Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

ISIS murders over 100.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ISIS murders over 100.

    Over 100 killed in at least two suicide bombings in Yemen, the ISIS faction in Yemen is claiming responsibility. The varsity league keeps playing in a widerr and wider field.

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/two-suic...ues-1426850471

  • #2
    This is a sectarian war, right? ISIS Sunnis killing Shiites. Reminds me kinda, sorta, of the Prots and the Catholics killing one another in Northern Ireland.

    But this Sunni Shiite hatred for one another is so much larger, and one wonders if they can ever put up with one another. The US needs to not take sides, although we already have, but its mixed up, in how we are taking sides. For instance. we side with the Sunni Saudis, against Shiite Iran, but we then side with the Shiites in Iraq against the Sunnis in Iraq who went radical after the Bush Admin. destabilized Iraq and the Shiites who had never ruled Iraq, took over, kicking the Sunnis who had held power there in Saddam's secular gov't, to the curb.

    One has to wonder just how much our own actions in the middle east has helped to lead to the sectarian wars we are seeing today. How much of this is our fault, that came from not taking the time to understand the middle east, and its sectarian Islam? We didn't create this division between the Shiite and the Sunni, but what we did do was to destablilize the area, creating power vaccums, which then provided the envirionment for these sectarian wars to manifest. The question is, does our gov't understand it better today? I don't think they do, especially congress, and especially the chicken hawk republicans, or the hawks in either party.

    Now I do not in the least believe in the prophesy of Revelations. But if there is to be another world war, it will probably happen, with the middle east driving it. Why? Iran. And the fact that China and Russia are on Iran's side. And we seem to be out to sooner or later attack Iran. And, the middle east is still a major supplier of oil for the world. Economies have to have oil. If a war is ever to happen again, it will require something like this mess in the middle east that leads to it. And the key factor is of course, oil supplies, which if they are cut off, it's lights out for the modern world. Makes one think that Revelations got lucky, or there is something to it. I mean, what a coincidence.
    Last edited by Blue Doggy; 03-20-2015, 09:37 AM.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      If these were just Muslim soldiers killing other Muslim soldiers, that would be OK by me but it's not.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
        If these were just Muslim soldiers killing other Muslim soldiers, that would be OK by me but it's not.
        So you want to also go to Africa and lose American lives there too? What about Mexico, with those drug cartels killing civilians?

        Why is it your business what happens in the middle east? How much more money do you want to borrow from china to pay for our actions over there? Think they will loan us a trillion?

        The US is broke oldman. We are in deep shit, waiting for the hatchet to fall on our debt, and you want to spend more money in the middle east? How many more American lives are you willing to lose, because you don't like how those muslims are acting?

        You know what I say? To hell with the muslims, and to hell with that cess pool called the middle east. Have we not already done enough damage? How much more do you want to do? All our meddling does is to serve as recruitment tools for new groups to rise up and start killing people. When is enough enough?

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5
          Take a look at this site. Christian human being slaughtered by Islamists. Can this only be a small group of radicals?

          http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pa...ianAttacks.htm

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            It is no small group. Even as a percentage of Muslims world wide, it is no small percentage. Do you see this sort of reporting in the MSM anywhere? You can be sure that if we were going around the U.S. killing Muslims as they are doing in other countries or even if Christians in Africa were doing this to Muslims there would be an international outcry. And the reason there is not outcry is because the world community fears these people.

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
              It is no small group. Even as a percentage of Muslims world wide, it is no small percentage. Do you see this sort of reporting in the MSM anywhere? You can be sure that if we were going around the U.S. killing Muslims as they are doing in other countries or even if Christians in Africa were doing this to Muslims there would be an international outcry. And the reason there is not outcry is because the world community fears these people.
              Personally Dan, I think using your examples they would be silent. Why? Because to announce killings like this unless it is Israel doing it, (which they would not) would notify the American people that President Obysmals foreign policy initiative is in the crapper.

              Give them cakes and circus, that is the mantra here. Unless people actually pay attention, the MSM has Obysmal doing wonderfully. How do we know? They all keep telling us we are neo-cons, crazy, flat earthers, etc, do they not? That is easy to say as long as you you either ignore what is really going on, or put your head in the sand, and proclaim........"I know nothing, nothing!"

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                It is no small group. Even as a percentage of Muslims world wide, it is no small percentage. Do you see this sort of reporting in the MSM anywhere? You can be sure that if we were going around the U.S. killing Muslims as they are doing in other countries or even if Christians in Africa were doing this to Muslims there would be an international outcry. And the reason there is not outcry is because the world community fears these people.
                Is it anything less than what Hitler did to the Jews? Are Christians not suffering the same fate in the middle east and Africa? Though Muslims are harmed as well, It is still the Muslims that are standing in the end as it was certain Germans standing. (Thank God it was not in the end). Wondering what the end game will be with the Muslim Terrorists.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by msc View Post
                  Is it anything less than what Hitler did to the Jews? Are Christians not suffering the same fate in the middle east and Africa? Though Muslims are harmed as well, It is still the Muslims that are standing in the end as it was certain Germans standing. (Thank God it was not in the end). Wondering what the end game will be with the Muslim Terrorists.

                  The final end game is delineated in The Revelation.

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by msc View Post
                    Is it anything less than what Hitler did to the Jews? Are Christians not suffering the same fate in the middle east and Africa? Though Muslims are harmed as well, It is still the Muslims that are standing in the end as it was certain Germans standing. (Thank God it was not in the end). Wondering what the end game will be with the Muslim Terrorists.
                    MSC, the end in much of Muslim terrorism will come when they try to do something to Israel. They won't tolerate it at all, and many of the moderate Middle Eastern states will clandestinely cheer them on. Were it not for Obama, I personally believe they would have done something already.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Imawhosure View Post

                      MSC, the end in much of Muslim terrorism will come when they try to do something to Israel. They won't tolerate it at all, and many of the moderate Middle Eastern states will clandestinely cheer them on. Were it not for Obama, I personally believe they would have done something already.
                      I do believe there was a time where Israel had a window, with the ability to do an air strike on Iran, and Obama threatened to shoot Israeli planes down if attempted. Obama certainly endorses involvement when it is to protect the Muslim way of life.

                      Was just watching some video's of Muslims cheering at terrorists attacks, Children supporting Jihad, MSA student supporting Hamas, and other horrific things. Wanted to post it, but it didn't have an original link available. It's spreading more and more. Moderate Muslims are not quite as moderate as people want to believe. I'm not denying that their are some who protest the Jihadist ways, but it seems that many moderates who will not participate are okay with the terrorists doing the dirty work for them. I don't want a war. Not with the US or Israel, but I fear that it has come to the point where war may be inevitable and the longer the wait, the bigger the war.

                      The shame is that it probably didn't have to come down to this. If people comprehended the difference between good and evil, sanctions, interrogations, spying on radical mosques, not entertaining rights of terrorists, support of Israel and other tactics, that are politically incorrect, war could be prevented. All laws were designed to protect the good from the bad, but when these laws begin to protect the bad and harm the good, human intellect should kick in.

                      If the end game is, (peace, equality, and freedom) for all, then we have to consider that we are not following the rules of the game properly, just created more obstacles to keep the game going on longer.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by msc View Post
                        I do believe there was a time where Israel had a window, with the ability to do an air strike on Iran, and Obama threatened to shoot Israeli planes down if attempted.
                        MSC, I never heard that before. Is that accurate, or are you embellishing? If it is accurate, then we really have a problem with our corny mander and chief.

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Imawhosure View Post

                          MSC, I never heard that before. Is that accurate, or are you embellishing? If it is accurate, then we really have a problem with our corny mander and chief.
                          No my friend, I did not embellish. I never do.

                          This link is not where I learned about it, but it's offering the same information.

                          http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Ne...6#.VPNFzGZGqpp
                          Last edited by msc; 04-14-2015, 04:39 AM.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #14
                            Do we have conformation from sources that aren't in Israel as considering the nature of this story the source you cited can hardly be seen as impartial.

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by msc View Post
                              I do believe there was a time where Israel had a window, with the ability to do an air strike on Iran, and Obama threatened to shoot Israeli planes down if attempted. Obama certainly endorses involvement when it is to protect the Muslim way of life.

                              Was just watching some video's of Muslims cheering at terrorists attacks, Children supporting Jihad, MSA student supporting Hamas, and other horrific things. Wanted to post it, but it didn't have an original link available. It's spreading more and more. Moderate Muslims are not quite as moderate as people want to believe. I'm not denying that their are some who protest the Jihadist ways, but it seems that many moderates who will not participate are okay with the terrorists doing the dirty work for them. I don't want a war. Not with the US or Israel, but I fear that it has come to the point where war may be inevitable and the longer the wait, the bigger the war.

                              The shame is that it probably didn't have to come down to this. If people comprehended the difference between good and evil, sanctions, interrogations, spying on radical mosques, not entertaining rights of terrorists, support of Israel and other tactics, that are politically incorrect, war could be prevented. All laws were designed to protect the good from the bad, but when these laws begin to protect the bad and harm the good, human intellect should kick in.

                              If the end game is, (peace, equality, and freedom) for all, then we have to consider that we are not following the rules of the game properly, just created more obstacles to keep the game going on longer.
                              There is a chicken bone stuck in the throat here though MSC. And that bone pertains to the results of an intelligence operation in 06 to determine when Iran would have their nuke. The results of that effort by several intelligence agencies was that Iran stopped their nuclear program, developing a bomb in 03. So, WHY are we still acting like they are trying to develop the bomb? You know, you really never find out the fact, unless you get outside of MSM. The man who is telling the world this fact is Ray McGovern, who was with the CIA for 30 years, and who briefed Reagan on intelligence issues daily.

                              This deal with Iran and their bomb is a lie. So why is Israel and the US rulers continuing to lie? The lie has people all upset, and we are even sanctioning Iran, beating the war drugs. So what is really going on here?

                              Just go to you tube and listen to Ray McGovern. He is on this stuff like white on rice.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?

                              Working...
                              X