Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Globalization continues to hollow out america..

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Globalization continues to hollow out america..

    NEW YORK (Reuters) - Alcoa Inc's plans to close its 269,000 tonne-per-year Warrick smelter, announced on Thursday, will bring U.S. aluminum output to its lowest level in more than 65 years as the industry endures tumbling prices amid rising trade tensions with China.



    Warrick is the largest currently-operating smelter in the United States and the biggest shoe to drop in a string of recent curtailments and closures, potentially boosting prices and possibly bolstering some U.S. producers' claims they are harmed by subsidized Chinese production.
    The Evansville, Indiana plant's closure, which will take place by the end of the first quarter, will leave Alcoa with just one active smelter: the 130,000 tonne-per-year Massena West plant, which was saved from closure with $70 million in New York state aid.
    It will bring annual U.S. production of aluminum, which became a key strategic material during World War II, down to around 720,000 tonnes, the lowest level since at least 1950, according to the U.S. Geological Survey
    http://news.yahoo.com/alcoa-plans-cl...2--sector.html

    We will reach a point where what made America so strong and healthy will no longer be here, as globalists seek to max out profits elsewhere by the exploitation of the poor for low wages. America will look like the carcass of a burned out building, with only rusting steel left to mark what it once was. If anyone thinks this is not intentional, driven by sociopathic greed, which destroyed and dismantled what FDR gave to the working people of America, then clearly a disconnect is involved.

    Long ago after Washington was elected, he went first to get an American tailor to make him a new suit. He next visited Jefferson and asked him to come up with a plan to create and sustain making here what the new America would consume, for this is nothing but common sense that a nation has to do this in order to be strong and viable. Jefferson gave him several points, with one being how to manufacture here, and not be devastated by cheap labor overseas. And so the tariff was created. If it cost 50 cents more an hour to make what a foreign nation was making, then you tariffed to allow for this, so that our own people would have jobs, and business would not be destroyed by cheap labor elsewhere in he world. This served us well, until the GOP and those special interests, banking, corporations, were allowed to move manufacturing offshore, to boost their profits. And so, the closure of Alcoa, created by not protecting American workers and American business has just made this nation closer to an economic paper tiger, and yet it continues on with each passing year. But this is what is created when you allow the banking cabal and MNCs to become the gov't that makes economic decisions for the people of America. And it is what oligarchy fascism looks like, when Reagan got he gov't out of the way of business. Until Reagan, gov't was operating more on the behalf of the people, and was concerned with keeping this nation strong, by her manufacturing what our consumers bought. And so, this change brought by the GOP once again shows just how stupidily destructive this GOP is, and what treasonous traitors they are to the American people. And yet, white working people will still vote for them. It incredible, and speaks to a depth of stupidity never seen before in this nation.

    And still the conservative voters holler socialism as the culprit, and with their ant view of the world, do not have enough intelligence to see the big picture, what drives it, and what is destroying this nation. Oh, its socialism they say, while private business, big business and the banking cabal is at its foundation. So until these conservative voters can become reconnected with reality, and understand that socialism has nothing to do with it, and that it is nothing but a kind of capitalism never envisioned by its founders, a capitalism that is hell bent on exploitation of America intent on sucking out its wealth, into the pockets of a few elites, then we will continue this plunge into something our ancestors would have never allowed.

    And so, if every working American does not vote for sanders, they are damn fools. And sadly enough, they will remain damned fools. For all he oligarchs have to whisper is socialism, and the conservative voting brain goes dead, and stops working. It is truly a helluva thing, for what Reagan brought back to fail this nation, to hollow it out, while the conservatives are so oblivious to the facts of what their votes have created. But what in the hell are they holding out for? Lower taxes and regulations that in their delusions they think will make America strong again, economically? But if we were to get that, and things continue to go down the tubes, what will be their excuse then? Socialism? God help us, for we are not intelligent enough to help ourselves.
    Last edited by Blue Doggy; 01-11-2016, 11:46 AM.

  • #2
    They can't compete with foreign competition. They are doing the same thing many other companies have done, go out of business. This has nothing to do with them taking their businesses to China. They didn't pressure the Republicans to open the borders to cheaper aluminum. The same thing that happened to Zenith TV and Motorola TV and Smith Corona typewriters. These companies didn't pressure the government to put them out of business.

    ?


    • #3
      And what is Komrade Sanders going to do for the Aluminum producers of America?

      1) He's going to make employing Americans in America more expensive with massive new entitlement spending.
      2) He's going to make it harder to operate a smelter with ever more meddling environmental regulation.
      3) He's going to make make it more expensive to smelt aluminum, an energy intensive process, by making energy more expensive with his global warming nonsense.

      And yet you still wonder why manufacturing has been fleeing the country.

      ?


      • #4
        Sanders, from the party who brought us NAFTA, MFN for China, and the TPP, is somehow the anti-globalization choice now.

        ?


        • #5
          Originally posted by MattInFla View Post
          Sanders, from the party who brought us NAFTA, MFN for China, and the TPP, is somehow the anti-globalization choice now.
          Sanders isn't technically a member of the Democratic party.

          ?


          • #6
            Originally posted by Commodore View Post

            Sanders isn't technically a member of the Democratic party.

            Pretty sure he is, since he is running as a Democrat.

            Bernie Sanders is a Democratic candidate for President of the United States.

            https://berniesanders.com/?nosplash=true/

            ?


            • #7
              Originally posted by MattInFla View Post
              Pretty sure he is, since he is running as a Democrat.[/FONT][/COLOR]
              Does that really make him a member of the democrat party ?

              Is Trump a member of the republican party ?

              Just thinking/wondering ...

              ... things aren't "regular" or "normal" anymore

              ?


              • #8
                Both big parties have failed the people of this country by rigging things to make it quicker and easier to outsoure our economy.

                ?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by JDJarvis View Post
                  Both big parties have failed the people of this country by rigging things to make it quicker and easier to outsoure our economy.
                  Without a doubt, this is true. And you only have to wonder what in the hell were they thinking about? It's like the whole bunch of them are worse than village idiots, for what makes any nation powerful, economically, socially, militarily is manufacturing what your own population consumes, thereby yielding sufficient standards of living for your citizens. The importance of at home manufacturing has always been essential and important, and then suddenly the whole lot of them go bonkers and start thinking irrationally. But we know what drove it, and what drove it was the greed of our elites to max out their own profits, which cannot be done when you follow Henry Ford, and pay your workers enough to buy what they are making. This is what helped to create history's largest middle class, and it is what attracted so many people to immigrate here, for they could be paid living wages for their work. But doing this inevitably limits profits of the elites. But that was the cost, and the cost didn't keep great wealth from being created here by our elites, it just limited how high their pile of gold would be.

                  What drove this utter insanity, was the effect of big money upon financing the campaigns of those who lust for power. So, maxing out profits, and the lust of power is the root cause, and for some reason the conservatives will never admit this. Instead they will create a ruse, taxes, regulations, for they will never accept that human greed will destroy a nation's working people. Hell, some of them even laud greed, as if it was absolutely necessary. While some of them who laud it, claim to believe in Christian principles. The incoherence of this has a cause as well. And that cause is the power of ideological beliefs, that mold brains, even into incoherence and ignore-ance.

                  Now there is no doubt, for we had one here a couple years ago, a liberal, who I used to argue with, that thought offshoring American middle class jobs to poor nations is what we should do to help out the poor of the world, even if you create poverty here by doing that. So there is a faction among the liberals, who like the idea of offshoring jobs, to help the poor, but you can bet your ass these liberals are not losing their jobs to the profit motive. So they are hypocrites, and in so far as I am concerned, the scum of the earth. For it is the responsiblility of other nations, to help their own people out, by making what they consume, as we used to do, and paying a living wage. This is the model that should have spread around the world, for each nation has to be responsible to their own people. But what stops that? The same mentality that sent American jobs to cheap labor. The elites of those other nations are responsible for their own lack of living standards of their own people.

                  Trade should be used as it was traditionally used. To foster friendship between nations, as to avoid war, and to import what we do not make here, like fine French wine, great cameras and high priced cars for the rich. For every product imported means that jobs are not here, in making what is imported. And every product exported to another nation, represents jobs there, that could be, but do not exist, employing that nation's citizens. Exports are hurting the people in the nation we export to, as every import here, hurts jobs in America. That is just the fact of the matter, that no one thinks about, or wants to think about. Every nation should be self sustaining, for that provides jobs that are essential for the people who live in that nation. And if the people were important, and gov't represented them, this is how it would be. But the people are not important, only the profits of the elites have importance, and that drives economic and trade policy. That is a hard fact, that is irrefutable.

                  ?


                  • #10
                    Arthur Brooks: Ceding The Poverty Fight To Liberals Has Cannibalized Three Generations Of Americans' Futures

                    Brooks was pleased that the panels referred to the poor as people, with a sense of optimism for the future. How can we foster a reconstruction of the American dream, especially since conservatives have retreated from this field of public policy, much to the detriment of the nation? The result has been three more generations lost to poverty. When conservatives cede areas of policy entirely to the left, peoples lives are wasted. Speaker Ryan added that the current way of fighting poverty is paternalistic, condescending and arrogant. Playing off of Woodsons remarks, the speaker noted that local communities are where well find the answers. Theyre the brain trust. He also emphasized that people, communities, churches, and civic groups are the ones who need to be on the frontlines of poverty, not the government. Government cans surely play a role in this fight, but it cannot be the principle actor in this fight.
                    When it comes to work, there are two types of people, according to Brooks. Those who view it as a blessing and those who think it's punishment. Both liberals and conservatives have channeled the latter to suit their own political agenda. The left is against work requirements for welfare programs because they think it punished the poor. The right wants those accountability measures because they really want to sock it to those on the welfare rolls. Work isnt a source of punishment. We cant treat the poor as the other in American society; we need to change this. Because the pursuit of happiness was written with the poor in mind; the riff raff, as Brooks mentioned, is us. We need policies and a philosophy that rewards and encourages good work. After all, work is part of the foundation, which includes faith, family, and community, that provides a path to happiness.
                    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattves...fight-n2104156

                    ?

                    Working...
                    X