Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

War for the soul of America

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by redrover View Post
    Yes getting some peoples panties in a wad yes like Americas former allies who use to think America could be counted on as a reliable partner.
    Which allies ?

    Originally posted by redrover View Post
    I wouldn't want to be in a foxhole with old bone spurs.Yes his tweets are as funny as my favorite pastime watching old ladies falling on the ice breaking their hips.
    Where do you go to see those ?

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #62
      Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

      Which allies ?



      Where do you go to see those ?
      Just pull your car into any grocery store parking lot up here in the frozen north between December and April.We know all you Trump fans are connoisseurs of cruelty. You would get a big kick out of it.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #63
        As is stated in the opening post of this thread; "With lies & propaganda, we're sold dangerous ideas."

        https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...ica#post547468

        There are destructive forces, destructive people, working to tear America down.

        They are these so called "progressives." Using this word 'progressive' helps hide, or cover-up their true purpose.

        As has become common-place, they use word games and language to hide their true agenda and make it seem desirable.

        It isn't.

        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        To say the U.S. Constitution and its principles are outdated ideas of old racist white guys is a perfect example of the progressive propaganda of the left. Our founding principles are timeless civil gifts from the geniuses who founded our nation. We inherited the most advanced, fair, and enlightened form of government that has ever been attempted in human history. It has led to a hegemony of wealth and prosperity. It has lifted humanity and been a force for truth and liberty for 242 years. To their everlasting disgrace, the left and all of its useful idiots wish to see it burn.

        Before I was old enough to understand the political difference between the right and left, I knew that certain things didn't add up. I recall pondering how Democrats could ever win elections with the stated goal of raising taxes. Who would willingly sign up to hand over more of his money to the government? What a ridiculous sales pitch. Do they think people are idiots? Um...yep. The joke was clearly on me.

        I don't consider the individuals on the left my enemies. I think of many of them as causalities of our Democrat media complex. The real enemy of the USA is the malignant ideology of the progressive left, which has been the enemy of our form of government since day one.

        The first thing that must be clarified is that liberalism no longer describes today's left in our country. At the core of liberalism is the embrace of the rights of the individual above all else, which is the purpose of the Bill of Rights and the foundation of our country's law structure. The left has abandoned liberalism, so it is oxymoronic for the left to describe its members as liberals. They are actively attacking liberalism and abandoning all the classic Democrat champions of liberalism, such as Alan Dershowitz.

        A more accurate term for the modern left is "progressive." The term conjures notions like "new and fresh ideas" and "continuous improvement" and "fixing what is broken." Like many of the obfuscations of the left, the reality of progressivism is quite different from the notion. To summarize the progressive movement in one sentence: Delegitimize and deconstruct the existing societal order with the intent of creating a new order in which progressives are the authors and can bequeath themselves permanent control. Think about the Bolsheviks. Think about Chairman Mao. They too wanted a "fundamental transformation" of their respective societies.

        Among the things that stand in the way of the left are the Constitution, the Bill of Rights – both of which are under unprecedented attack – and those pesky little formalities called elections. We see leftists actively undermining elections on two major fronts today. One is through illegal immigration to bring in a new underclass of loyal voters. The other is through the Russian collusion narrative to undermine the results of the latest presidential election.

        The left has made it commonplace to label groups and divide them into their respective tribes, so in the spirit of the left and the old adage, "know your enemy," I will attempt break down our modern left into categories so that when you encounter a lefty in the wild, you will be able to quickly file him into one of the following groups of misguided humanoids.


        1. The Ideologues: Like Karl Marx himself, a modern ideologue might include a college professor or philosopher who is mostly disconnected from reality and facts – a chalkboard hero, if you will. These are folks with seemingly good intentions who firmly believe in the historically debunked ideologies of socialism and communism despite the evidence. At the nucleus is a patent denial of the basic human instinct to pursue self-interest. Once you get past that, everything works nicely. Example: Doctors are more than happy to toil day and night for the same pay as the unemployed man. You will increasingly find ideologues in places of influence like executives in the tech industry and at social media giants. This should alarm us all. They believe that we are always one step away from singing kumbaya alongside the crew of the starship Enterprise. The ideologues are a sad bunch.

        2. The Dependents: There's nothing like a sure thing. What better way of commanding loyalty than promising to hand out goodies? Just ask Bernie. We'll have the "billionazz" pay for it. It's all done under the guise of humanity, but the real effect is a class of dependents who live at the mercy of the state. They neither define their own future nor have the means to pursue any sort of American dream.

        3. The Snowflakes: Defined by their low-info status, these young people are the product of our abusively biased education system. They shouldn't be blamed for the omissions of our corrupted educators, but they have proven to be effective carriers of the disease and should not be underestimated. The good news is that many of them will be rescued by the real world. They are misguided children. They deserve our guidance, and they deserve to hear about the actual history of our country. Eliminating this class is up to us.

        4. The Virtuous: Perhaps the largest and most pathetic group. We all know them and love them. Heck, most of us have family members in this group. These are the virtue-signaling elitist-wannabes who would define themselves as "10% left of center." They want everyone to know how woke they are and how ready they are to pile on to the hate-Trump bandwagon at dinner parties. These are the folks who can afford to signal their virtue. Their economic insulation from real problems affords them the luxury of cheerleading for policies that won't have an impact on them in their daily lives for now. But watch out: when crisis finally arrives or circumstances impact their property or their money, you can bet that their inner conservative will come out with guns blazing. The virtuous are the same wind socks that came out waving the flag after 9-11, and we were happy they joined us. But most of the time, they're caught up in perpetual self-loathing and have bought into so many of the divisive narratives of the left. Most of the news media have stumbled into this disgraceful position.

        5. The Ruling Class: Those who wish to author a new deal. Those who wish to fundamentally transform our society. Those who wish to write new rules and control the narratives. They want to be the arbiters of what is considered hate speech. They want to disarm the population. They want to conduct raids on the suspected. To silence all voices against them. They will pursue their goals at any cost and in defiance of any laws of man that may stand in their way. They deal in misinformation and use all the historic tactics of the left. They include Democrats, Republicans, and especially unelected members of the Deep State bureaucracy. In the events of human history, never has there been a more destructive force than the ruling class and dictators alike.

        https://www.americanthinker.com/arti..._the_left.html

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #64
          Originally posted by redrover View Post

          Yes getting some peoples panties in a wad yes like Americas former allies who use to think America could be counted on as a reliable partner. I wouldn't want to be in a foxhole with old bone spurs.Yes his tweets are as funny as my favorite pastime watching old ladies falling on the ice breaking their hips.
          You must be referencing other world leaders who, when Obama was on his world apology tour, believed they could kick America around with impunity.

          WELL, of course, with a new sheriff in town, people are going to get upset that they are no longer allowed to abuse us like they were the previous administrations...

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #65
            Originally posted by DavidSF View Post

            You must be referencing other world leaders who, when Obama was on his world apology tour, believed they could kick America around with impunity.

            WELL, of course, with a new sheriff in town, people are going to get upset that they are no longer allowed to abuse us like they were the previous administrations...
            Sure the new sheriff does a great job of standing up to our friends but our enemies like Russia never tire of giving him edgies.Getting back to the soul of America. Here is the next book on my must read list. You would hate it. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/b...9780399589812/

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #66
              Good luck with the media manipulation. Good luck selling your lies as truth. People see through it, they know the media eggheads look down on them. They're going to reject the bullshirt and send these liars packing.

              Watch

              As it says in the article below;

              "..we need to convince people that the issue is whether or not a bunch of very rich, very white techno-geeks should be allowed to censor the information we get."

              ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Historically, "common" folk were able to figure out that the National Enquirer's stories about two-headed alien Elvis clones are fake and even that professional wrestling is staged. They were able to see through the lies of Nazis and communists. Yet for some reason, we're now being told that we need our betters to protects us from what they think we shouldn't read because we're just too stupid to differentiate between what's true and what's not.

              Every time you hear some young hip woke leftist at a technology company like Facebook telling you he needs to protect you from fake news, remember that what he's saying is that you're a knuckle-dragging Neanderthal who is too stupid to figure out that it's okay for good people like Hillary to break the law. In fact, he's saying the majority of Americans are too intellectually challenged to discriminate between fact and fiction.

              The truth is that leftists are not interested in protecting us from lies. After all, if they did that, they'd all have to stop writing. Rather, the left wants to convince us that lies are the truth and that the truth is lies. Leftists need that to advance their agenda, which is ensuring that they can run every aspect of our lives.

              The reality is that when leftists talk about fake news, they're really talking about the truth, and when they talk about the truth, they're really talking about fake news.

              Look at the Mueller investigation. It's supposedly about Russia colluding with Trump to swing the election. Yet, to date, there is no evidence that that happened at all. But the woke leftists who want to censor your news declare that it's a "fact" that Trump did illegally collude – even though collusion is not a crime – with the Russians.

              Even worse, we know for a fact that Hillary did collude with the Russians by paying a former British spy to work with the Russians to get lies about Trump – lies that she weaponized both during the campaign and afterward. Yet, according to our woke betters, talking about that is fake news.

              Leftists know they will never win if people have the truth, so, like their fascist predecessors in Nazi Germany and the various communist regimes, they are desperately trying to flip our perception, making us think lies are truth and that truth is lies.

              ..leftists declare that DNA doesn't determine someone's sex, that human life doesn't begin at conception, and that mankind is destroying the Earth via climate change. They will censor real news that disagrees with those faith-based anti-science assumptions.


              ...

              https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...right_you.html

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #67
                Originally posted by redrover View Post

                Sure the new sheriff does a great job of standing up to our friends but our enemies like Russia never tire of giving him edgies.Getting back to the soul of America. Here is the next book on my must read list. You would hate it. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/b...9780399589812/
                You might mean "...standing up to our faux friends..." mightn't you? All Trump is doing is standing up for what he believes (rightly or wrongly) is best for America. He does not have ... and has never had ... and "America-only" stance. His thing has always been "America first."

                Remember the last time he ran for president? Epic fail because he didn't understand the American psyche.

                THIS time, he put his vast (and effective) research department to work and he found out what American's wanted: He (or, rather, his research department) figured out what worked for people like Reagan and others who were populist choices. AND then he used the information and won this time ...

                Today, he CANNOT go back on any of his campaign promises BECAUSE of the close scrutiny the media provides of his every move. He can't fart without the press whipping up that media feeding frenzy over it. So, at least in part, the Trump you hate is supported and encouraged by the alt-left media you love. HOW'S that for an odd twist.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #68
                  Originally posted by DavidSF View Post

                  You might mean "...standing up to our faux friends..." mightn't you? All Trump is doing is standing up for what he believes (rightly or wrongly) is best for America. He does not have ... and has never had ... and "America-only" stance. His thing has always been "America first."

                  Remember the last time he ran for president? Epic fail because he didn't understand the American psyche.

                  THIS time, he put his vast (and effective) research department to work and he found out what American's wanted: He (or, rather, his research department) figured out what worked for people like Reagan and others who were populist choices. AND then he used the information and won this time ...

                  Today, he CANNOT go back on any of his campaign promises BECAUSE of the close scrutiny the media provides of his every move. He can't fart without the press whipping up that media feeding frenzy over it. So, at least in part, the Trump you hate is supported and encouraged by the alt-left media you love. HOW'S that for an odd twist.
                  I grew up in the 1950's watching those old war movies where the valiant Americans who represented everything good in the world pitted themselves against the evil and barbaric Japanese. I think the next spate of movies will feature evil and barbaric Americans. Now that we've lost our souls I only wish president Trump had had a chance to have a sit down with the former president of Cambodia. They would have hit it off He was a strong leader loved by his people and he had a great sense of humor.https://www.biography.com/people/pol-pot-9443888

                  מה מכילות החדשות?


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by redrover View Post
                    I grew up in the 1950's watching those old war movies where the valiant Americans who represented everything good in the world pitted themselves against the evil and barbaric Japanese. I think the next spate of movies will feature evil and barbaric Americans. Now that we've lost our souls I only wish president Trump had had a chance to have a sit down with the former president of Cambodia. They would have hit it off He was a strong leader loved by his people and he had a great sense of humor.https://www.biography.com/people/pol-pot-9443888
                    Meaningless and irrelevant response. Do you want to try again? Or just leave this impression that you have no idea what I said?

                    מה מכילות החדשות?


                    • #70
                      We're told by certain information sources how independent and conservative woman are, how they think.

                      See video at the below link.

                      Where you'll see conservative women explaining why liberals are so wrong in their assumptions about them.

                      It's interesting to watch and hear them explain how completely incorrect liberals are ... on yet another subject.

                      ------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Campus Reform Asks Conservative Women About The Biggest ‘Misconceptions’ Liberals Have About Them

                      ...

                      https://www.dailywire.com/news/32219...ign=benshapiro

                      מה מכילות החדשות?


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post
                        We're told by certain information sources how independent and conservative woman are, how they think.

                        See video at the below link.

                        Where you'll see conservative women explaining why liberals are so wrong in their assumptions about them.

                        It's interesting to watch and hear them explain how completely incorrect liberals are ... on yet another subject.

                        ------------------------------------------------------------------

                        Campus Reform Asks Conservative Women About The Biggest ‘Misconceptions’ Liberals Have About Them

                        ...

                        https://www.dailywire.com/news/32219...ign=benshapiro
                        The problem with America is we have many people who base their faith on an incorrect translation of the bible These peole cling to their flawed version has been proven false by better translations and revelations given us by archeologists. When confronted with the truth they turn and start screaming fake news. How pathetic.http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...I.aspx#Article

                        מה מכילות החדשות?


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by redrover View Post
                          The problem with America is we have many people who base their faith on an incorrect translation of the bible These peole cling to their flawed version has been proven false by better translations and revelations given us by archeologists. When confronted with the truth they turn and start screaming fake news. How pathetic.http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...I.aspx#Article
                          Umm, yeah.

                          That's an entirely different topic.

                          What I posted above was a short video that showed some young conservative women explaining how liberals are so wrong in their assumptions about them.

                          מה מכילות החדשות?


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by redrover View Post

                            The problem with America is we have many people who base their faith on an incorrect translation of the bible These peole cling to their flawed version has been proven false by better translations and revelations given us by archeologists. When confronted with the truth they turn and start screaming fake news. How pathetic.http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...I.aspx#Article
                            Agreed, like the Universalists, the Jehovah's Witnesses (interesting story there) and the Mormons, for example... well the Mormons DO use the King James, but they also add in a couple other books as "scripture."

                            מה מכילות החדשות?


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by DavidSF View Post

                              Agreed, like the Universalists, the Jehovah's Witnesses (interesting story there) and the Mormons, for example... well the Mormons DO use the King James, but they also add in a couple other books as "scripture."
                              As I've said earlier I've known about the sea of reeds for over50 years. It's no big change it only corrects an error in translation from the original Hebrew. I wouldn't call it heresey, but if your faith is weded to the movie version so be it.

                              מה מכילות החדשות?


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by redrover View Post

                                As I've said earlier I've known about the sea of reeds for over50 years. It's no big change it only corrects an error in translation from the original Hebrew. I wouldn't call it heresey, but if your faith is weded to the movie version so be it.
                                So, now you acknowledge, you know nothing about God, the Bible, OR translating Hebrew.

                                First, go read Exodus, Chapter 14. The Hebrews left Goshen (up on the Mediterranean) and travelled down to Piharoth where they camped and when they realized Pharaoh's army was chasing them... they were all panicked: WHY were they all panicked? Because Piharoth is at the southern end of the Gulf of Aqabba (which is part of the RED SEA) and they had no convenient way to escape Pharaoh's army. According to Exodus 16, they crossed the Red Sea and came out at a place called Elim, which is directly across the Gulf of Aqabba from Piharoth.

                                SO, you would have them, by your august knowledge of Scripture and history, panicking over the Army pursuing them, picking up and travelling hundreds of miles north to the sea of reeds, crossing there, and travelling hundreds of miles back south to Elim? MEANTIME, the army pursued them across the sea of reeds and miraculously all drowned in a couple of feet of water.

                                I hope you're just being antagonistic (or trying to be) because if you are serious, you are a laughing stock.

                                מה מכילות החדשות?

                                Working...
                                X