by redrover View Post
    After Putin bitch slapped him in front of the whole world all he can say is thank you. Can you imagine this clown being president in 1941. Thank you Mr. Tojo for helping us dispose of those obsolete battleships and reduce our navy payroll. Then he gets tough with Kim Jung un. You better just stop right now or I'm going to bite you so hard your mommy will never be able to stop your crying. I'm embarrassed for you Americans.
    Had it not been for the weak Presidents before him, Korea would not be a nuclear state.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post

      Had it not been for the weak Presidents before him, Korea would not be a nuclear state.
      On the positive thing is you and I have been paying taxes to stock pile nukes we never get to use some of them. The problem with Trump is that he's just as likely to drop a big one on Switzerland as North Korea. Remember during the campaign he wouldn't rule out using nukes in Europe. Of course you eat up his bull about being left with a horrible mess. Which is consistent with his shocking responsibility for anything. It's all Mitches fault I'm sitting here with my pen stuck up my ass waiting for him to send me something to sign. Weak weak!.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        Originally posted by redrover View Post
        After Putin bitch slapped him in front of the whole world all he can say is thank you. Can you imagine this clown being president in 1941. Thank you Mr. Tojo for helping us dispose of those obsolete battleships and reduce our navy payroll. Then he gets tough with Kim Jung un. You better just stop right now or I'm going to bite you so hard your mommy will never be able to stop your crying. I'm embarrassed for you Americans.
        Yeah, Putin "bitch slapped" president Trump.. mmm hmmm..

        You're sounding like one of the scared creepezoids in D.C. LOL

        Why do the creeps in D.C. hate trump so much ?

        "Republicans" "Democrats" . . it doesn't matter. These people are ALL creeps of the same crawling ilk and hate Donald Trump because he might put an end to their scamming of the American people !!

        ... who should actually be pleased about this !!

        -----------------------------------------

        Not only did this newcomer speak bluntly, eschewing politically correct tap-dancing around issues, but he spoke forcefully about the venal nature of politics and those who use it for personal aggrandizement. He didn't use lofty rhetoric and eloquent phrases like his predecessor. Instead, he spoke in a language rarely heard in a country weaned on Pied Piper-style oratory. He merely told the truth in plain words that would resonate with the proletariat, the people who made this country the envy of the world. The voters were thrilled to finally have a leader who uses common sense, rather than a wet finger in the air before making decisions.

        ...those who have been entrenched in their private little fiefdoms in the nation's capital began to wonder how they were going to deal with this brilliant maverick who had captured the imagination of millions of Americans who had given up on government.

        Imagine that you were elected to a federal office several years ago and had a safe seat with all the perks attached, including salary, expense account, and influence with corporate CEOs and other titans of industry. Suppose further that you knew that the future would be prosperous when you left office because the connections you made would make you a fortune as a lobbyist. Moreover, since unseating an incumbent is a herculean task, you felt that you were set for life. In fact, as soon as you got elected, you began raising money and preparing for re-election. Governing and legislating became an afterthought – something you might engage in after your next campaign was carefully planned.

        Suddenly, a guy runs for office with a lot of ideas about "draining the swamp" and making rules that include a prohibition on lobbying for at least five years after leaving office. As if that's not enough, he criticizes the "establishment" of which you are a significant part. To add insult to injury, this upstart comes from the private sector with no record of elective office, yet he has the audacity to run for the highest office in the land. You, and most of your colleagues, got where you are by starting in local elections, from city councils to mayor to state rep, and on to your currents spots at the national level.

        You didn't take him seriously throughout his long and vociferous campaign, often refusing to endorse what he said and what he stood for. When he shocked the world with a strong win against a candidate the polls said would win easily, all you could do was feign approval and acceptance. You didn't dare speak publicly about your disdain for the man who was elected to actually make America great again!


        http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...tes_trump.html

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5
          Originally posted by redrover View Post
          After Putin bitch slapped him in front of the whole world all he can say is thank you. Can you imagine this clown being president in 1941. Thank you Mr. Tojo for helping us dispose of those obsolete battleships and reduce our navy payroll. Then he gets tough with Kim Jung un. You better just stop right now or I'm going to bite you so hard your mommy will never be able to stop your crying. I'm embarrassed for you Americans.
          Trump has been castrated, by a very nefarious and clever ruling elite. This is the fact, and your tirade about trump/putin is just more nonsense, for you are supporting this ruling elite, as revealed in the Princeton Study, evidencing we are now oligarchy, fascism, compliments of people like you, but also average American republicans who are clueless that our republic is dead, only the forms remain. This too is factual to all critical thinkers who actually have a decent education.

          I tthink what congress did with those sanctions, writing into the usurpation of executive authority and powers is unconstitutional. Yet the AG is not challenging it, sending it to the USSC to make a ruling. Hardly bothers you, I think, given your hatred of trump. Right? The hatred of trump makes some people willing to destroy our constitution, in order to hurt a president they hate, pathologically and irrationally.

          My problem with trump is he now believes the CIA, even when no one with a healthy brain would believe anything they say, when it comes to getting us into more war.

          So when Fox begins to agree with MSM, on war, on NK, a red flag the size of texas is unfurled. But Americans who are blind, who are clueless, get on board as they did with the false flag Vietnam war, the invasion of Iraq, based upon lies, as well a Libya, and Syria. A great change from earlier americans who had enough sense to not want wars unless physically attacked. But then you dems don't serve do you? You may have, but that ended when the draft ended. Yet they do love wars. They love the entertainment involved, watching the bombs go off, the tracers in night skies, a they General from their recliners, sipping suds, or smoking a doobie. Safe and sound. During commercials they play their war video games.
          Last edited by Blue Doggy; 08-11-2017, 12:33 PM.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post

            Had it not been for the weak Presidents before him, Korea would not be a nuclear state.
            I do not agree, given the rationale behind NK wanting nukes and ICBMs. It is completely rational for the govv't of NK to demand nukes. For they fear ending up like Iraq, Libya, and Syria if the neocons get their wishes and bloody dreams. If Gadafi had not trusted us, and got rid of his nuke program and developed them, as insurance he may still be ruler and no big knife rammed up his arse, before they killed him. Do you think this aided in NK's paranoia? LOL What about our history since the end of ww2? We are above international law. That is a fact. And most americans could not care less, since we no longer draft. If the draft was still here, the dems would be anti war again.

            Now if other presidents had in some way given NK security instead of doing 50 years of war game off their shores, creating paranoia, with a state who has not waged war as we have with others, there would have been no reason for NK to get nukes to keep our evil oligarchy arses from doing what we do, break the law we helped to write, and invade sovereign nations, removing their leaders, as a matter of habit.

            We say we are pressing for democracy around the world, which is a lie, for we are fascists, an oligarchy, with a m ountain of evidence backing this up. So even that is a ruse, a lie. My gov't is not trustworthy, they lie to us, and we are no longer a good nation, but quite the contrary, and most of our people are just like the Good German in time of Hitler. We are good americans, propagandized, lied to, and we forget quickly the lies and false flags, develop amnesia. We are dumb americans, easy marks for lies and propaganda. .It is embarrassing just how stupid so many have become

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post

              I do not agree, given the rationale behind NK wanting nukes and ICBMs. It is completely rational for the govv't of NK to demand nukes. For they fear ending up like Iraq, Libya, and Syria if the neocons get their wishes and bloody dreams. If Gadafi had not trusted us, and got rid of his nuke program and developed them, as insurance he may still be ruler and no big knife rammed up his arse, before they killed him. Do you think this aided in NK's paranoia? LOL What about our history since the end of ww2? We are above international law. That is a fact. And most americans could not care less, since we no longer draft. If the draft was still here, the dems would be anti war again.

              Now if other presidents had in some way given NK security instead of doing 50 years of war game off their shores, creating paranoia, with a state who has not waged war as we have with others, there would have been no reason for NK to get nukes to keep our evil oligarchy arses from doing what we do, break the law we helped to write, and invade sovereign nations, removing their leaders, as a matter of habit.

              We say we are pressing for democracy around the world, which is a lie, for we are fascists, an oligarchy, with a m ountain of evidence backing this up. So even that is a ruse, a lie. My gov't is not trustworthy, they lie to us, and we are no longer a good nation, but quite the contrary, and most of our people are just like the Good German in time of Hitler. We are good americans, propagandized, lied to, and we forget quickly the lies and false flags, develop amnesia. We are dumb americans, easy marks for lies and propaganda. .It is embarrassing just how stupid so many have become
              Your problem Dog is that history has passed you by. NK's quest for nukes is so 1945. Even with nukes NK will remain a third rate country with no future. The idea of having nukes is going to get you anywhere is as goofy as the idea that coal is the energy source of the future. Kim is struggling to get to 1945 while Trump is trying to get to 1845. They are birds of a feather just a century appart.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                How many years has Kim and his father been jerking our legs, threatening, etc?

                If you're paying attention you'll notice that Kim threatened Guam but didn't do it. He's just telling Trump, your big fat mouth will get a response from my big fat mouth, and that's about all that's going to happen. Kim Jong Un does not want to be wiped off the face of the earth, and he knows if he obliterated Guam or any other US interest, we'd blow him to smithereens.

                Does anybody here think Kim is ready to die or even ready to destroy his own country? What would he do if we wiped out his country? He wouldn't be a big man in town then because he's have no town to be big in.

                The fact is he's a hell of a lot smarter than Trump and a lot of Trump's supporters. Kim threatens but he's smart enough to know if he did anything he'd have to count maybe to ten before he'd meet his maker. He knows that this country would have obliterated him a long time ago if he'd nuked Guam. Obama, Clinton, and Bush Jr would not have hesitated to obliterate N Korea if they followed up on their threats.

                How many days ago did he threaten to attack Guam? Has he done it? What the hell is he waiting on?

                Actually he's crawdaddying... backing up now and saying "I said IF.... IF YOU ATTACK ME... I'll attack Guam."

                What a bunch of stupid losers. Trump and Kim sittin in a tree, kissing. And we thought it was Putin he was Jonesin for.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  If our goal is to keep nukes out of the hands of crazy people, then the U.S. needs to get rid of our nukes until we wise up and get rid of Trump

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Lucinda View Post
                    How many years has Kim and his father been jerking our legs, threatening, etc?

                    If you're paying attention you'll notice that Kim threatened Guam but didn't do it. He's just telling Trump, your big fat mouth will get a response from my big fat mouth, and that's about all that's going to happen. Kim Jong Un does not want to be wiped off the face of the earth, and he knows if he obliterated Guam or any other US interest, we'd blow him to smithereens.

                    Does anybody here think Kim is ready to die or even ready to destroy his own country? What would he do if we wiped out his country? He wouldn't be a big man in town then because he's have no town to be big in.

                    The fact is he's a hell of a lot smarter than Trump and a lot of Trump's supporters. Kim threatens but he's smart enough to know if he did anything he'd have to count maybe to ten before he'd meet his maker. He knows that this country would have obliterated him a long time ago if he'd nuked Guam. Obama, Clinton, and Bush Jr would not have hesitated to obliterate N Korea if they followed up on their threats.

                    How many days ago did he threaten to attack Guam? Has he done it? What the hell is he waiting on?

                    Actually he's crawdaddying... backing up now and saying "I said IF.... IF YOU ATTACK ME... I'll attack Guam."

                    What a bunch of stupid losers. Trump and Kim sittin in a tree, kissing. And we thought it was Putin he was Jonesin for.
                    Sounds like the angry and divided American people does it not ?

                    Everyone is freaked out about THIS about THAT and about whatever other pet issue they're thinking about that day, they're so busy arguing about everything, NO ONE REALLY KNOWS WHAT'S GOING ON.

                    Everyone gets more "satisfaction" fighting about "it" - shooting their mouths off etc etc etc.

                    ... we want world leaders to grow up and stop acting like &^%hills, but excuse ourselves from this request ???????????? LOL

                    Ridiculous isn't it ?

                    Originally posted by Lucinda View Post
                    If our goal is to keep nukes out of the hands of crazy people, then the U.S. needs to get rid of our nukes until we wise up and get rid of Trump
                    We did elect one barack hussein obama TWICE !

                    The people of America are obviously nutz. You're worried about Trump ?

                    ...worry about the sanity of the American people.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                      Sounds like the angry and divided American people does it not ?

                      Everyone is freaked out about THIS about THAT and about whatever other pet issue they're thinking about that day, they're so busy arguing about everything, NO ONE REALLY KNOWS WHAT'S GOING ON.

                      Everyone gets more "satisfaction" fighting about "it" - shooting their mouths off etc etc etc.

                      ... we want world leaders to grow up and stop acting like &^%hills, but excuse ourselves from this request ???????????? LOL

                      Ridiculous isn't it ?



                      We did elect one barack hussein obama TWICE !

                      The people of America are obviously nutz. You're worried about Trump ?

                      ...worry about the sanity of the American people.
                      Yeah what was Obama's Cuban missile crisis moment? Nicholas Burns a former high ranking diplomat in the W. admiration. He had some cogent words to say about Trump's betrayal of the 750 US diplomats kicked out of Russia. My sources tell me that morale within the corps of State department professionals is very low. Apparently things are in chaos and they all hate Trump. Throwing 750 of them under the bus probably won't help. I can't believe the patriotism of the people who have chosen to continue serving the country despite having to work for the most mentally unstable president in history. Being considered a loose cannon unless you ascribe to the mad man school of diplomacy. is not a strong starting point.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by redrover View Post
                        Yeah what was Obama's Cuban missile crisis moment? Nicholas Burns a former high ranking diplomat in the W. admiration. He had some cogent words to say about Trump's betrayal of the 750 US diplomats kicked out of Russia. My sources tell me that morale within the corps of State department professionals is very low. Apparently things are in chaos and they all hate Trump. Throwing 750 of them under the bus probably won't help. I can't believe the patriotism of the people who have chosen to continue serving the country despite having to work for the most mentally unstable president in history. Being considered a loose cannon unless you ascribe to the mad man school of diplomacy. is not a strong starting point.
                        Yes, a very accurate analysis of the current state of things, I see you have a very good handle on all that is going on in the current administration.

                        This is great. Keep us informed and thank you -grins-

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                          Yes, a very accurate analysis of the current state of things, I see you have a very good handle on all that is going on in the current administration.

                          This is great. Keep us informed and thank you -grins-
                          Actually Captain I look at you as the most likely domino to fall from the Trump band wagon. I have no idea how bad things have to get before OMD and Old Blue to flip. They are much too well informed to be sucked in by my siren's call. LOL

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by redrover View Post
                            Actually Captain I look at you as the most likely domino to fall from the Trump band wagon. I have no idea how bad things have to get before OMD and Old Blue to flip. They are much too well informed to be sucked in by my siren's call. LOL
                            I have high hopes for the president, but I always have to say; "We'll see what happens."

                            I have high hopes for every president, then things happen that I don't care for.

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                              I have high hopes for the president, but I always have to say; "We'll see what happens."

                              I have high hopes for every president, then things happen that I don't care for.
                              Do you remember republican outrage when Obama made a polite bow to a foreign leader but remain silent when the president announces to the world that the Kremlin dictates his state dept. personnel management. Weakest president in history. Maybe he should ask Putin to fire Mueller. http://www.msn.com/en-us/video/watch...aff/vp-AApQsPe

                              מה מכילות החדשות?

                              Working...
                              X