Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Liberal terrorists

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by redrover View Post
    Liberal terrorist strike again. We know Democrats hate Jewish people like Chuck Schumer and Jerrold Nadler. https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/ruth...and-a-swastika
    The liberal Nazis strike again !!!!

    See we can lie and make up idiotic nonsense just like you and your leftist friends in the "media."

    The difference being that we admit that we're lying, THE LEFT DOESN'T !!!

    No, they repeat the lies over and over for years, maybe decades, until people believe the crap they're saying !!

    ?


    • #77
      Originally posted by redrover View Post

      Liberal terrorist strike again. We know Democrats hate Jewish people like Chuck Schumer and Jerrold Nadler. https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/ruth...and-a-swastika
      We know that Democrats are tolerant of antisemitism, hence no censure of Omar, no removal of Omar from her committee assignments, no rebuke of Omar, and some lukewarm, half-assed generic 'down with all hate' BS resolution.

      Omar has a long history of being antisemitic and publicly making antisemitic statements.

      By contrast, Republican Steve King comes out with a half-assed White Nationalist statement, he was publicly rebuked, censured, and removed from his committee assignments.

      The Democrats need to do a better job of policing their own, instead of running around to ever media venue they can find, blame casting and making baseless accusation of racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic of everyone else.

      ?


      • #78
        Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

        We know that Democrats are tolerant of antisemitism, hence no censure of Omar, no removal of Omar from her committee assignments, no rebuke of Omar, and some lukewarm, half-assed generic 'down with all hate' BS resolution.

        Omar has a long history of being antisemitic and publicly making antisemitic statements.

        By contrast, Republican Steve King comes out with a half-assed White Nationalist statement, he was publicly rebuked, censured, and removed from his committee assignments.

        The Democrats need to do a better job of policing their own, instead of running around to ever media venue they can find, blame casting and making baseless accusation of racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic of everyone else.
        And of course no one here has ever said a negative word about Jews like George Soros. Never, No way.. In my life I can't remember a time when I didn't have Jewish friends, but at times I have felt that the interests of the US and Israel didn't coincide. I don't think that makes me a hater of Jewish people. Tomorrow one of our Jewish friends is coming over to celebrate St. Patrick's day with us.They are solid liberals just like me and my wife.

        ?


        • #79
          Originally posted by redrover View Post

          And of course no one here has ever said a negative word about Jews like George Soros. Never, No way.. In my life I can't remember a time when I didn't have Jewish friends, but at times I have felt that the interests of the US and Israel didn't coincide. I don't think that makes me a hater of Jewish people. Tomorrow one of our Jewish friends is coming over to celebrate St. Patrick's day with us.They are solid liberals just like me and my wife.
          Criticism of Israeli government policies or actions is not antisemitic.
          Criticism of Israeli government officials actions or policies is not antisemitic.

          Accusing American jews of having dual loyalty, of bribing congress to have a pro-Israeli foreign relation stance, and all the rest, using typical antisemitic tropes, now, that IS antisemitic.

          There's a difference, one that many form the left, wishing to protect one of their own, is conflating.

          Some may criticize Soros in an antisemitic manner, but generally speaking its far more criticism of the far left organizations that he funds, such as the disgusting and disingenuous Media Matters.

          ?


          • #80
            Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

            Criticism of Israeli government policies or actions is not antisemitic.
            Criticism of Israeli government officials actions or policies is not antisemitic.

            Accusing American jews of having dual loyalty, of bribing congress to have a pro-Israeli foreign relation stance, and all the rest, using typical antisemitic tropes, now, that IS antisemitic.

            There's a difference, one that many form the left, wishing to protect one of their own, is conflating.

            Some may criticize Soros in an antisemitic manner, but generally speaking its far more criticism of the far left organizations that he funds, such as the disgusting and disingenuous Media Matters.
            You should take a look at former disgraced vice president Spiro Agnew if you want to see what real Jew hating looks like. https://www.salon.com/2019/02/22/mad...-jews_partner/

            ?


            • #81
              Originally posted by redrover View Post

              You should take a look at former disgraced vice president Spiro Agnew if you want to see what real Jew hating looks like. https://www.salon.com/2019/02/22/mad...-jews_partner/
              <*shrug*>
              Pretty sure he's dead, and been dead for a long time, I would imagine.

              Noted that you didn't address anything that I posted.

              ?


              • #82
                Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

                <*shrug*>
                Pretty sure he's dead, and been dead for a long time, I would imagine.

                Noted that you didn't address anything that I posted.
                I think the whole premise of this thread that Liberal terrorism is a problem when you have the entire Republican party under the control of white supremists and their terror agenda. Don't you think it's it's comic that Trump dismisses white supremacy as the work of a small group of troubled individuals and then he turns around and parrots the killer by calling immigration an invasion. Only a white supremist would equate Omar with the people who are inspired by Trump to shoot up a Mosque. Do you think it's just a coincidence that the shooters in Canada and New Zeeland identify Trump as a kindred spirit? . ..http://outfront.blogs.cnn.com/2012/0...cy-in-america/

                ?


                • #83
                  Originally posted by redrover View Post

                  I think the whole premise of this thread that Liberal terrorism is a problem when you have the entire Republican party under the control of white supremists and their terror agenda.
                  White supremists blah blah blah. Your racist fetish is showing : )

                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  Don't you think it's it's comic that Trump dismisses white supremacy as the work of a small group of troubled individuals and then he turns around and parrots the killer by calling immigration an invasion.
                  Illegal immigration IS an invasion. This has nothing to do with racism. We allow LEGAL immigrants of all skin tones from all over the globe.

                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  Only a white supremist would equate Omar with the people who are inspired by Trump to shoot up a Mosque.
                  Idioctic. Typical rover.

                  Originally posted by redrover View Post
                  Do you think it's just a coincidence that the shooters in Canada and New Zeeland identify Trump as a kindred spirit? . ..http://outfront.blogs.cnn.com/2012/0...cy-in-america/
                  Your racist fetish is showing again.

                  People who go around committing mass murder, are sickos and idiots, no matter what their rationale happens to be.

                  That means these creeps are no different than your Islamic buddies who fly airplanes into buildings, behead people and/or blow themselves up to kill as many others as possible. The same type of imbeciles who run over as many people as possible at events with crowds on the streets & sidewalks.

                  Only a moron wants to put this all in the racist category.

                  Racism has nothing to do with it.

                  Stupidity has everything to do with it.

                  Grow up.

                  ?


                  • #84
                    Liberals have been hard at work destroying America for many decades.

                    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    Whoever does not see the before and after, the cause and effect, of moral-free governance in America is either too young to be aware of what has been done to their country by Marxists and leaders with a defective sense of justice or has been brainwashed by media to accept a false reality.

                    Look around and see what liberal missionaries of change have accomplished in the last few decades, outdoing the damage they did before 2000.

                    Minds that work see a deterioration in what was once a sane, vibrant, freedom-endowed nation, in spite of faults found in every system of government, this side of heaven. It was an America that its domestic enemies are ludicrously forced to hate, exposing a derangement hard to conceal.

                    ..in 1994 when Randall A. Terry said:


                    In 1959 it would have been unthinkable to the average American whether Democrat, Republican or Independent that children would be murdered by abortion, homosexuals would be indoctrinating our children and demanding marriage rights, that our surgeon general would be calling for the legalization of criminal drugs, and the distribution of condoms to ten-year-olds, that our tax money would pay for a crucifix floating in a vat of urine, that prayer and Bible reading would be illegal in government schools, that new-age, one-world, indoctrination would be standard fare. None of these atrocities could have been foreseen (much less discussed in mixed company) a scant 35 years ago. Where will it end? Will what is unthinkable and unspeakable today be commonplace 35 years hence? One shudders to imagine ."

                    Minds that dont work have been deconstructed by a postmodern lunacy that prevails among intellectuals, most of them born in the 1940s.

                    In brief, postmodern thinking suppresses critical centers of the mind that help form sound decisions sound as in valid. By turning all statements into a narrative equal to every other narrative, postmodernists have effectively trashed validity and made serious communication between people virtually impossible.

                    Value-free reasoning is the new standard for action in America, the U.K., and other countries hostage to political bigwigs. Witness the words of a prominent stateswoman when she said, regarding a fatal error of judgment, what difference does it make, at this point?

                    Before 1960, the churches and their educational institutions formed a bulwark against moral degeneracy and against the adverse social and political consequences that follow. Moral delinquency in high office was publicly denounced.

                    But after the 1960s social revolution, Marxist change agents infiltrated the churches to weaken their influence on society and appropriated the mission to lead it. Even the Catholic Church caved to the Marxists and adopted their model for salvation. Henceforth the churches were to follow the times, not lead the times. Any religion that did not step to the Marxist drumbeat was branded a cult and what it preached was condemned as hate. Speaking truth became hate speech. Appropriating morality to ones side is textbook Alinskyism, a set of Teflon-coated tools to ensure that heads, I win tails, you lose.

                    Because this country is a democratic republic thanks to its sharp-minded founders and not the plaything of power-hungry elites, the hottest question for Americans of every IQ and skin color is, are we to remain a free and independent people or march down the road to a future of servitude to a state run by rulers blind to the meaning and reality of being human?

                    Are there enough outraged Americans, in and out of positions of influence, to give these pushers of a global dystopia their eviction notice?

                    Are todays adults seriously enough committed to pass on to their children and grandchildren the wonderful, free, sane country they received at birth or by way of (legal) immigration? Are we, the citizens of America, going to turn our children, our belongings, and ourselves over to power-rabid masters who have seized this nation by stealth, deception, bribery, intimidation, smear, and every other method of lording known?

                    The push to a future with no rights and freedoms except what is allowed by the state, run by self-appointed elites with no respect for life, no use for God, no regard for the sacrifices of millions of Americans, past and president, who struggled, bled, and died to keep this land free and prospering this rush to a hellish dystopia must be halted and a saner course taken. It begins by giving the promoters of that hell their second notice of termination in 2020.


                    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...d_prophet.html

                    ?


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by redrover View Post

                      I think the whole premise of this thread that Liberal terrorism is a problem when you have the entire Republican party under the control of white supremists and their terror agenda.
                      "the entire Republican party under the control of white supremists"

                      Yeah, that there's a load of crap.

                      Don't you think it's it's comic that Trump dismisses white supremacy as the work of a small group of troubled individuals and then he turns around and parrots the killer by calling immigration an invasion.
                      Two things can be true at the same time.
                      White Supremacist groups in the US are a tiny fraction of the population, and hold no great political sway, other than what the Chicken Littles running around with their hair on fire at their very mention, such as the SPLC, once a reasonable organization but has since become corrupted by leftists and their political agenda.

                      Only a white supremist would equate Omar with the people who are inspired by Trump to shoot up a Mosque.
                      Citation please, a full transcript with full context please, as the media has demonstrated a track record of miss-quoting and taking Trump so badly out of context so as to push their TDS narrative and agenda.

                      Do you think it's just a coincidence that the shooters in Canada and New Zeeland identify Trump as a kindred spirit? . ..http://outfront.blogs.cnn.com/2012/0...cy-in-america/
                      You are quoting some unknown's blog as a citation? Seriously?

                      You need to do better. Too much crap, from non-serious sources. Do better.

                      ?


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

                        "the entire Republican party under the control of white supremists"

                        Yeah, that there's a load of crap.



                        Two things can be true at the same time.
                        White Supremacist groups in the US are a tiny fraction of the population, and hold no great political sway, other than what the Chicken Littles running around with their hair on fire at their very mention, such as the SPLC, once a reasonable organization but has since become corrupted by leftists and their political agenda.



                        Citation please, a full transcript with full context please, as the media has demonstrated a track record of miss-quoting and taking Trump so badly out of context so as to push their TDS narrative and agenda.



                        You are quoting some unknown's blog as a citation? Seriously?

                        You need to do better. Too much crap, from non-serious sources. Do better.
                        Let's face it Trump supporters fall into two camps they are either racists or idiots. For the record I don't think anyone here is an idiot..

                        ?


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          Let's face it Trump supporters fall into two camps they are either racists or idiots. For the record I don't think anyone here is an idiot..
                          So ALL Trump supporters are either racists or idiots according to you.

                          The same could be said of all Obama supporters & all hilary supporters.

                          All would be 100% untrue.

                          ?


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by redrover View Post

                            Let's face it Trump supporters fall into two camps they are either racists or idiots. For the record I don't think anyone here is an idiot..
                            I disagree. Surprise at that! (No, not really).

                            I would respectfully submit that Trump supporters are fed up with the ineffective dealing with the nation's real problems as the political elite have been the last decade or so.

                            If you look, the same can be said for the Democrats, although their apparent solution is to veer to the extreme left, far more radical than Trump supporters.

                            Take it for what you will.

                            ?


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

                              I disagree. Surprise at that! (No, not really).

                              I would respectfully submit that Trump supporters are fed up with the ineffective dealing with the nation's real problems as the political elite have been the last decade or so.

                              If you look, the same can be said for the Democrats, although their apparent solution is to veer to the extreme left, far more radical than Trump supporters.

                              Take it for what you will.
                              Yes we know what Republicans consider real problems. Things like black people voting.

                              ?


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by redrover View Post
                                Yes we know what Republicans consider real problems. Things like black people voting.
                                Ridiculous as usual ...

                                ?

                                Working...
                                X