Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Evidence the Democrat Party is Self-Destructing?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Evidence the Democrat Party is Self-Destructing?

    They simply cannot get over their disappointment that Clinton lost (again). SHE was their heir apparent to his lordship, the emperor of Obamastan. SHE was the fated winner of the election: Hers to lose (and lose it, she did). SHE was the appointed, the shoo-in, the mythical first woman president... and she tanked... The democrats, in response, vowed to oppose anything the winner tried... it did not matter how fine or great it would be, they would oppose it because [this] just could not happen.

    EVERYTHING they accused conservatives of doing to Obama, they now do to Trump only much bigger and actually hate-filled (as opposed to the accusation of hate against the conservatives).

    It is my opinion their rage, their unreasoned responses will be ... possibly already is ... their undoing. The "Blue wave" is simmering down to a trickle. I will try to post the evidence of this that I come across here. Feel free to post your own (or tell me why it is not the case ... whichever way you lean).

    The following from Fox News (which I know some of you ... ahem ... "hate") is my opening salvo (although I do think this article overstates it when it assures us he will win again in '20):

    If you want to understand why Donald Trump is president today (and why he could very well win a second term), look to the Democrats' hysterical response to two of Trump's major foreign policy achievements over the past week.

    Last Thursday, the president traveled to Joint Base Andrews to greet three American hostages whose release he had secured from North Korea. Unlike his predecessor, Trump did it without sending the offending regime an unmarked plane loaded with hundreds of millions in hard currency. The return of these American captives should have been a moment of celebration and bipartisan unity.

    So how did Democrats respond? By blasting Trump for the way he welcomed the U.S. hostages home. The pretext for their outrage was Trump's comment thanking Kim Jong Un, who he said "really was excellent to these three incredible people" -- by which Trump obviously meant releasing them. No matter. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., took the Senate floor to attack Trump for his "troubling" remarks. "Kim Jong Un is a dictator" who "capriciously detained American citizens," Schumer declared, channeling Captain Obvious, and warned that, by praising Kim, Trump "weakens American foreign policy and puts American citizens at risk around the world."
    ...Apparently, Trump Derangement Syndrome is so debilitating that Democrats can't bring themselves to say "Good job, Mr. President," even when he brings our hostages home. Before, Democrats complained that Trump was too belligerent toward Kim; now, they're upset that he is too effusive. This is absurd. Trump is laying the groundwork for a high-stakes nuclear summit with Kim; of course the president is not going to publicly criticize him. People in Middle America listen to the Democrats' reactions and think: Can Trump do nothing right in these people's eyes?
    Then, a few days later, Trump racked up another major achievement when he fulfilled his promise to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Four American presidents pledged to do it, but only Trump actually did. How did Democrats respond? Not a single congressional Democrat traveled to Israel to attend the historic opening of the embassy. Sen. Lindsey O. Graham, R-S.C., said that he personally invited Democrats to join the congressional delegation, but no one took him up on the offer. "I am disappointed that not one Democrat came," Graham said. "What does that say?" It says not a single Democrat could bring themselves to join in a celebration of what Trump had done.

    House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., blasted Trump's decision when he announced it in December, declaring that "moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem now may needlessly spark mass protests, fuel tensions, and make it more difficult to reach a durable peace." Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., did the same, declaring, "The future of Jerusalem is an issue that should be decided by Israel and the Palestinians, not unilaterally by the United States." Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., called Trump's embassy move a setback while former Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., declared that Trump's action would "severely, perhaps irreparably damage" peace efforts.

    Keep in mind, the past four Democratic Party platforms had called for the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. And last June, the Senate voted 90-0 (with the support of Feinstein, Murphy and Sanders) for a resolution that "reaffirms the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995," which mandated the embassy move (a bill that passed two decades ago with Pelosi's vote). Americans see Trump being criticized for doing exactly what Congress demanded, and his Democratic and Republican predecessors promised, and they rightly see hypocrisy.
    I will say it again, I do not know how the democrats expect to retake congress or even the white house if they intend to remain so freakishly unreasoned in every response... do you?



  • #2
    Originally posted by GOODave View Post
    They simply cannot get over their disappointment that Clinton lost (again). SHE was their heir apparent to his lordship, the emperor of Obamastan. SHE was the fated winner of the election: Hers to lose (and lose it, she did). SHE was the appointed, the shoo-in, the mythical first woman president... and she tanked... The democrats, in response, vowed to oppose anything the winner tried... it did not matter how fine or great it would be, they would oppose it because [this] just could not happen.

    EVERYTHING they accused conservatives of doing to Obama, they now do to Trump only much bigger and actually hate-filled (as opposed to the accusation of hate against the conservatives).

    It is my opinion their rage, their unreasoned responses will be ... possibly already is ... their undoing. The "Blue wave" is simmering down to a trickle. I will try to post the evidence of this that I come across here. Feel free to post your own (or tell me why it is not the case ... whichever way you lean).

    The following from Fox News (which I know some of you ... ahem ... "hate") is my opening salvo (although I do think this article overstates it when it assures us he will win again in '20):

    I will say it again, I do not know how the democrats expect to retake congress or even the white house if they intend to remain so freakishly unreasoned in every response... do you?
    No

    People are sick of being lied to.

    The media is giving an excellent assist in helping the "democrat" party self destruct.

    Today, people can easily find the facts online. They can easily see the obvious confusion, lies and hate coming from the liberal media and politicians.

    As this author points out;

    ....half of the country has gone from equating tin-foil idiocy with realizing they are being lied to. It is not "conspiracy theories" that matter, nor anyone peddling them under that title; the truth is that corporate media are the conspiracy, paralleled solely by Hollywood in terms of treasonous psychopathology. Where once a conspiracy theorist existed, now there are millions of people realizing that if they do not do something, the Constitution { and America } will be destroyed.

    Now that Trump is midway through his second year as president, I believe we can now announce without fear of the Post-Orwellian Thought Police: the enemies of President Trump are the enemies of the family, the Constitution, morality, and sanity. They are collectively the enemies of our nation's future, who actively seek to flood the nation with third-world refugees while disarming the native population. In a word, President Trump's enemies are barbarians within the gates, and they have gotten this far because they do a good job of weeping when retaliation looms. We now must update our terminology if we are consciously to move ahead: the words "liberal," "progressive," "Democrat" are what "National Socialist" are to "Nazi." They are a lot of misleading verbiage.

    The success of the totalitarian party has nothing to do with being morally superior, but being eternal victims. The key to destroying eternal victimhood is to recognize it.


    .....

    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...iberalism.html


    People DO recognize it.

    The game is over for the left. They're going to have to be honest and tell the truth.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

      No

      People are sick of being lied to.

      The media is giving an excellent assist in helping the "democrat" party self destruct.

      Today, people can easily find the facts online. They can easily see the obvious confusion, lies and hate coming from the liberal media and politicians.

      As this author points out;

      ....half of the country has gone from equating tin-foil idiocy with realizing they are being lied to. It is not "conspiracy theories" that matter, nor anyone peddling them under that title; the truth is that corporate media are the conspiracy, paralleled solely by Hollywood in terms of treasonous psychopathology. Where once a conspiracy theorist existed, now there are millions of people realizing that if they do not do something, the Constitution { and America } will be destroyed.

      Now that Trump is midway through his second year as president, I believe we can now announce without fear of the Post-Orwellian Thought Police: the enemies of President Trump are the enemies of the family, the Constitution, morality, and sanity. They are collectively the enemies of our nation's future, who actively seek to flood the nation with third-world refugees while disarming the native population. In a word, President Trump's enemies are barbarians within the gates, and they have gotten this far because they do a good job of weeping when retaliation looms. We now must update our terminology if we are consciously to move ahead: the words "liberal," "progressive," "Democrat" are what "National Socialist" are to "Nazi." They are a lot of misleading verbiage.

      The success of the totalitarian party has nothing to do with being morally superior, but being eternal victims.
      The key to destroying eternal victimhood is to recognize it.

      .....

      https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...iberalism.html


      People DO recognize it.

      The game is over for the left. They're going to have to be honest and tell the truth.
      I recognize it and confront it in my wife and children ... and it makes them mad.

      SO, I have to agree.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

        No

        People are sick of being lied to.

        The media is giving an excellent assist in helping the "democrat" party self destruct.

        Today, people can easily find the facts online. They can easily see the obvious confusion, lies and hate coming from the liberal media and politicians.

        As this author points out;

        ....half of the country has gone from equating tin-foil idiocy with realizing they are being lied to. It is not "conspiracy theories" that matter, nor anyone peddling them under that title; the truth is that corporate media are the conspiracy, paralleled solely by Hollywood in terms of treasonous psychopathology. Where once a conspiracy theorist existed, now there are millions of people realizing that if they do not do something, the Constitution { and America } will be destroyed.

        Now that Trump is midway through his second year as president, I believe we can now announce without fear of the Post-Orwellian Thought Police: the enemies of President Trump are the enemies of the family, the Constitution, morality, and sanity. They are collectively the enemies of our nation's future, who actively seek to flood the nation with third-world refugees while disarming the native population. In a word, President Trump's enemies are barbarians within the gates, and they have gotten this far because they do a good job of weeping when retaliation looms. We now must update our terminology if we are consciously to move ahead: the words "liberal," "progressive," "Democrat" are what "National Socialist" are to "Nazi." They are a lot of misleading verbiage.

        The success of the totalitarian party has nothing to do with being morally superior, but being eternal victims. The key to destroying eternal victimhood is to recognize it.


        .....

        https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...iberalism.html


        People DO recognize it.

        The game is over for the left. They're going to have to be honest and tell the truth.
        I'm glad that the right is starting to understand that they have stop always playing the victim I'm glad to see that the right is starting to recognize it.One gets tired of hearing the constant whining from a party that controls all three branches of government.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5
          Originally posted by redrover View Post

          I'm glad that the right is starting to understand that they have stop always playing the victim I'm glad to see that the right is starting to recognize it.One gets tired of hearing the constant whining from a party that controls all three branches of government.
          Are you kidding me ?

          These guys barely control their own toilet routines, you think they have control of all three branches of government ??

          You've been listening to Nancy Pelosi fantasize again haven't you ? She'll be joining these people in elderly care facilities soon herself LOL

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

            Are you kidding me ?

            These guys barely control their own toilet routines, you think they have control of all three branches of government ??

            You've been listening to Nancy Pelosi fantasize again haven't you ? She'll be joining these people in elderly care facilities soon herself LOL
            We keep waiting for you Gen X people to step up and take leadership, but first we'll have to get you out of our basements. It's safe to say in the future nobody will be weitting books about you guys calling you the greatest generation. You will forever be known as the generation that elected DJT. Shame.Start by showing more respect to your elders.

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Originally posted by redrover View Post

              We keep waiting for you Gen X people to step up and take leadership, but first we'll have to get you out of our basements. It's safe to say in the future nobody will be weitting books about you guys calling you the greatest generation. You will forever be known as the generation that elected DJT. Shame.Start by showing more respect to your elders.
              Yeah LOL

              History will show Donald Trump as one of Americas best presidents and the choice that drew us away from the cliff we were rushing towards.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                Yeah LOL

                History will show Donald Trump as one of Americas best presidents and the choice that drew us away from the cliff we were rushing towards.
                I am quite confident that 50 years from now historians will rank DJT dead last. I'm willing to bet a thousand dollars on that. If I'm wrong and he only comes out second to last. You can collect from my estate.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by redrover View Post

                  I am quite confident that 50 years from now historians will rank DJT dead last. I'm willing to bet a thousand dollars on that. If I'm wrong and he only comes out second to last. You can collect from my estate.
                  I doubt I'll be around then myself LOL

                  Still, future predictions made based on your emotional responses and dislike for a person, aren't likely to be what you predict.

                  It's possible.

                  Just as possible as my prediction..

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by redrover View Post

                    I am quite confident that 50 years from now historians will rank DJT dead last. I'm willing to bet a thousand dollars on that. If I'm wrong and he only comes out second to last. You can collect from my estate.
                    Haters gotta hate.

                    Isn't this very thing what liberals kept whining to conservatives about? I seem to recall words to the effect "hoping Obama fails is hoping America fails" and similar.

                    You are so blinded you cannot even see (never mind acknowledge) what Trump is doing despite the rancorous opposition.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by DavidSF View Post

                      Haters gotta hate.

                      Isn't this very thing what liberals kept whining to conservatives about? I seem to recall words to the effect "hoping Obama fails is hoping America fails" and similar.

                      You are so blinded you cannot even see (never mind acknowledge) what Trump is doing despite the rancorous opposition.
                      I think we can start talking about "
                      rancorous opposition".After the democrats take the house this fall. I will acknowledge that Trump is throwing children into concentration camps and separating them from their parents. Like most of the things Trump has done I think they are bad things.I'll give you one more example though I could easily go on for hours. His ongoing efforts to obstruct and discredit the Mueller investigation.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by redrover View Post

                        I think we can start talking about "
                        rancorous opposition".After the democrats take the house this fall. I will acknowledge that Trump is throwing children into concentration camps and separating them from their parents. Like most of the things Trump has done I think they are bad things.I'll give you one more example though I could easily go on for hours. His ongoing efforts to obstruct and discredit the Mueller investigation.
                        Exactly as I said, you are so blinded by your hatred of Trump, you are incapable of seeing anything but what the ardent left media spoon feeds you.

                        It really is a pity, too: Other than that obvious blind spot, your responses are generally pretty intelligent.

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DavidSF View Post

                          Exactly as I said, you are so blinded by your hatred of Trump, you are incapable of seeing anything but what the ardent left media spoon feeds you.

                          It really is a pity, too: Other than that obvious blind spot, your responses are generally pretty intelligent.
                          I know it's terrible the way they keep spoon feeding me clips of Trump making a pronouncement or Sarah Sanders delivering a press briefing.Or best of all the way they insist on relaying the content of the president's latest tweet. I like to think if he ever said or did anything I agreed with I wouldn't hate it.but then again I might be like the democrats who refused to clap for him every time he mentioned mom and apple pie during the state of the union. The traitors.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by redrover View Post
                            I know it's terrible the way they keep spoon feeding me clips of Trump making a pronouncement or Sarah Sanders delivering a press briefing.Or best of all the way they insist on relaying the content of the president's latest tweet. I like to think if he ever said or did anything I agreed with I wouldn't hate it.but then again I might be like the democrats who refused to clap for him every time he mentioned mom and apple pie during the state of the union. The traitors.
                            As much as I hated what barack obama was doing to America when he was president, I always at least said he gave very good sounding speeches when he gave them.

                            I never hated him personally, I hated what he stands for - and still do.

                            Still, I think he's great at delivering speeches.

                            You're so irrational, angry and hateful about this president, that I don't expect you'll ever say anything positive about him, even if his presidency does good things for you personally.

                            That's what hate for another person does to us, hinders our ability to think and reason clearly.

                            I remember a lot of things being said about trump; the orange haired idiot, the ORANGE idiot, etc etc etc..

                            But then I remember how nutty certain of us got when others said negative things about obama.
                            Everything negative said about HIM was called "racist" and was therefor VERBOTEN ! ... off limits if you don't know the term

                            Sorry but hate doesn't make hypocrisy and lack of reason acceptable.

                            It's really time to talk about facts instead of carrying on like spoiled brats because hilary isn't the president. All the unreasonable stuff liberals keep saying, just makes them look stupid, and I don't care for it, because, believe it or not, there are SOME things I agree with them about.

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by redrover View Post

                              I know it's terrible the way they keep spoon feeding me clips of Trump making a pronouncement or Sarah Sanders delivering a press briefing.Or best of all the way they insist on relaying the content of the president's latest tweet. I like to think if he ever said or did anything I agreed with I wouldn't hate it.but then again I might be like the democrats who refused to clap for him every time he mentioned mom and apple pie during the state of the union. The traitors.
                              Well, as you say, it IS pretty terrible how they spoon feed you only pieces of Trumps "pronouncements" or Sarah Sanders delivering only part of a press briefing; and how you gulp it up and trot off to share it with everyone like a proud puppy sharing the lizard he caught.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?

                              Working...
                              X