Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Liberal terrorists

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Captain Trips
    started a topic Liberal terrorists

    Liberal terrorists

    ... and we say nothing about them.

    We pretend they aren't there.

    How much leftist violence and killing will the people of America tolerate ?

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ...silence on the Left greets the news that a major conservative media figure is under a death threat taken very seriously by law enforcement.

    The attempted assassination of a large group of Republican Congressmen on a softball field that seriously wounded Steve Scalise ought to have been a wake-up call but wasn’t.

    Hatred and calls for violence are so normal now on the left – even among celebrities who just by being famous carry weight among many – that few if any prominent people bother to condemn them.

    Now comes news from the Washington Times of a threat to talk show host Michael Savage taken so seriously that the he has moved to a “changed location.” Cheryl Chumley reports:

    City, state and federal agencies are taking a look at a vicious, hateful email sent a restaurant frequented by talk radio icon Michael Savage that threatens to shoot up the establishment if he’s not denied future service.


    Portions of the email sent to the restaurant state, in all caps
    ,

    “I DEMAND THAT YOU REFUSE TO ALLOW MICHAEL SAVAGE … IN YOUR F-ING RESTAURANT AGAIN. HE IS A RACIST WHITE SUPREMACIST PIECE OF SH— … DONT WANT TO LISTEN TO ME? WELL I GUESS YOURE ALL GONNA F—ING DIE THEN CUZ I AM WAITING FOR THE MOTHAF— AND I WILL WAIT AND WATCH YOUR F—ING BUSINESS AND WHEN I SEE HIM GO IN THERE IM GOING TO START SHOOTING EVERY BODY I CAN FIND.”

    The suspect then gets very specific.

    “I OWN 3 GUNS AND I CAN DO SOME SERIOUS F—ING DAMAGE,” the email went on.I WILL KILL AS MANY OF YOU RACIST-SUPPORTING/ENABLING WHITE SUPREMACISTS AS I F—ING CAN.” (snip)

    “PEOPLE WILL F—ING DIE,the email messenger wrote. “IM GOING TO KILL THAT F—ING CRYPTO JEW BUT IF YOU DONT WANT YOUR WHOLE BUSINESS TO TURN INTO A F—IN SHOOTING GALLERY AND YOUR CUSTOMERS TO GET CAUGHT UP IN THIS YOU BETTER KEEP HIM OUTTA THERE OR ELSE … YOURE ALL GONNA F—IN DIE UNLESS YOU DO WHAT I F—IN SAY. ILL REALLY MAKE U F—IN FAMOUS.”

    So far as both a Duckduckgo news search and a Google news search reveal, no left wing politician or media figure has spoken up against this hideous threat. Perhaps they, too, are so full of hatred for those who oppose them that they are fine with threats, and maybe even death for their ideological opponents. This is shameful. Maybe today will bring a wave of condemnation, but I am not holding my breath.

    Ellen Barkin is calling for the rape and death of a comedian of whom she disapproves.

    She already has called for the assassination of President Trump
    and “endorsed a Tweet calling for Republicans to die via Hurricane Isaac.” None of this appears to have damaged her career, and she currently appears on air in a TNT series. A couple of decades ago, the debut of the AIDS threat led to a wave of propaganda proclaiming, “Silence = Death.” Today, with political violence rising, the same could become true here.

    Normalizing political violence never leads anywhere good. The Nazis rose to power on the effective use of violence against their opponents, at rallies and by assassination efforts. Japan’s Taisho Democracy was killed by military officers assassinating political foes, in a period that historians have dubbed “government by assassination.”

    So, as Chumley suggests, it is time for change on the left:

    Maybe now the Nancy Pelosis of the country and the Maxine Waters of the nation will start to understand that calls for summers of resistance and cries to confront conservatives — particularly those tied to this Donald Trump administration — in the streets, in restaurants, at their homes, are all examples of uncalled-for rallies that can indeed spark the mentally unstable or viciously partisan to actually get physical?


    If you think that it can’t happen here, you’re kidding yourself.

    And, if you think that an unanswered wave of actual violence won’t provoke counter-strikes, you are also living in dreamland.

    So, Rachel Maddow, Anderson Cooper, and all the others clamming up when a conservative is targeted ought to think twice about remaining silent. If this continues, everyone loses.


    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...s_of_hate.html




  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

    It is this type of insanity which will be their undoing.
    Yes, we can HOPE.

    "Gay pride parades" for little kids ?!?!?

    These fools say and do this idiocy publicly ??

    This is no longer stupid, it's dangerously sick.

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    .... and into their nastiness they push our children

    These people are very sick and should be no where near ANYONE'S child.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A head teacher who already has angered parents for organizing a gay pride pride parade for primary students and promoting LGBT views in class is under fire again.

    The British teacher, Susan Papas of Heavers Farmer Primary in Croydon, in south London, allegedly demanded five days of detention for a boy and a girl after they asked to be exempted from an LGBT lesson on June 20 during gay pride month.

    The girl, Kaysey, a Pentecostal Christian, says she was kept in detention for five hours, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

    And Papas is accused of screaming at the two children and accusing them of demanding death for LGBT members.

    The U.K. charity Christian Concern said it was the boy, Farrell, who first asked to be exempted from the LGBT promotion in class, but the teacher refused.

    Then Farrell explained he is a Christian and could not accept the promotion of the LGBT agenda.

    The teacher, according to Christian Concern, asked the two children, “Do you want them to die?


    Farrell said they told the teacher, “No.”

    Later, Papas shouted at the two children in front of the class, according to Kaysey.

    How dare you? You are a disappointment to the school,” Papas told the two children outside the classroom, the report said.

    Papas then put the children in different rooms and asked Kasey: “How dare you say that you want to kill LGBT people.”

    Kasey replied: “I didn’t say kill.”

    Papas then shouted at her and said, “Yes, you did, and don’t lie.”

    Parents of both children have filed complaints with the school authority. They contend their children did not make homophobic comments and point out the children’s version is supported by other children in the class and their parents, Christian Concern said.

    The five-day suspension violates standards for educators, they charge.

    They also cited Section 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights to ask that their children in the future be excused from LGBT promotions.

    “This is why parents are beginning to see the dangers of the imposition of the new sexual and gender ideology that does not permit dissent even from innocent 10-year-old children,” said Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre.

    “This incident highlights again just how aggressive and intolerant the LGBT agenda can be. An ideology that has to resort to such heavy-handed tactics to force ten-year-old children to accept something that instinctively they do not, only highlights how life-crushing that ideology is.”

    Williams said it is simply a matter of
    “bullies” knowing they are wrong and resorting to coercion and intimidation.


    https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/lgbt-tea...hristian-kids/
    It is this type of insanity which will be their undoing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    .... and into their nastiness they push our children

    These people are very sick and should be no where near ANYONE'S child.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A head teacher who already has angered parents for organizing a gay pride pride parade for primary students and promoting LGBT views in class is under fire again.

    The British teacher, Susan Papas of Heavers Farmer Primary in Croydon, in south London, allegedly demanded five days of detention for a boy and a girl after they asked to be exempted from an LGBT lesson on June 20 during gay pride month.

    The girl, Kaysey, a Pentecostal Christian, says she was kept in detention for five hours, from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

    And Papas is accused of screaming at the two children and accusing them of demanding death for LGBT members.

    The U.K. charity Christian Concern said it was the boy, Farrell, who first asked to be exempted from the LGBT promotion in class, but the teacher refused.

    Then Farrell explained he is a Christian and could not accept the promotion of the LGBT agenda.

    The teacher, according to Christian Concern, asked the two children, “Do you want them to die?


    Farrell said they told the teacher, “No.”

    Later, Papas shouted at the two children in front of the class, according to Kaysey.

    How dare you? You are a disappointment to the school,” Papas told the two children outside the classroom, the report said.

    Papas then put the children in different rooms and asked Kasey: “How dare you say that you want to kill LGBT people.”

    Kasey replied: “I didn’t say kill.”

    Papas then shouted at her and said, “Yes, you did, and don’t lie.”

    Parents of both children have filed complaints with the school authority. They contend their children did not make homophobic comments and point out the children’s version is supported by other children in the class and their parents, Christian Concern said.

    The five-day suspension violates standards for educators, they charge.

    They also cited Section 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights to ask that their children in the future be excused from LGBT promotions.

    “This is why parents are beginning to see the dangers of the imposition of the new sexual and gender ideology that does not permit dissent even from innocent 10-year-old children,” said Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre.

    “This incident highlights again just how aggressive and intolerant the LGBT agenda can be. An ideology that has to resort to such heavy-handed tactics to force ten-year-old children to accept something that instinctively they do not, only highlights how life-crushing that ideology is.”

    Williams said it is simply a matter of
    “bullies” knowing they are wrong and resorting to coercion and intimidation.


    https://www.wnd.com/2019/07/lgbt-tea...hristian-kids/

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
    If you look at Democratic presidential candidates some had trended to the left and were rejected. Then there was a more centrist and practical Clinton followed by a string of Republicans again.

    Seems the Democrat party cycles through leftism, it is rejected, and come back to the center. I figure that this cycle is where we are today, so, soon, I'm guessing.
    and where is that "center" they're going to return to NOW ?

    It has moved to the far left

    ever farther they slowly drag us into their nastiness

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    That's just it

    These days, both sides are harassing & attacking each other

    Both sides hate each other and I can see why

    On one side we have people who want to transform America into a socialist utopia - that will be anything but a utopia

    On the other, we have people who want to keep America America - they don't want to fundamentally transform America

    Both sides are very angry

    They who want to transform America into their dreamed of socialist utopia, are mad at those who resist

    They who want to keep America America, are mad at those who those who want to force their socialist dreams on them

    It's no mystery where I stand.

    Experience has taught me that trying to "fix" something that isn't broken, is always a bad idea. History shows the results of socialism, it's a system that must be rejected.

    But still we have angry people who want to transform America into a socialist utopia - that will be anything but a utopia

    and we have they who want to keep America America, mad at those who those who want to force their socialist dreams on them

    Will this never end ??

    If you look at Democratic presidential candidates some had trended to the left and were rejected. Then there was a more centrist and practical Clinton followed by a string of Republicans again.

    Seems the Democrat party cycles through leftism, it is rejected, and come back to the center. I figure that this cycle is where we are today, so, soon, I'm guessing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
    Attacking the child is iindefensible and speaks to hhatefulness and an absence of character and lack of basic dddecency.

    With that said those parents are political and partisans and used that child for their ppolitics. And that is also indefensible.

    Irresponsible parents. The following shit storm was predictable and those parents knew that imo
    That's just it

    These days, both sides are harassing & attacking each other

    Both sides hate each other and I can see why

    On one side we have people who want to transform America into a socialist utopia - that will be anything but a utopia

    On the other, we have people who want to keep America America - they don't want to fundamentally transform America

    Both sides are very angry

    They who want to transform America into their dreamed of socialist utopia, are mad at those who resist

    They who want to keep America America, are mad at those who those who want to force their socialist dreams on them

    It's no mystery where I stand.

    Experience has taught me that trying to "fix" something that isn't broken, is always a bad idea. History shows the results of socialism, it's a system that must be rejected.

    But still we have angry people who want to transform America into a socialist utopia - that will be anything but a utopia

    and we have they who want to keep America America, mad at those who those who want to force their socialist dreams on them

    Will this never end ??


    Leave a comment:


  • Blue Doggy
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    More terrorism from liberals

    A family gets death threats from them

    "...after receiving death threats and harassing phone calls......The Left's Harassment and death threats have gone too far for our family. We have been getting calls on our personal phone numbers."

    These are the kinds of people who vote for leftists

    They can make fun of and mock others - like the Trump baby balloon - but mock THEM

    ... they get dangerous

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    The family of a young girl who went viral for mocking Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez shut down all of her social accounts Wednesday, after receiving death threats and harassing phone calls.

    A tweet from the account purporting to belong to the little girl's stepfather said she will not be doing any more content because the harassment and death threats "have gone too far" and threaten her and the family’s safety.

    'Ava will not be doing any more MINI AOC content,' the tweet said. "The Left's Harassment and death threats have gone too far for our family. We have been getting calls on our personal phone numbers. For our safety and our child’s safety, we deleted all Mini AOC accounts."

    The 8-year-old girl, known as "Mini AOC," got attention for her impersonations of Ocasio-Cortez, such as a tweet in which she mocked the New York Democrat's theatrics over the migrant crisis. "Every time I plan a visit to the park it's closed!" she tweeted, along with several photos of her dressed up to look like Ocasio-Cortez when she visited a migrant detention center this week.

    She appeared on Fox Business in May to discuss her impersonations, saying her dad and her uncle encouraged her to start making videos because they thought she bore a striking resemblance to Ocasio-Cortez. She said she likes Ocasio-Cortez, but "not that much" and impersonated her saying "did you know that?" when prompted by the Fox News host.

    Her Twitter, Instagram and YouTube accounts are shut down. Her Twitter handle was taken over by another user, who tweeted from the account saying they want to prevent a "leftist takeover" of the handle.



    https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/03/m...cial-accounts/
    Attacking the child is iindefensible and speaks to hhatefulness and an absence of character and lack of basic dddecency.

    With that said those parents are political and partisans and used that child for their ppolitics. And that is also indefensible.

    Irresponsible parents. The following shit storm was predictable and those parents knew that imo

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post


    rooaarrr!

    <*wink*>, <*wink*>
    lol

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    That is true

    But there are those fighting this too

    Private schools and private schooling has been growing in the past decade.

    For clear reasons I think. Many don't want their kids indoctrinated with the nonsense being offered as information in public schools today.

    The little place I put my own in 10 years ago, has more than doubled in size. They're building a big new expansion in the next year or two !

    This isn't something we hear about. It's happening all over the country.

    America will hear about it in the next 20 - 50 years though, that I can guarantee !

    Rooaarrr!

    <*wink*>, <*wink*>

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

    With the liberal / progressive indoctrination of the education system one can never be too sure about that.
    That is true

    But there are those fighting this too

    Private schools and private schooling has been growing in the past decade.

    For clear reasons I think. Many don't want their kids indoctrinated with the nonsense being offered as information in public schools today.

    The little place I put my own in 10 years ago, has more than doubled in size. They're building a big new expansion in the next year or two !

    This isn't something we hear about. It's happening all over the country.

    America will hear about it in the next 20 - 50 years though, that I can guarantee !

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    We're betting that enough Americans aren't insane

    I do think that's the case, but the media wants us to believe otherwise I suspect
    With the liberal / progressive indoctrination of the education system one can never be too sure about that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
    'We can hope not that the liberals can control themselves? Umm, I'd rather hope that they will; that they'll come to their senses and see what they are doing to the nation and the people. The real 'hope' is that the electorate doesn't buy into nor support their hate & venom, and reject their far left as they have in previous elections in which they've lost putting forth such far leftist candidates.
    We're betting that enough Americans aren't insane

    I do think that's the case, but the media wants us to believe otherwise I suspect

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    Predictions on what kind of Hell liberals will unleash on innocent Americans just wanting to enjoy celebrating America ?

    On Independence day

    Liberals are so full of hate & venom, .. can they control themselves ?

    We'll have to see..soon

    We can hope not, in spite of some disturbing facts... liars and manipulators .. they're old, rusty & crusty, but we still have these same types of desperate weasels among us. They've been with us always ...
    'We can hope not that the liberals can control themselves? Umm, I'd rather hope that they will; that they'll come to their senses and see what they are doing to the nation and the people. The real 'hope' is that the electorate doesn't buy into nor support their hate & venom, and reject their far left as they have in previous elections in which they've lost putting forth such far leftist candidates.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While tearing down everything that's great about our country, the left has always permitted us to celebrate patriotic holidays.

    But this year, on the week that we commemorate the unveiling of the Declaration of Independence, Nike yanked a Betsy Ross tribute sneaker off the market because the American flag didn't sit well with Colin Kaepernick.

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is telling wild, provable lies about America's border agents.

    This Fourth of July, let's look at the tactics used by the left to blacken the reputations of American heroes.


    [ it's an old game ]

    To wit, the lie that the principal author of the declaration, Thomas Jefferson, fathered a child with his slave, Sally Hemings.

    The charge was first leveled in 1802 by a muckraking, racist, alcoholic journalist, James Callender, who had served prison time for his particular brand of journalism. He had tried to blackmail Jefferson into appointing him postmaster at Richmond. When that failed, Callender retaliated by publicly accusing Jefferson of fathering the first-born son of Sally Hemings -- or, as the charming Callender described her, "a slut as common as the pavement."

    No serious historian ever believed Callender's defamation -- not Dumas Malone, Merrill Peterson, Douglass Adair or John Chester Miller. Not one. Their reasoning was that there was absolutely no evidence to support the theory and plenty to contradict it.

    The Jefferson-Hemings myth was revived by feminists trying to elevate the role of women in history. Modern pedagogy requires that no period of our past be taught without turning it into a lecture on racism, sexism or homophobia.


    .....

    So now you, at least, know the truth -- not that it matters in the slightest. Happy Fourth of July!

    http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/20...html#read_more

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Predictions on what kind of Hell liberals will unleash on innocent Americans just wanting to enjoy celebrating America ?

    On Independence day

    Liberals are so full of hate & venom, .. can they control themselves ?

    We'll have to see..soon

    We can hope not, in spite of some disturbing facts... liars and manipulators .. they're old, rusty & crusty, but we still have these same types of desperate weasels among us. They've been with us always ...

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While tearing down everything that's great about our country, the left has always permitted us to celebrate patriotic holidays.

    But this year, on the week that we commemorate the unveiling of the Declaration of Independence, Nike yanked a Betsy Ross tribute sneaker off the market because the American flag didn't sit well with Colin Kaepernick.

    Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is telling wild, provable lies about America's border agents.

    This Fourth of July, let's look at the tactics used by the left to blacken the reputations of American heroes.


    [ it's an old game ]

    To wit, the lie that the principal author of the declaration, Thomas Jefferson, fathered a child with his slave, Sally Hemings.

    The charge was first leveled in 1802 by a muckraking, racist, alcoholic journalist, James Callender, who had served prison time for his particular brand of journalism. He had tried to blackmail Jefferson into appointing him postmaster at Richmond. When that failed, Callender retaliated by publicly accusing Jefferson of fathering the first-born son of Sally Hemings -- or, as the charming Callender described her, "a slut as common as the pavement."

    No serious historian ever believed Callender's defamation -- not Dumas Malone, Merrill Peterson, Douglass Adair or John Chester Miller. Not one. Their reasoning was that there was absolutely no evidence to support the theory and plenty to contradict it.

    The Jefferson-Hemings myth was revived by feminists trying to elevate the role of women in history. Modern pedagogy requires that no period of our past be taught without turning it into a lecture on racism, sexism or homophobia.


    .....

    So now you, at least, know the truth -- not that it matters in the slightest. Happy Fourth of July!

    http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/20...html#read_more

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X