Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Dick Cheney Was Lying About Torture

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
    Reality is no tougher when America and other civilized nations deemed water boarding torture and agreed with others to not do it. We then proscecuted the Japanese for using it. Reality has always been tough. Far too many americans, coming from the conservative side, don't have much use for older principles. They like wallowing in the mire. They see moral principles as a weakness. Christian right wing radio is in support of torture. The same mindset the RCC evolved out of, with its own tortures. Fundamentalism brought it back. Yet even fundamentalism used to be against it. Yeah, we are living in the Crazy Years. We have lost our way, and we celebrate it. We love being the lowest common denominator. That is what has changed.
    I think you might be making some comparisons that don't actually work, I'm not sure ?

    I agree that we HAVE lost our way - in SO many ways - I'm just not sure we will be able to find our way BACK without some serious hell FIRST.

    There are many many people on this planet looking forward to awarding us this hell too, so ... maybe we'll find our way back .... in time .. .after a lot of trouble that we brought on ourselves.

    ?


    • #92
      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
      Reality is no tougher when America and other civilized nations deemed water boarding torture and agreed with others to not do it. We then proscecuted the Japanese for using it. Reality has always been tough.




      Can you show me where we prosecuted a Japanese interrogator who’s worst offense was waterboarding?

      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
      Far too many americans, coming from the conservative side, don't have much use for older principles. They like wallowing in the mire. They see moral principles as a weakness. Christian right wing radio is in support of torture. The same mindset the RCC evolved out of, with its own tortures. Fundamentalism brought it back. Yet even fundamentalism used to be against it. Yeah, we are living in the Crazy Years. We have lost our way, and we celebrate it. We love being the lowest common denominator. That is what has changed.



      Um, yeah; we need to get back to the morality of the FDR years;

      American soldiers in the Pacific often deliberately killed Japanese soldiers who had surrendered. According to Richard Aldrich, who has published a study of the diaries kept by United States and Australian soldiers, they sometimes massacred prisoners of war. Dower states that in "many instances ... Japanese who did become prisoners were killed on the spot or en route to prison compounds." According to Aldrich it was common practice for U.S. troops not to take prisoners. This analysis is supported by British historian Niall Ferguson, who also says that, in 1943, "a secret [U.S.] intelligence report noted that only the promise of ice cream and three days leave would ... induce American troops not to kill surrendering Japanese."
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_crimes#World_War_II

      ?


      • #93
        Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post
        So to beat terrorists we have to be ok with abandoning our morals and stooping to their level and forget that we're supposed to be the good guys.
        Whatever happened to having lines we don't cross and if you're fine with doing this to terrorists how long before this starts to be used against regular criminals as just a matter of course just so you don't appear to be soft on criminals.

        Stooping to their levels. I don't recall us beheading anyone, I don't recall us raping kidnapped victims and then killing them and selling their organs. I don't recall us going into schools and killing hundreds of school children. I don't recall us killing people for refusing to convert to a different religion. I don't recall us filling ditches with prisoners and machine gunning them. I don't recall us crucifying people. Maybe we aren't quite stooping to their level.

        ?


        • #94
          Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
          Stooping to their levels. I don't recall us beheading anyone, I don't recall us raping kidnapped victims and then killing them and selling their organs. I don't recall us going into schools and killing hundreds of school children. I don't recall us killing people for refusing to convert to a different religion. I don't recall us filling ditches with prisoners and machine gunning them. I don't recall us crucifying people. Maybe we aren't quite stooping to their level.
          Indeed we are not. Any claim that we are seems to be facetious.

          ?


          • #95
            Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post


            Well, if anyone has a problem discerning evil, you just gave an example of what evil looks like. And are these not supposed to be people of religion? So, if you want to know what a religion of satan looks like, you gave an example of that too.

            But the best thing we could ever do, is to pull out of that part of the world, and let them live in their evilness. If those people want to live like that, then let em. Sooner or later the good people there will clean up that infestation of rats. So, lets us leave it up to them.. Within a generation, since we would not be interfering, they would have no need to come after us.

            We need a president, who has the good sense to withdraw from the middle east. Columbus took those great risks across the unknown, in order to find a way to india, without having to travel through muslim lands. LOL.. Not much has changed since that time.

            Now, if you want to spend the next hundred years or so, fighting muslims, having them coming after americans, wherever they can find them, insuring that there will be a never ending supply of them coming after us, get yourself a president who will keep butting our noses in their business. Hillary will be a good one. Don't think she is empathetic, she is a hawk. She would make Obama look like Gandhi. This nation needs a man like Ron Paul, who understands cause/effects. He is the only one who knows he lives in a cause effect universe.
            You are staying true to your theory of how and why cause and effect has created this situation we're in with the Middle East, and it could be true and may have gone the way you believe it would have went down had we stayed out of it. But it is just a theory. And there are many who believe as you do.

            However, I and many others see the it differently as well. There are many reasons other than the economic reasons that were definitely at play in addition to proactive and defensive reasons why we got involved to protect our nation and other nations as well.

            We go in to help and fight the enemy Ebola to help the people of the infested nation, because 1 - We care about human life outside our country. 2 - We want to keep the virus from spreading to other nations that have people that we care about as well. And 3 - We know that as Ebola spreads it will eventually become a threat to our nation as well. We risk the lives of American soldiers to assist is the destruction of this virus for these reasons. Involvement. No one complains about that. These radical Muslims are nothing more than the Ebola virus. I believe those who decided, and took action as to involve America regarding the Radical Muslims saw it this way and I support that theory. Ebola will kill without concern for human life the same way these terrorists do. Would you propose that we should have stayed out of the Ebola issue and it would have resolved itself without our intervention?

            I see one difference that you may proclaim. Ebola is not a living human being like the radical Muslims. I object to that difference. Blood and Flesh, but that's the only difference.

            It also get's me to as why, I'll use the word torture because I don't believe the label really matters. Most individuals when asked that question being thrown around, "If one of your kids were taken, and one of the kidnappers were caught, would you stop at nothing to get info that could save your child's life?" Well even those who oppose the torture techniques; either evaded the question, or hesitantly agreed that the would do anything and passed it off as if it was a silly question that didn't apply. So this is who WE ARE. People that would stop at nothing to protect our loved ones/our innocent children. So why does anyone believe that when we collect together as a country we should deny who we are and pretend that we are above it. We are not. No compassionate, loving, human, civilized person in the world is not. Save a few. When it comes to this we are no different than a lioness protecting her cub. This is a fact of humanity. Natural instinct that is a part of our very being.

            This entire issue is brought to light to force people to challenge their principles. It's easier to convince the people who are removed from the reality of the threat, who have not suffered at the hands of this evil. It's easy to stay true what one believes if their principles are only challenged in theory and not in reality when one is forced to make such a decision. Well America is our baby and when the chips were down all gov't officials were responsible to protect Americans as a parent protects their children and they turned a blind eye to the torture as they knew it was necessary to protect. It is deliberately insinuated that in order to be a civilized nation that we must suppress our human nature to pretend we, as Americans, are above being human. A trait we were born with for survival. Born with the same nature of a lioness. Animal and human. The difference between humans and animals is that we were born with the additional gift of compassion, and higher intelligence with the ability to feel beyond our instinct with the ability to reason. We as humans can, do, and should use this ability that separates us from the animals, but not force upon ourselves the denial of this human nature that is necessary for our survival, but to know when to keep it at bay and when it NEEDS to be unleashed. That is who we are, lets stop pretending we are something we are not in the name of civilized behavior. A theory of who we want to think we could be and not a reality of who we actually are. We can be civilized, but only to point. Just a little bit arrogant to believe we can and should overcome who we righteously are, especially when preaching to others.

            America is people of compassion that will take every measure to the best of our ABILITY to treat all others humanely, but when pushed to far, we will stop at nothing to protect ourselves and our loved ones. Let's accept it and appreciate it so we can survive.

            Now sit and contemplate if you are a supreme being, or a human being.

            Now we must use all the gifts we have been given as nature intended and stop at nothing to get whatever we need out of these captured terrorists. The only reasonable conclusion is that Cheney was right on! and a man to be admired and appreciated. He took all the gifts we were born with and used them to the best of human ability. He protected us, so stop spitting in his face.
            Last edited by msc; 12-20-2014, 07:23 AM.

            ?

            Working...
            X