Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Calm down

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Calm down

    ......The media keeps looking dumber by the day

    How long have they been carrying on with this russian c*&p ?

    Too long, even they're sick of it. How can we tell ?

    Because now it's a different story.

    Now the president is a supporter of the KKK and likes Nazis ... and is probably going to start a concentration camp soon for Arabic people . . . or is it Black people ? I forget. BUT ... we KNOW he's a racist and going to start one !!

    Soon. and he's going to -fill in the blank-

    Yeah -rollseyes-

    Russia didn't hire or elect our president.

    Our president isn't a racist.

    He doesn't suffer from any mental disorders
    - beyond being an extreme narcissist ... which all politicians are...

    So calm down everyone, unless you like giving yourself high blood pressure over nothing

    -----------------------------------------

    Eric Trump on Tuesday slammed the Russia collusion investigation as "a total hoax" telling Newsmax TV that the media was keeping it alive only because no matter what President Donald Trump does, "he's going to get hit."

    "They tried really hard," the Trump, 33, told "The Joe Pags Show" in an exclusive interview of the Russia probe. "They tried really hard, but it didn't fly.

    "And everybody realizes the whole thing was a total hoax and a spoof and that there was nothing there.

    "Politics is nasty," he told Pags. "It's the nastiest business I've ever seen.

    "It's just the evilness and the hatred in that world is unlike I could've ever fathom before.

    "And no matter what he does, they're going to hit him on it and they're going to go after him," Trump added.

    "It's the media, the mainstream media, who does not want him to succeed. No matter what he does, he's going to get hit."

    How does the president's son deal with the negative attacks on his father?

    "You have to tune it out," he told Pags. "Obviously, you have to be tuned into it because you need to know what's being said.

    "At the same time, you have to take it all with a grain of salt," he added. "If they weren't talking about you, you wouldn't be doing something right.

    "It's important to keep it in context otherwise, quite frankly, you'd probably end up killing yourself out of depression," Trump said.

    "But he's doing a great job.


    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/er.../29/id/810554/

  • #2
    I remember when it became clear of the position MSM would take towards trump real early in the primaries and of course it worsened after that, but their dishonest tactics remained the same. So, they stated a lie about trump, and then repeated it non stop for the primary season, and ramped it up even more during the general election. Using the simplest propaganda tactic, which is creating a lie, and then repeating it everyday. And it continues until this very day.

    This early lie, propaganda, happened when I was supporting sanders, but even with my involvement in supporting sanders did not blind me to what MSM and the democrats were doing, fabricating a lie and then non stop repetition. This happened when trump gave a stump speech at the southern border, when he was talking about illegal immigration. After I heard that speech, immediately following it MSM took some of his words, as evidence trump was a racist, while an honest intellect could have never used what trump said as any kind of evidence trump was a racist. But MSM isn't honest, nor journalistic, and certainly do not resemble what a free press looks like.

    So it is a fact that MSM can fabricate a lie based upon something trump said, which logically could not be used as evidence to back up their lie, and yet a significant number of americans can be convinced what trump said is irrefutable evidence trump is a racist. So no wonder MSM will invent lies that serves their agenda, for too many americans are weak enough mentally to be conned. The lies and repetition works, any yet this is not how a free press looks.

    ?


    • #3
      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
      I remember when it became clear of the position MSM would take towards trump real early in the primaries and of course it worsened after that, but their dishonest tactics remained the same. So, they stated a lie about trump, and then repeated it non stop for the primary season, and ramped it up even more during the general election. Using the simplest propaganda tactic, which is creating a lie, and then repeating it everyday. And it continues until this very day.

      This early lie, propaganda, happened when I was supporting sanders, but even with my involvement in supporting sanders did not blind me to what MSM and the democrats were doing, fabricating a lie and then non stop repetition. This happened when trump gave a stump speech at the southern border, when he was talking about illegal immigration. After I heard that speech, immediately following it MSM took some of his words, as evidence trump was a racist, while an honest intellect could have never used what trump said as any kind of evidence trump was a racist. But MSM isn't honest, nor journalistic, and certainly do not resemble what a free press looks like.

      So it is a fact that MSM can fabricate a lie based upon something trump said, which logically could not be used as evidence to back up their lie, and yet a significant number of americans can be convinced what trump said is irrefutable evidence trump is a racist. So no wonder MSM will invent lies that serves their agenda, for too many americans are weak enough mentally to be conned. The lies and repetition works, any yet this is not how a free press looks.
      It really comes down to the belief, on the side of the "media" and others, that lying constantly is going to be effective against the people and the president they hate.

      It's going to backfire on them in some big ways.

      Lying & being so obvious about it, just doesn't work in the end.

      Hatred and lies are ALWAYS destructive to those who use and engage in them... look at history and all the famous liars and haters who were destroyed in the end by their lies and hate.

      ?


      • #4
        Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

        It really comes down to the belief, on the side of the "media" and others, that lying constantly is going to be effective against the people and the president they hate.

        It's going to backfire on them in some big ways.

        Lying & being so obvious about it, just doesn't work in the end.

        Hatred and lies are ALWAYS destructive to those who use and engage in them... look at history and all the famous liars and haters who were destroyed in the end by their lies and hate.
        One can only hope they are destroyed. For some of us really do want people to reap what they sow.



        ?


        • #5
          Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
          One can only hope they are destroyed. For some of us really do want people to reap what they sow.
          They will be.

          It may take time, & probably won't happen the way anyone expects, but people who lie and hate are always destroyed.

          ?


          • #6
            They call you a fascist if you don't agree with them.

            But, they don't want to let you speak.

            Nearly one fifth of these people, even say it's Ok to use violence to silence you.

            Yet, will call YOU a fascist if you don't agree with them.

            --------------------

            When asked if it was acceptable for a student group to disrupt a controversial speaker by loudly and repeatedly shouting so that the audience cannot hear the speaker, 51% of students agreed with this compared to 49% who opposed it.
            In other words, over half of students dont support unimpeded free speech.

            The students were then asked if it was OK for a student group opposed to the speaker to use violence to prevent the speaker from speaking.

            19% agreed that violence was acceptable in this context, leading the Brookings Institution to comment that the fraction of students who view the use of violence as acceptable is extremely high and that any number significantly above zero is concerning
            .

            ....

            https://www.infowars.com/poll-nearly...n-free-speech/

            ?


            • #7
              I have been watching reporting, but not from MSM, on this and it is alarming. It is ironic that many of these Antifa people are what they claim to hate, fascism. You cannot make this stuff up, due to the high strangeness and utter absurdity. And you know this comes from far left Profs. I remember seeing one last year on some campus, egging on the students to violence to suppress the first amendment. What is odd is that the democrats do not come out in one voice against this kind of behavior and beliefs, but they don't mind calling trump a supporter of the KKK and neo nazis.

              Now, they say trump does not come out strong enough against the KKK and neo nazis because he wants their votes. And yet what in the hell do you think keeps the dems from strongly rejecting these Antifa fascists? LOL Well, hypocrisy is mandatory for politics in this current era, and like never before perhaps.

              And yet trump and others in his admin. have come out strongly against these racists on the right, and we have not seen such a degree on the democratic side in regards to their own crew of fascists.

              ?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                I have been watching reporting, but not from MSM, on this and it is alarming. It is ironic that many of these Antifa people are what they claim to hate, fascism. You cannot make this stuff up, due to the high strangeness and utter absurdity. And you know this comes from far left Profs. I remember seeing one last year on some campus, egging on the students to violence to suppress the first amendment. What is odd is that the democrats do not come out in one voice against this kind of behavior and beliefs, but they don't mind calling trump a supporter of the KKK and neo nazis.

                Now, they say trump does not come out strong enough against the KKK and neo nazis because he wants their votes. And yet what in the hell do you think keeps the dems from strongly rejecting these Antifa fascists? LOL Well, hypocrisy is mandatory for politics in this current era, and like never before perhaps.

                And yet trump and others in his admin. have come out strongly against these racists on the right, and we have not seen such a degree on the democratic side in regards to their own crew of fascists.
                It is amazing the things these people, these liberal "democrats,"... the things these people say.

                And they say them and seem to actually believe them ! They think WE should believe them WITH them LOL

                It's just weird.

                Read the noise coming out of hilary clinton recently..

                ---------------------------

                In her concession speech back in November, a defeated Hillary Clinton said she wanted to make it clear that Americans should allow President Donald Trump to be the leader for everybody, but on Saturday, she said "that just hasn't turned out to be the case."

                "I really had such deep doubts about his preparation, his temperament, his character, his experience, but he's been even worse than I thought he would be," Clinton, during a lengthy interview on MSNBC's "AM Joy," told show host Joy Reid. "We want to feel like the person in the Oval Office really cares about and is looking after everybody. That just hasn't turned out to be the case."

                "... all he did was reinforce the dark, divisive image of America that he'd been feeding to his supporters," ..


                [ that is what liberals specialize in ! But you see how they play this game ? They tell the world that it's other people that are guilty of the crimes THEY'RE COMMITTING ]

                "He had dog whistles that got increasingly louder on immigrants, and Latinos, and African-Americans, and women, and Muslims, and the whole panoply of scapegoats that he was holding out to his supporters as the explanation for whatever their grievance was," said Clinton. "What I try to say in the book is, look, you need both economic justice and social justice."

                Further, she said she thinks Trump sees the world in a "very dark, divisive way, as we heard in the UN speech. It's us versus them."


                [ Same game, accuse other people of the crimes THEY'RE COMMITTING ]

                "His us is also how he tried to motivate voters to be for him and he didn't really repudiate David Duke, he didn't really repudiate a lot of the white supremacists who came out strongly for him. I called him out in a speech in Las Vegas in August of 2016 about the so-called alt right, which is certainly very much grounded in white supremacy. So I think he has to be judged on his record."

                [ I'll finish that sentence for you hilary; "... and WE shouldn't be judged on OUR words or record." ]

                Clinton told Reid it was "deeply troubling" during the election to hear the chants, led by Trump, to "lock her up" and to see women wearing buttons and t-shirts with obscenities about her on them.

                [ I'm sure it is "deeply troubling" to you hilary. You belong in prison and you know it ! So does most of America. ]

                "I try to unpack this, because, first of all, it's not pleasant to be called names and to be subjected to the kind of insults that come across the online media all the time, which we see when women express an opinion," said Clinton. "On a personal level, it was both distressing, but also somewhat problematic because it's one thing for people individually to express those views, but for a candidate running for president of the United States to give permission to those views being put out into the public are, in fact to encourage it and carry it on, to make it a centerpiece of his convention."

                [ "..which we see when women express an opinion," or rather, we see when a woman is a criminal. ]

                http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Hill.../23/id/815304/

                This hilary woman is such a complete fraud it's sickening.

                BUT, it's great to have her still out there in public "supporting" democrats.

                ?


                • #9
                  Looks better and better every day. These people are hell-bent on flaunting their status as losers.

                  Desperate liberals WILL say anything won't they ?

                  Yes, they will.

                  ----------------------------------

                  White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Wednesday the suggestion that the Trump administration supports slavery in light of Chief of Staff John Kelly's praise of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee was "disgusting and absurd."

                  ".... it is disgusting and absurd to suggest that anyone inside of this building would support slavery," Sanders told reporters at the daily briefing.

                  She was responding to a question from April Ryan, Washington bureau chief for American Urban Radio Networks and a CNN commentator.

                  Kelly has come under sharp attack for praising Lee on Monday in a Fox News interview as "an honorable man" and saying that "the lack of an ability to compromise" led to the Civil War."

                  "I'm not going to get in and re-litigate the Civil War," Sanders said. "I'm not going to re-litigate history here."


                  http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/sara.../01/id/823516/

                  ?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                    Looks better and better every day. These people are hell-bent on flaunting their status as losers.

                    Desperate liberals WILL say anything won't they ?

                    Yes, they will.

                    ----------------------------------

                    White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Wednesday the suggestion that the Trump administration supports slavery in light of Chief of Staff John Kelly's praise of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee was "disgusting and absurd."

                    ".... it is disgusting and absurd to suggest that anyone inside of this building would support slavery," Sanders told reporters at the daily briefing.

                    She was responding to a question from April Ryan, Washington bureau chief for American Urban Radio Networks and a CNN commentator.

                    Kelly has come under sharp attack for praising Lee on Monday in a Fox News interview as "an honorable man" and saying that "the lack of an ability to compromise" led to the Civil War."

                    "I'm not going to get in and re-litigate the Civil War," Sanders said. "I'm not going to re-litigate history here."


                    http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/sara.../01/id/823516/
                    It is said that war is the result of the failure of politicians. In regards to the Civil War this is probably true. Some historians have said that war was unnecessary and Lincoln's greatest failure. I do not know enough about it to have a learned opinion.

                    ?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                      It is said that war is the result of the failure of politicians. In regards to the Civil War this is probably true. Some historians have said that war was unnecessary and Lincoln's greatest failure. I do not know enough about it to have a learned opinion.
                      It was a war over whether some should have powers over others - slavery.

                      Republicans, led by Abraham Lincoln, supported banning slavery in all the U.S. territories.

                      It's an ongoing struggle we are battling even today ! Certain people ALWAYS want to exercise power over others, we see this still happening in America. The manners in which slavery is practiced are endless.

                      ?

                      Working...
                      X