Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Liberal terrorists

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    I know, that's why I thought I'd post it again for him.

    Though he doesn't read, it did please him so .....
    The one thing I have learned from this thread is that neither one of you know the definition of terrorism

    ?


    • #47
      Originally posted by redrover View Post

      The one thing I have learned from this thread is that neither one of you know the definition of terrorism
      So tell us, what is terrorism ?

      ?


      • #48
        Originally posted by redrover View Post

        The one thing I have learned from this thread is that neither one of you know the definition of terrorism
        One thing I have learned... but not strictly from this thread, is you have difficulty with cogent thought.

        ?


        • #49
          Originally posted by DavidSF View Post

          One thing I have learned... but not strictly from this thread, is you have difficulty with cogent thought.
          It is hard to discuss terrorism with people who not the slightest idea of what the word means. Please demonstrate your ignorance by giving a prime example of liberal terrorism.

          ?


          • #50
            Originally posted by redrover View Post
            It is hard to discuss terrorism with people who not the slightest idea of what the word means.
            You say; "It is hard to discuss terrorism with people who not the slightest idea of what the word means."

            Which is just another example of your inability to formulate a proper sentence. There are thousands more examples on this forum.

            You were just asked; "So tell us, what is terrorism ?"

            https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...349#post560349

            Which you've been unable to answer

            Originally posted by redrover View Post
            Please demonstrate your ignorance by giving a prime example of liberal terrorism.
            This thread has shown many examples of liberals terrorizing people.

            You're inability to read is the only factor allowing you to write such stupid statements as;

            "The one thing I have learned from this thread is that neither one of you know the definition of terrorism."

            As if YOU know !!! LOL

            You can't even read or write ! LOL

            ?


            • #51
              Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

              You say; "It is hard to discuss terrorism with people who not the slightest idea of what the word means."

              Which is just another example of your inability to formulate a proper sentence. There are thousands more examples on this forum.

              You were just asked; "So tell us, what is terrorism ?"

              https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...349#post560349

              Which you've been unable to answer



              This thread has shown many examples of liberals terrorizing people.

              You're inability to read is the only factor allowing you to write such stupid statements as;

              "The one thing I have learned from this thread is that neither one of you know the definition of terrorism."

              As if YOU know !!! LOL

              You can't even read or write ! LOL
              Okay since you won't pick one let's discuss take this one. "the left is so literally hell-bent on having the right to put an infant not a mere clump of cells but a live infant outside the mothers womb to death, then there is no moral limit to what they will do in service to their satanic vision." Are you saying that liberals are grabbing pregnant women off the street and forcing them to have an abortion against their will I would agree that is terrorism. I think even you know this is not what is happening. In your opinion who is being terrorized by this legal voluntary medical procedure? Is this causing terror in the minds of fetuses all over the world fearing they will the next ones to die? Since you have no idea of what terror is let me tell you that the purpose of terror into the hearts of people you want to control and manipulate. Voluntary abortion doesn't fit the definition. Forcing a women to a baby she doesn't want is more of a terrorist act than making legal abortion available I understand you don't like abortion on moral grounds that's fine but to call it terrorism is just stupid.

              ?


              • #52
                Originally posted by redrover View Post

                Okay since you won't pick one let's discuss take this one....
                Put the beer and the bong away and come back later when you can post something MODERATELY sensible.

                Then...

                Have someone read the posts in the last three or four pages of this thread, and carefully explain them to you.

                THEN maybe you can post something that makes sense, is formatted correctly and written in the version of the English language that is used today.

                ?


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                  Put the beer and the bong away and come back later when you can post something MODERATELY sensible.

                  Then...

                  Have someone read the posts in the last three or four pages of this thread, and carefully explain them to you.

                  THEN maybe you can post something that makes sense, is formatted correctly and written in the version of the English language that is used today.
                  You son are the one who is claiming that elective abortion is terrorism. I am tired of the insulting insinuations of a drinking problem and having my posts altered I hope you and David SF enjoy ditto heading each other. I am done with you two.

                  ?


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by redrover View Post
                    You son are the one who is claiming that elective abortion is terrorism. I am tired of the insulting insinuations of a drinking problem and having my posts altered I hope you and David SF enjoy ditto heading each other. I am done with you two.
                    Ok

                    ....still

                    It is well documented the terrorism that liberals perpetrate.

                    This is just one of the latest examples that I pointed out here;

                    https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...309#post560309

                    Naturally a liberal will get angry when their terrorism of others is pointed out.

                    They hate that.

                    --------------------------------------------------------------

                    ...the left pounced on the opportunity to demonize and destroy the Covington Catholic high school kids involved in a more recent controversy completely manufactured by the left-dominated media.

                    Trump-deranged former comedienne Kathy Griffin called for their doxing. Late-night talk show hosts, Twitters blue-checked media elites, and leftist pundits like disgraced Islam apologist Reza Aslan joked about punching the face of Nick Sandmann, the white 16-year-old at the center of the controversy. He and his family received death threats.


                    [ Liberal terrorists ]

                    --------------------------------------------------------------

                    This is the event we all heard about in our "media."

                    Our "media" that lied to America to help tear down and terrorize innocent people.

                    The kid couldn't even return to school !

                    --------------------------------------------------------------

                    One of the attorneys representing Covington High School student Nick Sandmann and his parents confirmed to LifeSiteNews that Native American activist Nathan Phillips, and some of the others who have received notices from the attorneys, will be sued.

                    Lin Wood, an Atlanta-based lawyer, told LifeSite yesterday that Phillips lies and false accusations against Sandmann and the other Covington students are well documented.

                    A January 25 press release issued by attorneys Wood and McMurtry stated,

                    On January 18, in the span of a few hours, Nick Sandmanns peaceful attendance with his Covington Catholic classmates at the March for Life in Washington, D.C. was turned into a personal nightmare when Nick became the focus of false and defamatory accusations published and broadcast across the nation and the world. A mob comprised of activists, church and school officials, members of the mainstream print and broadcast media, and individuals on social media, including elected public officials and celebrities, rushed to condemn and vilify this young man by burying him in an avalanche of false accusations, false portrayals, and cyberbullying that have threatened his reputation and his physical safety.

                    Nick Sandmann is 16 years old. He is an eleventh-grade high school student. He is not the face of evil and he did absolutely nothing wrong or inappropriate in connection with the incident to deserve the heinous accusations made against him by uninformed or agenda-driven individuals and media entities.


                    There are significant items in the video that have not been reported by mainstream media that heavily covered the incident with the Covington students and American activist Nathan Phillips.

                    Most seemed to rely almost entirely on statements made by Phillips and especially on a short initial video posted on social media that went viral. The video appears to have been deliberately edited to portray the Covington students as accosting and disrespecting Phillips.

                    The video was initially pushed through what has been revealed by Breitbart to be a likely Democrat activist controlled, anti-Trump fake Twitter account. It has since been suspended by Twitter for violating its fake account policy. Experts say the use of the account to so effectively promote the video had "the hallmarks of a disinformation campaign."


                    .........

                    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/co...round-of-lawsu

                    --------------------------------------------------------------

                    The following text is from the very bottom of that post.

                    It is there showing another evil liberals promote. Beyond terrorizing people who may not agree with them.

                    .... which there are plenty of examples in this thread to read. When you learn to read.

                    In the mean-time, here's what is written at the bottom of that post.

                    And it is true what the highlighted text says at the bottom.

                    That being;

                    "If the left is so literally hell-bent on having the right to put an infant not a mere clump of cells but a live infant outside the mothers womb to death, then there is no moral limit to what they will do in service to their satanic vision."

                    Nowhere is it claimed that "elective abortion" is terrorism.

                    That "abortion" after birthing a full-term infant....

                    killing a newborn baby ..........

                    Is clearly Satanic and evil and is included in that article to underscore how evil liberalism really is.

                    It is sick.


                    --------------------------------------------------------------

                    Virginia politicians including Governor Ralph Northam recently repulsed countless Americans for casually endorsing the abortion of babies all the way up to literally the moment of birth and even beyond. Fox News Tucker Carlson brought Monica Klein, the co-founder of a political messaging firm called Seneca Strategies, on his show to ask her opinion of this shocking pro-abortion extremism, and for the entirety of the nearly four-minute segment Klein belligerently stonewalled his question, hurling irrational accusations and predictable Democrat Party talking points, refusing to address third trimester abortions except to fiercely defend a womans right to discard her child.

                    If the left is so literally hell-bent on having the right to put an infant not a mere clump of cells but a live infant outside the mothers womb to death, then there is no moral limit to what they will do in service to their satanic vision.


                    --------------------------------------------------------------

                    ?


                    • #55
                      Another liberal terrorist.

                      ... but; "there aren't any of those." we're told.

                      Yes, there actually are.

                      We see stories like this pretty regularly.

                      Americans are starting to be afraid to wear hats that support the current president !

                      Some liberal ass-hat might harass & aim a gun at them... in Walmart/Samsclub !

                      So much for freedom of expression & speech, or even clothes choice !!

                      ... unless you're a liberal, or gay, or a transgender, or an illegal immigrant, or a Muslim or ...

                      An American, maybe caucasion wearing a MAGA hat ?

                      Be afraid, be very afraid

                      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                      Ky. Police: Man Pulled Gun on Couple Wearing MAGA Hats



                      Kentucky Police say a Tennessee man pulled a gun on a couple wearing "Make America Great Again" hats, The Lexington Herald-Leader reports.

                      James Phillips, 59, was charged with wanton endangerment after witnesses told police he pulled a gun on Terry Pierce and his wife, Cherrie, at a Sam's Club in Bowling Green, Kentucky.

                      Pierce and Phillips gave different accounts of what took place last Saturday.

                      Phillips said he flipped off the Pierces for "solely wearing the hats," according to the arrest citation.

                      Surveillance footage shows Tony Pierce coming up behind Phillips and putting his hands in his face.

                      Multiple witnesses said Phillips then pulled a gun on Pierce inside the store.

                      Pierce told WBKO for Phillips to "pull the trigger. Put the gun down and fight me or pull the trigger. Whichever one you want."

                      Phillips, then told him, "It's a good day for you to die," according to the report.

                      Pierce said he followed Phillips out to the parking lot to confront him.

                      "I went out the front of the store to confront him again, and that's when I got him in his car," Pierce said. "He couldn't leave because his mother was still in the store. And we were having a verbal altercation outside.

                      "He tried telling me I assaulted him and I said, 'I never touched you,'" he added.

                      Police say Phillips had a Glock .40 caliber with a round chambered in his back pocket.


                      https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/ke.../19/id/903404/

                      ?


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by redrover View Post

                        It is hard to discuss terrorism with people who not the slightest idea of what the word means. Please demonstrate your ignorance by giving a prime example of liberal terrorism.
                        Using only terms your limited mentality can easily comprehend, my prime example is... you

                        ?


                        • #57
                          To be fair.

                          Liberals and followers of Islam, DON'T have a corner on the market in terrorism.

                          This guy was a real whiz-bang, at least wanted to be.

                          He "allegedly drafted a letter to known American neo-Nazi leader."

                          I'm unsure how to interpret that.

                          Was he addressing our current president as a known American neo-Nazi leader. ??

                          That would undermine my theory that he's a hard-core right winger.

                          I guess we'll have to wait, as "..this is an open investigation, the Coast Guard has no further details at this time.

                          --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                          It is Lt. Christopher Paul Hasson who was arrested and charged on Feb. 15.

                          He was serving as an acquisitions officer for the National Security Cutter Acquisition Program, the report said.

                          A member of the U.S. Coast Guards detachment at its headquarters in Washington, D.C., is being accused of planning to murder innocent civilians on a scale rarely seen in this country.

                          Military.com quoted documents filed in U.S. District Court in Maryland in making the statement.

                          The lieutenant was stationed in Washington and now has been arrested on drug and gun possession charges, the report said.

                          Significantly, the potential targets included prominent Democratic congressional leaders, activists, political organizations, and MSNBC and CNN media personalities such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.; Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va.; Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-New York and more, authorities said.

                          The claims first were found by Seamus Hughes of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University and then shared with Military.com, the report said.

                          A motion for detention pending trial, filed by U.S. Attorney Robert K. Hur, paints a much more menacing portrait of Hassons crimes and planned crimes, Military.com said.

                          Hurs statement was: The current charges, however, are the proverbial tip of the iceberg.

                          The defendant is a domestic terrorist, bent on committing acts dangerous to human life that are intended to affect government conduct.

                          He was found to be in possession of 15 guns, including shotguns and handguns, as well as more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition, when he was taken into custody in Silver Spring, Maryland, the report said.

                          Hur noted a search of his computers found an email draft from two years ago in which he dreamed about a way to kill almost every last person on the earth. He speculated about Spanish flu, botulism, anthrax and more.


                          [ sounds like a real friendly fellow ]

                          The suspect also allegedly drafted a letter to known American neo-Nazi leader.

                          An active-duty Coast Guard member stationed at Coast Guard Headquarters in Washington, D.C., was arrested last week on illegal weapons and drug charges as a result of an ongoing investigation led by Coast Guard Investigation Services, in cooperation with the FBI and the Dept. of Justice, said Coast Guard spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Scott McBride in a statement.

                          Because this is an open investigation, the Coast Guard has no further details at this time.


                          https://www.wnd.com/2019/02/pelosi-j...d-terror-plot/

                          ?


                          • #58
                            Another liberal terrorist.

                            This one charged with disorderly conduct and assault and battery.

                            Because some guy was wearing a MAGA hat in a Mexican restaurant ! LOL

                            Now we know for sure !

                            Yes, terrorists really ARE dangerous and stupid !

                            Dangerous BECAUSE they're stupid !!


                            -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            The man wearing the hat, 23-year-old Bryton Turner of Mashpee, was so annoyed with the woman's antics that he pulled out his phone and started recording her.

                            The incident occurred last Friday at the "Casa Vallarta" Mexican restaurant in Falmouth.

                            Turner says he was minding his own business, when Santos started yelling at him because of his hat, which bears the theme that President Donald Trump campaigned on.

                            The woman is seen walking behind him and hitting his hat off his head.

                            When asked if Turner did anything to provoke Santos, bartender Geo Macarao said, "No, no he just walked in and ordered his food."

                            When police showed up to the restaurant, the woman told them the man shouldn't be allowed to eat in a Mexican restaurant. President Donald Trump is aiming to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.


                            [ Yes, "President Donald Trump is aiming to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border."

                            That's correct !

                            That is because we have a massive problem of illegal immigrants crossing our border. ... it has nothing to do with whether or not a person should be allowed to wear a certain hat, or have some Mexican food. ]

                            As Falmouth police officers were escorting Santos out of the restaurant, Macarao said she took another swipe at Turner.

                            "I couldnt imagine somebody just coming up and hitting them when theres cops right here," Macarao said.

                            "She just tried to grab my hat in front of four officers, not smart," Turner said.

                            Santos, a Brazilian immigrant, said while she regrets her actions, she claims she was provoked.

                            I had a little bit to drink maybe thats the reason that I couldnt walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself," she said. "Hes not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?



                            [ So we have a drunk, Brazilian ring-a-ding ... who "had a little bit to drink maybe," saying she is the victim of "discrimination" because some dude wore a hat.

                            Saying "..I have been bullied, OK?

                            ...not a good reason to assault someone over wearing a hat LOL ]

                            https://www.boston25news.com/news/wo...-cod/923965262

                            ?


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                              Another liberal terrorist.

                              This one charged with disorderly conduct and assault and battery.

                              Because some guy was wearing a MAGA hat in a Mexican restaurant ! LOL

                              Now we know for sure !

                              Yes, terrorists really ARE dangerous and stupid !

                              Dangerous BECAUSE they're stupid !!


                              -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              The man wearing the hat, 23-year-old Bryton Turner of Mashpee, was so annoyed with the woman's antics that he pulled out his phone and started recording her.

                              The incident occurred last Friday at the "Casa Vallarta" Mexican restaurant in Falmouth.

                              Turner says he was minding his own business, when Santos started yelling at him because of his hat, which bears the theme that President Donald Trump campaigned on.

                              The woman is seen walking behind him and hitting his hat off his head.

                              When asked if Turner did anything to provoke Santos, bartender Geo Macarao said, "No, no he just walked in and ordered his food."

                              When police showed up to the restaurant, the woman told them the man shouldn't be allowed to eat in a Mexican restaurant. President Donald Trump is aiming to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border.


                              [ Yes, "President Donald Trump is aiming to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border."

                              That's correct !

                              That is because we have a massive problem of illegal immigrants crossing our border. ... it has nothing to do with whether or not a person should be allowed to wear a certain hat, or have some Mexican food. ]

                              As Falmouth police officers were escorting Santos out of the restaurant, Macarao said she took another swipe at Turner.

                              "I couldnt imagine somebody just coming up and hitting them when theres cops right here," Macarao said.

                              "She just tried to grab my hat in front of four officers, not smart," Turner said.

                              Santos, a Brazilian immigrant, said while she regrets her actions, she claims she was provoked.

                              I had a little bit to drink maybe thats the reason that I couldnt walk away but being discriminated for so many times in my life, I just had to stand up for myself," she said. "Hes not a victim. I am the victim. I have been bullied, OK?



                              [ So we have a drunk, Brazilian ring-a-ding ... who "had a little bit to drink maybe," saying she is the victim of "discrimination" because some dude wore a hat.

                              Saying "..I have been bullied, OK?

                              ...not a good reason to assault someone over wearing a hat LOL ]

                              https://www.boston25news.com/news/wo...-cod/923965262
                              What has any of this got to do with liberal terrorism. Why don't you talk about conservative terrorism. Like your Coast Guard buddy and Trump's friend the pipe bomber?

                              ?


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by redrover View Post
                                What has any of this got to do with liberal terrorism. Why don't you talk about conservative terrorism. Like your Coast Guard buddy and Trump's friend the pipe bomber?
                                We're still waiting for more information to come out about the one fellow.

                                He was military or ex-military, so we may never hear anything ... we can only wait & hope to learn more.

                                Curious about the presidents friend the pipe bomber though, can you show us that story ?

                                That would be great, thanks.

                                ?

                                Working...
                                X