Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules - You must read(Updated!)

DISCLAIMER

You agree to NOT use this site or its affiliated sites, services you may have access to as a result of being a member here (subscriber or otherwise), to post items (images, textual material, etc.) that are pornographic in nature, illegal in the United States and/or the country you reside in, support or encourage illegal activities (e.g., terrorism), advertise for your own personal profit, or send unsolicited messages (i.e. SPAM) to members or non-members.

AND

You agree that if any clause or component of this document is found to not be legally binding in a court of law of proper jurisdiction then the remainder of this document shall remain fully binding and in full force.

AND

You agree to NOT hold Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. (makers of the forum software), uspoliticsonline.com, sites affiliated with uspoliticsonline.com, its administrators, its moderators, others associated with its operation, and its owners liable for any and all of the following (in whole or in part):
Personal insults/attacks by other members.
The content posted by other members, whether directed at you personally or a label/classification you associate with. This includes remarks you consider to be libelous or slanderous in any way.
Any financial or time loss due to your participation here or as a result of something you read at this site, including posts/PMs by other members and feature(s)/software available at the domain uspoliticsonline.com.
The dissemination of any personal information about you as a result of either your negligence (e.g. staying logged into a computer that others have access to) or willingness to post such information on a public and or private forum, private message or chat box. This includes using your real name or other details that could allow other members and/or the general public to determine your true identity. You are prohibited from using your real name on these forums, either as your username or in posts / PMs you write.

FORUM RULES, IN ADDITION TO THE DISCLAIMER

1. These rules apply to all sections of USPOL, including public and private forums, blogs, and visitor messages.

2. You cannot attack and/or personally insult someone. You cannot bait other forum members; this includes referring to posters by derogatory terms. Please, remain courteous and respectful to all forum members at all times. You agree to take responsibility for reporting such posts when you come across them. Please, use the ignore feature if need be. Any member who intentionally and continually posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response, or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, may be regarded as a troll by staff, and have their account suspended or banned.

3. You cannot harass (sexually or otherwise) other members. This includes malicious, slanderous, or defamatory comments. If you are not sure if something you write is inappropriate or not then don't say it. Err on the side of caution.

4. Copying and Pasting Articles, and Starting New Threads. You cannot simply cut and paste in posts or when starting threads. You MUST provide the identifying information (source, author, date, and URL). You must also offer some original thoughts along with the cut and paste. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts from the article. Excerpts really shouldnt be more then a paragraph or two. Furthermore, if you use images or other copyrighted material in your posts or signature you must have permission of the copyright holder unless you know for a fact that the image is in the public domain. In addition:
a. It must include the identifying information; e.g., where available, the author, the publication, the date, the URL.
b. The member must offer some context, including: How did you hear of this article? What is your opinion? Why is it important to you? Why should it be important to forum readers? The more context you provide, the more you assist others in gauging the excerpted information's significance.
c. You may copy and paste an excerpt or series of excerpts, not the whole thing or even the majority of the whole thing to encourage people to read the entire article.

A violation of any of the above will result in the deletion or closing of the post or thread and could earn you a warning or suspension. If you have any questions concering any of the above please PM a moderator and we will be happy to clarify.

5. You cannot post the same thing in multiple forums. You must not open similar threads about the same or a similar topic. You cannot spam the board or send unsolicited messages to members via PM, email or any other means.

6. Do not post off-topic. You cannot derail a thread with off topic posts.

7. You cannot shout in posts. This includes posting in all CAPS, bold, lIkE tHiS, and extra large font. Posts should also be one color, although you may use an additional color for highlighting ideas you wish to address.

8. You may not alter quotes in a way that misrepresents what was originally said.

9. Multiple accounts are not allowed. If you are found to have more than one account all accounts will be permanently terminated.

10. You cannot have a user name, avatar, signature, or post images that are deliberately offensive. That includes the display of overly explicit or graphic images that may not be suitable for minors.

11. Signatures can not have more than three lines of text, with a font size no larger than "4", and no more than two font colors. Images in signatures cannot be any larger than 800 pixels wide x 200 pixels tall. Animated images are not allowed.

12. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses, spyware or any other malicious code or harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services.

13. Discussion of moderation actions in public and/or private forums is not permitted. Moderation actions include warnings, suspensions and the editing or deletion of posts. If a member has a concern about a moderation action, he or she is invited to address it with the board staff via Private Message. This rule exists to protect the privacy of all posters with regards to disciplinary action. The moderator team will never publicly discuss the warnings/suspensions of any posters, and we ask that you return the favor, whether about yourself or another poster. Posting about moderation actions in the public forums constitutes a violation. You are free to discuss a moderation action via Private Message with the moderator involved, but you may not harass or abuse the moderators (as already specified in the forum rules). In practical terms, this means that once a moderator tells you his or her decision is final, no further PMs about that moderation action are permitted. If you have a concern about a moderation action, you are free to appeal to a Forum Administrator via Private Message. You may only discuss moderator activities or discussion of moderation with staff member if you chose to private message and are not under any circumstances allowed to use the PM function to forward or promote moderator discussion in regards to specific forum action, amongst other regular members. Administrators do reserve the right to read said PMs and may do so ; if that results in discovery of messaging between posters of such moderator discussion then it will lead to the same violation being received for discussing said moderator actions on the forum. If you receive a message to the effect of having been given moderator information, please report it to a member of staff. Engaging back in that discussion with the original violator will earn you just as stiff a sanction.

14. Do not ignore moderators or administrators. Do not repost something a moderator or administrator has deleted. You cannot have moderators or administrators on your ignore list.

15. Only post in English. Short passages in foreign languages may be acceptable if its use seems helpful for the ongoing discussion and when there is no indication of a potential violation of the forum rules. Always provide a translation into English in such cases. In case of doubt, the incident will be regarded as a violation, no matter of the actual meaning of the foreign language text.

16. The use of words/comments etc. written by other posters, without approval of the poster in your personal signature is not allowed nor are references, by name, to other posters allowed.

17. Please pay attention to announcements by Forum staff that will be found in the "Welcome! / News & Announcements" forum from time to time.

18. Use of "liar", "lies", "lying", etc. Accusing someone of being a "liar" or similar accusations towards other posters will generally be regarded as implying an insult and therewith as a violation of the forum rules. "I question the validity of your statement because...", "That's not the truth" or "you are wrong about that" are sufficient for any decent discussion if you want to disagree with somebody's assertions.

19. Thread opening restriction for new members. In order to control SPAM, new members must have moderator approval to start their own threads.

20. Thread titles must relate to the discussion within. Do not make misleading titles, or titles such as "Guess what..." or "You'll never believe this...". Members need to be able to identify the general gist of the thread via the title. Profanity in thread titles is not permitted.

21. Forum members are instructed to use forum tools and abilities for their intended purposes and no other. If members identify a forum glitch or weakness of any kind that allows you to see or do something you know you shouldn't, please report it. Being aware of any unintended access to the Forum and failing to take appropriate steps to notify staff of said access issues, will create a presumption of seeking to take advantage of the issue, will result in either account suspension, or banishment.

22. Any link to a site that contains graphic content, must contain a warning describing what a person might reasonably expect to view if they click on said link. No graphic pictures are to be posted on the Forum.

23. Threats or advocations of violence toward a public figure, or member of the Forum, will not be tolerated. Conversation about revolution or the like is not prohibited by this rule; directly calling for violence is, eg It's time to kill every <redacted> that voted for the bill, is not permitted.

24. Accounts with no posts will be deleted after 30 days. Inactive accounts with low post histories may be deleted after one year.

25. Private forums are something offered to members that decide to contribute directly to this site via donations. These donations help immensely in keeping this site up and running. Private forums are designed to allow the contributing member discuss whatever he/she wants to and to have the power to direct that discussion in whatever way he/she chose. They were not designed nor are they intended for simply talking trash about members that don't have access to the forum. While the targeted members cannot see the forum or the comments, it creates a negative atmosphere that really isn't necessary. If you want to totally rip apart ideas, ideologies, political parties, etc. that is fine. We simply ask that you don't use the private forums as a means to attack other members that aren't privy to such comments. It is difficult enough to have a political discussion forum because the discussion of politics is inherently heated as people are so passionate about their beliefs...the ones that take the time to come to such a site in the first place at least. The idea of private forums is so people of similar political persuasions can discuss whatever they want without fear of being attacked. Nonetheless, we hope that a certain level of maturity would foster itself within such an arena and not simply lend itself to a bashing forum.

Private Forums are governed by all of the above Forum rules. In addition:
  • Private forums that essentially become abandoned homes will be subject to deletion, donation or reorganization. Just like elsewhere in life, clubs sometimes lose their vitality and purpose for a myriad of reasons. If it becomes clear that a private forum has clearly lost its vitality and nobody is going to really use it anymore, owners are advised to consider whether to reuse the forum for something new and productive rather than let them linger or notify the Administration that the forum should be rearranged for other purposes, closed, merged with other compatible private forums, donated to others for new purposes, etc. Do not be concerned that your forum must be a membership and post count race with others to avoid falling under this policy; the question is whether your forum has actual vitality instead of being 'brain dead.'
  • Additionally, private forums may only be owned by subscribed members in the Platinum or Diamond categories.
  • Should the owner of a private forum be banned, quit USPOL or otherwise abandon the forum the PF will be transferred to another owner or closed.
  • Propriety of private forums. Administration staff will determine the desirability of a proposed private forum and enact any conditions upon it to ensure its purpose is productive.
  • Any and all instances of sharing accounts by allowing someone else to log in under their own account so they can see into private forums for which they are otherwise not permitted to access, will be deemed violation of the double account rule and all caught doing so will be permanently banned.
  • Relaying private forum posts and information to other posters who are not members of the particular private forum for any negative or destructive purpose (eg mean-spirited gossip, fueling interpersonal disputes, etc), is not permitted, and will constitute a violation of the Forum rules.
  • For purposes of monitoring USPOL Terms of Service Administrative staff (not Moderators) will have access to Private Forums.
  • All Private Forums must have at least one active Administrator as a member for purposes of handling issues which cannot be addressed through moderation permissions.
  • Discussion of moderation activities is prohibited on the open site and is likewise prohibited in Private Forums.

26. The administrators and moderators reserve the right to edit and/or delete a post,and/or close a thread, and/or delete a thread at any time if of the opinion that the post is too obscene, inappropriate, or the discussion has run its course.

27. 'Back seat moderating' is not allowed. If you take issue with another poster's contribution to the forum, you're welcome to report any posts you think are out of line, but you should not bring it up publicly within the forum.

28. Images in posts (whether embedded or hot linked) must be reasonable in size. 800x800 should be considered a good rule of thumb. Excessively large images make it difficult for users on mobile devices to load pages. If necessary please simply link to very large images using the URL tags. In addition, the following images are not permitted (including, but not limited to pages with images or videos containing):
  • Strategically covered nudity
  • Sheer or see-through clothing
  • Lewd or provocative poses
  • Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches

29. Any solicitation or communication involving sports betting / gambling / online casinos / bookies and or internet based card or slot machine systems or sites will lead to all said content being physically removed from the site and server, and will lead to any and or all parties involved being permanently removed and banned from the site to the farthest extent possible. This includes any links to any form of bookmaker, casino, any type of game or match or event where money transfers on the outcome or link of any sort to wire act violations and or anything in violation of either the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, or the Federal wire Act. This applies not only to the open forum but all and or any chat rooms, articles, private messages and or private forums. All content that violates this rule will be deleted, without notice.

CONSEQUENCES

Failure to comply with any of the forum rules may result in your posts being edited or deleted and/or your account being temporarily or permanently banned from the forums. U.S. Politics Online uses a warning system that generates an automated Private Message to members when they are in violation of Forum rules. The decision to issue a warning is left to the discretion of the moderator or administrator handling the violation. If a member does not agree with an action taken by a moderator, they can appeal to an administrator after seeking clarification from the moderator who issued the warning/infraction and appealing to them in the first instance. Members MAY NOT harass a moderator or administrator by sending excessive PMs when they are discussing an appeal.

Violations are assigned a point value. Points are valid for 30 days. When a members earns 10 points, their account will be automatically suspended: five (5) days for a first suspension; ten (10) days for a second suspension; and twenty (20) days for a third suspension. If a member incurs an additional 10 points after having served three periods of suspension, then they will be permanently banned from the Forum.

Point values are as follows:
Zero (0) points Warning
Two (2) points - Minor infraction / Non post infraction (minor) / Off topic posts / spamming
Four (4) points - Academic dishonesty / Baiting / Discussing moderator or administrator actions / Implying an insult / Minor insults / Moderate infraction / Non-post infraction (moderate) / Thread dumping
Six (6) points - Direct insult at another member / major infraction / Non-post infraction (major)
Ten (10) points - Act of criminality, or advocating thereof

The administrators and moderators also bear the right to issue warnings, temporarily suspend or ban posters for continued trolling or other serious misconduct (eg. professional spamming) even if the poster has not yet reached the maximum warning points or suspensions level. Other options if the above consequences do not seem adequate include placing the member in a moderation queue, which means all posts will have to be approved before they are posted to the board.

PRIVACY POLICY

All information obtained by the end user via the registration process is for internal purposes only and will not be sold to or shared with any third parties. However, if the end user participates in illegal activities and a court of proper jurisdiction orders U.S. Politics Online to release certain information about said user then we will act according to the law. Furthermore, no information will be released on threat of a lawsuit, attempted or actual intimidation, or due to any other reason except as notated in the first sentence of this paragraph. Nonetheless, keep in mind that the information we do have is very limited and generally only consists of the IP address a member uses.

SUBSCRIPTIONS

U.S. Politics Online offers several subscription plans to help cover the operational costs of the site. As a thank you for your donation, you will receive special added benefits meant to enhance your U.S. Politics Online experience. Plans vary in price, starting at only $0.05/day, and benefits vary with the price. Benefits include ability to go straight to new posts, to search the forum, larger avatar, private forums, invisible mode, photo gallery, email, web hosting, and no advertisement banners. Please, click here for more details.
See more
See less

Hard to Tell the Real Followers ...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hard to Tell the Real Followers ...

    Currently making the Facebook rounds are a couple of articles that would seem to contradict each other in terms of who the "real" followers of Christ are.

    The first, and most frequently quoted when trying to disparage Christ's followers, is a sermon from an independent (for reasons that will be obvious in a moment) Baptist senior pastor at a congregation out in Tempe, AZ:

    No homos will ever be allowed in this church as long as I'm the pastor here. Never!

    -The time has come for Christians to stop listening to the media, the politicians, and the watered-down preachers of our day, and to get back to a biblical view of the sodomites. We must protect ourselves and our children from these dangerous disease-filled predators. Our nation has become a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah and it is our job as Christians to hold forth the Word of Life in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation among whom we shine as lights in the world.

    -It's filthy! It's vile! They're wicked! And AIDS is the judgment of God tonight!
    Honestly, it was difficult to figure out which passage from his sermon to quote for you: The whole thing is filled with this guy's ranting hatred against homosexuals. Oh, he salted it here and there with his preference for his Bible and his faith, but the sermon topic was "Aids-the Judgment of God" so it was not hard to figure out his point. In my opinion, this pastor doesn't get it and stands in the same line as those affiliated with the Westboro Baptist Church.

    In my opinion (which I loathe having to constantly point out because EVERYTHING here is my opinion), Christians should be about pointing others to God ... not pointing others away from anything. Also, in my opinion, the Bible does not elevate ANY sinful behavior over any other sinful behavior. It is all sin and it all separates us from God [case closed] ... a homosexual (sin) is no better, larger, or worse than an adulterer (sin) which is no [better/larger/worse] than a thief (sin) or a liar (sin) ... etc. Sin is sin (and that is NOT my opinion, but Scriptural).

    ON the other hand, these people have it right:
    At the Bond hearing for Dylan Roof, relatives of those killed by Roof's hatred were asked to share in the courtroom before the Judge decided bail: Person after person expressed their forgiveness of Roof, and entreated God to have mercy on him:
    I forgive you. You took something very precious away from me. I will never get to talk to her ever again. I will never be able to hold her again, but I forgive you, and have mercy on your soul. You hurt me. You hurt a lot of people. If God forgives you, I forgive you. -Daughter of Ethel Lance
    I would just like him to know that, to say the same thing that was just said: I forgive him and my family forgives him. But we would like him to take this opportunity to repent. Repent. Confess. Give your life to the one who matters most: Christ. So that He can change him and change your ways, so no matter what happens to you, youll be okay.-Relative of Myra Thompsom
    We welcomed you Wednesday night in our Bible study with welcome arms. You have killed some of the most beautiful people that I know. Every fiber in my body hurts and Ill, Ill never be the same. Tywanza Sanders was my son. But Tywanza Sanders was my hero. Tywanza was my hero. May God have mercy on you.-Felicia Sanders, mother of Tywanza Sanders
    Although my grandfather and the other victims died at the hands of hate, this is proof, everyones plea for your soul, is proof that they lived in love and their legacies will live in love. So hate wont win. And I just want to thank the court for making sure that hate doesnt win.-Wanda Simmons, granddaughter of Daniel Simmons
    That was my sister, and Id like to thank you on behalf of my family for not allowing hate to win. For me, Im a work in progress. And I acknowledge that I am very angry. But one thing that DePayne always enjoined in our family is she taught me that we are the family that love built. We have no room for hating, so we have to forgive. I pray God on your soul.-Sister of DePayne Middleton Doctor
    I will also confess to you, I am not certain I could be as forgiving as these people have been if someone like Roof had killed my relative.

    But even so, while God has not left it to me to judge the salvation of people like Pastor Anderson (above) or Fred Phelps (et al): He has definitely asked me to know them by their fruits. People who focus on what they hate are, in my opinion, not following Christ. People who forgive those whom they SHOULD seek retribution against, are.

  • #2
    This only underlines that forgiveness is something EVERYBODY should try to practice.

    I say 'try' because we're all broken humans and it is a difficult thing - this forgiveness business.

    We have the unforgiving homosexual "activists" who want to force Christians to either shut up, OR fully embrace and encourage their lifetyle. It's been in the news quite a bit lately of what these types are doing to "battle the Christians."

    And we have to ask ourselves if what they are doing is justified (no it isn't, but we might consider it) in light of Fred phelps and his ilk, who preach anti-Christian rhetoric, falsely framed as Christian, against homosexuals.

    Then we have more messed up people deciding "cases" for or against these matters in ways. For instance it seems to make the most sense for a judge to take the following position instead of fining or forcing a business to close because the owners do not wish to be involved with such things.

    A sensible judge would explain to gays wanting to force a bakery to make them a gay wedding cake;

    "Did you attempt to locate a different business that would have been willing to accomodate your order ? I ask, because that is the easiest and most civil choice in a matter like this. If I can quickly use a telephone and find a business willing to accomodate your order, I will afford this case no further inquiry."


    Everybody wants to "have it their way" and are throwing forgiveness and civility out the window while doing it.

    We have what has been called a "cultural rot," which is more simply put as a civilization at war with itself - essentially over nothing. Now we've been manipulated into a big hooraw about the confederate flag. Always something, and we all need to settle down, focus on what we have and be forgiving and civil to each other.

    Yes, there will be some busybody die hard assho - activists - but non-reactivity is the best reaction to them. Hard it is, but if we want this foolishness to die down - ignore it to kill it !

    ?


    • #3
      Or maybe they could have just made the cake as that would also have solved the issue.
      If you're going to become a baker or do any service industry trade you have to put up with serving people you don't like.

      ?


      • #4
        Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post
        Or maybe they could have just made the cake as that would also have solved the issue.
        If you're going to become a baker or do any service industry trade you have to put up with serving people you don't like.
        In my opinion, only a flaming liberal would insist someone abandon their values to fulfill some social mandate they have dreamed up. Those who have no values are quick to insist others abandon theirs but seem quite select in the groups they attack while refusing to look in their own yard... JUST LIKE that Pastor Anderson I cited in the OP and JUST LIKE Fred Phelps and his flock. Same hatred, same manipulations to their own, self-righteous ends, just a different focus.

        I pity people like that: Folks who have seriously missed the point (of life and definitely of this thread).

        ?


        • #5
          It's simple enough, if you don't want to serve certain people don't enter the service industry.
          If you honestly can't understand that simple rule and think that it's part of some so called liberal attack on Christianity then I'm not sure what to add.

          ?


          • #6
            Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post
            Or maybe they could have just made the cake as that would also have solved the issue.
            If you're going to become a baker or do any service industry trade you have to put up with serving people you don't like.
            Oh sure, and that would apply and work just as well going into a bakery owned and operated by Muslims ...

            ... Go in there and ask them to make you a cake with a parody picture of Mohammed on it, surely a judge would side with the customer ...

            .. is that right ? Make them shut their cake making business down because they wouldn't bake a cake for people asking them to insult their Islamic religious principles ?

            Hmmm... I don't see that happening.

            I sense a big and dirty double standard here.

            ?


            • #7
              Originally posted by Good1 View Post
              In my opinion, only a flaming liberal would insist someone abandon their values to fulfill some social mandate they have dreamed up. Those who have no values are quick to insist others abandon theirs but seem quite select in the groups they attack while refusing to look in their own yard... JUST LIKE that Pastor Anderson I cited in the OP and JUST LIKE Fred Phelps and his flock. Same hatred, same manipulations to their own, self-righteous ends, just a different focus.

              I pity people like that: Folks who have seriously missed the point (of life and definitely of this thread).
              Civilization in self destruct mode.

              That's all.

              Sadly too few of us see it.


              ?


              • #8
                Originally posted by Good1 View Post
                Currently making the Facebook rounds are a couple of articles that would seem to contradict each other in terms of who the "real" followers of Christ are.

                The first, and most frequently quoted when trying to disparage Christ's followers, is a sermon from an independent (for reasons that will be obvious in a moment) Baptist senior pastor at a congregation out in Tempe, AZ:


                Honestly, it was difficult to figure out which passage from his sermon to quote for you: The whole thing is filled with this guy's ranting hatred against homosexuals. Oh, he salted it here and there with his preference for his Bible and his faith, but the sermon topic was "Aids-the Judgment of God" so it was not hard to figure out his point. In my opinion, this pastor doesn't get it and stands in the same line as those affiliated with the Westboro Baptist Church.

                In my opinion (which I loathe having to constantly point out because EVERYTHING here is my opinion), Christians should be about pointing others to God ... not pointing others away from anything. Also, in my opinion, the Bible does not elevate ANY sinful behavior over any other sinful behavior. It is all sin and it all separates us from God [case closed] ... a homosexual (sin) is no better, larger, or worse than an adulterer (sin) which is no [better/larger/worse] than a thief (sin) or a liar (sin) ... etc. Sin is sin (and that is NOT my opinion, but Scriptural).

                ON the other hand, these people have it right:
                At the Bond hearing for Dylan Roof, relatives of those killed by Roof's hatred were asked to share in the courtroom before the Judge decided bail: Person after person expressed their forgiveness of Roof, and entreated God to have mercy on him:






                I will also confess to you, I am not certain I could be as forgiving as these people have been if someone like Roof had killed my relative.

                But even so, while God has not left it to me to judge the salvation of people like Pastor Anderson (above) or Fred Phelps (et al): He has definitely asked me to know them by their fruits. People who focus on what they hate are, in my opinion, not following Christ. People who forgive those whom they SHOULD seek retribution against, are.
                Yep, these people are true Christians, and I wish I could come to the peace they can with suffering such a horrific tragedy. But honestly, I don't think I could ever forgive such a man that deviously killed. Most certainly not ask God for mercy for them. But surely those who can forgive, not I, will have a better, more peaceful, happier life than I would, had I been in their shoes. The only mercy I could ask for is for mercy on my soul because I couldn't forgive. I follow christ, but think I'd be at the back of the line. I envy these people. Envy is a sin, right?

                ?


                • #9
                  Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post
                  Or maybe they could have just made the cake as that would also have solved the issue.
                  If you're going to become a baker or do any service industry trade you have to put up with serving people you don't like.
                  lol

                  ?


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Captain Trips View Post

                    Oh sure, and that would apply and work just as well going into a bakery owned and operated by Muslims ...

                    ... Go in there and ask them to make you a cake with a parody picture of Mohammed on it, surely a judge would side with the customer ...

                    .. is that right ? Make them shut their cake making business down because they wouldn't bake a cake for people asking them to insult their Islamic religious principles ?

                    Hmmm... I don't see that happening.

                    I sense a big and dirty double standard here.

                    Yep, a Muslim baker would have to make a cake with a picture of Mohammed on it and if they decide to shut the store because they refuse to serve people then so be it.
                    No double standard here.

                    ?


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post
                      Or maybe they could have just made the cake as that would also have solved the issue.
                      If you're going to become a baker or do any service industry trade you have to put up with serving people you don't like.
                      This is a position that is taken by those who do not fully understand what liberty and freedom means. The baker is no infringing on the rights of that person. There is no "right to someone else's personal property". The only people that can infringe on the rights of others is the government. You propose that the government should infringe on the rights of this business to fulfill what equates to your own personally held views. That's a horrible basis to establish law.

                      ?


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post


                        Yep, a Muslim baker would have to make a cake with a picture of Mohammed on it and if they decide to shut the store because they refuse to serve people then so be it.
                        No double standard here.
                        That ain't freedom dude.

                        ?


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by msc View Post
                          That ain't freedom dude.

                          So you think freedom is a business being able to decide who they will or won't serve?
                          How about a company that refuses to sell to white christians?

                          ?


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by fishjoel View Post

                            This is a position that is taken by those who do not fully understand what liberty and freedom means. The baker is no infringing on the rights of that person. There is no "right to someone else's personal property". The only people that can infringe on the rights of others is the government. You propose that the government should infringe on the rights of this business to fulfill what equates to your own personally held views. That's a horrible basis to establish law.

                            Unfortunately for you the US will in the end go this way just as most of Europe has already.
                            That you don't like it is plain to see but I don't see how it's any different to serving anyone you don't like personally and you're more than free to do a shitty job so they don't come back if they offend you that much you just can't flat out refuse to serve them.
                            I do know how freedom works I just have a different view than you on this.

                            ?


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by PeterUK75 View Post


                              So you think freedom is a business being able to decide who they will or won't serve?
                              How about a company that refuses to sell to white christians?
                              NO, freedom is a business being able to decide what they will or won't serve. Big difference!

                              ?

                              Working...
                              X