Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)


You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.


You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.


You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software),, sites affiliated with, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.


1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.


Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.


All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.


U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Let's send new Immigrants to Washington D.C.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Let's send new Immigrants to Washington D.C.

    Liberal 'immigration' policy, applied by people who are insulated from its effects...

    ... which is why we still have a wide open southern border and are "debating" about a wall.

    What needs to happen is that these wonderful 'immigrants,' -

    - these great experiments in 'diversity' -

    - need to be moved into the neighborhoods of our "leaders" - those who have decided that America needs these immigrants.

    After-all, it is they who have decided this is good for us.

    It's so wonderful, they would want this !!!! They want these people in their neighborhoods !!!...

    RIGHT ???

    Let it be done !!


    Unlike Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz, I cannot simply tap my heels together and get back to the imperfect but largely harmless familiarity of home.

    One more part of America has been allocated to another alien population squatters who have been brought here to feed on us and to drive us out. But where do we have left to go? This isnt progress though it is progressive.

    When immigration is talked about on what sneeringly masquerades as news, it is always painted in fatalistic phrases that make it sound like an unstoppable force of nature as though the people surging into America were a swarm of Mexican butterflies or a herd of East African wildebeests that had somehow overwhelmed the TSA.

    This invasion is portrayed as if there were no plan involved at all just some primal urge that arises spontaneously in third-worlders that cant be stopped.

    This is the narrative fashioned for the convenience of the unaffected.

    That they might feel good about themselves while enjoying a little schadenfreude at our expense.

    They do not see the consequences. They see the dream. No one who actually lives here could possibly believe that back in the 1990s a group of impoverished Somali fishermen and goat herders woke up one morning and said to one another:

    I hear there is good fishing in Alum Creek Lake, and abundant grazing in Sharon Woods Metro Park! Lets hop a flight to Ohio and become Americans!

    They did not aspire to be Americans in any remotely meaningful sense of the word. We have seen them, and we are not that stupid.

    The African populations seeded in Columbus, Minneapolis, and many other places did not come here to learn our culture or our values. They were not blown here in some unavoidable freak storm, nor did they wander here in search of missing livestock. They were certainly not brought here centuries ago as hapless and unwilling slaves.

    People from Washington, Boston, San Francisco and New York have sponsored this invasion people who staff committees and think tanks, people who show the residents of the heartland the same loving concern that the Jackson administration showed the Cherokee.

    Call me a racist if you want to I cannot bring myself to care. I saw the buried remains of displaced Indian nations as child. The basic lesson of what migrants do to native populations wasnt lost on me.

    Times change but human nature doesnt. The internet has, to the extent to which the left controls it, hidden the inconvenient contradiction between reality and grand utopian narrative but only if you stay in cyberspace.

    On the internet, yesterdays hostile, crime-ridden slum can become todays rich and vibrant haven of diversity just as any imaginative loser can become a thriving entrepreneur, or any slobbering pervert can become a childs new best friend. This is the magic of wishful thinking. It is the refuge of those who can dream the accepted dream, speak the accepted speech, and live some kind of nervous little life inside the accepted safe space of the well-cultivated neo-Marxist mind. There have always been costs to the buzzing, dizzying circus act that has passed itself off as human progress but our wheels have somehow slipped entirely off the road this time. We are in new, uncharted territory.

    Though not exactly a tourist magnet, the northeastern part of Columbus, Ohio used to be an unpretentious, unremarkable part of America. You could go there if you wanted to. It is now an unofficial colony of Somalia. The business signs, grimy and grey for decades, are now in Arabic. Somali women, grown fat on an American diet doled out by the publics confiscated largesse, waddle along the street in their abysmal burkas. Somali men are something other than Americans with funny accents. Something has gone badly wrong.

    While I can still drive through this part of Columbus, I notice the Americans who used to live there, white and black, are fewer and farther between.

    I notice when I hear on the local news that a refugee has run his car into a group of students at Ohio State, then chased others down the street with a knife while shouting Allahu Akbar! I notice when another migrant, a Muslim from Ghana, enters a restaurant owned by an Israeli and proceeds to hack at the customers with a machete. Americas earlier minorities didnt do these things. This is something new. I may be in Ohio, my dear Toto, but something tells me Im not in my own country anymore. Im in the middle of a pre-industrial, semi-literate, dystopian Islamic theme park.


  • #2
    Send them to Washington DC !!!

    They're the people that have allowed this invasion to continue for decades.

    Now it's getting really gross...

    Importing more diseased "migrants"

    Tuberculosis !

    Great stuff !

    Let the politicians have them AROUND THEM !!!!


    We dont need immigration reform. We need to secure our border and enforce our immigration laws. Why is that so hard?

    After more than two decades of steady decline in active cases of tuberculosis in America, the trend has now reversed.

    Its time for fools to take a bow. Congratulations Marxists and complicit members of the GOP. Your commitment to import large numbers of people from third world countries is really paying off.

    CDC stats from 2017 show that 70% of reported cases of TB in the United States was found among non-U.S.-born individuals. Migrants from Mexico accounted for the largest share.

    For patients who respond to standard treatment, the cost of treating active TB is about $17,000 per person. For those who have drug-resistant strains, the cost is anywhere from $130,000 to $430,000, depending on how resistant the strain is.

    Got that? Taxpayers may shell out nearly half a million dollars to treat one case of a drug-resistant strain of TB.

    Then theres the issue of tracking. After folks develop active disease, tracking them is spotty. So, if they fall off the radar, oh well.

    California, Texas, New York, and Florida (states with the largest number of foreign-born residents) have more than half the active TB cases in the country. And despite California having the largest TB prevention and control program, their infection rate is nearly twice the national average, though that figure is likely higher since about 2.5 million Californians who are infected are unaware they have it.

    In addition, data from just a few years ago in Minnesota showed that 26% of all foreign-born cases of TB were Somalis who came here through the refugee resettlement program and 20% of these colonizers forced upon the good people of Minnesota tested positive for latent TB (latent TB is not contagious, but it can turn into active TB, which is contagious).

    And on and on it goes. The same pattern is seen everywhere. An uptick in TB due in large part to an influx of people from impoverished countries (here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). addition to TB, leprosy is making a comeback, as is chicken pox. Were also seeing cases of flesh-eating bacteria. In addition, CDC data documents migrants from Bhutan, Burma, Congo, Iraq, Somalia, Syria, and Central America infected with malaria, hepatitis, syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, HIV, dengue virus, zika virus, and a wide array of intestinal parasites, among others. And thats just communicable diseases that have been reported in those we know about (here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here).

    The impact of this is devastating. Border patrol is on the front-line battling diseases as they contend with sick migrants, most of whom arent vaccinated. Buildings have become infested with scabies. Many of the illegal wannabes showing up with symptoms arent being quarantined. And our resources are being depleted and misdirected.


    • #3
      Word around here is, ICE is planning to build a 12,000 (or maybe its only 2000) bed containment center here in IL to house immigrants while their cases wind through immigration court.

      That means it is time to leave Oclock.


      • #4
        Originally posted by DavidSF View Post
        Word around here is, ICE is planning to build a 12,000 (or maybe its only 2000) bed containment center here in IL to house immigrants while their cases wind through immigration court.

        That means it is time to leave Oclock.
        They need to house these people in Nancy and Chucks neighborhoods. Or with them IN their homes !

        They're so hell-bent on defending and allowing these "migrants" to come here illegally, let them LIVE WITH THEM THEN !

        It's the right thing to do is it not ?


        • #5
          ... of course it's the right thing to do.

          After-all, these illegal "migrants" seeking "asylum" are wonderful people !

          Yes they are !

          Nancy & Chuck ... ALL DC liberals, republicans, democrats - the whole lot of them - will be more than happy to welcome these people into their neighborhoods & homes !!

          More than happy !!

          After-all, it would be wrong of them to share these illegal "migrants" and "asylum seekers" with the rest of us.

          THEY value these wonderful people MUCH more than we possibly ever could ! ... they're not going to want to share them with US !!!

          They know better ! They know best ! They want the best people with & around THEM !!

          And so, we'll have to miss out .........-frowns-

          Only the elites in D.C. get to share their lives with these great "migrants" and "asylum seekers" !!

          Are we ever going to miss out !!

          There's a LOT of caravans coming our way !! Coming for the benefit of our elites in D.C. ONLY !!!

          They're all going to be so happy ! Are we feeling left out yet ?



          • #6
            Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
            ... of course it's the right thing to do.

            After-all, these illegal "migrants" seeking "asylum" are wonderful people !

            Yes they are !

            Nancy & Chuck ... ALL DC liberals, republicans, democrats - the whole lot of them - will be more than happy to welcome these people into their neighborhoods & homes !!

            More than happy !!

            After-all, it would be wrong of them to share these illegal "migrants" and "asylum seekers" with the rest of us.

            THEY value these wonderful people MUCH more than we possibly ever could ! ... they're not going to want to share them with US !!!

            They know better ! They know best ! They want the best people with & around THEM !!

            And so, we'll have to miss out .........-frowns-

            Only the elites in D.C. get to share their lives with these great "migrants" and "asylum seekers" !!

            Are we ever going to miss out !!

            There's a LOT of caravans coming our way !! Coming for the benefit of our elites in D.C. ONLY !!!

            They're all going to be so happy ! Are we feeling left out yet ?

            What another racist thread o-boy.


            • #7
              Originally posted by redrover View Post

              What another racist thread o-boy.
              Illogical and foolish as usual.

              Racism has nothing to do with keeping America safe from invasions.

              ... or is it racist for us to have a military ?

              It must be racist for our politicians to live in protected communities BEHIND WALLS ... with guys with guns keeping them safe if they have to go out in public.

              You don't lock your home and your car do you ? Keep your money visible on a table in your unlocked home because you're "not a racist" RIGHT ??


              You're a racist hater, probably a Nazi even ! Definitely a "white nationalist" ! ... it comes through every time you write something...


              • #8
                Originally posted by redrover View Post

                What another racist thread o-boy.
                As observant as you are intelligent: This thread, which you have just noticed, has been around for three weeks, Braintrust.


                • #9
                  Actually, what about Puerto Rico? If all these illegals are a great economic resource, can anyone think of anyplace in our sovereign territory more in need of them?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
                    Actually, what about Puerto Rico? If all these illegals are a great economic resource, can anyone think of anyplace in our sovereign territory more in need of them?
                    It needs rebuilt, why NOT ??

                    Puerto Rico would celebrate this yes ??


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                      It needs rebuilt, why NOT ??

                      Puerto Rico would celebrate this yes ??
                      And given that the overwhelming majority of non-English speaking illegals DO speak Spanish...where better than Puerto Rico!


                      • #12
                        I have a strange feeling liberals will be against it.

                        Why ?

                        Not sure.

                        Other than the fact that they didn't think of it. Only things THEY dream up... are good ideas you see ?

                        Like sanctuary cities & states . . . that they don't want us to send immigrants to -shrugs-


                        • #13
                          Sending illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities and states sounds about right to me.
                          They are the ones that are putting out the welcome mat by declaring themselves to be sanctuary cities and states.
                          Seems rather hard to justify not accepting them.

                          I notice that the Democrats who were fauxraged against this idea have slipped from the news coverage, once this hypocrisy of theirs was observed.


                          • #14
                            Sending them to where they're wanted !

                            What is wrong with that ?

                            Nothing ! It's happening..


                            President Donald Trump says hes proud to take full credit for the sick idea of sending detained illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities and that the plan is already underway.

                            In a rally in Green Bay, Wis., Saturday night, Trump admitted he came up with the idea to exact revenge on political enemies.

                            Last month alone, 100,000 illegal immigrants arrived at our borders, placing a massive strain on communities and schools and hospitals and public resources like nobodys ever seen before," Trump said

                            "Now were sending many of them to sanctuary cities, thank you very much. Theyre not too happy about it. Im proud to tell you that was actually my sick idea."

                            "Hey, hey, what did they say? We want them," Trump continued. "I say well give em to you, thank you."



                            • #15
                              And yes, these illegal "migrants" SHOULD all be sent to Washington D.C.

                              It is they in D.C. who want them so bad, let them have them !!

                              More fun for all, more drunk drivers, more DUI's, more people killed by intoxicated "migrants," HEY, it's all in good fun !!!

                              Diversity for D.C. !!!


                              COULD I GET THAT ILLEGAL "TO GO"? [ to DC ]

                              As we head into the long Labor Day weekend, here are two tips to make your holiday even more cheerful.

                              First: Remember to watch out for drunk driving illegal aliens!

                              The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has issued report after report showing that Hispanics are wildly overrepresented in drunk driving accidents (but also contribute so much to our cultural life, musical heritage and landscape!).

                              Or, as the Huffington Post puts it: "Latinos At Greater Risk of Dying From Driving While Intoxicated." They're victims of the drunk driving epidemic! German Concentration Camp Guards At Greater Risk of Dying From Accidental Inhalation of Zyklon B.

                              One NHTSA report elaborated on the inebriated Latino driver problem:

                              "The authors found that some Latino parents actively promoted drinking among their sons as a sign of masculinity or machismo. (A focus group) indicated drinking among Hispanics might be motivated by the need to prove their manhood within the Latino culture: "Everyone thinks they can handle alcohol, especially men." ... "A lot of Hispanics think that way. It's the macho male and the woman gives in to the man. Machismo causes this behavior."

                              The report also stated, "Mexican-American DWI offenders vastly overestimated the number of drinks required to make them unsafe drivers (eight to 10 drinks)."

                              It's unclear if the NHTSA's methodology took into account the effects of Cinco de Mayo.

                              Naturally, it would be outrageous to conclude from this that drunk driving is the national sport of Mexico.

                              However, last year alone, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deported 80,730 illegals for drunk driving, the majority of them Mexicans.

                              As the Houston Chronicle delicately put it a few years ago: "Young Hispanic men not getting message about drinking, driving." ... crashing, burning, their ashes being spread across Cuernavaca ...

                              Thanks to its proximity to Mexico, Texas leads the nation in fatal drunk driving accidents, including those involving a blood alcohol content of 0.15 or greater -- nearly double the legal limit. In 2014, young Latinos were responsible for about one-third of all DUI accidents in Houston -- 535 -- though they made up only 8 percent of the population.

                              MSNBC's Lawrence
                              O'Dumbell sneered at President Trump's June 2018 meeting with family members of Americans killed by illegals, saying most of their dead kids were killed in traffic accidents. As if that doesn't count.

                              Why did we have to hear endlessly about O'Donnell's car accident in Tortola a few years ago, which he described as his "brush with death"?

                              Yeah, that must have been rough, some real Brian Williams stuff there. But Don Rosenberg finding out his 25-year-old son had been run over, backed over and then run over again by an illegal alien -- well, that's just a "traffic accident."

                              Our media have no idea who Don Rosenberg is, and no interest in finding out. Their concern for "children" is limited to the ones they can exploit to get their way on illegal immigration. They wail about "children separated from their parents," but it would be a dream come true for the "Angel Mom" parents if their kids were merely separated from them for six months -- or six years! -- if only they could see them again, ever.

                              You know what else is kind of traumatic? Being wedged into the false panel of a truck with a breathing tube before traversing hundreds of miles of rough terrain to make it to the U.S. border. These parents did that to their kids.

                              The New York Times, too, nonchalantly mentioned that the kids of some of the families at Trump's White House meeting "died in car accidents." They just died. Car accidents happen all the time.

                              Yes, traffic accidents can be caused by anyone -- especially a sh*t-faced illegal going 80 miles per hour on a residential street. Internet scams happen all the time, so, let's take in more Nigerians!

                              The point is, these particular drunk drivers never should have been here in the first place.

                              Tricia Taylor didn't die, but the 18-year-old had to have her legs amputated almost to the hip after a drunk driving illegal alien from El Salvador swerved his car onto a sidewalk in Pontiac, Michigan, and rammed her against the wall. It was a miracle that she lived, suffering through multiple surgeries and a lifetime of pain medications. At Jose Carcamo's sentencing, Taylor said, "What you give him won't come close to the sentence he gave me for the rest of my life."

                              D.J. and Wendy Corcoran began 2019 by burying their 22-year-old son, Pierce, senselessly killed when a 44-year-old illegal alien from Mexico, Francisco Eduardo Franco-Cambrany, swerved headfirst across a double yellow line, straight into oncoming traffic. Echoing the media, Alexander De La Espriella tweeted of Pierces horrible death, "Accidents happen, by anyone to anyone ... " -- as quoted in the Knoxville News. At least we didnt have to hear about the great tacos this time.

                              Six-year-old Annie Cumpston was walking hand-in-hand with her mother in 2003, after attending the Ringling Brothers Circus in Baltimore with her family, when a drunk Mexican plowed into the crosswalk, killing the little girl. The intoxicated illegal, Guillermo Diaz-Lopez, fled the scene, dragging a pedestrian on his truck, and was finally apprehended while trying to break through a police barrier.

                              Today, you can visit "Annie's Playground," a beautiful 60,000-square-foot wonderland built in the victim's honor in Fallston, Maryland -- at least until Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris demand its demolition to show their support for undocumented immigrants."

                              Second friendly holiday tip: Always remember -- diversity is a strength!