Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

    Originally posted by USCitizen View Post
    Rak,
    Actually, I'm calling Paul Ryan a racist.
    cool.... but on the afghanistan comment i still have no clue what you meant by rove, norquist etc.. i brought up the subject not to toot horns.. but to show that BOTH parties were out to make the sitting president a ONE TERM president....

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #62
      Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

      Rak,
      The problem with your "uninformed" theory is that my little sub-subculture consists of highly educated people, who, for the most part, own their own businesses.
      I don't care about who Fox or CTR cater to, I am exposed to thousands of families and those who supported Romney were TOTALLY incapable of explaining "why?".
      They did no research and I know why...they're too busy making darned good money to do anything other than to listen to their preferred white noise.
      So, actually, they are uninformed, even though highly educated.

      Are there lazy pigs?
      Yep, Pubs who live off their government subsidized portfolios and Dems who want handouts.
      And they exist in equal number.
      And I have contempt for the moochers with and without portfolios.
      At least the non-portfolio moochers don't bullsh!t me about the "job creators".

      (̅_̅_̅(̅(̅_̅_̅_̅_̅_̅̅()ڪ

      Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
      cool.... but on the afghanistan comment i still have no clue what you meant by rove, norquist etc.. i brought up the subject not to toot horns.. but to show that BOTH parties were out to make the sitting president a ONE TERM president....
      Rove and Norquist are phonies of the worst type...they are liars and hypocrites.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #63
        Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

        Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
        you are truly brainwashed... there are proven cases that people are NOT taking jobs to keep the freebies for the Obama Jobs are low paying and you cant live on them , and by taking them they lose their freebies.. once again personal witnessed by numerous of my employees who out right quit to take freebies ... and my own child who lives in obama world ...

        I have said republicans hold some responsibility they let obama and his liars run the media PR campaign against him and never went on the offensive and articulated the misery this dick weed is inflicting on this country... they failed there... that still doesnt excuse the media collusion and support of this candidate that pushed him over the top.. especially the hurricane coverage which was sure a lot different than katrina... still have people fucked up in the NE yet i see no coverage from the storm.....

        They were not predicting .. they were saying and i doubt you were for it ....
        There are proven cases of men fucking sheep too, but I don't assume everyman that owns sheep fucks them.

        But I have no doubt that is someone is on unemployment and is getting food stamps as he has kids, and he knows where a low wage job is that would leave him worse off than he is now, and he is barely making ends meet now, that he would not take it but wait for a job that would not make him worse off financially. And my money says that a conservative voter would do it just as fast as a loony ass liberal who french kisses trees.

        For anyone to blame obama for not having a fast recovery from a financial led crash hasn't read enough history to understand the nature and duration of these type of crashes. They are so hard to get out of, they last so long, that FDR regulated banks so we would not have to put up with the bankers doing that to this nation as they did prior. Many times.

        Only the uneducated would blame obama for the suffering of the unemployed. That is why blind ideologues do. And there are so many of those on the right that they trip one another up and bust their asses alot when they can pull their feet from their mouths.

        Obama has failed to the right simply because he has not given the right side their way. Well, tough shit sherlock, some of us on the left thinks he has governed as a moderate to conservative republican. I did not vote for him because when it came down to brass tacks, this guy could have been a moderate republican. You know, that breed that has been run out of congress by the radicals? And the radical voters. The modern conservative is closer to a radical islamic group than a party that belongs in the US. No compromise, true believers. Those are radical religious traits!

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #64
          Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

          Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
          For anyone to blame obama for not having a fast recovery from a financial led crash hasn't read enough history to understand the nature and duration of these type of crashes. They are so hard to get out of, they last so long, that FDR regulated banks so we would not have to put up with the bankers doing that to this nation as they did prior. Many times.
          Bleu Chien, bankers did not cause this recession, your own governments policies from Clinton and Bush made and carried out bad policy which caused the crash in real estate which hurt the bankers who then made bad investment sales of bad mortgages. Then to Obama who did not make the right moves by doing his stimulus aimed at the wrong people. Obama should have stimulated demand which would have created good business for companies to hire workers and end the recession much faster. How? Give immediate tax breaks to the people who spend all their money every month, the viola, demand. Maybe the best thing for US economy is to fall off that cliff the news talks about. That would force them out of Afghanistan, cut the military and other programs and raise taxes. Talk about austerity, that is what you will have, of your own doing. The company I work for has manufacturing over the world, and the US. They talk about shutting down because of your lame leaders and their corporate policies.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #65
            Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

            Originally posted by USCitizen View Post
            Rak,
            The problem with your "uninformed" theory is that my little sub-subculture consists of highly educated people, who, for the most part, own their own businesses.
            I don't care about who Fox or CTR cater to, I am exposed to thousands of families and those who supported Romney were TOTALLY incapable of explaining "why?".
            They did no research and I know why...they're too busy making darned good money to do anything other than to listen to their preferred white noise.
            So, actually, they are uninformed, even though highly educated.

            Are there lazy pigs?
            Yep, Pubs who live off their government subsidized portfolios and Dems who want handouts.
            And they exist in equal number.
            And I have contempt for the moochers with and without portfolios.
            At least the non-portfolio moochers don't bullsh!t me about the "job creators".

            (̅_̅_̅(̅(̅_̅_̅_̅_̅_̅̅()ڪ



            Rove and Norquist are phonies of the worst type...they are liars and hypocrites.
            What is a government supported portfolio? Government bonds?

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #66
              Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

              Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
              you are truly brainwashed... there are proven cases that people are NOT taking jobs to keep the freebies for the Obama Jobs are low paying and you cant live on them , and by taking them they lose their freebies.. once again personal witnessed by numerous of my employees who out right quit to take freebies ... and my own child who lives in obama world ...
              Anecdotal evidence is statistically meaningless. Also — and I say this as a father myself — your willingness to sell out your own child is a little unsettling.

              I have said republicans hold some responsibility they let obama and his liars run the media PR campaign against him and never went on the offensive and articulated the misery this dick weed is inflicting on this country... they failed there...
              Ha-ha! Seriously? You don't think the right wing ever went on the offensive against Obama? Amazing. They attacked him non-stop for four years (and will continue for the next four). The reality is that you guys underestimated Obama not once, but twice. You made the classic strategic blunder (the most important of which is never get involved in a land war in Asia) and believed your own bullshit.

              that still doesnt excuse the media collusion and support of this candidate that pushed him over the top.. especially the hurricane coverage which was sure a lot different than katrina... still have people fucked up in the NE yet i see no coverage from the storm.....
              There are still people suffering in the northeast, to be sure. One of my best friends (and his family) were flooded out of their home and have yet to return. But the federal response was undeniably light years better than what we saw under Bush (just ask Governor Christie). FEMA was a disaster under the first Bush, but functioned extremely well under Clinton; it was a disaster under the second Bush, but functioned extremely well under Obama. See the pattern?

              They were not predicting .. they were saying and i doubt you were for it ....
              You are welcome to believe me or disbelieve me; arguing with strangers about what I think is pretty pointless.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #67
                Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                Originally posted by AdamKadmon View Post
                ....
                There are still people suffering in the northeast, to be sure. One of my best friends (and his family) were flooded out of their home and have yet to return. But the federal response was undeniably light years better than what we saw under Bush (just ask Governor Christie). FEMA was a disaster under the first Bush, but functioned extremely well under Clinton; it was a disaster under the second Bush, but functioned extremely well under Obama. See the pattern? ....
                Yeah, I see the pattern. Allot more depends on what your media coverage is than it should.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #68
                  Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                  Originally posted by AdamKadmon View Post
                  Anecdotal evidence is statistically meaningless. Also — and I say this as a father myself — your willingness to sell out your own child is a little unsettling.



                  Ha-ha! Seriously? You don't think the right wing ever went on the offensive against Obama? Amazing. They attacked him non-stop for four years (and will continue for the next four). The reality is that you guys underestimated Obama not once, but twice. You made the classic strategic blunder (the most important of which is never get involved in a land war in Asia) and believed your own bullshit.



                  There are still people suffering in the northeast, to be sure. One of my best friends (and his family) were flooded out of their home and have yet to return. But the federal response was undeniably light years better than what we saw under Bush (just ask Governor Christie). FEMA was a disaster under the first Bush, but functioned extremely well under Clinton; it was a disaster under the second Bush, but functioned extremely well under Obama. See the pattern?



                  You are welcome to believe me or disbelieve me; arguing with strangers about what I think is pretty pointless.
                  your premise is based on the liberal fairy tale that FOX or as i am sure you call it FAUX news has a never ending reach to the populace and puts the "stupid mindmeld" on people ... here is some Math for you ....


                  Liberal News
                  NBC 9,195,000
                  ABC 8,476,000
                  CBS 6,749,000
                  MSDNC 1,052,000
                  CNN 463,000

                  Total Viewers: 25,472,000

                  Conservative media
                  FOX 1,986,000

                  Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, November 21, 2012 - Ratings | TVbytheNumbers
                  Evening News Ratings - TVNewser

                  Based on average viewers for the main stream media for a week and the one night prime time numbers for the 20th of November for the Faux/MSDNC/CNN numbers this clearly shows that regardless of what fox says... during primetime the main time people get their news.... Obama love prevails....for you probably really happy... here you go something for your alter

                  obama-rainbows.jpg

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #69
                    Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                    Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
                    your premise is based on the liberal fairy tale that FOX or as i am sure you call it FAUX news has a never ending reach to the populace and puts the "stupid mindmeld" on people ... here is some Math for you ....


                    Liberal News
                    NBC 9,195,000
                    ABC 8,476,000
                    CBS 6,749,000
                    MSDNC 1,052,000
                    CNN 463,000

                    Total Viewers: 25,472,000

                    Conservative media
                    FOX 1,986,000

                    Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, November 21, 2012 - Ratings | TVbytheNumbers
                    Evening News Ratings - TVNewser

                    Based on average viewers for the main stream media for a week and the one night prime time numbers for the 20th of November for the Faux/MSDNC/CNN numbers this clearly shows that regardless of what fox says... during primetime the main time people get their news.... Obama love prevails....for you probably really happy... here you go something for your alter

                    [ATTACH]13793[/ATTACH]
                    Could be that people are realizing what Fox News and Rush is all about and are rejecting them.

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #70
                      Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                      Originally posted by Patin View Post
                      What is a government supported portfolio? Government bonds?
                      How many Free Market, Self-Reliant Conservatives ask their financial advisors to only invest in entities that don't have no-bid government contracts?
                      These Free Market idiots invest all the time in tax payer funded Pork Fed corporations that couldn't exist without these contracts.

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #71
                        Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                        Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
                        your premise is based on the liberal fairy tale that FOX or as i am sure you call it FAUX news has a never ending reach to the populace and puts the "stupid mindmeld" on people ... here is some Math for you ....


                        Liberal News
                        NBC 9,195,000
                        ABC 8,476,000
                        CBS 6,749,000
                        MSDNC 1,052,000
                        CNN 463,000

                        Total Viewers: 25,472,000

                        Conservative media
                        FOX 1,986,000

                        Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, November 21, 2012 - Ratings | TVbytheNumbers
                        Evening News Ratings - TVNewser

                        Based on average viewers for the main stream media for a week and the one night prime time numbers for the 20th of November for the Faux/MSDNC/CNN numbers this clearly shows that regardless of what fox says... during primetime the main time people get their news.... Obama love prevails....for you probably really happy... here you go something for your alter

                        [ATTACH]13793[/ATTACH]
                        So O'Reily is lying when he claims he has 3+ million viewers?
                        CTR is lying when they claim that Fox has a solid 20% of news viewers?
                        It seems Fox and CTR lie about everything.

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #72
                          Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                          Originally posted by Rakkasan View Post
                          your premise is based on the liberal fairy tale that FOX or as i am sure you call it FAUX news has a never ending reach to the populace and puts the "stupid mindmeld" on people ... here is some Math for you ....


                          Liberal News
                          NBC 9,195,000
                          ABC 8,476,000
                          CBS 6,749,000
                          MSDNC 1,052,000
                          CNN 463,000

                          Total Viewers: 25,472,000

                          Conservative media
                          FOX 1,986,000
                          Fox, while inarguably influential in its own right, does not represent the entirety of the conservative media (nor could it, since the word "media" is plural). There is also conservative talk radio which is massive, with tens of millions of listeners weekly (dwarfing the audience for liberal talk radio). There are a bevy of conservative publications (The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, etc.) and conservative web sites (Drudge, Newsmax, etc.). So your math, sadly is incorrect.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #73
                            Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                            Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                            I hate to break the bad news to ya, thereby bringing you back to reality, but cons have no qualms about taking gov't handouts when they lose their jobs. I know, it's hard for such an altruistic group to accept, but there ya go. We do have meds for the mental confusion that arises when reality throws a right cross and lands hard though. Bringing a dead brain back to life is very difficult though. Some people actually love having dead brains. They are fed a steady diet of propaganda which has its own pleasures. Even a dead brain constantly seeks gratification from pleasure.

                            As the good Pirate has pointed out here on this forum succesfully, cons like to talk the talk, but seldom do they actually walk the walk. It's an etherial thing, modern conservatism. A web of ideas that even its proponents cannot live by. But it shore do look good on paper. To them. These same people also do the exact same thing with their religion. They talk the talk, but seldom do they actually live what is taught in the Book. I think it's a peculiar modern conservative affliction that makes them appear "somewhat affected". They remind me of the jewish priests that the christ railed against so strongly a couple thousand years ago who prayed flowerly in public so that others might see them. Like them, our cons put on quite the show. But few actually live it. That makes the blue states send their tax money to the red states.
                            Conservatives and libertarians do not like to pay taxes, and they do not like for the government to tell them what to do. Nevertheless, they do like for the government to help them get through life, especially when they are unemployed, or otherwise in desperate straights.

                            That is why since 1932 Republican efforts to reduce the size of government have always failed, and while since 1980 Republican efforts to cut taxes have always increased the national debt.

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #74
                              Re: Is this the type of person Liberals like? - Video is a little over a year old.

                              Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                              This happens to any people driven by an ideology that has at its very essence a deep and abiding selfishness. Without that, the ideology would have never been thought up by the brain. I think this is obvious if one is obective for just a nanosecond. It is my main objection to modern conservatism. It rests on the base side of human nature, and not the noble side of human nature. It sees people, average people, common man, in a very twisted way, that wreaks of elitism and looking down your nose attitudes. Caviar anyone?
                              The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
                              - John Kenneth Galbraith

                              Ayn Rand said people should do what is in their self interest. It is often in the self interest of people to accept help from the government.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?

                              Working...
                              X