Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

All for 3%

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Captain Trips
    replied
    And our gay Mafia will SCREAM DISCRIMINATION !!!!!!!!!!!!

    HOMOPHOBIA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Yammering mindlessly about their behaviour & how wonderful it is...

    Let them scream, there will be more like this...

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    City banned from forcing artists to promote gay weddings

    The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Monday that the city of Phoenix violated the constitutionally protected religious freedom of two Christian calligraphers by prosecuting them for their refusal to create custom invitations for a same-sex wedding.

    The court ruled: "The rights of free speech and free exercise, so precious to this nation since its founding, are not limited to soft murmurings behind the doors of a person's home or church, or private conversations with like-minded friends and family. These guarantees protect the right of every American to express their beliefs in public. This includes the right to create and sell words, paintings, and art that express a person's sincere religious beliefs. With these fundamental principles in mind, today we hold that the city of Phoenix…cannot apply its Human Relations Ordinance…to force Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski…to create custom wedding invitations celebrating same-sex wedding ceremonies in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs."

    The court said the government "must not be allowed to force persons to express a message contrary to their deepest convictions.'"

    The lawyers said the artists serve anyone with their products but not any message.

    They argued: "Their faith simply prevents them from expressing certain messages for anyone.

    So this case is not about whether businesses can decline to serve an entire class of people. It is about whether artists can freely choose which messages their own art conveys."

    They create custom artwork for announcements and other documents needed for weddings and other events.

    ADF explained, "Phoenix interprets its ordinance, City Code Section 18-4(B), in a manner that forces artists, like Duka and Koski, to use their artistic talents to celebrate and promote same-sex marriage in violation of their beliefs, even when they decide what art they create based on the art's message, not the requester's personal characteristics."

    The majority opinion responded directly to the minority's contention that the artists were guilty of sexual discrimination.

    "This mischaracterization reflects neither plaintiffs' position nor our holdings. … Plaintiffs must, and they do, serve all customers regardless of their sexual orientation. However, by focusing solely on the anti-discrimination purpose of the ordinance, the dissent engages in a one-sided analysis that effectively deprives plaintiffs of their fundamental right to express their beliefs."

    The ruling also cited the First Amendment, saying: "The enduring strength of the First Amendment is that it allows people to speak their minds and express their beliefs without government interference. But here, the city effectively cuts off plaintiffs' right to express their beliefs about same-sex marriage by telling them what they can and cannot say."

    The lawsuit was a pre-emptive strike against the discriminatory law to head off any potential fines and jail sentences.

    Officials from eight states had filed briefs supporting the arguments of Brush & Nib.

    The Jewish Coalition for Religious Liberty filed a brief pointing out that when the U.S. Supreme Court created same-sex marriage, the ruling "promised that religious believers and organizations would remain secure in their constitutional right to believe, teach and live out their sincere religious convictions that marriage is between a man and a woman."

    "The promise was unmistakable and unambiguous," the filing said.


    The Supreme Court's majority opinion acknowledged those who believe marriage "is by its nature a gender-differentiated union of man and woman."

    "This view long has been held – and continues to be held – in good faith by reasonable and sincere people. … Many who deem same-sex marriage to be wrong reach that conclusion based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises, and neither they nor their beliefs are disparaged here," the opinion stated.


    https://www.wnd.com/2019/09/city-ban...-gay-weddings/

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Gay fascists struggling to recover from the lies they've told

    The hatreds of these people must be rejected & cleansed with facts and truth

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As America reels under the left's many infringements on our liberties, Big Brother is taking the form of a fist in a rainbow-colored glove.

    But they won't have the "gay gene" in that glove anymore.

    The media outdid themselves recently when reporting on a genetic study that blows apart the much-repeated myth of an elusive "gay gene" that supposedly causes homosexuality.

    .. the original findings damaged the idea of the "gay gene" so badly that the researchers were pressured into recasting the data.

    Imagine the outrage if, say, researchers rewrote tobacco smoke studies to please cigarette company lawyers.

    A dishonest axis between politically correct sex researchers and activist media has been afoot since Alfred C. Kinsey wooed credulous reporters before publishing his groundbreaking and fraudulent study of male sexual behavior in 1948. He did the same with his volume on female sexuality in 1953. Eager to validate casual sex of all kinds, the media have suppressed negative medical evidence about certain behaviors while hyping fake science, such as genetic studies that fail to be replicated.

    ..the LGBTQ movement is on a jihad to criminalize professionally licensed counseling aimed at reducing homosexual or gender dysphoric inclinations – even if a client wants it.

    Their main argument is that if people are born gay or transgender and can't change, then any effort to assist them to do so amounts to malpractice or even criminal activity.

    The myth that people are born gay and cannot possibly change is a direct rejection of the Christian gospel of sin and redemption.

    It has fueled a dangerously unconstitutional movement to criminalize traditional moral views regarding sexuality.

    It's one thing to treat everyone with respect.

    It's quite another to use cultural and political power to crush dissent and force people to lie. These are the seeds of tyranny.


    https://onenewsnow.com/perspectives/...gay-gene-study

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    It's entertaining, in a macabre sort of way watching the pandoras box the dumb-asses on the supreme court opened when they decided "gays" could get married.

    Now they get to deal with all manner of weirdnesses, They even get to see if they have to find a new, magic definition for the word sex LOL https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/next-maj...on-the-s-word/



    One has to wonder if they're regretting creating a "right" for "gays" to get married LOL

    The pursuits of the perverse will now never end

    And they haven't

    This is where accepting the perverse leads

    To ever worse perversions

    These people are showing themselves to be the disgusting sickos they are

    "Drag syndrome" . . we dress up downs syndrome men & boys as women.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    What happens when you cross a deviant misogynistic sexual fetish with people who are intellectually disabled?” writes Anna Bohach in an Activist Mommy online post.

    “You get a sexually exploitative nightmare that is the equivalent to a turn-of-the-century freak show.”

    What is angering Bohach, who leads the group 500 Mom Strong, is the newest twist on the already-controversial story hour: parading Down syndrome men, dressed as women, in front of an audience.

    She is speaking out after learning a London-based drag performer, Daniel Vais, has recruited Down syndrome men for his “Drag Syndrome” shows that are now touring the United States and Canada.

    Down syndrome people are vulnerable to abuse because they are very trusting and caring, yet they are often unable to communicate when someone has harmed them.

    “It's a problem because it's sexual exploitation of developmentally disabled people,” she tells OneNewsNow, “people who are not always able to understand what something is when it's in a context like drag, which is a sexual fetish.”

    The progressive left that has been pushing Drag Queen Story Hours and “Drag Syndrome” cares little about the human rights and the dignity of children and disabled persons, much less the rights of women.

    They regularly push for the extermination of persons with Down Syndrome while they are still in the womb and abortion up to and after birth of all children abled and disabled. They have already fully embraced the idea that men can be women and celebrate womanface, so I guess we should not be surprised when they attempt to shred every bit of dignity and respect that Down Syndrome families have fought for.


    https://onenewsnow.com/culture/2019/...-to-get-sicker

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by Brexx View Post
    Its a mental disorder for some and just a perversion of choice for others. In some places its a cultural norm - after a decades long intense propaganda campaign that is what it has become here too.

    People are such goddamn sheep they will follow along with anything, and there are people taking full advantage of that. Its hard to imagine where this crazyness is going to take us. There seems to be no end in sight.
    It's entertaining, in a macabre sort of way watching the pandoras box the dumb-asses on the supreme court opened when they decided "gays" could get married.

    Now they get to deal with all manner of weirdnesses, They even get to see if they have to find a new, magic definition for the word sex LOL https://www.wnd.com/2019/08/next-maj...on-the-s-word/



    One has to wonder if they're regretting creating a "right" for "gays" to get married LOL

    The pursuits of the perverse will now never end

    Leave a comment:


  • Brexx
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    It was nonsense from the day the APA decided - for political reasons - to remove homosexuality from the list of mental disorders.

    We see proof almost every day, that it really IS a disorder.... here we have more LOL

    ... as if we needed any more.

    This is where they will call us racists or haters or even closet homosexuals . . because "anti-gay" people are gay they say LOL

    Word games and bologna is all they have. All they ever had !
    Its a mental disorder for some and just a perversion of choice for others. In some places its a cultural norm - after a decades long intense propaganda campaign that is what it has become here too.

    People are such goddamn sheep they will follow along with anything, and there are people taking full advantage of that. Its hard to imagine where this crazyness is going to take us. There seems to be no end in sight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by Brexx View Post
    So, after spending decades convincing our children and other gullible members of society that homosexuality is normal and innate they are now saying that heterosexuality is NOT normal or innate.

    We have been told that there is no way a homosexual can ever go straight, but now they are saying people can "opt out" of heterosexuality whenever they feel like it.

    I hope more and more people start to notice that this has all been a bunch of BS right from the get-go.
    It was nonsense from the day the APA decided - for political reasons - to remove homosexuality from the list of mental disorders.

    We see proof almost every day, that it really IS a disorder.... here we have more LOL

    ... as if we needed any more.

    This is where they will call us racists or haters or even closet homosexuals . . because "anti-gay" people are gay they say LOL

    Word games and bologna is all they have. All they ever had !

    Leave a comment:


  • Brexx
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
    The perverse just get dumber & dumber.

    And more perverse.

    Moron justifies deviance by claiming to be a "victim"

    "Men bad ! Women GOOOOD !! OOooofff !" LOL

    This article can't be meant seriously I hope ...?

    NBC News: "Heterosexuality Is Just Not Working"


    =------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Women are increasingly opting out of heterosexuality because it is "the bedrock of their global oppression," NBC News asserted in a bizarre opinion piece this week.

    "Men need heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women," writes Marcie Bianco for the NBC News website. "Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don't need heterosexuality, but that it also is often the bedrock of their global oppression."

    Ms. Bianco lumps together a series of recent news stories, "from Jeffrey Epstein to the Dayton and El Paso mass shooters, to Miley Cyruss separation and Julianne Hough's declaration that she's "not straight," which, she says, "together have laid bare the strictures of an American patriarchy on the edge of a nervous breakdown.

    "As the status quo, heterosexuality is just not working," she concludes, before explaining just how evil men are and how women are learning to live without them.

    "As a snapshot of 2019 America, these stories present a startling picture: Men continue to coerce, harass, rape and kill girls and women "and go to extreme lengths to avoid responsibility for their actions," she states.

    "On the other side of the issue, girls and women are challenging heterosexuality, and even absconding from it altogether."

    "Patriarchy is at its most potent when oppression doesn't feel like oppression, or when it is packaged in terms of biology, religion, or basic social needs like security comfort, acceptance and success," Ms. Bianco declares.

    "Heterosexuality offers women all these things as selling points to their consensual subjection," she concludes, in a painful piece of contorted logic that reveals far more about the writer than it does about society and its institutions.

    "Historically, women have been conditioned to believe that heterosexuality is natural or innate, just as they have been conditioned to believe that their main purpose is to make babies - and if they fail to do so, they are condemned as not "real," or as bad, women," she pronounces.


    ....

    https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...z-XmReqzwfsrBQ
    So, after spending decades convincing our children and other gullible members of society that homosexuality is normal and innate they are now saying that heterosexuality is NOT normal or innate.

    We have been told that there is no way a homosexual can ever go straight, but now they are saying people can "opt out" of heterosexuality whenever they feel like it.

    I hope more and more people start to notice that this has all been a bunch of BS right from the get-go.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    The perverse just get dumber & dumber.

    And more perverse.

    Moron justifies deviance by claiming to be a "victim"

    "Men bad ! Women GOOOOD !! OOooofff !" LOL

    This article can't be meant seriously I hope ...?

    NBC News: "Heterosexuality Is Just Not Working"


    =------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Women are increasingly opting out of heterosexuality because it is "the bedrock of their global oppression," NBC News asserted in a bizarre opinion piece this week.

    "Men need heterosexuality to maintain their societal dominance over women," writes Marcie Bianco for the NBC News website. "Women, on the other hand, are increasingly realizing not only that they don't need heterosexuality, but that it also is often the bedrock of their global oppression."

    Ms. Bianco lumps together a series of recent news stories, "from Jeffrey Epstein to the Dayton and El Paso mass shooters, to Miley Cyruss separation and Julianne Hough's declaration that she's "not straight," which, she says, "together have laid bare the strictures of an American patriarchy on the edge of a nervous breakdown.

    "As the status quo, heterosexuality is just not working," she concludes, before explaining just how evil men are and how women are learning to live without them.

    "As a snapshot of 2019 America, these stories present a startling picture: Men continue to coerce, harass, rape and kill girls and women "and go to extreme lengths to avoid responsibility for their actions," she states.

    "On the other side of the issue, girls and women are challenging heterosexuality, and even absconding from it altogether."

    "Patriarchy is at its most potent when oppression doesn't feel like oppression, or when it is packaged in terms of biology, religion, or basic social needs like security comfort, acceptance and success," Ms. Bianco declares.

    "Heterosexuality offers women all these things as selling points to their consensual subjection," she concludes, in a painful piece of contorted logic that reveals far more about the writer than it does about society and its institutions.

    "Historically, women have been conditioned to believe that heterosexuality is natural or innate, just as they have been conditioned to believe that their main purpose is to make babies - and if they fail to do so, they are condemned as not "real," or as bad, women," she pronounces.


    ....

    https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...z-XmReqzwfsrBQ

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

    Let's just hope that that rejection of that idiocy continues, especially when it comes to public policy.
    It cannot !

    Not and LAST for long.

    If it does, anything goes, there will be no limit to what some fruit-loop can demand of others in the name of "equality."

    It just won't function for too long. If they can demand these kinds of things in the name of equality, I MYSELF could get creative and dream up somethings that THEY can't reject.... since WE can't reject the weird sh*t they're dreaming up - we have to bake their queefter cakes, we have to wax their ding-dongs ... they will have NO leg to stand on if I demand and take them to court for somethings just as rancid and sick !

    That's why none of these leftist dreams of "equality" can last.

    Equal is equal and they only want to be who gets to define equal... doesn't work that way liberals : )

    If all things are "equal," we have no less standing than YOU to say what WE think it means : )

    So don't piss & whine when you have to . . . . .

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    In general people mature, grow up etc. and set aside these kinds of things

    In general !

    There will always be the nuts who forever have no connection to reality, they've been with us for as long as we've existed

    But they're a serious minority - they're just very loud right now, they're angry at being rejected
    Let's just hope that that rejection of that idiocy continues, especially when it comes to public policy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post

    SJWs have gone around the bend. Hopefully, it'll be just a passing 'fad'. I worry about those 'true believers' who have cast aside any sort of rationality.
    In general people mature, grow up etc. and set aside these kinds of things

    In general !

    There will always be the nuts who forever have no connection to reality, they've been with us for as long as we've existed

    But they're a serious minority - they're just very loud right now, they're angry at being rejected

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    It does

    Who could imagine a scenario like this - ""Wax my wang or your going to court."

    would happen in real life instead of on some bad, R-rated version of Monty Pythons Flying Circus ?

    This is the result of goofy things like "transgender bathroom rights," "gay" marriage rights etc

    ... these things happen, you let a camel in your tent, ... you're going to have a camel in your tent LOL .. and all the fun things that go along with it
    SJWs have gone around the bend. Hopefully, it'll be just a passing 'fad'. I worry about those 'true believers' who have cast aside any sort of rationality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by eohrnberger View Post
    Get 'woke' go broke.

    Shows you just how stupid this SJW 'woke' bullshit really is.
    It does

    Who could imagine a scenario like this - ""Wax my wang or your going to court."

    would happen in real life instead of on some bad, R-rated version of Monty Pythons Flying Circus ?

    This is the result of goofy things like "transgender bathroom rights," "gay" marriage rights etc

    ... these things happen, you let a camel in your tent, ... you're going to have a camel in your tent LOL .. and all the fun things that go along with it

    Leave a comment:


  • eohrnberger
    replied
    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

    Hard to believe

    But when we celebrate and encourage unreality .. even insanity, should we expect something else ??

    This is what our idiotic "tolerance" has gotten us. Enjoy : )

    "Wax my wang or your going to court."

    When a society decides the sick are healthy, there are going to be problems.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There's an important category in logic known as reductio ad absurdum, according to which you contradict an argument by showing that its general application will produce absurd results.

    ...Yaniv presents us with a reductio ad absurdum on two legs.

    For those who have not been following the case (which, oddly, has been covered by the international media, but mostly ignored by Canada's own press), the details will sound unbelievable.

    Last year, Yaniv used social media to contact 16 female aestheticians in the Vancouver area, most working out of their own homes, who advertized Brazilian waxing - the removal of some or all of a woman's pubic hair by applying and then yanking off strips of heated wax.

    Sometimes, Yaniv would use the name Jonathan and a clearly male profile pic. Only then, upon being told that Brazilian waxing is for women only, would Yaniv reply to the effect of 'I am trans.' The women would then convey that they were unwilling or unqualified to wax male genitalia. At this point, Yaniv would put in a complaint to the human-rights tribunal, alleging discrimination on the basis of gender identity, a protected characteristic under British Columbia's human-rights code.

    Last year, I spoke to one of the women thus targeted, Shelah Poyer. Her name had been made public, though the tribunal originally ordered anonymity for Yaniv (that order was lifted last week). The whole thing had been hugely distressing for her, she said. People who read about the case in its early stages assumed she must be a bigot (though that has presumably changed now that more facts have been disclosed). And she had stopped advertizing her services, instead relying on personal recommendations, meaning she has lost a good deal of her income. Several other women settled in mediation, paying Yaniv thousands of dollars so they could be rid of the proceedings.

    But Poyer did not. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, a libertarian non-profit, offered to represent her and two other women facing Yaniv’s claims. Jay Cameron, one of the Centre’s lawyers, applied to have the tribunal’s order for anonymity lifted on the grounds that Yaniv was open in public about being transgender, and so had forfeited any need for privacy.

    Cameron presented evidence to the tribunal that included social-media posts in which Yaniv talked about using women's public facilities, such as toilets and a gym, and asked for advice on matters of etiquette - such as when it might be appropriate to approach a pre-teen girl to ask for a tampon, or whether it might be okay to accompany such a girl into a stall to show her how to use it. (Yaniv claims that such messages came from hacked accounts, but has provided no proof in this regard.)


    In the past couple of weeks, the tribunal has been hearing three of Yaniv's complaints together. At first, a lone observer who tweets as @goinglikeelsie was the only source of information about what was going on. Canadian journalists apparently had little interest in whether B.C.'s human-rights code covered the right of males who identify as women to have their genitals treated as female, even to the point of coercing women working alone in their homes (in some cases, with children in attendance), and to come in and strip, and then to handle said genitals.

    More


    https://quillette.com/2019/07/25/a-c...ender-self-id/

    Jessica Yaniv is the complainant in a 'stranger-than-fiction' B.C. Human Rights Tribunal case. The 32-year-old transgender woman has 13 outstanding complaints against various waxing service providers who, for a variety of reasons, could not give her a Brazilian wax because she still has a penis and testicles.

    More

    https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/co...male-genitalia


    Canada’s bizarre trans-waxing controversy

    Female waxers are being branded 'transphobic' because they refused to wax a trans-woman’s bollocks.

    ...For proof that the woke war on common sense and decency is now completely out of control, look no further than the Canadian trans-waxing controversy. A born male who identifies as female, and whose male genitalia is still intact, is suing female-only waxers on the basis that their refusal to wax his bollocks - sorry, her bollocks - is an act of discrimination. Yes, this person believes that because he identifies as female he should therefore have access to every female service, including the most intimate female services. Any female beautician who refuses to tend to his testicles is being "transphobic", apparently, because they are denying his womanhood.


    more

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/0...g-controversy/
    Get 'woke' go broke.

    Shows you just how stupid this SJW 'woke' bullshit really is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Trips
    replied
    Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
    I don't recall where I heard it first put this way, but equality under the law, and the expansion of "fundamental rights" has confused liberty with license. The notion that society as a whole cannot set certain moral and ethical boundaries through negative law. That is how we have come to the utterly ass-backwards jurisprudence that reads the First Amendment as permitting sitting politicians from restricting time and manner of political speech against them, but virtual child pornography is sacrosanct!
    Hard to believe

    But when we celebrate and encourage unreality .. even insanity, should we expect something else ??

    This is what our idiotic "tolerance" has gotten us. Enjoy : )

    "Wax my wang or your going to court."

    When a society decides the sick are healthy, there are going to be problems.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There's an important category in logic known as reductio ad absurdum, according to which you contradict an argument by showing that its general application will produce absurd results.

    ...Yaniv presents us with a reductio ad absurdum on two legs.

    For those who have not been following the case (which, oddly, has been covered by the international media, but mostly ignored by Canada's own press), the details will sound unbelievable.

    Last year, Yaniv used social media to contact 16 female aestheticians in the Vancouver area, most working out of their own homes, who advertized Brazilian waxing - the removal of some or all of a woman's pubic hair by applying and then yanking off strips of heated wax.

    Sometimes, Yaniv would use the name Jonathan and a clearly male profile pic. Only then, upon being told that Brazilian waxing is for women only, would Yaniv reply to the effect of 'I am trans.' The women would then convey that they were unwilling or unqualified to wax male genitalia. At this point, Yaniv would put in a complaint to the human-rights tribunal, alleging discrimination on the basis of gender identity, a protected characteristic under British Columbia's human-rights code.

    Last year, I spoke to one of the women thus targeted, Shelah Poyer. Her name had been made public, though the tribunal originally ordered anonymity for Yaniv (that order was lifted last week). The whole thing had been hugely distressing for her, she said. People who read about the case in its early stages assumed she must be a bigot (though that has presumably changed now that more facts have been disclosed). And she had stopped advertizing her services, instead relying on personal recommendations, meaning she has lost a good deal of her income. Several other women settled in mediation, paying Yaniv thousands of dollars so they could be rid of the proceedings.

    But Poyer did not. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, a libertarian non-profit, offered to represent her and two other women facing Yaniv’s claims. Jay Cameron, one of the Centre’s lawyers, applied to have the tribunal’s order for anonymity lifted on the grounds that Yaniv was open in public about being transgender, and so had forfeited any need for privacy.

    Cameron presented evidence to the tribunal that included social-media posts in which Yaniv talked about using women's public facilities, such as toilets and a gym, and asked for advice on matters of etiquette - such as when it might be appropriate to approach a pre-teen girl to ask for a tampon, or whether it might be okay to accompany such a girl into a stall to show her how to use it. (Yaniv claims that such messages came from hacked accounts, but has provided no proof in this regard.)


    In the past couple of weeks, the tribunal has been hearing three of Yaniv's complaints together. At first, a lone observer who tweets as @goinglikeelsie was the only source of information about what was going on. Canadian journalists apparently had little interest in whether B.C.'s human-rights code covered the right of males who identify as women to have their genitals treated as female, even to the point of coercing women working alone in their homes (in some cases, with children in attendance), and to come in and strip, and then to handle said genitals.

    More


    https://quillette.com/2019/07/25/a-c...ender-self-id/

    Jessica Yaniv is the complainant in a 'stranger-than-fiction' B.C. Human Rights Tribunal case. The 32-year-old transgender woman has 13 outstanding complaints against various waxing service providers who, for a variety of reasons, could not give her a Brazilian wax because she still has a penis and testicles.

    More

    https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/co...male-genitalia


    Canada’s bizarre trans-waxing controversy

    Female waxers are being branded 'transphobic' because they refused to wax a trans-woman’s bollocks.

    ...For proof that the woke war on common sense and decency is now completely out of control, look no further than the Canadian trans-waxing controversy. A born male who identifies as female, and whose male genitalia is still intact, is suing female-only waxers on the basis that their refusal to wax his bollocks - sorry, her bollocks - is an act of discrimination. Yes, this person believes that because he identifies as female he should therefore have access to every female service, including the most intimate female services. Any female beautician who refuses to tend to his testicles is being "transphobic", apparently, because they are denying his womanhood.


    more

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2019/0...g-controversy/

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X