Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

    Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
    ahoy Erikvv,

    'tis odd, but it seems that only folks on the front lines ought to get medals or somethin'.
    Everyone gets medals, whether you're on the front lines or not. The question is the degree of the medal that is in question. Why should someone who gave up his life, or is in danger and separated from their family living in the suck for a year be subordinate to someone who plays video games at Nellis AFB and then goes home to fuck his wife?

    the way i see it, ye need yer infantry...a protection warrior or blood death knight or somethin', to take the enemy's attention, aye? but ultimately ye need high damage per second classes in the rear to actually kill things. ye need mages to cast arcane explosion, or warlocks to cast thar shadowbolts from a safe distance...ye need yer elemental shamans blastin' away from afar with thar lava bursts and chain lightenin' casts.

    ye can't just hand out medals to rogues, retribution paladins, fury warriors and feral druids.

    that wouldn't be fair and equitable.

    *nods enthusiastically*

    aye.

    - MeadHallPirate
    Your example falls a little short of the reality of the matter. Yer ranged DPS is more like artillary and real pilots who fly our Apache helicopters, C-130 Spectre Gunships, ect. In your example, everyone has a chance of dying. If ranged dps doesn't move out of the AOE or the tanks fall, everyone dies and you wipe. No one at Nellis AFB in Nevada are in danger of dying except by boredom (it's not all action like you see in the movies).

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #32
      Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

      Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
      still, the drone operators might be nuked...or targeted by suicide bombers. 'tis possible, afterall - the Pentagon was targeted a few years back and hit on September 11th.
      Right but the chances are what?....significantly less than your chances of dying in a car crash? If you bring up 9/11 then you're actually proving that civilian jobs are much more dangerous and likely to be killed than military ones. After all, thousands died in the WTCs as compared to 125 people in the Pentagon. Also, it's the Pentagon, of course it's going to be higher on the list of places to attack than anything else.

      "Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, announcing the new "Distinguished Warfare Medal," said it was time to recognize those who play a crucial role in modern warfare with hi-tech weapons far from the frontline. "Our military reserves its highest decorations obviously for those who display gallantry and valor in actions where their lives are on the line, and we will continue to do so," Panetta told a Pentagon news conference.

      "But we should also have the ability to honor the extraordinary actions that make a true difference in combat operations."

      He said operators of unmanned, robotic aircraft and cyber weapons "contribute to the success of combat operations, particularly when they remove the enemy from the field of battle, even if those actions are physically removed from the fight." The medal reflects a new age of warfare that emerged over the past decade featuring robotic weapons and digital combat."


      Read more at: Pentagon creates new medal for cyber, drone warriors

      ^----Of course they can recognize people for doing a good job. We already have medals for this. Regardless, it doesn't compare to those are are also doing a good job but they are putting their lives on the line. I stand by my statement that this is a PR move to try and make heroes out of people playing video games to try and get some support for a very unpopular tool of the admin.

      when i was GM and captain 'o me own vessel, i'd promote and reward non-raiders from time to time. maybe they farmed fer some kinda reagent needed to make capes with frost resistance (Mount Hyjal in the Burning Crusade, aye) or maybe they made mighty contributions to the guild bank so we could gear up a new Holy Paladin our raid needed. without these folks, thar be no raid...no guild, so they're all important.

      i also just like the idear 'o gamin' geeks havin' thar day in the sun.
      They do have their day in the sun. I'm in a job that is considered the geek of the geeks. Us in SIGINT are the military intelligence of the military intelligence. We are known for being gamers, table-toppers, LARPers, and all kinds of nerdiness. I'll admit that I'm a jock-geek hybrid, as you've probably figured out. That aside, we still deploy and there are aspects of our job that are very dangerous. One guy in my platoon was out on a patrol, attached to an infantry unit, it was his first one of the deployment. An IED cut one guy in half and took the face off of another guy. The guy that was cut in half lived for a few minutes. Conversely, my job field also enables many people to not deploy at all. Most of us could actually do our jobs w/o deploying. I was stationed for a few years at a place that was non-deploying. That is significantly different than what I've done on deployment to Iraq with the 1st Cav or to Afghanistan with the 4th ID.

      it amuses me when i see all this alpha male flexin' ondeck, 'bout folks who yearn fer the collapse 'o society and how they'll fight government in the trenches with thar deer rifles, thar Dinty Moore™, thar dumb campin' gear...all the moronic videos 'o folks doin' pushups and runnin' obstacle courses in the woods. i've always felt that a roomful 'o pale, Red Bull™ drinkin' computer nerds in hoodies who had a grasp 'o hacker exploits could utterly lulzsec the Federal Government - and i'd pick'm over a bunch 'o amped up middle aged Outward Bound wanna be's any day 'o the week.
      Agreed. I think people romanticize how what it would be like. It would be a lot of your buddies and family dying and possibly living in horrible conditions but having to keep sticking it out.

      so imma ok with this medal afterall, though a few months ago i thought the idear was goofy.
      Haha...you're letting personal feelings get in the way of how things should be. The nerd doesn't always get the girl, no matter how the movies make it out to be.

      this might be a good time to encourage South Korean immigration to our nation....the best gamers in all the seven seas!

      ye might not know these fellas, but second from the right is Boxer, a legend in the Starcraft™ gamin' community fer his ground breakin' Terran play and micro skills. the more i think 'o it, the more i like the idear 'o gamers gettin' good medals.

      aye.

      - MeadHallPirate
      I haven't played SC in quite a while. I played SCII for a bit but I never really got into it too much. I like building up in games and using all the high end equipment. Competitive RTSs are basically a practice of who can zerg the best.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #33
        Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

        Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
        imma really ok with this medal. does it seems silly? aye, kinda, but it doesn't offend me as much as ye does ye....which is understandable. i get vexed o'er folks who steal on Pirate Bay, but no one cares 'bout that. it just depends on yer point 'o view, i guess.
        Seems pretty damn silly. This medal will have precedent over medals that are earned by putting your ass on the line, something people who could conceivably be awarded this medal are not being asked to do.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #34
          Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

          Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
          i like the idear that if yer a skinny, nerdy sorta fella who'd probably never amount to much carryin' a rifle on the front lines, ye can still have yer moment 'o distinguished glory if yer a really, really good at usin' the joystick and various knobs and controls at the drone station.
          I have no problem with men like that being recognized or even awarded medals. I do have a problem with them being awarded medals that are on par, or above, medals earned in actual combat.

          Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
          i could also imagine if the nation be invaded by land or somethin', then maybe the drone bunkers whar these folk ply thar trade might get targeted. wouldn't these folk ultimately have to come out and fight, if thar drone place was hit by a bomb or somethin'? drone operators know how to use guns and stuffs, aye?
          Medals for valor aren't awarded for simply being shot at. If they were forced to come out and fight, ie close with and engage an enemy, then that would be entirely different. I don't know about their weapons proficiency or what they are asked to do as part of their basic training, as these drone operators are Air Force.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #35
            Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

            Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
            ahoy ThorHammer,

            bear with me matey, fer this be a philosophical point i was raisin' earlier that no one took me up on...and if imma wrong on any 'o me assumptions, feel free to correct me.

            medals 'o valor primarily go to folks on the front lines 'o combat, aye? its a "type" 'o commendation. if yer one 'o the upper echelon assets 'o the military (a general, an admiral, a high rankin' intelligence officer, a drone pilot expert - the Red Baron 'o drone pilots!) yer seldom if ever on the front lines, aye?

            them front line folks be like the blue collar assembly heroes 'o our industrial revolution. that doesn't mean that folks in corporate, though, weren't doin' equally "heroic" and critical tasks...super important deeds, aye? so maybe thar be no valor in the corner office, just as thar be no valor in the drone bunker, but the service rendered thar outpaces the more "minor acts 'o valor" on the battlefield, and be recognized as such, aye?

            do ye get me meanin'? imma not sure what i wrote above be clearly written.

            - MeadHallPirate
            You wrote it as clear as a pirate can.

            Yes, valor medals are given out for valor in combat. I am not trying to downplay the critical roles played by many "upper echelon assets", as you term them. What I am saying is that award them medals on par with, or even higher than, valor medals is a step too far and a slap in the face to anyone who has ever been awarded one.

            Look at it this way. If a drone pilot, for example, fucks up what happens? In the best scenario he sits back, says "awww man, game over" and takes a sip of his coffee or coke. Worst case scenario, his fuck up might get men killed. Regardless of the scenario, the drone pilot will never be in danger. Now look at an infantryman. What happens when he fucks up doing his job, or is just plain unlucky? Odds are he is going to pay for it with his life or come out of it with a serious physical injury that will stay with him the rest of his life. I won't even go into the mental burdens. Ask yourself, Pirate, my friend, who's service outpaces who's. Who is putting more on the line? You're telling me there should be non-combat related medals that take precedence over medals where those that earn them actually put their lives on the line?

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #36
              Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

              Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
              ahoy ThorHammer,

              imma not tryin' to be provocative here, matey, i just wanted to clarify that.

              *continues*

              so yer sayin' then, fer example, that the folks who work the line at the meatpackin' slaughterhouses be the real heroes, not the well paid executives at Tyson Foods?
              You're not trying to be provocative? Please Pirate.....

              No, they aren't heroes and neither are the well paid executives. I am talking about the military, Pirate. There is a pretty big fucking difference.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #37
                Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

                Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
                really, if yer goin' to hand out Bronze Stars fer "acts of valor", as the ones depicted, imma fine with some top end quality gamers gettin' a drone medal that ranks o'er the Bronze Star.

                *salutes*

                - MeadHallPirate
                I'm not ok with those examples and that is why, at least in my experience, bronze stars with valor devices (the "V") are viewed as being real bronze stars. Bronze stars are being handed out like candy these days.

                Still, this new medal would rank higher than a bronze star with a V. That isn't right.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #38
                  Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

                  Originally posted by MeadHallPirate
                  ahoy ThorHammer,

                  okies matey, i can agree thats not right - but i think them expert drone operations who serve with distinction should then qualify fer the Bronze Star without the "V" thingy, aye?

                  - MeadHallPirate
                  They should be able to qualify for that. I got one for the job I did in Afghanistan but my job did not involve actual combat.

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #39
                    Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

                    I want to clarify that they already should be be able to qualify for that. I see no regulation that would prohibit them from getting one and I'm sure many already have them. Of course, I would never compare my BSM to a BSM with V.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #40
                      Re: Obama admin continues to demonstrate ignorance regarding the military.

                      My issue with this medal is not that it is given at all, I actually have no issue with this award.

                      My issue is with it's precidence. Putting it as high as it is is what the real joke and insult is.

                      If they want to make this award, fine. I am all for it. But at most rate it equal to or no higher then an ARCOM with a Combat V.

                      Making a "combat award" with no risk to the life of the individual to me is frankly insulting to all of those that have put their lives at risk.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?

                      Working...
                      X