Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

About That Global Warming...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
    Yes, think about the implications of liberal beliefs. If CO2 emissions are a threat to the planet...doesn't that mean every exhale we take is a crime against the planet in their view?
    At your next doctors appointment - for whatever reason - your lung capacity will also be checked.

    This will be used to levy the proper tax against you for carbon emissions.

    This will be great for our criminal enterprise government, who will of course make themselves even more money off of us.

    No scam is too crazy for them.

    ?


    • I suspect in their heart of hearts, liberals consider the mass abortion industry they so love as part of the "green" economy, reducing our carbon emissions by slaughtering would be living, carbon spewing human beings. After all, they have already proven their simply start from the baseless assumption that nature MUST be good (unless it is the sex you were born with) and man's impact on anything MUST be bad (or at the very least "can't be good")

      ?


      • Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
        I suspect in their heart of hearts, liberals consider the mass abortion industry they so love as part of the "green" economy, reducing our carbon emissions by slaughtering would be living, carbon spewing human beings. After all, they have already proven their simply start from the baseless assumption that nature MUST be good (unless it is the sex you were born with) and man's impact on anything MUST be bad (or at the very least "can't be good")
        why must we turn every thread an argument about abortion?

        ?


        • A good summary of the Paris Climate Deal
          Obama's Decisions Doomed The Paris Climate Accord To Failure In The US, Experts Say


          http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/03/ob...s-experts-say/

          And European hypocrisy.
          Europe Slams Trump In Public On Climate, Lobbies Him In Private For Natural Gas Exports

          http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/03/eu...l-gas-exports/

          ?


          • Originally posted by redrover View Post

            why must we turn every thread an argument about abortion?
            It doesn't, only when it is clearly relevant, like when the fact that Liberals believe that the very act of human beings breathing is polluting the environment!

            Can you deny the logical inference that people who believe that carbon emissions are a threat to life on Earth, and who do not view abortion as morally wrong, would view abortion as merely another means of decreasing carbon emissions?
            Last edited by Marcus1124; 06-04-2017, 10:26 AM.

            ?


            • Originally posted by Marcus1124 View Post
              It doesn't, only when it is clearly relevant, like when the fact that Liberals believe that the very act of human beings breathing is polluting the environment!

              Can you deny the logical inference that people who believe that carbon emissions are a threat to life on Earth, and who do not view abortion as morally wrong, would view abortion as merely another means of decreasing carbon emissions?
              And as the following article states; abortion is a liberals high sacrament. ..."...abortion is the high sacrament considered even holier and more sacred to liberals than gay marriage or genital mutilation. The battlefield concerning the sanctity of human life sets the stage for every other cultural battle."

              ....

              Life is valuable because it is life, he said. If you deny this, then you deny everything. There is no reason for justice, fairness, equity, compassion, or charity if human life has no value, or merely a value contingent upon whatever parameters weve arbitrarily assigned. There can be no justification for any human right if we are simply commodities whose stock falls or rises. This is why the war against liberalism must begin with the sanctity of life. If liberalism can redefine life strip it of its value and its purpose the game is over. Theres nothing left to argue about.

              ....

              Liberals achieved monumental success with the legalization of same sex marriage. But that wasnt enough. Liberalism must be continually progressing, thus the reason for the word progressive. When the movement gains ground, it must secure more and more. Its never enough.

              Liberalism has no truth at its foundation, so it can only keep moving, said Walsh. Christians live in a house built on rock, but secular progressives have no house at all. They are ideological nomads, wandering even farther into the ether...."


              https://afajournal.org/past-issues/2...r-own-devices/

              ?


              • Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                And as the following article states; abortion is a liberals high sacrament. ..."...abortion is the high sacrament considered even holier and more sacred to liberals than gay marriage or genital mutilation. The battlefield concerning the sanctity of human life sets the stage for every other cultural battle."

                ....

                Life is valuable because it is life, he said. If you deny this, then you deny everything. There is no reason for justice, fairness, equity, compassion, or charity if human life has no value, or merely a value contingent upon whatever parameters weve arbitrarily assigned. There can be no justification for any human right if we are simply commodities whose stock falls or rises. This is why the war against liberalism must begin with the sanctity of life. If liberalism can redefine life strip it of its value and its purpose the game is over. Theres nothing left to argue about.

                ....

                Liberals achieved monumental success with the legalization of same sex marriage. But that wasnt enough. Liberalism must be continually progressing, thus the reason for the word progressive. When the movement gains ground, it must secure more and more. Its never enough.

                Liberalism has no truth at its foundation, so it can only keep moving, said Walsh. Christians live in a house built on rock, but secular progressives have no house at all. They are ideological nomads, wandering even farther into the ether...."


                https://afajournal.org/past-issues/2...r-own-devices/

                A very wise post. I have said many times that when any society begins to lose the value and sanctity of human life, as abortion clearly does, this reverberates throughout the society and shows up in other areas. Like the all to often willingness for some cops to kill, when it was not necessary. Or when we invade other nations, starting wars which kill others not engaged in combat, or economically sanction another nation which results in untold deaths of children. Abortion, for birth control, has devalued human life in this society, not just limited to killing an unborn, developing human being. It devalues all of human life, consciously and unconsciously. And the sad thing is also that with modern birth control easily accessible, we should have hardly any abortions at all. We have them primarily because we subsidize irresponsible behavior, and most abortions come because of the refusal to be a responsible human being. This absurd, irrational idea that the rights of a female trumps the right of human life of another being has been forced upon the youth, brainwashing them to believe the right of convenience transcends the right of human life.

                ?


                • Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                  A good summary of the Paris Climate Deal
                  Obama's Decisions Doomed The Paris Climate Accord To Failure In The US, Experts Say


                  http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/03/ob...s-experts-say/

                  And European hypocrisy.
                  Europe Slams Trump In Public On Climate, Lobbies Him In Private For Natural Gas Exports

                  http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/03/eu...l-gas-exports/
                  I am elated trump got us out of this scheme to continue to deindustrialize America, in order that other nations can wreck the environment to keep slave labor consumer goods maximally profitable for our elites. And this deal was just another way to take from working and middle class americans, to redistribute into the hands of the filthy rich elites and tin pot dictators in developing nations. As we strangle our economy which is what feeds our own people. This scheme as well as the other schemes to create lower living standards and greater income disparity serves the New World Order Elites, who benefit from these schemes as it devastates everyone else. This, these schemes, are serving nothing but fascism, world wide fascism, in the form of oligarchy. For this is what Globalism is, the destruction of nation states, national sovereignty, placing all of the power into the hands of so few people. Everything you see up until trump won served this vision, including this climate change scheme. And if you look at it, things like the Paris Accord, it is so obvious what is going on. Right there in black and white.

                  ?


                  • Originally posted by Blue Doggy View Post
                    I am elated trump got us out of this scheme to continue to deindustrialize America, in order that other nations can wreck the environment to keep slave labor consumer goods maximally profitable for our elites. And this deal was just another way to take from working and middle class americans, to redistribute into the hands of the filthy rich elites and tin pot dictators in developing nations. As we strangle our economy which is what feeds our own people. This scheme as well as the other schemes to create lower living standards and greater income disparity serves the New World Order Elites, who benefit from these schemes as it devastates everyone else. This, these schemes, are serving nothing but fascism, world wide fascism, in the form of oligarchy. For this is what Globalism is, the destruction of nation states, national sovereignty, placing all of the power into the hands of so few people. Everything you see up until trump won served this vision, including this climate change scheme. And if you look at it, things like the Paris Accord, it is so obvious what is going on. Right there in black and white.
                    As is pointed out here;

                    https://www.uspoliticsonline.com/for...698#post541698

                    The scam has been admitted and exposed.

                    See this article and the clear admissions made in it.

                    http://www.americanthinker.com/artic...l_classes.html

                    ?


                    • DELINGPOLE: "Global Warming" Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017

                      "Global warming" is a myth - so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.
                      In other words, the so-called Consensus on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true.

                      http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...c-papers-2017/

                      ?


                      • Originally posted by OldmanDan View Post
                        DELINGPOLE: "Global Warming" Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017

                        "Global warming" is a myth - so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.
                        In other words, the so-called Consensus on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true.

                        http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...c-papers-2017/
                        Of course it's a scam. So far throughout time, all scientists that were acknowledged, proclaiming with confidence, what will happen to the temperature of the earth in time to come, were WRONG. We did not go into an ice age in the 1900's as predicted by scientists.

                        This didn't happen either:
                        (CNSNews.com) A 2007 prediction that summer in the North Pole could be ice-free by 2013 that was cited by former Vice President Al Gore in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech has proven to be off by 920,000 square miles.

                        In his Dec. 10, 2007 Earth has a fever speech, Gore referred to a prediction by U.S. climate scientist Wieslaw Maslowski that the Arctics summer ice could completely disappear by 2013 due to global warming caused by carbon emissions.
                        http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...disappear-2013


                        The most logical of reasoning, that I read somewhere, (maybe here), for scientist who are not on the payroll and think that global warming could be due greatly to emissions, is because they haven't researched in depth, other things that could be effecting the climate cycles.

                        Our gov't has been corrupting and destroying everything important that they get their hands on. Even those in the scientific field who are supposed to be our intellect of the day and the future.

                        We sat in awe that one man, Hitler could convince so many people that a falsehood is a truth. Yet we are not capable of comprehending that the same thing is being done regarding climate change. If "so many people say it's so, then it must be so." Have we learned nothing.

                        ?


                        • The global scamming scheme coming apart.

                          Uh oh !! They're going to have to go on a massive campaign of repeating lies again ... Oh,... oh yes they've been doing that.

                          Maybe they'll have to slow down on the story of president trump getting elected by Zimchacha from Mars ..

                          . . or was it Putin from russia ?

                          Doesn't matter, they're going to have to cut back on one, to give more repeating coverage to the other. Maybe organize some "protests" or "rallies." Really spread it around and make it look big & important to people ! Every weather forecast everywhere in America, be sure to mention how 'unusual' these latest 'weather events' have been and relate it to 'climate change.'

                          That should do it . .

                          They HOPE !

                          It's probably just not going to work. Those poor faithful few will be pretty upset.

                          Desperate Al will probably make another dumb movie.
                          Maybe he'll get Michael Moore to help him, make it really fun LOL


                          -----------------------------------------

                          ...the self-correcting mechanisms of science finally are contradicting the global warming fraud. Despite billions of dollars of grants for those who support the so-called consensus (itself, a lie), and the fear of retaliation, scholars interested in the truth are publishing a wave of scientific papers contradicting the orthodoxy.

                          ..

                          The No Tricks Zone has catalogued 650 skeptic scientific papers already, and as we see, the wave is growing larger.

                          The huge problem for the Warmists is that cutting edge research now works against them.


                          ...

                          http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...ing_fraud.html

                          ?


                          • ?


                            • A global warming research study in Canada has been cancelled because of unprecedented thick summer ice.

                              The study, entitled BaySys, is a $17-million four-year-long program headed by the University of Manitoba. It was planning to conduct the third leg of its research by sending 40 scientists from five Canadian universities out into the Bay on the Canadian Research Icebreaker CCGS Amundsen to study contributions of climate change and regulation on the Hudson Bay system.

                              But it had to be cancelled because the scientists icebreaker was required by the Canadian Coast Guard for a rather more urgent purpose rescuing fishing boats and supply ships which had got stuck in the unprecedented ice conditions.

                              It became clear to me very quickly that these werent just heavy ice conditions, these were unprecedented ice conditions, Dr. David Barber, the lead scientist on the study, told VICE. We were finding thick multi-year sea ice floes which on level ice were five metres thick it was much, much thicker and much, much heavier than anything you would expect at that latitude and at that time of year.

                              The Caitlin Expedition supported by the Prince of Wales in which Pen Haddow and his team had to abandon their trip to the North Pole because it was colder than theyd expected.
                              http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...ecedented-ice/

                              ?


                              • STUDY BLOWS 'GREENHOUSE THEORY OUT OF THE WATER'

                                BOZEMAN, Mont. A new scientific paper contends the entire foundation of the man-made global-warming theory the assumption that greenhouse gases warm the atmosphere by trapping heat is wrong.

                                If confirmed, the studys findings would crush the entire climate change movement to restrict CO2 emissions, the authors assert

                                Some experts contacted by WND criticized the paper, while others advised caution.

                                Still others suggested that the claimed discovery represents a massive leap forward in human understanding a new paradigm.

                                The paper argues that concentrations of CO2 and other supposed greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have virtually no effect on the earths temperature.

                                They conclude the entire greenhouse gas theory is incorrect.

                                Instead, the earths greenhouse effect is a function of the sun and atmospheric pressure, which results from gravity and the mass of the atmosphere, rather than the amount of greenhouse gases such as CO2 and water vapor in the atmosphere.
                                http://www.wnd.com/2017/07/study-blo...-of-the-water/

                                ?

                                Working...
                                X