Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

All for 3%

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by redrover View Post

    How many 13 and 14 year olds had this surgery last year? I think it all started 60 years ago when I was in junior high school. All the girls would dance with each other because none of the boys knew how to dance. The boys would stand around and talk about our favorite war movies..
    These "gender clinics" are all busy and growing in number - which you would know if you read what is posted.

    ?


    • New trends in American culture. Perversion & mental illnesses are celebrated and encouraged.

      Oddly, our own hypocrisy is widely available for the world to see.

      We condemn the female genital mutilation of girls & young women done by the Islamic culture, yet we've decided that we should mutilate our own for ideas of "gender fluidity."

      This is a wide spread macabre sickness of a mass scale. Something a horror writer like Stephen King couldn't even dream up.

      ?


      • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
        New trends in American culture. Perversion & mental illnesses are celebrated and encouraged.

        Oddly, our own hypocrisy is widely available for the world to see.

        We condemn the female genital mutilation of girls & young women done by the Islamic culture, yet we've decided that we should mutilate our own for ideas of "gender fluidity."

        This is a wide spread macabre sickness of a mass scale. Something a horror writer like Stephen King couldn't even dream up.
        New trends in American culture. Perversion & mental illnesses are celebrated and encouraged. What new trend. I thought the premise of this thread was that homosexuals were only three percent of the population. Pray tell how such a small number of people could have much impact on culture? It is true that homosexuality is met with more tolerance now. Why don't you go to the gay bar in town and scream at them that they are doomed to burn in hell.

        ?


        • Originally posted by redrover View Post
          New trends in American culture. Perversion & mental illnesses are celebrated and encouraged. What new trend.
          Yeah, what a trend. Like I said, it's; "a wide spread macabre sickness of a mass scale. Something a horror writer like Stephen King couldn't even dream up."

          Originally posted by redrover View Post
          I thought the premise of this thread was that homosexuals were only three percent of the population. Pray tell how such a small number of people could have much impact on culture?
          Because they never stopped pushing their perversities. Eventually people got sick of listening to it and did the "yeah, whatever" and ignored them.

          That was the end of it ? No ! They wanted to try to make what they do "equal" to the realities and logic of biology - which they can't ever do . . . but ... no, it's not over yet...

          Now they're trying to make gender meaningless. Hell, today the boy scouts decided to make themselves the boygirl scouts. Who knows what's gonna happen to the girl scouts ? Just another victim of these peoples destructive insanity.....will the girl scouts now become the girlboy scouts ..? and ... this crap is so obviously foolish,

          .........it's bizarre to see people arguing for it with straight faces.


          A new prestigious goal for girls....LOL

          http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy...oin/index.html

          become a boy LOL

          -------------------------------------------

          Scouts doing a disservice to boys, girls

          The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) announced on Wednesday that starting next year they will allow girls to join Cub Scout dens, and in 2019 older girls to join the Boy Scouts.

          ..there's quite a difference now in the Boy Scouts since it was founded in the early 1900s by Lord Robert Baden-Powell.


          https://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2...-to-boys-girls


          Originally posted by redrover View Post
          It is true that homosexuality is met with more tolerance now. Why don't you go to the gay bar in town and scream at them that they are doomed to burn in hell.
          Why would I do that ? They'll come to MY business to ask me to make them something that I don't agree with, take me to court and sue me ! Maybe THEN I'll yell at 'em, but I'm certainly not going to go in SEARCH of the gay nazis.

          ?


          • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

            Yeah, what a trend. Like I said, it's; "a wide spread macabre sickness of a mass scale. Something a horror writer like Stephen King couldn't even dream up."



            Because they never stopped pushing their perversities. Eventually people got sick of listening to it and did the "yeah, whatever" and ignored them.

            That was the end of it ? No ! They wanted to try to make what they do "equal" to the realities and logic of biology - which they can't ever do . . . but ... no, it's not over yet...

            Now they're trying to make gender meaningless. Hell, today the boy scouts decided to make themselves the boygirl scouts. Who knows what's gonna happen to the girl scouts ? Just another victim of these peoples destructive insanity.....will the girl scouts now become the girlboy scouts ..? and ... this crap is so obviously foolish,

            .........it's bizarre to see people arguing for it with straight faces.


            A new prestigious goal for girls....LOL

            http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy...oin/index.html

            become a boy LOL

            -------------------------------------------

            Scouts doing a disservice to boys, girls

            The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) announced on Wednesday that starting next year they will allow girls to join Cub Scout dens, and in 2019 older girls to join the Boy Scouts.

            ..there's quite a difference now in the Boy Scouts since it was founded in the early 1900s by Lord Robert Baden-Powell.


            https://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2...-to-boys-girls




            Why would I do that ? They'll come to MY business to ask me to make them something that I don't agree with, take me to court and sue me ! Maybe THEN I'll yell at 'em, but I'm certainly not going to go in SEARCH of the gay nazis.
            Don't give up maybe Trump will give you a pardon

            ?


            • Originally posted by redrover View Post
              Don't give up maybe Trump will give you a pardon
              I doubt it.

              Can't hurt to hope though. Send me a private message and remind me what I need pardoned for, I forgot

              ?


              • Originally posted by redrover View Post

                New trends in American culture. Perversion & mental illnesses are celebrated and encouraged. What new trend. I thought the premise of this thread was that homosexuals were only three percent of the population. Pray tell how such a small number of people could have much impact on culture? It is true that homosexuality is met with more tolerance now. Why don't you go to the gay bar in town and scream at them that they are doomed to burn in hell.
                Well, what percentage of the population are mass shooters...and Liberals seem obsessed with this infinitesimal fraction of the population (who are actually only even responsible for a small fraction of total gun violence). Or for that matter, a virus which (even after multiplying) makes up a microscopic portion of your body mass can be lethal. Do you have any more silly questions?

                ?


                • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                  Yeah, what a trend. Like I said, it's; "a wide spread macabre sickness of a mass scale. Something a horror writer like Stephen King couldn't even dream up."



                  Because they never stopped pushing their perversities. Eventually people got sick of listening to it and did the "yeah, whatever" and ignored them.

                  That was the end of it ? No ! They wanted to try to make what they do "equal" to the realities and logic of biology - which they can't ever do . . . but ... no, it's not over yet...

                  Now they're trying to make gender meaningless. Hell, today the boy scouts decided to make themselves the boygirl scouts. Who knows what's gonna happen to the girl scouts ? Just another victim of these peoples destructive insanity.....will the girl scouts now become the girlboy scouts ..? and ... this crap is so obviously foolish,

                  .........it's bizarre to see people arguing for it with straight faces.


                  A new prestigious goal for girls....LOL

                  http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/us/boy...oin/index.html

                  become a boy LOL

                  -------------------------------------------

                  Scouts doing a disservice to boys, girls

                  The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) announced on Wednesday that starting next year they will allow girls to join Cub Scout dens, and in 2019 older girls to join the Boy Scouts.

                  ..there's quite a difference now in the Boy Scouts since it was founded in the early 1900s by Lord Robert Baden-Powell.


                  https://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2...-to-boys-girls




                  Why would I do that ? They'll come to MY business to ask me to make them something that I don't agree with, take me to court and sue me ! Maybe THEN I'll yell at 'em, but I'm certainly not going to go in SEARCH of the gay nazis.
                  BTW, it should not go unremarked that the Boy Scouts' decision to start allowing girls is PROOF that long-term, free markets fight discrimination. This was not the result of any law being passed, or some activist judge forcing them to do so, it was a purely financial decision (one which the Girl Scouts of American ironically enough have criticized). What we have here is pure, plain, simple economic (aka "Greed") overriding other considerations in ameliorating a discriminatory behavior. No force of government required. This is how it should be.

                  ?


                  • Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
                    BTW, it should not go unremarked that the Boy Scouts' decision to start allowing girls is PROOF that long-term, free markets fight discrimination. This was not the result of any law being passed, or some activist judge forcing them to do so, it was a purely financial decision (one which the Girl Scouts of American ironically enough have criticized). What we have here is pure, plain, simple economic (aka "Greed") overriding other considerations in ameliorating a discriminatory behavior. No force of government required. This is how it should be.
                    As it states here:

                    "It's not just political correctness but is it the almighty dollar, the drop of membership? And have they ever considered that perhaps that drop in membership is due to their no longer [having] an obligation to biblical values and the way that God made this earth, male and female?"

                    https://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2...-to-boys-girls

                    So they think that making boy scouts into "anybody scouts" is going to help ? LOL

                    As I asked earlier, what of the GIRL scouts ? Is this an opportunity for creating a transgender scouts maybe ? -shrugs- ... or will boys NOW be able to join girl scouts and.... then what ? What are we to call these different "scouts" groups ?

                    It just gets weirder & weirder.

                    ?


                    • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                      As it states here:

                      "It's not just political correctness but is it the almighty dollar, the drop of membership? And have they ever considered that perhaps that drop in membership is due to their no longer [having] an obligation to biblical values and the way that God made this earth, male and female?"

                      https://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2...-to-boys-girls

                      So they think that making boy scouts into "anybody scouts" is going to help ? LOL

                      As I asked earlier, what of the GIRL scouts ? Is this an opportunity for creating a transgender scouts maybe ? -shrugs- ... or will boys NOW be able to join girl scouts and.... then what ? What are we to call these different "scouts" groups ?

                      It just gets weirder & weirder.
                      This is terrible. We may have to bring back the draft to get more girls into the Girl scouts. It's great that we have you guys to worry about these issues. B y the way did you ever get the job at the high school checking crotches of people going into the girl's room?Do you pat them down or judt demand to see their birth certificates?

                      ?


                      • Originally posted by redrover View Post
                        This is terrible. We may have to bring back the draft to get more girls into the Girl scouts. It's great that we have you guys to worry about these issues. B y the way did you ever get the job at the high school checking crotches of people going into the girl's room?Do you pat them down or judt demand to see their birth certificates?
                        You missed the point. Boy scouts has the name "boy" - that's a young male - in it.

                        Girl scouts has the name "girl" - that's a young female - in it.

                        If Boy Scouts is now boygirl scouts, why have girl scouts ?

                        As for "checking crotches" at the high school restrooms, that sounds like another great opportunity for perverts to take advantage of. So, we'll have boys claiming to be girls so they can go into the girls room and vice versa and we've already seen the results of that - which you happily pretend don't exist. So now we have some perv. looking down pants to make sure they're what sex they say they are before going into the restroom LOL

                        You're full of great ideas . . or something

                        ?


                        • ............. speaking of perverts taking advantage of a society gone full on stupid........................

                          Moronic is what it is. But some of us SUPPORT THIS LOL

                          --------------------------

                          Naked Man in Womens Bathroom, Cites Gender Rule And the City Cant do Crap!

                          Transgenders are the preferred protected class du jour for leftists (Read, Male Who Claims Hes a Woman Beats Up Women in Cage-Fighting for a Living here), and for some reason public bathrooms are the front line (watch Planet Fitness Allows Self-Professed Women to Use Any Bathroom they Want here). Step aside beaches of Normandy, theres a new battlefront for the history books. Seattle for example passed a gender rule, that says men and women who claim to be the opposite of that can use any bathroom they want, and cant be discriminated against. Because social justice.

                          Seattle Parks and Recreation is facing a first-of-a-kind challenge to gender bathroom rules. A man undressed in a womens locker room, citing a new state rule that allows people to choose a bathroom based on gender identity.

                          It was a busy time at Evans Pool around 5:30pm Monday February 8. The pool was open for lap swim. According to Seattle Parks and Recreation, a man wearing board shorts entered the womens locker room and took off his shirt. Women alerted staff, who told the man to leave, but he said the law has changed and I have a right to be here.

                          A few issues, but heres the best part

                          As far as policy to protect everyone, Seattle Parks spokesman David Takami says theyre still working on the issue. Right now, theres no specific protocol for how someone should demonstrate their gender in order to access a bathroom.

                          HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! The city is still working on the issue. They dont know what to do. They literally have no idea how this could have happened. Their hands are tied.

                          My second favorite part, is this woman in the videos quote

                          I have no idea why anyone would even want to do that!

                          Cant. Stop. Laughing. This woman is incapable of fathoming why a man would want to gain access to the womens changing room. To better understand this situation, see every fantasy of every teenage boy in the history of ever.

                          My third favorite part is this man himself. You know why? Because hes still doing it. Hes just sauntering on in there, dropping his pants and when anyone questions him on it, he points to the rulebook and continues pissing them off. Clearly this guy is trying to make a point. Yes, hes being a bit of a jerk. And boy oh boy, do I love him for it.

                          The city is in turmoil and has no idea how to react. After all, this is absurd! This man is using the womens room! Hes showing entire disregard for gender norms and sensitivity! This simply isnt done!

                          Now simply replace man with the word transgender who actually happens to still be a man, with a penis, and leftists welcome it with open arms.

                          Of course the city doesnt know how to react. They have no leg to stand on. You cant simply peddle the idea that people can choose their gender, that gender is non-binary, that people should be free to use the restroom of their choosing and then do an about-face when someone calls you on it.

                          This city is moronic. These laws are moronic. The modern, SJW trans movement is moronic. And its taking one brilliant man, acting like a moron, to expose just how moronic it is. Say, this seems familiar

                          Watch the video below of me going full transgender at Planet Fitness. You wont be disappointed.


                          https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/ma...mens-bathroom/

                          ----------------------------------

                          North Carolina going for stupid too.

                          North Carolina; "Hey look at us, WE'RE DUMB TOO !"

                          ----------------------------------

                          Gov. Roy Cooper (D-N.C.) signed an executive order Thursday that forces businesses throughout North Carolina to allow men to use womens restrooms as well as permit women in mens restrooms.

                          The left-leaning governors LGBT-friendly order officially makes sexual orientation and gender identity or expression protected classes, and businesses that do not comply can suffer the consequences financially.

                          The order applies to employment in state government and the provision of government services, including programs and services concerning public safety, health and welfare, LifeSiteNews reported. In order to be awarded a state contract or grant, a business will have to comply with the pro-transgender order. Public facilities must also allow men to use womens restrooms in accordance with their gender identity.

                          [The order is] a massive power grab, with sweeping changes that only the Legislative Branch has the authority to enact, Fitzgerald asserted, according to LifeSiteNews. Governor Cooper has betrayed the people of North Carolina with an Executive Order that not only allows boys and men into girls' and women's showers and bathrooms, but also forces private businesses to adopt sweeping LGBT privileges.

                          ..In the order, the landmark Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decision Obergefell v. Hodges was cited in an attempt to justify its reasoning, along with a study published by the National Center for Transgender Equality.

                          The majority of federal courts that have addressed the issue to date have held that discrimination on the basis of transgender status is unlawful, Cooper's order states. It is necessary to provide state and local government actors with clarity and guidance regarding existing laws and policies prohibiting discrimination, harassment and retaliation.

                          According to Fitzgerald, the new law is elevating the LGBT community above other citizens.

                          [North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein is] elevating LGBT privileges above the rights of common everyday people to privacy and safety in bathrooms and showers, the pro-family leader contended. [Stein is] failing to defend the laws of the state.

                          Even though the wording of the executive order claims that it is not inconsistent with existing North Carolina state and federal laws, Fitzgerald discounts that argument and insists that the legislation will not go unchallenged.

                          It is despicable, and the voters of N.C. will hold [Cooper and Stein] accountable, Fitzgerald assured.

                          [Its just] a step in the right direction, Equality North Carolina Interim Director Matt Hirschy stressed according to LifeSiteNews not fully accepting Coopers concession to the LGBT rights movement.

                          National Center for Transgender Equality Executive Director Nara Keisling was a little more direct about her disappointment that Cooper did not also get rid of HB 142 while signing the pro-LGBT order.

                          Its not nearly enough, Keisling insisted, according to LifeSiteNews.

                          The lead plaintiff in one of North Carolinas major transgender lawsuits demanded that the courts go a step further and fully accommodate the LGBT community.

                          Nothing can make up for the cruel and senseless attacks transgender people have faced in North Carolina, but I am hopeful that the court will agree to clarify the law so that we can live our lives in less fear, Joaqun Carcao a transgender man who led the legal charge to tear down laws in North Carolina established to protect women and children told Reuters.


                          https://www.onenewsnow.com/legal-cou...mens-restrooms





                          ?


                          • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                            ............. speaking of perverts taking advantage of a society gone full on stupid........................

                            Moronic is what it is. But some of us SUPPORT THIS LOL

                            --------------------------

                            Naked Man in Womens Bathroom, Cites Gender Rule And the City Cant do Crap!

                            Transgenders are the preferred protected class du jour for leftists (Read, Male Who Claims Hes a Woman Beats Up Women in Cage-Fighting for a Living here), and for some reason public bathrooms are the front line (watch Planet Fitness Allows Self-Professed Women to Use Any Bathroom they Want here). Step aside beaches of Normandy, theres a new battlefront for the history books. Seattle for example passed a gender rule, that says men and women who claim to be the opposite of that can use any bathroom they want, and cant be discriminated against. Because social justice.

                            Seattle Parks and Recreation is facing a first-of-a-kind challenge to gender bathroom rules. A man undressed in a womens locker room, citing a new state rule that allows people to choose a bathroom based on gender identity.

                            It was a busy time at Evans Pool around 5:30pm Monday February 8. The pool was open for lap swim. According to Seattle Parks and Recreation, a man wearing board shorts entered the womens locker room and took off his shirt. Women alerted staff, who told the man to leave, but he said the law has changed and I have a right to be here.

                            A few issues, but heres the best part

                            As far as policy to protect everyone, Seattle Parks spokesman David Takami says theyre still working on the issue. Right now, theres no specific protocol for how someone should demonstrate their gender in order to access a bathroom.

                            HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! The city is still working on the issue. They dont know what to do. They literally have no idea how this could have happened. Their hands are tied.

                            My second favorite part, is this woman in the videos quote

                            I have no idea why anyone would even want to do that!

                            Cant. Stop. Laughing. This woman is incapable of fathoming why a man would want to gain access to the womens changing room. To better understand this situation, see every fantasy of every teenage boy in the history of ever.

                            My third favorite part is this man himself. You know why? Because hes still doing it. Hes just sauntering on in there, dropping his pants and when anyone questions him on it, he points to the rulebook and continues pissing them off. Clearly this guy is trying to make a point. Yes, hes being a bit of a jerk. And boy oh boy, do I love him for it.

                            The city is in turmoil and has no idea how to react. After all, this is absurd! This man is using the womens room! Hes showing entire disregard for gender norms and sensitivity! This simply isnt done!

                            Now simply replace man with the word transgender who actually happens to still be a man, with a penis, and leftists welcome it with open arms.

                            Of course the city doesnt know how to react. They have no leg to stand on. You cant simply peddle the idea that people can choose their gender, that gender is non-binary, that people should be free to use the restroom of their choosing and then do an about-face when someone calls you on it.

                            This city is moronic. These laws are moronic. The modern, SJW trans movement is moronic. And its taking one brilliant man, acting like a moron, to expose just how moronic it is. Say, this seems familiar

                            Watch the video below of me going full transgender at Planet Fitness. You wont be disappointed.


                            https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/ma...mens-bathroom/

                            ----------------------------------

                            North Carolina going for stupid too.

                            North Carolina; "Hey look at us, WE'RE DUMB TOO !"

                            ----------------------------------

                            Gov. Roy Cooper (D-N.C.) signed an executive order Thursday that forces businesses throughout North Carolina to allow men to use womens restrooms as well as permit women in mens restrooms.

                            The left-leaning governors LGBT-friendly order officially makes sexual orientation and gender identity or expression protected classes, and businesses that do not comply can suffer the consequences financially.

                            The order applies to employment in state government and the provision of government services, including programs and services concerning public safety, health and welfare, LifeSiteNews reported. In order to be awarded a state contract or grant, a business will have to comply with the pro-transgender order. Public facilities must also allow men to use womens restrooms in accordance with their gender identity.

                            [The order is] a massive power grab, with sweeping changes that only the Legislative Branch has the authority to enact, Fitzgerald asserted, according to LifeSiteNews. Governor Cooper has betrayed the people of North Carolina with an Executive Order that not only allows boys and men into girls' and women's showers and bathrooms, but also forces private businesses to adopt sweeping LGBT privileges.

                            ..In the order, the landmark Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decision Obergefell v. Hodges was cited in an attempt to justify its reasoning, along with a study published by the National Center for Transgender Equality.

                            The majority of federal courts that have addressed the issue to date have held that discrimination on the basis of transgender status is unlawful, Cooper's order states. It is necessary to provide state and local government actors with clarity and guidance regarding existing laws and policies prohibiting discrimination, harassment and retaliation.

                            According to Fitzgerald, the new law is elevating the LGBT community above other citizens.

                            [North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein is] elevating LGBT privileges above the rights of common everyday people to privacy and safety in bathrooms and showers, the pro-family leader contended. [Stein is] failing to defend the laws of the state.

                            Even though the wording of the executive order claims that it is not inconsistent with existing North Carolina state and federal laws, Fitzgerald discounts that argument and insists that the legislation will not go unchallenged.

                            It is despicable, and the voters of N.C. will hold [Cooper and Stein] accountable, Fitzgerald assured.

                            [Its just] a step in the right direction, Equality North Carolina Interim Director Matt Hirschy stressed according to LifeSiteNews not fully accepting Coopers concession to the LGBT rights movement.

                            National Center for Transgender Equality Executive Director Nara Keisling was a little more direct about her disappointment that Cooper did not also get rid of HB 142 while signing the pro-LGBT order.

                            Its not nearly enough, Keisling insisted, according to LifeSiteNews.

                            The lead plaintiff in one of North Carolinas major transgender lawsuits demanded that the courts go a step further and fully accommodate the LGBT community.

                            Nothing can make up for the cruel and senseless attacks transgender people have faced in North Carolina, but I am hopeful that the court will agree to clarify the law so that we can live our lives in less fear, Joaqun Carcao a transgender man who led the legal charge to tear down laws in North Carolina established to protect women and children told Reuters.


                            https://www.onenewsnow.com/legal-cou...mens-restrooms




                            This seems to be a regional problem peculiar to the south.

                            ?


                            • Originally posted by redrover View Post
                              This seems to be a regional problem peculiar to the south.
                              No, the perverts and dimwits are wide spread.

                              Notice the first story takes place in Seattle. The second in North Carolina - https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...362#post546362

                              ?


                              • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                                No, the perverts and dimwits are wide spread.

                                Notice the first story takes place in Seattle. The second in North Carolina - https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...362#post546362
                                Those perverts must have moved from North Carolina to Seattle.

                                ?

                                Working...
                                X