Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a “troll” by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldn’t be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg “It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill,” is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points – Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

The faiure of neoliberal GOP capitalism...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The faiure of neoliberal GOP capitalism...



    I hardly expect any conservative here to take a few minutes in their spare time to watch what Mr. Roberts. of the Reagan administration says, for it would only show the treasonous incompetence of the GOP who brought this crap back from the 1920s, and who were operating on behalf of ONLY the elites in this nation, but I posted the video anyways, for although I just found this interview or debate with Roberts, what he says basically is what I have been saying since day one. Roberts came to his conclusion about the failure of capitalism, the neoliberal kind, by looking at the data, whereas my own opinion was formed by looking at the reality of everyday life when it comes to the lives of working people and the middle class.

    It appears that regardless of the hatred of FDR by conservatives, the man was a damn genius when it comes to an economy that actually is devised to help the population of a nation to have decent standards of living and physical security. For without security human beings start acting crazy, creating tremendous societal problems and disorder, and even risks the republic form of gov't.

    And in the past the failure of neoliberal capitalism has made real deal state ownership socialism attractive, when each time that has been tried it creates the greatest and the most evil tyranny.

  • #2
    BTW, Mr Roberts served under Reagan and is touted as being the father of reaganomics. So, that might make the cons here want to listen to the man since he is not some bleeding heart liberal doing the loony tunes

    What you should take away from what he says is that the GOPhers should never vote for another GOP candidate, AND the only thing that will get rid of this deal of the private sector, big money interests destroying America is simply a revolution, preferably at the ballot boxes, by NOT voting for the establishment GOP or Democratic party.

    He also explains where this executive action power originated, which is used like some kind of Caesar today, by passing the balance of power. It was birthed during the GOP Nixon admin. when the GOP could not get control in congress but wanted to get some of their agenda up and rolling. And while the consititution did not cover this, giving such power to the president, they found a way around it. So, when you bitch and complain about a non GOP president actting like Caesar, just remember, your boys created it, so stop the bitching.

    מה מכילות החדשות?


    • #3
      Look, I do not expect any conservative here, or libertarians, to listen to Dr. Roberts, even given he was a treasury official under Reagan, or that he is a columnist to the Wall Street Journal(although I cannot imagine WSJ from ever publishing his articles, given WHO they are), but so far I think he is still with them. And he is an author, an economist, and from an earlier generation that actually had integrity and honesty, and who has no problem seeing the big picture for he is not burdened nor shackled by having to maintain ideological purity in order to be in the GOP.

      But here he is saying, in greater detail and moves outside just the change in economic models by the elites, what I have been claiming from day one. Mine came from business experience and just watching these great changes brought to us by neoliberal GOPhers and Clinton's treasonous democratic party who are also in the neoliberal camp.

      So, listen here to him on a radio show interview, reveal the big picture, and the utter corruption and idiocy of our oligarchs and their puppets, the men you put into office every two years, 4 years, 6 years.



      I had no idea that experts, some of them, were saying exactly what I have been railing against, for MSM hardly allows these men time to speak to the REAL and essential issues in 21st century America, How many people know of Dr. Roberts? I would imagine perhaps one or two people here even know who he is, and certainly not what he says. The limitation on being informed is vast in this nation today, IMO. And everything is revealed from the left, right, lib, con, paradigm, and neither party is talking about what Roberts is talking about. They ignore it, and will not talk about it, and neither will MSM, which clearly is not speaking truth to power. The game is rigged, and far too many people are watching a theater, thinking it is reality, instead of a distraction, whether it is intentional for not.

      Sanders is indeed speaking to the bought out federal gov't and bribed politicians, helped by a USSC who confused bribery with free speech. And Sanders is telling a great truth when he says that he cannot take on these great powers by himself, no one can, unless they have a vast number of americans behind him, and helping him by their calls, demonstrations, and votes, in cleaning up this oligarchic cesspool in DC that has usurped our Constitutional Republic, turning America into a genuine police state, and waging war upon America's citizens, as well as waging war overseas.

      As Roberts said, when the President was given the power to detain American citizens without charges for an unlimited time period, and given the right to murder American citizens without it being given by the justice system, that is exactly the foundation of a police state. Our designated terrorists are now just not radical muslims, but also American citizens who do not like this oligarchy and do not like, and rail against the corruption between elite special interests and gov't which is destroying America's economy, for profit.

      Apparently some americans are beginning to see more clearly what they have as a gov't, and this has made madmen like Trump popular and drawing crowds and inevitably votes, if he is not assassinated. And it has put wind in the sails of Bernie Sanders, which even the cries of him being a socialist, or communist has not killed his run for the oval office. We, the younger crowd knows nothing of FDR and how he stepped in to save capitalism from the greed driven capitalists that will crap in the bed which is America, for profit. But yet, the power of those oligarchs is even greater than in FDR's time, and they are not beyond assassinating anyone who will not fall into the lines, they draw. Some say they already killed one president back in 1963, but I do not know the truth of this.
      Last edited by Blue Doggy; 11-28-2015, 02:53 PM.

      מה מכילות החדשות?


      • #4
        I do not blame the conservatives here, to not respond to this, for if you cannot defend it, why would you even try to respond? And that GOP neoliberalism, brought back to America, by the GOP, from the 1920s, where it crashed the world's economies, is due to do this again. The 08 crash, was just a taste of what is to come, and all of this was created by turning the elites loose, getting gov't out of their way, which they then bought that same gov't and the banking cabal deregulated themselves, as the MNCs and elites took away our primary job creation engines, and sent them to a communist state, to exploit their poor for greater profits, hollowing out America, with the complicit help of first the GOP and then the Dems.

        Here, a Reagan admistration official will tell you the results of this, for you will not believe me.




        I guess I am waiting for a conservative to scream out socialism, communism, to take his mind off of what his party has created, and committed, basic treason against the American people.

        מה מכילות החדשות?


        • #5
          There is simply not enough time in the day to rebuke all the people on Youtube who make you feel all warm and fuzzy.

          מה מכילות החדשות?


          • #6
            Originally posted by Commodore View Post
            There is simply not enough time in the day to rebuke all the people on Youtube who make you feel all warm and fuzzy.

            It's lucky then that you're only being asked to reply about this one single guy.

            מה מכילות החדשות?


            • #7
              Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post
              It's lucky then that you're only being asked to reply about this one single guy.
              He has fore-worded similar conspiracy theories many times before. But they all fall to Hanlon's razor.

              Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
              Omnipotent villains petting white haired cats might make entertaining movies, but conjuring such bogeymen in real life is just a cop out that surrenders ones own power and agency to some temporal savior who simply won't be there for them when the time comes. For over a century people in this country, barely a century after they gained what no other people in history have ever had, have been surrendering the power and freedom to craft their own destiny for mythical greener pastures. First it was to the city and a cushy factory job. Then Mr. Roosevelt was going to save us all. Then Johnson's Great Society. When that failed, it was Wall St. We're still recovering from "change you can believe it". It's all the same, people have been selling their birthright for a mess of pottage since the beginning. But if you just give a little more, it will work next time.

              Thankfully, the solution is just a simple. Take responsibility for your own well being. If you ask Wall St to make your money for you, they will do it. You may find that you will have to pay for it in some other way, but you have no one to blame but yourself. People will say that there is no other way, and thats because they don't want another way.

              מה מכילות החדשות?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Commodore View Post
                There is simply not enough time in the day to rebuke all the people on Youtube who make you feel all warm and fuzzy.
                As Peter said, I just used ONE example, a very credible man, a man who's integrity cannot be questioned, and a man who has spent his live in gov't and economics, and a guy who is old enough to have seen this treason transpire in his lifetime, unlike some here. Who are clueless.

                But there are many more than him, all credible, all men of integrity, and what they all have in common is that MSM would never talk to a single one of them. For they would spill the beans, and actually inform people to the treason that has been committed upon the American people. I include you as one of the many ideological driven voters who is clueless and is quite happy living in a state of "ignorance is bliss" for to do otherwise would force you to change your mind about your sacred GOP politicians and the party in general, and the same goes for the liberal democrat.

                So argue against him, and at least do it as intelligently, for otherwise, you fail coming out of the gates.

                מה מכילות החדשות?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Commodore View Post

                  He has fore-worded similar conspiracy theories many times before. But they all fall to Hanlon's razor.



                  Omnipotent villains petting white haired cats might make entertaining movies, but conjuring such bogeymen in real life is just a cop out that surrenders ones own power and agency to some temporal savior who simply won't be there for them when the time comes. For over a century people in this country, barely a century after they gained what no other people in history have ever had, have been surrendering the power and freedom to craft their own destiny for mythical greener pastures. First it was to the city and a cushy factory job. Then Mr. Roosevelt was going to save us all. Then Johnson's Great Society. When that failed, it was Wall St. We're still recovering from "change you can believe it". It's all the same, people have been selling their birthright for a mess of pottage since the beginning. But if you just give a little more, it will work next time.

                  Thankfully, the solution is just a simple. Take responsibility for your own well being. If you ask Wall St to make your money for you, they will do it. You may find that you will have to pay for it in some other way, but you have no one to blame but yourself. People will say that there is no other way, and thats because they don't want another way.
                  One thing is obvious here. You know NOTHING of Dr. Roberts, and what he has said. For you never have spent a min of 30 minutes of actually listening to the guy, and unlike you he does not wax ideological philosophical when he speaks, when he points out the stupidity, the agendas, involved. So, you simply discount him as a conspiracy theorists, for he takes on something you must fervently believe in, as laid out by your waxing and waning philosophical. Not one bit of evidence to contradict what the Dr. says, not one.

                  He was one of the architects of Reaganomics. My money says, in your dismissal, you had no clue as to the fact of that.

                  I voted for Perot, so I blame you, and others just like you. Ha, ha. For not having enough damned sense to be logical, rational enough to make a damned decision that would eventually destroy our large middle class. Because first and foremost, you want to belong to a tribe and it doesn't matter if that tribe brought back something that destroyed our working and middle class. FDR sure as hell did not do that, and that is a fact that should stick in your throat and choke you. But facts do not matter, so not to fear.

                  Lastly, OMNIPOTENT VILLIANS is hyperbole used by you, to dismiss Roberts, but that too is a fail.(straw man) He has never talked about such for they have never existed, in a gov't that has the power of the vote in the hands of the people, FDR took them to task, for he was one of these elites, who wanted to save capitalism from their excesses created by sociopathic greed. And he did it, and he gets zero credit, from the right wingers. But that is an ego thing, an ego who cannot tolerate being wrong, even when they are so wrong it screams.

                  We already know what helps to create a prosperous America, for her people, and we can now see once again what works against that. Thankfully though, there are a growing number of conservatives that are finally coming to their senses, though probably not enough, just yet. One wonders if you ever will?

                  Yet I do not blame you for arguing against Roberts, for truth is, you cannot rationally do it. So you take another course, all to common on your side. As well on the other side today. For both are treasonous bastards, and I refuse to belong to either group.

                  So, if one compares what was created, in the interest of the majority in America, the working and middle class, and how they fared, and then one compares that to what has happened over the last 35 years, since 1981, which WAY was GOOD, BETTER for average americans? Which way did they do better under? If you answer that with honesty and integrity, it would be what FDR helped to create. That is an irrefutable fact, one of those that would choke a conservative to death when he finally swallowed it. Which of course they will not. But reality is a harsh mistress when a conservative, a GOPher, or even a modern liberal is concerned. For she will whip your asses with barbed wire.
                  Last edited by Blue Doggy; 12-04-2015, 08:48 AM.

                  מה מכילות החדשות?

                  Working...
                  X