Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

The great middle class is in trouble...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Re: Hey, Boss, We Elected Somebody Else in Your Place Because You Think Only GUBMINTS Rule

    Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
    "Living wage" is one of those stupid liberal terms that substitutes for actual thinking. If all those people are not making a "living wage" how is it they do not have near 100% turnover in staff as those peolple must be dying.

    And again, YOUR preference (as stated) would be that those people receive NO WAGES.

    Here is a fact, if the worker is not being paid the value of his labor, then he would have absolutely NO trouble going and getting work from someone who will pay him what it is worth. If there is nobody willing to pay him, then he is free to work for himself.

    Here is a question for you, do you believe that fast food workers in this country are 'underpaid for the value of their work?" If so, why haven't they all just opened their own fast food places as employee owners and reaped the full reward of their labors?




    You just keep making statements which demonstrates your perception of the world is 180 degrees off. Here is a question for you, is buying a lottery ticket an act of immorality and greed?

    As for your example of an ugly man married to a sexy, beautiful woman didn't want that sort of woman to marry is perplexing and shows how shallow you are in your thinking. Why would it matter whether than man is ugly or not? Ugly or handsome, only the most shallow thinking person (both in their values and their intellectual scope) would conclude that the only conceivable reason that such a person would end up with a sexy, beautiful woman was because that was their goal. Has it ever occured to you that this person's goal was to find the person that made them happiest, a friend, a companion with similar interests and values, and that the looks were incidental?

    When did Sam Walton go from being an entrepreneur to being immoral and greedy? Was it when he built his second store? Third, fourty seventh? Unless you can give an objective answer, than you are really just rationalizing your own jealousy and fixation on others who have more than you.

    Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
    I was not greedy and this caused me to pay my employees more than industry average for wages in my sector. My competitors were greedy little beings who would never pay their employees these wages, and they would often use the excuse of, " we are paying the industry average, and if you go elsewhere, the pay will be basically unchanged". I always got some of their best employees over the decades, which grew my business, and allowed me to retire early while I could still enjoy retirement. The cost? I am much less wealthy than I could have been. But I was not driven by greed, and a need to show others that I had arrived. My competitors indeed were caught up in such childish games. And their workers suffered and still suffer due to the greed of these owners. I like using real world examples, because it isn't theoretical, but actuality. And I like staying grounded in the way things really are, as opposed to some ideal created by a creative, selfish brain. And that is why I have little time for the defenders of the greedy elites. Greed is indefensible but that doesn't stop your team from defending it, or simply saying it doesn't exist in the wealthy. What else could you do, if you support the rich elites? LOL

    Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
    So, why didn't those people all come to work for you? Why couldn't you hire all of them? And ask yourself this, suppose you paid your employees the same as your competitors, and realized greater profit because of it. What would you have done with that extra money? You could have given it to a charity devoted to helping the truly less fortunate. Instead, Here is a question for you, do you believe that fast food workers in this country are 'underpaid for the value of their work?" If so, why haven't they all just opened their own fast food places as employee owners and reaped the full reward of their laborsyou thoughtlessly paid one group of people more than their labors were worth in the marketplace at the expense of being able to help those who had far less than either you or your workers.

    And another BIZARRO ass-backwards understanding of reality. How does hiring more workers grow your business, because if this is true, rather than some irrational example of post hoc ergo propter hoc, then every business in the world would go out and start hiring more employees because guess what world! Blue Doggy has figured out the secret to growing a business...just start hiring more people.

    Hell, I have a small business on the side (started as a hobby) Who knew that the only thing standing between me and wealth was immorality, greed, and not being smart enough to just start hiring lots of workers...because hiring workers will cause my business to grow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Let me pull out a few of your points and address them...

    Here is a question for you, do you believe that fast food workers in this country are 'underpaid for the value of their work?" If so, why haven't they all just opened their own fast food places as employee owners and reaped the full reward of their labors
    Having managed a McD's for a couple years when I was still young, yes, they are underpaid. Underpaid because if you own a couple franchises, you can live in far above the average guy, big unnecessary, pretentious house, his and her Mercedes and vacations in all of the posh locations, worthy of envy by the lessor among us. I know some of these franchise owners, and the income was so lucrative for owning a McD's franchise that you had to know someone in the McD corporation to get one of those. I know, I tried after college. And this was back when it took twice as many employees to run a shift at a McD's. These days they only need half as many because so much of their faire comes pre cooked and assembled. Was the savings in labor costs passed on to the employees? LOL. Should I have even asked such a silly question?

    Is buying a lottery ticket driven by a greed to be like the folks the cons worship immoral? If the act is driven by greed, you bet your butt it is. Is gambling immoral when you know humans are starving to death? Most certainly. But look, the morality of this society is immorality. And just as prevalent on the right as the left.

    You are not only responsible for yourself, but for others. Or you can choose NOT to be your brother's keeper as Cain chose. Your individualism is basically void of being your brother's keeper. And so your individualism itself is an immoral thing. Pretty simple stuff here, unless your head is filled with the ideas of other brains and can't actually look yourself at the simplicity of it all.

    In regards to the ugly female versus the beautiful one, have you ever known a man who would never settle for a plain or ugly looking woman? Surely you have, with your wide experience in life. He wasn't looking for just any companion, but one that society particularly liked, especially other males. Why? Because he defines himself with his property, his position, his property, even in how his wife looks. This the the ego at work, and it defines itself with the material things, including beautiful females. He is proud, he is haughty and his very existence is proof of that. If one can look without the ideological blinders in place.

    You want me to give you an answer as to when Walton became greedy, and if I don't then all that I say is rubbish? I don't like your parameters, especially when it is impossible to know when this happened since I have never spent one second in his company. I don't know him personally. And so when it happened is just a guess. When did Obama feel the need for power as to run for his first political office? You can guess, but it's a guess. But the knowledge that greed is generally present prior to creating and hoarding great wealth can be seen within the each of us, in our own self centered consciousness. I felt it at one time in my life, and most men do. If one is neurotically driven by it, they don't much care who they step on in achieving the goal of getting rich and hoarding it. Greed doesn't care about anything but the futile attempt made to satiate it. But it can never be satiated by the same consciousness that is a victim to it.

    So then you ask why all of my competitors employees didn't come to work for me? LOL. Some of them did, the great ones I kept in my back pocket to call on when needed. And those very experienced and skillfull men make me and themselves a good bit of money over the years. They made my job so much easier. No turnover, no call ins when they just didn't feel like coming to work, and they knew their efficiency meant a larger quarterly bonus. They actually felt as if they were a very important part of this company, and by god they were. And I treated them as such. Slapping a guy on the back for a job well done and with an extra pay check to illustrate I really believed that instead of pointing out his errors worked better for me. Morale in my business was always optimum. Why? Because I am not a greed driven human being. And didn't run my business and treat
    others as if I were.

    I could not run a mom and pops burger stand with the way I ran my manufacturing business. And so I would never open a business that didn't pay a living wage to my employees. And I feel those that do are whale shit. I will never exploit another human being for their labor so that I might be rich and then hoard that wealth. And I detest those that do, and I detest those that think it is perfectly fine to do a basic immoral act. Only an immoral society could ever see this as acceptable. And of course conservatives.

    If you actually think and believe that capitalism has to be immoral, you are delusional. The men of my youth who owned their own business, that I knew personally, never exploited the poor for their wages. Every single one of them paid a living wage, and felt compelled morally to do that. But they died out and the greedy took over and have no problem in not paying a man enough to support himself, even in an austere fashion. Anyone who doesn't pay a man enough to live on has no business being in business. He is an exploiter of other people. Which makes him highly immoral, no matter how much you may look up to them.
    Last edited by OldmanDan; 11-08-2013, 06:18 PM.

    ?


    • #92
      Re: The great middle class is in trouble...

      Even as a kid, when I read about people who were rich, not actors, but people who owned and ran companies.

      I didn't say, wow I deserve what they have so they must have it taken and given to me.

      I said, damn, I am going to bust my ass and become one of them through my own actions.

      I may not be 1% but if the deal I just had presented to me goes through, I will jump into something like the 4%. Not because I sat there whining about how some CEO makes millions but because I busted my ass and strove to improve myself through hard work and occasionally working for others.

      Got to love getting MS certified, Novell Certified, Red Hat Certified, IBM, Dell, HP etc etc etc certified ALL on the dime of the companies I worked for before actually opening my own. It is like going to college and having the company reimburse you for those classes that you pass. Additionally some of my coworkers have moved to management of the companies I worked for because they took those certs and college degrees and used them to move up the corporate ladder.

      People who did not sit there and whine about what someone else has, envy, but actually worked to get their piece of the pie the old fashioned way, through hard work and effort.

      ?


      • #93
        Re: Hey, Boss, We Elected Somebody Else in Your Place Because You Think Only GUBMINTS Rule

        Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
        I could not run a mom and pops burger stand with the way I ran my manufacturing business. And so I would never open a business that didn't pay a living wage to my employees. And I feel those that do are whale shit. I will never exploit another human being for their labor so that I might be rich and then hoard that wealth. And I detest those that do, and I detest those that think it is perfectly fine to do a basic immoral act. Only an immoral society could ever see this as acceptable. And of course conservatives.
        Do you eat pizza? Doughnuts? Have yo bought anything from a non-corporate business?

        What you don't realize is that people like me who own mom and pop businesses, IE Small local businesses, work hard. We are not some corporate CEO that has a contract to run a big business. You just shit on most of america with that statement.

        Go to Wal Mart, McDonalds, Pizza Hut we local business people don't want your business. I wonder if the local store where you buy something would say about you calling them whale shit.

        BD you really are less than what you call us small business owners. As far as I am concerned you insulted me directly with that statement and I have every right to respond in kind but that would be against TOS, you slid it by and I am quite sure no one other then me will say you are less than what you called me or call you to task for it.

        I hope when you buy a pizza or burger from a local store they spit in it.

        ?


        • #94
          Re: The great middle class is in trouble...

          Seems that Blue is oblivious to the business challenges that these small local business people are facing in these challenging environment.

          It seems that he believes there's an infinite amount of money to be fleeced from customers so that local businesses can over pay for the value that their employees bring.

          I already know that he doesn't believe that here is such a thing as a job market with determines the compensation rate for every role that an employee can fill, and that there is a compensation rate that is essentially self-managing.

          He's fallen into the liberal / progressive mental trap that all these things don't matter; that businesses should go out of business trying to deliver on his mandate (and then get a government bailout?), namely a living wage for every working person. Seems a rather socialistic and / or communistic point of view, in that regard. The market determines this compensation far, far more effectively than one person's or government's edict. It just doesn't work that way.

          Yes, I've discussed this a number of times with Blue, and he's unwilling to go there; unwilling to accept the reality of the situation. Kinda surprising, really, as I somehow got the impression that the was mentally flexible to accept and accommodate new information. But I've been wrong before.

          ?

          Working...
          X