Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

    Wow, just wow. There really isn't any bottom to how low many pro gun people will stoop. The man just had his son killed. Those people are human fucking scum in my opinion.

    Neil Heslin, the father of a 6-year-old boy who was slain in the Sandy Hook massacre in Newtown, Conn., on Dec. 14, stoically faced down pro-gun activists last night.

    More than 1,000 people attended a hearing before the Gun Violence Prevention Working Group at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford on Monday to share their views on gun control, USA Today reported. Among them was Heslin, who held a large framed picture of himself and his son Jesse as he urged officials to consider strengthening gun laws in Connecticut.

    But as he gave his emotional testimony, pleading with lawmakers to improve mental health options and to ban assault weapons like the one Adam Lanza used to murder his child and 25 other people, his speech was interrupted by dozens of audience members, The Connecticut Post reported.
    Father of Newtown victim heckled at hearing - Connecticut Post

    Neil Heslin, Father Of Newtown Victim, Heckled By Pro-Gun Activists (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

  • #2
    Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

    You're right, he did just have a son killed. Still, he was at a public political event that was discussing a very charged issue. Should we condone the behavior of those who "heckled" (which I think is a strong word for what happened) him? Of course not. Should we feel sorry that he got heckled at a political event? Of course not.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

      And then there was this one:

      ‘The Problem Is Not Gun Laws’: Watch the Emotional Speech by a Sandy Hook Victim’s Dad That Got a Standing Ovation

      Parents of children killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School appeared before a subcommittee of the Connecticut Legislature on Monday to speak about gun control. While some used the platform to promote stricter firearms legislation, at least one parent became passionate, claiming that there are more than enough laws on the books, that current regulations simply need to be enforced and that the nation needs to embrace personal responsibility.
      ‘The Problem Is Not Gun Laws’: Watch the Emotional Speech by a Sandy Hook Victim’s Dad That Got a Standing Ovation | Video | TheBlaze.com

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

        A Political party that uses the death of children to push their gun grabbing agenda ... Those people are human fucking scum in my opinion.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5
          Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

          From the video I have seen he wasn't heckled. He said something to the effect of "can anyone give me a reason that a civilian needs this kind of weapon?" and somebody in the audience said "Shall not be infringed".

          It should be noted that this wasn't happening on the streets. This was at a meeting to determine what, if any, CT laws regarding guns should be changed.

          It's interesting if you watch the video edit from Telegraph - Gun activists heckle father of child killed at Sandy Hook - Telegraph
          as compared to the video edit from the Blaze - ‘The Second Amendment Shall Not Be Infringed!’: Sandy Hook Victim’s Father Interrupted During Public Hearing | Video | TheBlaze.com

          I'd sure like to see a clip of the whole thing because it seemed to be quite civil.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

            Originally posted by Lutherf View Post
            From the video I have seen he wasn't heckled. He said something to the effect of "can anyone give me a reason that a civilian needs this kind of weapon?" and somebody in the audience said "Shall not be infringed".

            It should be noted that this wasn't happening on the streets. This was at a meeting to determine what, if any, CT laws regarding guns should be changed.

            It's interesting if you watch the video edit from Telegraph - Gun activists heckle father of child killed at Sandy Hook - Telegraph
            as compared to the video edit from the Blaze - ‘The Second Amendment Shall Not Be Infringed!’: Sandy Hook Victim’s Father Interrupted During Public Hearing | Video | TheBlaze.com

            I'd sure like to see a clip of the whole thing because it seemed to be quite civil.
            You don't suppose our media would try to spin an issue like this do you?

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

              Originally posted by Lutherf View Post
              From the video I have seen he wasn't heckled. He said something to the effect of "can anyone give me a reason that a civilian needs this kind of weapon?" and somebody in the audience said "Shall not be infringed".

              It should be noted that this wasn't happening on the streets. This was at a meeting to determine what, if any, CT laws regarding guns should be changed.

              It's interesting if you watch the video edit from Telegraph - Gun activists heckle father of child killed at Sandy Hook - Telegraph
              as compared to the video edit from the Blaze - ‘The Second Amendment Shall Not Be Infringed!’: Sandy Hook Victim’s Father Interrupted During Public Hearing | Video | TheBlaze.com

              I'd sure like to see a clip of the whole thing because it seemed to be quite civil.
              Yeah, that is why I said "heckled" was a strong word for what went down. Then again, look at the source: HuffPo. Plus, this is Danny we're talking about.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
                A Political party that uses the death of children to push their gun grabbing agenda ... Those people are human fucking scum in my opinion.
                Rakkason your drivel is reached new lows as well. This problem has been solved in every country but the US. Gun laws will stop people from being killed and it's the proper response to a massacre of children. It's offensive that you are accusing Dems (though many GOPers are also on board) of using the tragedy for something else other than to save the lives of their fellow citizens. If having lots of guns reduced gun deaths then nobody would be trying to restrict them. But they don't. IF THEY DID YOU'D HAVE THE LOWEST GUN DEATH RATE INSTEAD OF THE HIGHEST.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                  Originally posted by Danny View Post
                  Rakkason your drivel is reached new lows as well. This problem has been solved in every country but the US. Gun laws will stop people from being killed and it's the proper response to a massacre of children. It's offensive that you are accusing Dems of using the tragedy for something else other than to save the lives of their fellow citizens. If having lots of guns reduced gun deaths then nobody would be trying to restrict them. But they don't. IF THEY DID YOU'D HAVE THE LOWEST GUN DEATH RATE INSTEAD OF THE HIGHEST.
                  Tell that to the Russians and Germans who had their weapons confiscated. The reason other countries are safe without guns is because we have them. The reason Canada doesn't have to spend much on defense is because they have agreements with us to defend them.

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #10
                    Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                    Originally posted by Danny View Post
                    Rakkason your drivel is reached new lows as well. This problem has been solved in every country but the US. Gun laws will stop people from being killed and it's the proper response to a massacre of children. It's offensive that you are accusing Dems of using the tragedy for something else other than to save the lives of their fellow citizens. If having lots of guns reduced gun deaths then nobody would be trying to restrict them. But they don't so responsible people are doing what's right.
                    Surprise, surprise, you find a conflicting opinion "offensive".

                    The problem you are so quickly to dismiss is that we are talking about infringing on one of our core, Constitutional rights and one of our greatest strengths as a nation. Demolish one and you lay the ground work for demolishing the rest.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #11
                      Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                      Originally posted by Danny View Post
                      Rakkason your drivel is reached new lows as well. This problem has been solved in every country but the US. Gun laws will stop people from being killed and it's the proper response to a massacre of children. It's offensive that you are accusing Dems (though many GOPers are also on board) of using the tragedy for something else other than to save the lives of their fellow citizens. If having lots of guns reduced gun deaths then nobody would be trying to restrict them. But they don't. IF THEY DID YOU'D HAVE THE LOWEST GUN DEATH RATE INSTEAD OF THE HIGHEST.
                      there you go .... acting like your messiah ... you must demonize all those that disagree with you on every issue. Back when W was in office people like you decried that "dissent was the highest form of patriotism" now any dissent is evil and "drivel"

                      "Drivel" Danny is what you and your ilk are pushing.. Statism .. blind cult devotion for a man who could do or say anything and you would follow like the good sheeple you are

                      At one time Danny you had valid points now you just push talking points handed to you by your dear leader.... sad truly sad

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #12
                        Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                        Originally posted by Danny View Post
                        Rakkason your drivel is reached new lows as well. This problem has been solved in every country but the US. Gun laws will stop people from being killed and it's the proper response to a massacre of children. It's offensive that you are accusing Dems (though many GOPers are also on board) of using the tragedy for something else other than to save the lives of their fellow citizens. If having lots of guns reduced gun deaths then nobody would be trying to restrict them. But they don't. IF THEY DID YOU'D HAVE THE LOWEST GUN DEATH RATE INSTEAD OF THE HIGHEST.
                        Danny, I don't have the exact numbers on hand right now but after the UK did their last big gun grab in 1995 or so the homicide rate dropped by something like 12%. When Australia did their gun grab at roughly the same time their homicide rate dropped by something in the area of 20%. In the US we also instituted new legislation but it didn't take away any guns and our homicide rate dropped by more than 40%. The reason for that drop wasn't taking guns away. It couldn't have been because we had double or better the drop off in homicides yet we didn't confiscate anything. What happened is that as part of the law that included the AWB we toughened sentencing guidelines and made it easier for law enforcement to get criminals off the street.

                        Do you know why that worked, Danny? It worked because guns aren't the problem....criminals are!!

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #13
                          Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                          Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
                          there you go .... acting like your messiah ... you must demonize all those that disagree with you on every issue. Back when W was in office people like you decried that "dissent was the highest form of patriotism" now any dissent is evil and "drivel"

                          "Drivel" Danny is what you and your ilk are pushing.. Statism .. blind cult devotion for a man who could do or say anything and you would follow like the good sheeple you are

                          At one time Danny you had valid points now you just push talking points handed to you by your dear leader.... sad truly sad
                          Danny himself was here before the blood even dried, using this tragedy to make partisan political hash. He's likely to get all faux-indignant because I just said that, but the truth is that he eventually acknowledged doing exactly that.

                          As you have correctly noted, his hatred and intolerance for any contrasting view has grown out of control. I received a nasty PM from him because I dared to point out that he was exploiting the CT shooting for political gain. He used to be a reasonable guy, before he found Obama and surrendered all original thought to HuffPo.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #14
                            Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                            [w]Gentlemen, please, this thread has a specific topic. Feel free to beat one anothers opinion to a pulp but leave the personal crap out of it.[/w]

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #15
                              Re: Father of murdered son HECKLED by pro gun activitsts

                              Looking at the video, I think it is a huge stretch to call this "heckling".

                              מה מכילות החדשות?

                              Working...
                              X