Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Democratic Suicide

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Democratic Suicide

    The self strangulation of democrats

    This "party" is self destructing before our eyes.

    Why would people so openly destroy themselves ?

    They're either;

    1. Completely delusional

    or

    2. So wracked with guilt that they WANT to be punished, SEEK IT !!

    Or

    3. So awesomely ignorant & foolish it's scary.

    Which is it do you think ??

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Abortion and the Politics of Self-Destruction

    It’s odd that large groups of people often take political stands seemingly against their best interests.

    In the age of Trump, these oddities have become readily apparent.

    Obama made a deal to create a nuclear Iran, a country that wants to exterminate the Jewish state. Yet, “American Jews tend to favor Democrat candidates, with 71% of Jewish voters choosing Democrat candidates and only 25% choosing Republicans since 1968.” Voting against their interests.

    The LGBT community is a fellow progressive traveler with radical Islam apologists despite how gays are treated in some Muslim countries which are not tolerant of sexual and gender diversity compared to the U.S. and most western countries. Voting against their interests.

    Then there is overwhelming black support for Democrats. According to Pew Research Center, blacks in 2016 voted for Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump by a 91-6 margin. This is despite Trump and Republican economic policies driving black employment to “better than it ever has been” per CNBC. Democrats, under Barack Obama, gave blacks high unemployment and lots of excuses, yet blacks continue to support Democrats. Voting against their interests.

    Abortion, a core issue for Democrats, is another area where blacks are supporting a political party which is acting very much against the interests of blacks. Let’s take a look at Planned Parenthood and abortion, specifically whether Democrats are advocating for the well-being and advancement of blacks, or instead, for their destruction.

    Planned Parenthood began 1916 when Margaret Sanger opened America’s first birth control clinic in Brooklyn. Less well known is that Sanger was a racist and eugenicist who considered many Americans unworthy of life. And who might one of these unworthy groups be?

    Her views of eugenics in the 1930s and 1940s led to compulsory sterilization laws in 30 U.S. states, ridding the population of what Sanger described as people she considered "feeble-minded, idiots and morons.”

    She addressed a Ku Klux Klan rally in New Jersey in 1926, too.
    “That she generated enthusiasm among some of America’s leading racists says something about the content and tone of her remarks.”

    Sanger wrote a letter in 1939 saying “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” Given the popularity of Planned Parenthood among Democrats, and overwhelming support of the Democrat party among blacks, obviously word of this did not get out.

    Modern day Democrats, descendants of the party of the KKK, have become more enlightened and tolerant. Or have they?


    Hillary Clinton, in 2009, accepted Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award. She remarked, “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision.” Going further she said, “I am really in awe of her, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life.” Do those lessons include Sanger’s Negro Project, dedicated to “the elimination of human waste”? Yet by almost a 20-1 margin, blacks voted for Mrs. Clinton for president.

    Planned Parenthood and its founder once had their “Negro Project.” What about today? Is that project ongoing?

    Where does Planned Parenthood locate their clinics?

    “The primary consideration in making this determination is not poverty but the percentage of blacks in the area.” “Population control centers” are disproportionately “located in ZIP codes with higher percentages of blacks and/or Hispanics than the state’s overall percentage.”


    ...


    https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...struction.html

    --------------------------


    That democrats now want to legalize infanticide is truly sickening !

    "It's 'abortion'... we'll call it." - they say

    They have openly declared that newborn infants can be killed !! ??

    Yes !

    They're openly Satanic now. Evil..

    How successful they are, will tell us a lot ...and soon.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ...at the very moment the Democratic Party has sunk to shocking new lows of immorality – like legalizing and celebrating infanticide – it simultaneously and on an almost hourly basis accuses the Republican Party and President Trump of “immorality”...

    [ as always, accuse others of what you're guilty of ]

    Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillebrand and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez can barely open their mouths in public these days without attacking the “morality” of Republicans, the president and all who support his agenda.

    Beyond the grotesque hypocrisy, there’s a powerful truth buried in this. Let’s dig it out.

    ...in speaking of the Democrats’ increasingly immoral agenda, we’re not referring solely to New York’s barbaric new abortion law, which legalizes virtually every atrocity for which abortionist Kermit Gosnell is now serving life in prison, having been convicted on three first-degree murder counts. But let’s start there.

    The so-called Reproductive Health Act permits abortion not only throughout all nine months up to the very moment of birth, and for any (or no) reason, but even after the baby is born – the dictionary definition of infanticide.

    Yet the hideous law itself was almost overshadowed by the ghoulish celebration that broke out following the Jan. 22 New York Senate vote. Cheering, applause, hugs and exuberant high fives filled the chamber, followed by the beyond-tasteless illumination in pink – to celebrate “women’s rights” – of the spire atop One World Trade Center,...

    Democratic majorities are following in New York’s bloody footsteps. Virginia Democrat Delegate Kathy Tran just proposed a law to permit abortion in her state through all nine months of pregnancy, even publicly specifying that the mother can decide to kill her baby literally as she is dilating and about to give birth. Shockingly, the state’s Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam said on-camera he is just fine with that.

    ..such horrors as celebrating infanticide – reminiscent of the ancient sacrifice of children to the pagan god Moloch – constitute only the most graphic example of Democrats’ latest plunge into immorality.


    The rest of their 2020 agenda consists of a slew of outright anti-American, Marxist and just-plain-insane programs giddily promoted by the Democrats’ radical new socialist standard-bearers.

    There’s current presidential frontrunner California Sen. Kamala Harris’s astounding advocacy of nationalizing the entire health care sector (“Medicare for All”) and eliminating all private insurance, and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s equally mind-numbing proclamation that America should stop all fossil fuel production in pursuit of a “Green New Deal.” And then of course there’s free college for all, confiscatory new taxes including a 70 percent marginal rate, de facto open borders, a vastly expanding welfare state for illegal aliens, and on and on it goes.

    Such utopian promises – closely mirroring those made by Marxist demagogues over the last century, which soon enough led to abject totalitarian slavery, mass death and unimaginable misery (most recently in oil-right Venezuela, where inflation is 80,000 percent and there is no toilet paper) – are way beyond stupid. They’re even way beyond literally impossible to achieve. They are, simply, a sure formula for national suicide. And suicide is immoral.

    Strangely, despite having sunk into new depths of immorality, Democrats in typical lockstep have adopted a new talking-points regimen that involves continually accusing Republicans and the president of being shockingly “immoral.”

    A border wall to protect Americans from the corrupt, narco-terrorist state to our south is an “immorality,” intones House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, her voice dripping with religious fervor, repeatedly assuring the press that Democrats won’t under any circumstances fund Trump’s “immoral” border wall.

    (That would be the exact same border wall Democrats funded, publicly supported and built hundreds of miles worth just a few years ago.)


    Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez – who claims the “three chambers of government [are] the presidency, the Senate, and the House,” and yet who is such a brilliant climate scientist that she’s calculated the earth will perish in 12 years due to global warming – argues that capitalism is immoral and “wrong,” and that it’s “immoral” that America even allows billionaires to exist.

    What’s really happening here? This is not just your run-of-the-mill virtue signaling.

    As I explained recently in “Democrats and the dark art of projection”:

    Those who are guilty of all this leftist insanity – trying to disarm law-abiding citizens, accusing thoroughly decent people of being “racists,” demanding open borders, defending late-term abortion and so on – project their guilt and blame onto others because they actually know, on some level, they are guilty. There is, after all, this thing we call conscience (“con+science,” literally, “with knowing”).

    Whether they acknowledge it or not, they know deep down they are guilty. Why? Because God is real, “right and wrong” are a real thing, we are spiritual-moral beings, and thus we all experience guilt when we do wrong.

    But what happens when we don’t want to admit we’re wrong?

    If we’re leftists, we transfer our guilt and blame to an innocent party and in return we appropriate their innocence.


    Stay with me here.

    If this sounds a little religious, that’s because like everything else with the left, we’re actually dealing with a religion – a very perverse one.

    Whereas in Christianity, through Christ’s atoning death, the repentant sinner is graced to be able to transfer his or her guilt to the innocent Son of God in return for His innocence – the greatest gift of a loving God – the angry left relies on its own inverted version of salvation by trading its guilt for others’ (relative) innocence. That’s what we call projection.

    ..how does someone who’s been seduced into embracing today’s mad, utopian, socialist, sexual-anarchy, gender-fluid, identity-politics gospel, which is basically immoral in any traditional sense of the word, maintain the idea that he or she is morally superior? That requires constant comparison with people who are far less moral. People like you.

    That’s why the left continually defames utterly decent Americans as racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic, too white, too male – in a word, too immoral.

    Without that feeling of moral superiority by comparison, they would – perhaps for the first time – wake up and experience the pride-and-illusion-shattering influence of their own conscience, with which they are currently at war.

    So let’s answer the question: How can people who high-five each other over the barbaric murder of beautiful, full-term human babies see themselves as morally superior to you?

    Only one way: They steal the “moral” label from you by accusing you of being immoral – immoral for wearing a MAGA hat at a prolife march, immoral for wanting to stop endless caravans of unknown migrants from invading our national home, immoral for not agreeing that confused men are actually women, immoral for not agreeing that up is down and evil is good.

    Unfortunately, the ideas animating today’s Democrat leaders are so toxic that they will accommodate no genuine dialogue with them, since that would serve only to annihilate their arguments and agenda.

    Therefore, as long as they’re captivated by their immoral ideology, immoral behavior will follow – such as antifa violence, attacks on free speech, and death threats against Catholic kids from Kentucky who wear the wrong hats.


    https://www.wnd.com/2019/01/dems-cla...g-infanticide/

  • #2
    Well... they DID tap into the millennials or Ocasio-Cortez would never have been nominated, never mind elected. They have also managed to get the media on their side to promote lies and innuendo. They convinced Americans that Obama’s birth circumstances (including his real name) are irrelevant...

    they made a Republican controlled legislature, both houses, completely sterile...

    they em are obviously taking their previous successes too far, but we can’t say they haven’t figured some stuff out well.

    îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


    • #3
      Originally posted by DavidSF View Post
      Well... they DID tap into the millennials or Ocasio-Cortez would never have been nominated, never mind elected. They have also managed to get the media on their side to promote lies and innuendo. They convinced Americans that Obama’s birth circumstances (including his real name) are irrelevant...

      they made a Republican controlled legislature, both houses, completely sterile...

      they em are obviously taking their previous successes too far, but we can’t say they haven’t figured some stuff out well.
      They market evil to us, make it sound acceptable with language games... infanticide is NOW 'abortion' or 'a womans right' etc etc

      They've figured out how to use "media" to destroy truth & people..how to use "media" to help people destroy themselves and each other.

      Here's what Nancy P. herself explained awhile ago on that;

      How to smear someone with lies and then "merchandise it" via the "media"

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMJd...B13YjrKEzd0XNo

      ... thanks for the heads up Nancy

      People need to call attention to, wake up those who are hypnotized by the charlatans in American culture, society & politics.

      This countries survival depends on it !

      Thank heavens we have free speech and access to other media than the now government run "mainstream media" ... which is only a tool of propaganda.

      Pushing hate, garbage and nonsense at us all day, every day. ... and explaining to us all how hateful we are, if we don't accept the sh*t they're selling.

      That's how evil is marketed and sold to the masses.

      It must be rejected !

      îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


      • #4
        The open ways democrats now promote hatred & evil, isn't going to work out for them.

        People don't want hatred & evil.

        People don't appreciate being called hateful and evil BY people who are hateful & promote evil !!

        They can market their hate & evil with fine sounding phrases and words, but people don't want that !

        People see through it.

        The truth is too easy to find in today's high tech. world of open information.

        --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        Northam introduced a whole new shock factor into the equation by exposing the details of a law allowing the execution of a newborn.

        Clinton has refused to distance herself from the racist agenda of Planned Parenthood and its founder, Margaret Sanger. Sanger is on record advocating for forced sterilization and eugenics and wrote in her own autobiography about speaking to a women’s group affiliated with the KKK.

        Hillary Clinton and the Democrats don’t want the truth that America is legalizing infanticide to stay in the news.

        Otherwise it might break through the dulled consciences of voters who consider themselves “moderate,” “balanced,” or “centrist” — yet vote for candidates who support an abortion agenda so radical that babies up to the moment of birth or even after can be killed simply at the whim of their mother.

        For the sake of our nation, the truth must prevail, and despite Democrat and media efforts to bury the story, more and more Americans must be confronted with the fact that standing for “pro-choice” means supporting infanticide.


        https://www.newsmax.com/mariamcfadde.../13/id/902588/

        îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


        • #5
          Democrats are actively pursuing self destruction.

          For the record, they always have been.

          Let them continue

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          Do none of the present inhabitants of the White House know the phrase (which is attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte): “Never interrupt your opponent when he makes a mistake”?

          The racist scandal of the three top Democrat office holders in the state of Virginia should have ended in 24 hours – the governor should have resigned. A week later, no one in the media would remember this annoying incident, and in a year almost no voter would remember it, and this would not have affected the 2020 election. However, the Democrats have their brains turned off, and the Republicans are wisely silent, and as a result, the Democrats, to their horror, continue to tear each other apart.

          Turning off the brains of American Democrats is not solely happening at the federal level. Do New York Democrats not understand that legally authorizing abortion in the ninth month of pregnancy is a political nightmare? Did none of them think about the consequences of the fact that now, thanks to the Democrats, abortions in New York can be done by any person, and not just by a licensed phsyician? Is it a symptom of mass psychosis or a mass (D)ebilism? Moreover, this criticism does not even touch the moral, religious or legal side of abortion, but only the political side of it.

          Anti-Semitism and racism of the modern Democratic Party of the USA have well-known and deep roots.

          The Democratic Party is the creator of the KKK and the author of the Jim Crow laws.

          It was the Democratic Administration of President Roosevelt that turned away a ship with Jewish refugees in 1939.

          A vital role in the refusal of Jewish refugees to go ashore in America was played by Secretary of State Cordell Hull (by the way, it was with him that the shameful history of the undeserved Nobel Peace Prizes began).

          It was the Democrats who threw U.S. citizens of Japanese descent into concentration camps during World War II.

          It was the Democrats who became famous for the systematic persecution and extermination of North American Indians.

          It was the Democrats who were the party of slave owners.


          Therefore, the open anti-Semitism of Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar should not surprise anybody.

          It should not be a shock that the former head of the Ku Klux Klan, David Duke, in February 2017 supported the Muslim (and anti-Semite) Keith Ellison to head the DNC, and in February 2019 openly supported Ilhan Omar in her series of anti-Semitic tweets.

          Support for her was also expressed by the chief adviser and closest friend of Barack Obama, Valerie Jarrett.


          https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...fdestruct.html


          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          The radicals are helping them tear themselves apart !

          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


          New York Mayor Bill DeBlasio tore into rookie Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez when she gloated about playing a big role in the decision by Amazon not to open a second headquarters in Queens.

          “As a progressive my entire life — and I ain’t changing — I’ll take on any progressive anywhere that thinks it’s a good idea to lose jobs and revenue because I think that’s out of touch with what working people want,” the mayor said on WNYC radio.

          Ocasio Cortez (D-Bronx/Queens) — who lobbed bombs at the $3 billion incentives package offered by city and state leaders — said Thursday that Amazon’s withdrawal from the deal showed that“everyday Americans still have the power to organize and fight for their communities and they can have more say in this country than the richest man in the world.”

          You've got to spend money, to make money and while one could argue the incentive package offered by the city and state was excessive, you have to remember that New York city was competing against several other cities. The fact is, 25,000 jobs just don't fall into your lap like manna from heaven and AOC's gloating about New York city losing that bonanza angered DeBlasio:

          “I came up watching the mistakes of progressives of the past, unfortunately what happened in this city when it almost went to bankruptcy in the 1970s,” said a boiling de Blasio. “I saw all the times progressives did not show people effective governance and all the times progressives made the kinds of mistakes that alienated working people.”

          “Working people are very smart and very discerning. They want jobs, they want revenue, they want the kinds of things that government can do for them,” he added. “They understand they have to be paid for.”

          John Hinderaker:


          This is almost unbelievably stupid. Obviously, there is no “$3 billion dollars that we were willing to give to Amazon.” No one ever proposed to give money to Amazon. Those were dollars that “we” hypothetically would have refrained from collecting from Amazon. Those dollars do not exist. They are not in the possession of New York State or any other public entity. They cannot be “invest[ed] in our local community.” The absence of those funds will not “allow our subway system to crumble.” No one has ever proposed “giving away our infrastructure, our schools, our teachers’ salaries, our firefighters’ budgets,” to Amazon or anyone else.

          This isn’t complicated stuff. If Ocasio-Cortez is really this stupid, she shouldn’t have graduated from high school. She certainly shouldn’t be representing many thousands of constituents, who must assume that she is of at least average intelligence, in Congress.

          Her level of intelligence doesn't matter to her legion of Twitter fans who thinks AOC is leading the way to a socialist paradise. Ocasio-Cortez has learned that parroting socialist nonsense about "exploitation" and other Marxist bromides will take her a lot farther than impressing us with her vast intellect.

          DeBlasio may be a radical progressive himself, but he needs the people of New York to vote for him. Even the dumbest politician knows that bringing 25K jobs to the city would be a political boon. The spat over Amazon's headquarters has divided Democrats in the city and could cost Ocasio-Cortez local support.

          And it gives national Democrats more of an excuse to try and get rid of her in 2020.



          https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...ters_flap.html

          îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


          • #6
            Another arrogant liberal regaling us about our "standards & values."

            What HE thinks our "standards & values" are at least. What HE wants them to be.

            ...looking at his criminal/legal record, he wants us to have NONE apparently... no surprise from a democrat...

            Always interesting how it's liberal progressives making statements like;

            "That's not who we are."

            or

            "Those aren't our standards & values."

            Telling us what "most Americans" "standards & values" are... according to them.

            Then THEY get to patiently explain to us what our "standards & values" ARE ! See how this game works ??

            Then..

            This Bob Menendez fellow, like far too many democrats, has forgotten what America is !

            He says;

            While this administration hasn’t prioritized support for democracy and human rights, we must not lose heart and we must not lose focus,”...

            America isn't a democracy !

            How do such fools get elected ???????????????

            Are we not embarrassed when these people we voted for, go out in public & make such ignorant declarations ???

            Then he complains that the president saved America from the fraud of "the Paris climate accord." .. a ridiculous bit of tomfoolery not worth any serious leaders attention.

            Then he says;

            In a world where we need to work together to face real threats, I for one humbly believe that the U.S. should lecture less and lead more.”

            What ?

            Did he just wake up ?????????????

            He's NOW going to tell us we should "lecture less and lead more" !?!?!?!?

            Are we not embarrassed when these people we voted for, go out in public & make such ignorant declarations ???

            This creep saying such things isn't laughable, it's an embarrassment !

            Take a look at HIS "standards & values" before you think he has ANY authority to tell us ANYTHING ABOUT SUCH THINGS !!!

            That goes for ALL democrat/progressives lecturing America about "who we are" etc



            ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Bob Menendez, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said President Donald Trump is out of touch with most U.S. citizens when it comes to democratic standards and values.

            “While this administration hasn’t prioritized support for democracy and human rights, we must not lose heart and we must not lose focus,” Menendez said during a speech to the German Marshall Fund in Brussels. “On this issue the administration does not speak for and does not represent all Americans, or even most Americans.”

            Menendez warned that “the trans-Atlantic relationship is under serious strain,” adding that Trump’s decision to withdrawal from the Paris climate accord, impose tariffs on European steel and aluminum imports and to downgrade “long-held universal values of democracy and human rights” have all dealt a blow to America’s relationships with its allies.

            “Instead of attacking our friends in Europe as President Trump has done we should redouble our efforts to find areas of common ground and common interest,” Menendez said. “In a world where we need to work together to face real threats, I for one humbly believe that the U.S. should lecture less and lead more.”


            https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/tr.../18/id/903178/

            ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...nendez/357360/

            https://splinternews.com/sticking-wi...d-d-1826650768

            https://nypost.com/2017/11/12/dems-m...-if-convicted/

            lots more if you look

            This guy is a real class act !

            But he's gonna lecture us about Donald Trump being out of touch with American standards and values ????????

            îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


            • #7
              Funny, those who constantly lecture everyone complaining about someone else doing the same.

              Menendez? Isn't he the guy that got free rides from a donor to go and boink young Filipino boys, and then got brought up under federal corruption charges?

              As if that's someone who should be lecturing to anyone!

              îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


              • #8
                Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
                Funny, those who constantly lecture everyone complaining about someone else doing the same.

                Menendez? Isn't he the guy that got free rides from a donor to go and boink young Filipino boys, and then got brought up under federal corruption charges?

                As if that's someone who should be lecturing to anyone!
                Exactly !

                These people are so insane !

                The worst offenders are going to give US ADVICE ?

                ... and this ISN'T A Saturday night live skit ??

                îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                  Exactly !

                  These people are so insane !

                  The worst offenders are going to give US ADVICE ?

                  ... and this ISN'T A Saturday night live skit ??
                  No, it would never be a SNL skit, as it would put liberals / leftists / Democrats in a bad light, and that's not permitted by their ideology. It's only permitted to make all non-liberals / non-leftists / non-Democrats look bad as often as possible, or so it seems.

                  A mere joke and shell of what late night comedy used to be when it actually contained humor rather than virtue signaling and political preaching.

                  îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                  • #10
                    This isn’t quite as off-topic as one might, at first, believe. This Democrat suicide plot has, in fact, given rise to this possibility:
                    Howard Schultz, former CEO of Starbucks, as a “progressive” independent presidential candidate.

                    An interesting article in last week’s Fortune magazine talks about the as-yet unannounced presidential aspirations this guy might or might not have.

                    The Pro of a Schultz candidacy
                    -His desire to run as an independent would siphon votes from the democrats (for a change)
                    -he wants to more closely monitor political campaign contributions (cancel them all together until Congress “gets their act together”)
                    -he is (another) savvy business man with a head for marketing
                    -he stands a good chance of impacting our entrenched two-party system

                    The Con of a Schultz candidacy
                    -I don’t like his liberal ideas about gun control or abortion or health care or illegal immigration... and he could get elected.
                    -he is much more like Bernie Sanders in his economic philosophies than he is like, say, Ted Cruz
                    -from our department of redundancy department, he might win.

                    So that article is from last week and we have not heard anything from him since, so I’d imagine the democrats flew into a frenzied panic at the thought of him running and have likely, by now, made him an offer he can’t refuse...maybe even threatened him with a visit from the Clinton family.

                    Have you considered Howard?

                    îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                    • #11
                      All the Democrats are all in a panic about Schultz running. They have reason to be. The base has swung so far left, dragging the more moderate part of the party base with them, kicking and screaming. Schultz runs, and he'll do a Ross Perot, splitting the Democratic vote, and re-electing Trump. I suspect that the DNC is going to destroy Schultz with all their dirty tricks (so how many unfounded and un-evidenced sexual assault accusations are going to fly now?) to prevent that from happening.

                      îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DavidSF View Post
                        This isn’t quite as off-topic as one might, at first, believe. This Democrat suicide plot has, in fact, given rise to this possibility:
                        Howard Schultz, former CEO of Starbucks, as a “progressive” independent presidential candidate.

                        An interesting article in last week’s Fortune magazine talks about the as-yet unannounced presidential aspirations this guy might or might not have.

                        The Pro of a Schultz candidacy
                        -His desire to run as an independent would siphon votes from the democrats (for a change)
                        -he wants to more closely monitor political campaign contributions (cancel them all together until Congress “gets their act together”)
                        -he is (another) savvy business man with a head for marketing
                        -he stands a good chance of impacting our entrenched two-party system

                        The Con of a Schultz candidacy
                        -I don’t like his liberal ideas about gun control or abortion or health care or illegal immigration... and he could get elected.
                        -he is much more like Bernie Sanders in his economic philosophies than he is like, say, Ted Cruz
                        -from our department of redundancy department, he might win.

                        So that article is from last week and we have not heard anything from him since, so I’d imagine the democrats flew into a frenzied panic at the thought of him running and have likely, by now, made him an offer he can’t refuse...maybe even threatened him with a visit from the Clinton family.

                        Have you considered Howard?
                        I think Howard would be the best choice for democrats.

                        Compared to the rest of the wild-eyed creeps calling themselves democrats.

                        He at least behaves and speaks like a normal American.

                        He's a bit farther to the left than I care for, but I think a lot of democrats out there could align with a person that doesn't speak and act like a ding-dong.

                        îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                        • #13
                          My guess is, there is a committee of democrats trying to convince him to run as a democrat.

                          they are absolutely panicked at the thought of Schultz running as an independent: Amongst horrors like “he might win” and irrevocably quash the sacrosanct two-party system, even if he doesn’t win, a viable independent candidate will guarantee a second Trump administration.

                          îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DavidSF View Post
                            My guess is, there is a committee of democrats trying to convince him to run as a democrat.
                            Good cop, bad cop? Either run as a Democrat (and probably lose) or we'll unleash the dogs of political character assassination. (?)

                            they are absolutely panicked at the thought of Schultz running as an independent: Amongst horrors like “he might win” and irrevocably quash the sacrosanct two-party system, even if he doesn’t win, a viable independent candidate will guarantee a second Trump administration.
                            I like it. The independent party and the GOP, with the Dems running a distant third. OK by me, but I rather don't believe it to be likely, but then again, the times are tumultuous.

                            îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by DavidSF View Post
                              My guess is, there is a committee of democrats trying to convince him to run as a democrat.

                              they are absolutely panicked at the thought of Schultz running as an independent: Amongst horrors like “he might win” and irrevocably quash the sacrosanct two-party system, even if he doesn’t win, a viable independent candidate will guarantee a second Trump administration.
                              Anything to cause these two "parties" heartache is wonderful if you ask me.

                              Anything

                              Their power is too great and needs serious dilution !

                              îä îëéìåú äçãùåú?

                              Working...
                              X